A virtual centralized cytotoxic preparation unit simulation to evaluate the pharmacy staff knowledge

Abstract

Background

The risk of medication errors related to drug preparation unit cannot be totally avoided because of human interference. The aim of this study is to investigate the background and knowledge of the pharmacy staff by replicating the cytotoxic preparation unit with potential errors.

Methods

A 10-m² room was provided to duplicate the centralized chemotherapy unit with three areas reproducing virtually the equipment preparation bench, the isolator, and the dispensing bench. The 14 situations selected by experts were integrated to each corresponded area. For each participant, a form was given and answers were analyzed by two independent experts. Statistical processing data were performed using GraphPad Prism® software.

Results

A total of 19 professionals participated in error simulation workshop over a one-month period. The overall rate of correct responses was 58 ± 19%. In five situations, correct responses rate was lower than 50%: wrong drug batch related to the preparation sheet (40%), inappropriate sterilizing conditions (15%), the time on the preparation sheet provides an expired expiry date for melphalan preparation (45%), a maximum drug dose exceeded (25%), the dispensing form not corresponds to the preparation sheet and final product label (30%). The rate of correct responses was 45 ± 25% for professionals not specifically dedicated to chemotherapy preparation. The overall satisfaction workshop rate was 8.7 ± 1.0 out of 10.

Conclusion

This study showed the importance of training programs to sensitize personal staff to the risks of chemotherapy preparation and prevent errors.

Keywords

Medication error chemotherapy preparation simulation workshop evaluation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Institute of Medicine. To err is human: building a safer health system, Washington: National Academies Press, 2000.

Daupin

Atkinson

Bédard

et al.

Medication errors room: a simulation to assess the medical, nursing and pharmacy staffs’ ability to identify errors related to the medication-use system. J Eval Clin Pract 2016; 22: 907–916.

Weiss

Scott

Demmel

et al.

Significant and sustained reduction in chemotherapy errors through improvement science. J Oncol Pract 2017; 13: e329–e336.

Greenall

Shastay

Vaida

et al.

Establishing an international baseline for medication safety in oncology: findings from the 2012 ISMP International Medication Safety Self-Assessment® for Oncology. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2015; 21: 26–35.

Classen

Pestotnik

Evans

et al.

Computerized surveillance of adverse drug events in hospital patients. JAMA 1991; 266: 2847–2851.

Markert

Thierry

Kleber

et al.

Chemotherapy safety and severe adverse events in cancer patients: strategies to efficiently avoid chemotherapy errors in in- and outpatient treatment. Int J Cancer 2009; 124: 722–728.

Kukreti

Cosby

Cheung

et al.

Computerized Prescriber Order Entry Guideline Development Group. Computerized prescriber order entry in the outpatient oncology setting: from evidence to meaningful use. Curr Oncol 2014; 21: e604–e612.

Aita

Belvedere

De Carlo

et al.

Chemotherapy prescribing errors: an observational study on the role of information technology and computerized physician order entry systems. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13: 522–522.

Nerich

Limat

Demarchi

et al.

Computerized physician order entry of injectable antineoplastic drugs: an epidemiologic study of prescribing medication errors. Int J Med Inform 2010; 79: 699–706.

10.

Limat

Drouhin

Demesmay

et al.

Incidence and risk factors of preparation errors in a centralized cytotoxic preparation unit. Pharm World Sci 2001; 23: 102–106.

11.

Pauly-O’Neill

Prion

. Using integrated simulation in a nursing program to improve medication administration skills in the pediatric population. Nurs Educ Perspect 2013; 34: 148–153.

12.

Murdoch

Bottorff

McCullough

. Simulation education approaches to enhance collaborative healthcare: a best practices review. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh 2014; 10: 307–321.

13.

Ford

Seybert

Smithburger

et al.

Impact of simulation-based learning on medication error rates in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 1526–1531.

14.

Loboda

Vigneron

Mulot

et al.

A “chamber of errors” adaptation to assess pharmaceutical assistants’ knowledge in chemotherapy preparation. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2017; Jan 1:1078155217743311.

15.

Serrano-Fabiá

Albert-Marí

Almenar-Cubells

et al.

Multidisciplinary system for detecting medication errors in antineoplastic chemotherapy. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2010; 16: 105–112.

16.

Díaz-Carrasco

Pareja

Yachachi

et al.

Prescription errors in chemotherapy. Farm Hosp 2007; 31: 161–164.

17.

Ford

Killebrew

Fugitt

et al.

Study of medication errors on a community hospital oncology ward. J Oncol Pract 2006; 2: 149–154.

18.

Agence Nationale de Sécurité des Médicaments et produits de santé (ANSM). Les événements qui ne devraient jamais arriver – never events, http://ansm.sante.fr/Dossiers/Securite-du-medicament-a-l-hopital/Les-evenements-qui-ne-devraient-jamais-arriver-Never-Events/(offset)/0 (accessed July 2018).

19.

National Health Services (NHS). Revised never events list 2018, https://improvement.nhs.uk/documents/2899/Never_Events_list_2018_FINAL_v6.pdf (accessed July 2018).