Information from a staff survey of opinions about working with mentally ill prison inmates was used to enhance staff training and cooperation. The survey analysis used Attribution Theory to link the results with four dichotomous custody-therapy policy models typically applied in criminal justice settings: punishment as incarceration, the traditional medical treatment model, education and habilitation, and reparation as restitution. Security and support staff embraced incarceration and traditional treatment, whereas treatment staff supported habilitation. Within groups, all staff favored habilitation over other policies. Differences and shared opinions were used to improve understanding and cooperation between security and treatment roles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderR. (1992). Determining appropriate criteria in the evaluation of correctional mental health treatment for inmates. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 18, 119-134.
2.
BairanA., & FarnsworthB. (1989). Attitudes toward mental illness: Does a psychiatric nursing course make a difference? Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 3(6), 351-357.
3.
BrickmanP., RabinowitzV., KaruzaJ., CoatesD., CohnE., & KidderL. (1982). Models of helping and coping. American Psychologist, 37(4), 368-384.
4.
CarrollJ., PerkowitzW., LurigioA., & WeaverF. (1987). Sentencing goals. Causal attributions, ideology, and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 107-118.
5.
Cruser, dA., & DiamondP. (1996). An exploration of social policy and organizational culture in jail based mental health services. Administration & Policy in Mental Health, 24(2), 129-148.
6.
DiamondM. (1993). The unconscious life of organizations: Interpreting organizational identity. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
7.
DiamondP., Cruser, dA., ChildsR., SchneeS.B., & QuinnM. (1999). The impact of knowledge and opinions on the implementation of public policies for mentally ill offenders. Administration & Policy in Mental Health, 26(5), 329-344.
8.
DrolenC.S. (1993). The effect of educational setting on student opinions of mental illness. Community Mental Health Journal, 29, 223-234.
9.
HeiderF. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
10.
Jails nationwide trying to cope with increasing numbers of mentally ill offenders. (1997). Corrections Alert, 4, 1-3.
11.
LarivereM., & RobinsonD. (1996). Attitudes of federal correctional officers towards offenders (Executive Summary). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Correctional Service of Canada: Research Division.
12.
McGreevyM. (1993). A description of the forensic outpatient and the opinions of mental health professionals who work with these clients. Psychiatric Quarterly, 64, 235-243.
13.
MelvinK.B., GramlingL.K., & GardnerW.M. (1985). A scale to measure attitudes toward prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 241-253.
14.
MumolaC., & BeckA. (1997). Prisoners in 1996. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin, (164619). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
15.
Ortet-FabregatG., PerezJ., & LewisR. (1993). Measuring attitudes toward prisoners: A psychometric assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 190-198.
16.
PalermoG., GumzE., & LiskaF. (1992). Mental illness and criminal behavior revisited. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 36, 53-61.
17.
PollockJ.M. (1997). Ethics in crime and justice: Dilemmas and decisions (3rd Ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
18.
RiceM. (1997). Violent offender research and implications for the criminal justice system. American Psychologist, 52, 414-423.
19.
RoskinG., CarsenM.L., RabinerC.J., & MarellS.K. (1988). Attitudes toward patients among different mental health professional groups. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 29, 188-194.
20.
RussellM. (1997) The mentally ill offender: Improving treatment and joining forces. The Corrections Professional, 2(1), 9-10.
21.
SharrockR., DavA., QuaziF., & BrewinC. (1990). Explanations by professional care staff, optimism and helping behavior: An application of attribution theory. Psychological Medicine, 20, 849-855.
22.
SteadmanH., McCartyD., & MorrisseyJ. (1989). The mentally ill in jail: Planning for essential services. New York: The Guilford Press.
23.
WalshM. (1995). Why patients get the blame for being ill. Clinical Nursing Ethics, 9(37), 38-40.
24.
WeinerB. (1993). On sin versus sickness: A theory of perceived responsibility and social motivation. American Psychologist, 48(9), 957-965.
