Abstract
Background
Oncology pharmacy clinics play a crucial role in improving medication adherence, managing drug-related problems (DRPs), enhancing quality of life, and reducing costs. However, standardized protocols for such clinics are currently lacking in China.
Objectives
This study aimed to develop a standardized clinical thinking model for oncology medication consultations to ensure consistent and high-quality pharmaceutical care.
Methods
A mixed-method study was conducted, analyzing 100 oncology medication consultations from January to July 2024 at Shanghai Xinhua Hospital. Retrospective statistics and root cause analysis, using a fishbone diagram across four dimensions (personnel, materials, methods, environment), were employed to identify gaps in current practices. Based on findings, the “Information gathering, Reasoning, Judgement, Enacting a decision” (IRJE) model was developed. Pharmacists received IRJE-based training, and its effectiveness was evaluated using pre- and post-training questionnaires.
Results
A total of 100 medication-related cases were analyzed. The results revealed issues such as incomplete medication evaluations by pharmacists. Root cause analysis using the fishbone diagram identified key factors across the four dimensions. In response, the IRJE clinical thinking model was established to guide safe antitumor medication use. Post-training, pharmacists demonstrated significantly improved confidence in identifying medication-related factors, maintaining standardized records, and conducting medication consultations (p < 0.05).
Conclusions
The IRJE model provides a structured decision-making pathway for oncology pharmaceutical care. It has the potential to standardize consultations and improve patient outcomes across pharmacy clinics in China.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
