Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2018-9
RETRACTED: Cost-utility analysis of trastuzumab combined with Docetaxel for patients with HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer – real world claim data
KatajaVCastiglioneM. ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Locally, recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol2012; 23: vii11–vii19.
6.
Moreno-AspitiaAPerezEA. Treatment options for breast cancer resistant to anthracycline and taxane. Mayo Clin Proc2009; 84: 533–545.
7.
MurrayCJEvansDBAcharyaAet al.Development of WHO guidelines on generalized cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Econ2000; 9: 235–251.
DiabyVAliAAAdunlinGet al.Parameterization of a disease progression simulation model for sequentially treated metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive breast cancer patients. Curr Med Res Opin2016; 32: 991–996.
11.
PetrouPKTaliasMA. Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib compared to best supportive care in second line renal cell cancer from a payer perspective in Cyprus. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res2014; 14: 131–138.
12.
PurmonenTMartikainenJASoiniEJet al.Economic evaluation of sunitinib malate in second-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Finland. Clin Ther2008; 30: 382–392.
13.
HeddenLO'ReillySLohrischCet al.Assessing the real-world cost-effectiveness of adjuvant trastuzumab in HER-2/neu positive breast cancer. Oncologist2012; 17: 164–171.
14.
DurkeeBYQianYPollomELet al.Cost-effectiveness of Pertuzumab in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positivemetastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol2016; 34: 902–909.
15.
DrummondMFSculpherMJTorranceGW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programs, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2005.
16.
Net benefits calculations, TreeAge Pro 2015 User’s Manual. Chapter 32, pp426. TreeAge Software, Inc, 2015.
17.
DendukuriNKhetaniKMcIsaacMet al.Testing for HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. CMAJ2007; 176: 1429–1434.
18.
AndradeTSMoseguiGBMirandaESet al.Trastuumab in metastatic breast cancer: systematic review of cost-effectiveness analysis. Int Pharm Pharmaceut Sci2015; 7: 47–56.
19.
Perez-EllisCGoncalvesAJacquemierJet al.Cost-effectiveness analysis of trastuzumab (herceptin) in HER2-overexpressed metastatic breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol2009; 32: 492–498.
20.
PoncetBBachelotTColinCet al.Use of the monoclonal antibody anti-HER2 trastuzumab in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Clin Oncol2008; 31: 363–368.
21.
NorumJRisbergTOlsenJA. A monoclonal antibody against HER-2 (trastuzumab) for metastatic breast cancer: a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Oncol2005; 16: 909–914.
22.
NeumannPJWeinsteinMC. Legislating against use of cost-effectiveness information. N Engl J Med2010; 363: 1495–1497.