Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Capital punishment is one of the most controversial issues in America and also creates unique problems for the medical professionals who care for persons sentenced to death. An introductory true case vignette describes a death row inmate who overdosed on sedative medication 48 hours before his scheduled execution and was rushed to a university hospital for care. After treatment and stabilization, he was returned to prison where he was immediately executed by lethal injection. This clinical case raises several professional, legal, and ethical issues, including how general medical care should be provided to the death row inmate and how this care might be influenced by the increasing proximity of execution. Presented last are new guidelines for medical care on death row that balance the physician’s professional obligations to the inmate as patient against the requirements of the criminal justice system.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American College of Physicians Ethics Manual (4th ed.).(1998). Annals of Internal Medicine, 128(7), 576–594.

American Medical Association Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs . (1993). Physician participation in capital punishment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 270(3), 365–368.

American Medical Association Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs . (2000). Code of medical ethics. Current opinions with annotations (2000–2001 ed., Section 2.06, pp. 9–10.). Chicago: American Medical Association.

American Nurses Association . (2001). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing.

American Public Health Association . (1993). Policy Statement No 8521: Participation of health professions in capital punishment. In APHA public policy statements. 1948–present, cumulative. Washington DC: Author.

Beck, A. J. , & Karberg, J. C. (2001, March). Prison and jail inmates at midyear 2000 (Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin NCJ 185989). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

Blacks Law Dictionary (6th ed.). (1990). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.

Bureau of Justice Statistics . (2002, December). Capital Punishment 2001. Available at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cpOl.pdf

Doe v. Delie, 257 F. 3rd 309 (3d Cir. 2001).

10.

Duquett v. Superior Court, 778 P.2d 634, 640 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1989).

11.

Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976).

12.

Farber

, Davis, E. B. , Weiner

, Jordan

, Boyer, E. G. , & Ubel, P. A. (2000). Physicians’ attitudes about involvement in lethal injection for capital punishment. Archives of Internal Medicine, 160, 12–2916.

13.

Farber, N. J. , Aboff, B. M. , Weiner

, Davis, E. B. , Boyer, E. G. , & Ubel, P. A. (2001). Physicians’ willingness to participate in the process of lethal injection for capital punishment. Annals of Internal Medicine, 135, 884–888.

14.

Helling v. Carey, 83 WN 2d 514; 519 2.d 981, 983–984 (Wash. 1974).

15.

Hoopes v. Hammargren, 725 P.2d 238, 242 (Nev. 1986).

16.

Kermani, E. J. , & Kantor, J. E. (1994). Psychiatry and the death penalty: The landmark Supreme Court cases and their ethical implications for the profession. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 22, 95–108.

17.

Lockett v. Goodill, 430 P.2d 589, 591 (Wash. 1967).

18.

McCormick v. Stalder, 105 F. 3d 1059 (5th Cir. 1997).

19.

Michalos

(1997). Medical ethics and the executing process in the United States of America. Medicine and Law, 16, 125–168.

20.

Moore, David W. (2004, June 2). Public divided between death penalty and life imprisonment without parole. Available at the Gallup Organization Web site: http://www.gallup.com/poll/content/login.aspx?civ 11878

21.

Panama Process v. Cities Serv. Co., 796 P.2d 276, 290 (Okla. 1990).

22.

Schiff

, & Shansky

(1998). Challenges of improving quality in the correctional setting. In M. Puisis (Ed.), Clinical Practice in Correctional Medicine. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

23.

Skolnick, A. A. (1995). Physicians in Missouri (but not Illinois) win battle to block physician participation in executions [News]. Journal of the American Medical Association, 274, 524-524.

24.

Washington v. Harper , 494 U.S. 210 (1989).

25.

Zitter, J. M. (1995). Standards of care owed to patients by medical specialist as determined by local, “like community,” state, national or other standards. Annotation, 18 A.L.R. 2d 597.

“Well Enough to Execute”: The Health Professional’s Responsibility to the Death Row Inmate

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References