Evaluation of a medication intensity screening tool used in malignant hematology and bone marrow transplant services to identify patients at risk for medication-related problems

Abstract

Background

In 2014, a screening tool was implemented at Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) Health to identify patients who are at risk for medication-related events. Patients are classified as high-risk if they meet one of the following criteria: receiving anticoagulation therapy, taking more than 10 scheduled medications upon admission, or readmission within the past 30 days. The goal of this study was to determine risk criteria specific to the malignant hematology (MH) and bone marrow transplant (BMT) patients.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of 114 patients admitted and discharged from the MH/BMT services between 1 September 2015 and 31 October 2015 was performed. A pharmacist-conducted medication history was completed and documented, and all interventions at admission and throughout hospitalization were categorized by severity and by value of service. The primary objective was to evaluate if patients in the MH/BMT services have more medication-related interventions documented upon admission compared with patients who are not screened as high risk. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the different types and severities of interventions made by pharmacists during the entire hospital stay, and to determine if there are certain characteristics that can help identify hematology/oncology high-risk patients.

Results

More interventions documented upon admission in the high-risk group as a whole when compared with the not high-risk group (73 vs. 31), but when normalized per patients in each group, there was an equal number of interventions (1.0). The most common interventions were to modify regimen (36%) and discontinue therapy (16%). The patient characteristics associated with high-risk included neutropenia, lower average platelet counts on admission, and longer length of stay.

Conclusion

The screening tool does not further differentiate an already complex MH/BMT patient population. Pharmacists may be more useful at capturing errors or changes during a patient’s hospital stay instead of upon admission. Thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and active infections may correlate with higher-risk status.

Keywords

Oncology screening tool high-risk medication-related problems

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Readmissions reduction program, https://www.cms.gov/medicare/medicare-fee-for-service-payment/acuteinpatientpps/readmissions-reduction-program.html (accessed 9 May 2016).

Forster

Clarke

Menard

et al.

Adverse events among medical patients after discharge from hospital. CMAJ 2004; 170: 345–349.

Pal

et al.

Can the target use of discharge pharmacist significantly decrease 30-day readmissions?

Hosp Pharm 2013; 48: 380–398.

Anderegg

et al.

Effects of a hospital wide pharmacy practice model change on readmission and return to emergency department rates. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2014; 71: 1469–1479.

Society of Hospital Medicine. Project better outcomes for older adults through safe transitions, http://www.hospitalmedicine.org/ResourceRoomRedesign/RR_CareTransitions/CT_Home.cfm (accessed 9 May 2016).

Bixby

et al.

The transitional care model (TCM): hospital discharge screening criteria for high risk older adults. Medsurg Nurs 2010; 19: 62–63.

Nightingale

et al.

Evaluation of a pharmacist-led medication assessment used to identify prevalence of and associations with polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication use among ambulatory senior adults with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33: 1435–1439.

Overhage

Lukes

. Practical, reliable, comprehensive method for characterizing pharmacists’ clinical activities. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1999; 56: 2444–2450.