This paper focuses on the social capital of prisoners and the impact of criminal behavior and incarceration on its formation and mobilization. Emphasis is on the time-varying nature of four attributes of social capital: the strength of connections, the ability to mobilize them, the endowment of resources within these relationships, and their social context. The incarceration experience has the potential to alter the attributes of social capital in ways that reduce its ability to improve health and justice outcomes. To offset this effect, an investment strategy is recommended that could have a positive impact on the prisoner’s social capital and prospects for successful reentry.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbertM., BeckerT., McCroneP., & Thornicroft, G (1998.) Social networks and mental health service utilization: A literature review. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 44(4), 248-266.
2.
Bakker, L. J., Morris, B. A., & Janus, L. M. (1978). Hidden victims of crime. Social Work, 23(2), 143-178.
3.
Balthazar, M. L., & KingL. (2001). The loss of the protective effects of relationships of incarcerated African American men: Implications for social work. Journal of African American Men, 6(1), 31-41.
4.
BanduraA. (1992). Exercise of personal agency through the selfefficacy mechanism. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Through control of action (pp. 3-38). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
5.
BaunachJ. (1979). The separation of inmate mothers from their children. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
6.
Bayse, D. J., Allgood, S. M., & Van Wyk, P. H. (1991). Family life education: An effective tool for prisoner rehabilitation. Family Relations: Journal of Applied Family and Child Studies, 40(3), 254-257.
7.
BontaJ., LawM., & HansonK. (1998). The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: A meta-analysis. Psychology Bulletin, 123, 123-142.
8.
BoudinK. (1998). Lessons from a mother’s program in prison: A psychosocial approach supports women and their children. In J. Harden & M. Hill (Eds.), Breaking the rules: Women in prison and feminist therapy (pp. 103-125). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
9.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 339-365.
11.
ButterfieldF. (2002, August 21). Father steals best: Crime in an American family. New York Times, p. A1-A1.
12.
Carlson, B. E., & CerveraN. (1992). Inmates and their wives: Incarceration and family life. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press/Greenwood Publishing Group.
13.
CaronJ., TempierR., MercierC., & LeouffreP. (1998). Components of social support and quality of life in severely mentally ill, low income individuals and a general population group. Community Mental Health Journal, 34(5), 459-475.
14.
ClearT., Rose, D. R., & Ryder, J. A. (2001). Incarceration and community: The problem of removing and returning offenders. Crime and Delinquency, 47(3), 335-351.
15.
ClemmerD. (1940). The prison community. New York: SAGE Publications.
16.
CohenD., & PrusakL. (2001). In good company: How social capital makes organizations work. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
17.
CohenS., Gottlieb, B. H., & Underwood, L. G. (2000). Social relationships and health. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 3-25). New York: Oxford Press.
18.
CohenS., & Syme, S. L. (1985). Issues in the study and application of social support. In S. Cohen & S. L. Syme (Eds.), Social support and health (pp. 3-22). New York: Academic Press.
19.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
20.
ColvinM., Cullen, F. T., & Vander VanT. (2002). Coercion, social support, and crime: An emerging theoretical consensus. Criminology, 40(1), 19-42.
21.
DavidsonL., ChinmanM., KloosB., WeingartenR., StaynerD., & Tebes, J. K. (1999). Peer support among individuals with severe mental illness: A review of the evidence. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 165-187.
22.
Dixon, L. B., & Lehman, A. F. (1995). Family interventions for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 21, 631-643.
23.
DowdenC., & Andrews, D. A. (1999). What works for female offenders: A meta-analytic review. Crime and Delinquency, 45(4), 438-452.
24.
DuenwaldM. (2002, September 10). Some friends, indeed, do more harm than good. New York Times, p. F5-F5.
25.
Eckland-OlsonS., SupancicM., CampbellJ., & Lenihan, K. J. (1983). Postrelease depression and the importance of familial support. Criminology, 21(2), 253-275.
26.
FaccincaniC., MignolliG., & PlattS. (1990). Service utilization, social support, and psychiatric status in a cohort of patients with schizophrenic psychoses: A 7 year follow-up study. Schizophrenia Research, 3, 139-146.
27.
Falloon, I. R. H., Boyd, J. L., McGill, C. W., RazaniJ., Moss, H. B., & Gilderman, A. M. (1982). Family management in the prevention of exacerbation of schizophrenia: A controlled study. New England Journal of Medicine, 306(24), 1437-1440.
28.
FendrichM. (1991). Institutionalization and parole behavior: Assessing the influence of individual and family characteristics. Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 109-122.
29.
Fishman, L. T. (1986). Repeating the cycle of hard living and crime: Wives’ accommodations to husbands’ parole performance. Federal Probation, 50(1), 44-54.
30.
Fishman, L. T. (1988). Prisoners and their wives: Marital and domestic effects of telephone contacts and home visits. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 32(1), 55-66.
31.
Fleisher, M. S., & Decker, S. H. (2001). Going home, staying home: Integrating prison gang members into the community. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5(1), 65-77.
32.
FrolandC., BrodskyG., OlsonM., & StewartL. (2000). Social support and social adjustment: Implications for mental health professionals. Community Mental Health Journal, 36(1), 61-75.
33.
FukuyamaF. (1995). Trust: Social virtues and the creation of prosperity. London: Hamish Hamilton.
34.
GadsenV. (Ed.). (2003). Heading home: Offender reintegration into the family - What works. Philadelphia: American Correctional Association.
35.
GendreauP., LittleT., & GogginC. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!. Criminology, 34, 575-607.
36.
GeorgeL., Blazer, D. G., Hughes, D. C., & FowlerN. (1989). Social support and the outcome of major depression. British Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 478-485.
37.
GordonJ., & McConnell, E. H. (1999). Debate 2: Are conjugal and familial visitations effective rehabilitative concepts?. Prison Journal, 79(1), 119-135.
38.
Grandovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
39.
Hairston, C. F. (1991). Family ties during imprisonment: Important to whom and for what?. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 18(1), 87-1041.
40.
Hairston, C. F. (2001). Fathers in prison: Responsible fatherhood and responsible public policies. Marriage and Family Review, 32(304), 111-135.
41.
HammerM. (1963-64). Influence of small social networks as factors on mental hospital admission. Human Organization, 22, 243-251.
42.
HandlerE. (1974). Family surrogates as correctional strategy. Social Service Review, 48, 539-549.
43.
HaneyC. (2001, January). The psychological impact of incarceration: Implications for post-prison adjustment. Paper for From Prison to Home: The Effect of Incarceration and Reentry on Children, Families and Communities, a conference held by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Urban Institute. Available at http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/prison2homeO2/
44.
Hogarty, G. E., Anderson, C. M., Reiss, D. J., Kornblith, S. J., Greenwald, D. P., Javna, C. D., et al. (1986). Family psychoeducation, social skills training, and maintenance chemotherapy in the aftercare treatment of schizophrenia I: One-year effects of a controlled study on relapse and expressed emotion. Archives of General Psychiatry, 43(7), 633-642.
45.
Holmes-EberP., & RigerS. (1990). Hospitalization and the composition of mental patients’ social network. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 16, 157-164.
46.
House, J. S., & Khan, R. L. (1985). Measures and concepts of social support. In S. Cohen & S. L. Syme (Eds.), Social support and health (pp. 83-108). New York: Academic Press.
47.
Jeffries, J. M., MenghrajS., & Hairston, C. F. (2001, February). Serving incarcerated and ex-offenderfathers and their families: A review of the field (NCJ 191839). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
48.
JohnsonD. (1995). Incarcerated parents. In K. Gabel & D. Johnson (Eds.), Children of incarcerated parents (pp. 3-20). Pasadena, CA: Pacific Oaks Center for Children of Incarcerated Parents.
49.
Jorgensen, J. D., Hernandez, S. H., & Warren, R. C. (1986). Addressing the social needs of families of prisoners: A tool for intimate rehabilitation. Federal Probation, 50(4), 47-52.
50.
KanterJ. (1996). Engaging significant others: The Tom Sawyer approach to case management. Psychiatric Services, 47, 799-801.
51.
KazuraK. (2001). Family programming for incarcerated parents: A needs assessment among inmates. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 32(4), 67-83.
52.
Klein, S. R., & Bahr, S. J. (1996). An evaluation of a family-centered cognitive skills program for prison inmates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 40(4), 334-346.
53.
Klein, S. R., Bartholomew, G. S., & HibbertJ. (2002). Inmate family functioning. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46(1), 95-111.
54.
KolmS. (2000). The logic of good social relations. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 71(2), 171-189.
55.
Lehman, A. F., KernanE., DeForge, B. R., & DixonL. (1995). Effects of homelessness on the quality of life of persons with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 46, 922-926.
56.
LichtensteinB. (1997). Women and crack-cocaine use: A study of social networks and HIV risk in an Alabama jail sample. Addiction Research, 5(4), 279-296.
57.
Lipsey, M. W., & Derzon, J. H. (1998). Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research. In R. Loeber and D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious & violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86-105). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
58.
MarunaS. (2002). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
59.
McMahon, R. C. (2001). Personality, stress, and social support in cocaine relapse prediction. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 21(2), 77-87.
60.
Miller, W. R., & Mount, K. A. (2001). A small study of training in motivational interviewing: Does one workshop change clinician and client behavior?. Behavioral and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29, 457-471.
61.
Mitchell, M. E. (1989). The relationship between social network and variables and the utilization of mental health services. Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 258-266.
62.
Mueser, K. T., Corrigan, P. W., Hilton, D. W., TanzmanB., SchaubA., GingerichS., et al. (2002). Illness management and recovery: A review of the research. Psychiatric Services, 53, 1272-1284.
63.
Mumola, C. J. (2000, August). Incarcerated parents and their children (Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report, NCJ 182335). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
64.
NohS., & Avison, W. R. (1998). Spouses of discharged psychiatric patients: Factors associated with their experience of burden. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(2), 377-389.
65.
O’Connell, R. A., Mayo, J. A., Eng, L. K., Jones, J. S., & Gabel, R. H. (1985). Social support and long-term lithium outcome. British Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 272-275.
66.
Parke, R. D., & Clarke-Stewart, K. A. (2001, January). Effects of parental incarceration on young children. Paper for From Prison to Home: The Effect of Incarceration and Reentry on Children, Families and Communities, a conference held by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Urban Institute. Available at http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/prison2homeO2/
67.
PetersiliaJ. (2000, November). When prisoners return to the community: Political, economic, and social consequences. Sentencing & corrections: Issues for the 21st century, 9 (NIJ Research in Brief, NCJ 184253, pp. 1-8). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
68.
PetersiliaJ. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69.
Prest, L. A., Benson, M. J., & Protinksy, H. O. (1998). Family of origin and current relationship influences on codependency. Family Process, 37(4), 513-528.
70.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. American Prospect, 13, 35-42.
71.
Renzulli, L. A., AldrichH., & MoodyJ. (2000). Family matters: Gender, networks and entrepreneurial outcomes. Social Forces, 79(2), 523-546.
72.
Richie, B. E. (2001). Challenges incarcerated women face as they return to their communities: Findings from life history interview. Crime & Delinquency, 47(3), 368-389.
73.
Robert, S. A. (1999). Socioeconomic position and health: The independent contribution of community socioeconomic context. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 489-516.
74.
Rose, D. R., & Clear, T. R. (1998). Incarceration, social capital, and crime: Implications for social disorganization theory. Criminology, 36, 441-479.
75.
Rose, D. R., Clear, T. R., & Ryder, J. A. (2001). Addressing the unintended consequences of incarceration through community-oriented services at the neighborhood level. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5(3), 62-71.
76.
RoweM. (1999). Crossing the border: Encounters between homeless people and outreach workers. Berkeley, CA: SAGE Publications.
77.
Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G., & Gurung, R. A. R. (2001). Close personal relationships and health outcomes: A key to the role of social support. In B. R. Sarason & S. W. Duck (Eds.), Personal relationships: Implications for clinical and community psychology. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
78.
Schneller, D. P. (1976). The prisoner’s family: A study of the effects of imprisonment on the families of prisoners. San Francisco: R and E Research Associates.
79.
ShapiroC. (2003, September). Families: A critical resource for New Jersey’s prisoner reentry strategy. Paper prepared for the New Jersey Institute of Social Justice. Available at http://www.njisj.org/reports/shapiro-report.html
80.
SlaghtE. (1999). Family and offender treatment focusing on the family in the treatment of substance abusing criminal offenders. Journal of Drug Education, 19(1), 53-62.
81.
Strauss, J. S., & Carpenter, W. T. (1972). The prediction of outcome in schizophrenia: I. characteristics of outcome. Archives of General Psychiatry, 27, 739-746.
82.
Strauss, J. S., & Carpenter, W. T. (1977). Prediction of outcome in schizophrenia: III. Five-year outcome and its predictors. Archives of General Psychiatry, 34, 159-163.
83.
Surtees, P. G., & InghamJ. (1980). Life stress and depressive outcome: Applications of a dissipation model to life events. Social Psychiatry, 15, 21-31.
84.
Wilson, M. K. & Anderson, S. C. (1997). Empowering female offenders: Removing barriers to community-based practice. Affilia, 12(3), 342-358.
85.
WuT., & Serper, M. R. (1999). Social support and psychopathology in homeless patients presenting for emergency psychiatric treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(9), 1127-1133.
