The author analyzed electronic health records (EHR) systems in use in a dozen prisons or jails across the United States and defined 20 criteria for EHR in four categories: clinical interface; integration; logging, tracking, and reporting; and miscellaneous. The majority of EHR surveyed did not meet more than a few of the criteria. It should be feasible to incorporate these criteria in a single EHR. The author aims to provide criteria to help correctional health care administrators and practitioners make informed choices regarding EHR.
DesrochesC. M., CampbellE. G., RaoS. R., DonelanK., FerrisT. G., JhaA., … BlumenthalD. (2008). Electronic health records in ambulatory care—A national survey of physicians. New England Journal of Medicine, 359, 50–60.
2.
GreenbergM., RidgelyS. (2011). Clinical decision support and malpractice risk. Journal of the American Medical Association, 306, 90–91.
3.
ParisJ. E. (2009a). Electronic health records in correctional health care: A skeptical view. Correctional Health Care Report, 11, 3–8.
4.
ParisJ. E. (2009b). Going to court with an EHR. CorrectCare, 23(3), 16–17.
5.
ParisJ. E. (2009c). The litmus test of electronic health record performance. CorrectCare, 23(4), 14–15.
6.
RadeckiR. P., SittigD. F. (2011). Application of electronic health records to the Joint Commission 2011 National Patient Safety Goals. Journal of the American Medical Association, 306, 92–93.
7.
SchiffG. D., BatesD. W. (2010). Can electronic clinical documentation help prevent diagnostic errors?. New England Journal of Medicine, 362, 1066–1069.
8.
SittigD. F., AshJ. F., ZhangJ., OsheroffJ. A., ShabotM. M. (2006). Lessons from “Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system.”. Pediatrics, 118, 797–801.
9.
SittigD. F., ClassenD. C. (2010). Safe electronic health record use requires a comprehensive monitoring and evaluation framework. Journal of the American Medical Association, 303, 450–451.
