Abstract
Purpose
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are valuable tools for capturing how oral chemotherapy affects patients’ quality of life (QOL), yet their integration into routine clinical practice remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using remote electronic PROMs (ePROMs) to collect QOL data from patients receiving oral anti-cancer (OAC) therapy. Specifically, we assessed patient response rates to text message prompts linking to a web-based EORTC QLQ-C30 survey and examined the practicality of incorporating text-based communication into clinical practice.
Patients and Methods
We conducted a prospective pilot study involving 64 patients (mean age 60 years; range 29–84) diagnosed with breast, colorectal, prostate, or lung cancer and actively receiving OAC therapy. Participants received automated monthly text message reminders over a 6-month period, directing them to complete the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire online.
Results
The initial survey response rate was 98.4%, with monthly survey completion rates ranging from 83.6% to 96.3%. Despite overall strong engagement, some noncompliance occurred due to technical issues, forgetfulness, or early withdrawal. Across the study period, 38 significant QOL changes were identified, with a median provider notification time of 1 day (range 0–89 days). Patient satisfaction surveys revealed generally positive perceptions, with participants highlighting ease of use, convenience, and appropriate survey frequency.
Conclusion
Text message–based ePROM collection is a feasible approach for monitoring QOL in patients on OAC therapy, though completion rates vary. While patient satisfaction is high, opportunities remain to streamline the process and better integrate it into existing clinical workflows.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
