From the perspective of applied research, a critical urban theory presents the opportunity to become a force for social change. Nowhere has this perspective been more present than in activities around supporting the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). The author applies evidence from an evaluation of the impact of CRA organizing to assess the success of efforts to bring about institutional change. This research suggests that local organizing provided the impetus for the establishment of a national political climate favorable to serious CRA enforcement. Evaluation approaches are needed to move theory from being pure critique to developing strategies for change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berkovec, J. A. , G. B. Canner, S. A. Garbriel, and T. H. Hannan. 1996. Mortgage discrimination and FHA loan performance. Cityscape2 (1): 9-24.
2.
Blossom, T. D. , R. Everett, and J. Gallagher. 1988. The race for money. Detroit Free Press, 4-9 August.
3.
Bradbury, K. L. , K. E. Case, and C. R. Dunham. 1989. Geographic patterns of mortgage lending in Boston, 1982-1987. New England Economic Review4 (1): 2-30.
4.
Bradford, C.1979. Financing home ownership: The federal role in neighborhood decline. Urban Affairs Quarterly14 (2): 313-325.
5.
Bradford, C.1989. Reinvestment: The quiet revolution. Neighborhood Works12 (4): 22-26.
6.
Bradford, C. , and G. Cincotta. 1992. The legacy, the promise and the unfinished agenda. In From redlining to reinvestment: Community responses to urban disinvestment, edited by G. D. Squires. Philadelphia, PA: Temple Univ. Press.
7.
Bradford, C. , and L. S. Rubinowitz. 1975. The urban-suburban investment-disinvestment process: Consequences for older neighborhoods. Annuals, AAPSS422:77-86.
8.
Bradford, C. , and P. Schersten. 1985. A tool for community capital: Home Mortgage Disclosure Act national survey. Minneapolis: Hubert Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota.
9.
Canner, G. B. , and D. S. Smith. 1991. Home Mortgage Disclosure Act: Expanded data on residential lending. Federal Reserve Bulletin77 (11): 859-881.
10.
Center for Community Change . 1989. New research shows S&Ls shun lower income and minority neighborhoods. Washington, DC: Author.
11.
Dedman, B.1988. The color of money. Atlanta Journal and Atlanta Constitution.
12.
Evanoff, D. D. , and L. M. Segal. 1996. CRA and fair lending regulations: Resulting trends in mortgage lending. Economic Perspectives20:618-646.
13.
Feagin, J. R.1998. The new urban paradigm: Critical perspectives on the city. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
14.
Finn, C.1989. Mortgage lending in Boston’s neighborhood 1981-1987: A study of bank credit and Boston’s housing. Minneapolis, MN: Hubert Humphrey Institute on Public Affairs.
15.
Fishbein, A. J.1992. The ongoing experiment with “regulation from below”: Expanded reporting requirements for HMDA and CRA. Housing Policy Debate3 (2): 601-636.
16.
Goldstein, I. , and A. B. Shlay. 1988. Getting the credit we deserve: An analysis of residential lending in New Castle County, Delaware 1984-1986. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Institute for Public Policy Studies.
17.
Gottdeiner, M. , and J. Feagin. 1988. The paradigm shift in urban sociology. Urban Affairs Quarterly24 (2): 163-167.
18.
Graham, M. A. 1997. Regulation from above: The enforcement of the community reinvestment process. Master’s thesis, Temple University.
19.
Hansen, J. , and B. Blalock. 1989. The lending gap: Race and mortgages in Birmingham. The Birmingham News, 20-23 August.
20.
Jackson, K.1985. Crabgrass frontier. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
21.
Kim, S. , and G. D. Squires. 1995. Lending characteristics and racial disparities in mortgage lending. Journal of Housing Research6 (2): 99-113.
22.
Logan, J. R. , and H. L. Molotch. 1987. Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
23.
Massey, D. S. , and N. A. Denton. 1992. American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
24.
Molotch, H.1976. The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology82 (3): 309-332.
25.
Munnell, A. H., L. E. Browne, J. McEneraney, and G.M.B. Tootel. 1992. Mortgage lending in Boston: Interpreting HMDA data. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Working Paper No. 92-7, October.
26.
Pogge, J.1989. Vista of opportunity: An analysis of 1983 and 1984 residential lending in the Denver/Boulder SMSA. Chicago: Woodstock Institute.
27.
Rossi, P. H.1998. Evaluating community development programs: Problems and prospects. In Community development programs, edited by R. Ferguson and W. Dickens. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
28.
Rossi, P. H. , and H. Freeman. 1993. Evaluation: A systematic approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
Schill, M. H. , and S. M. Wachter. 1993. A tale of two cities: Racial and ethnic geographic disparities in more mortgage lending in Boston and Philadelphia. Journal of Housing Research4 (3): 245-276.
30.
Schwartz, A. 1998. The limits of community reinvestment: The implementation of community reinvestment agreements in Chicago, Cleveland, New Jersey, and Pittsburgh. Paper presented at the 1998 annual meetings of the Urban Affairs Association, Fort Worth, TX, April.
31.
Schwartz, A.1999. Banking lending to minority and low-income households and neighborhoods: Do community reinvestment agreements make a difference?Journal of Urban Affairs20 (3): 269-302.
32.
Shlay, A. B.1985. Where the money flows: Lending patterns in the Washington, D.C.-Maryland--Virginia SMSA. Chicago: Woodstock Institute.
33.
Shlay, A. B.1986. A tale of three cities: The distribution of housing credit from financial institutions in the Chicago SMSA from 1980-1983. Chicago: Woodstock Institute.
34.
Shlay, A. B.1987a. Maintaining the divided city: Residential lending patterns in the Baltimore SMSA. Baltimore, MD: Maryland Alliance for Responsible Investment.
35.
Shlay, A. B.1987b. Credit on color: The impact of segregation and racial transition on housing credit flows in the Chicago SMSA from 1980-1983. Chicago: Chicago Fair Housing Alliance.
36.
Shlay, A. B.1988. Not in that neighborhood: The effects of housing and population on the distribution of mortgage finance within the Chicago SMSA from 1980-1983. Social Science Research17 (2): 137-163.
37.
Shlay, A. B.1989. Financing community: Methods for assessing residential credit disparities, market barriers and institutional reinvestment performance in the Metropolis. Journal of Urban Affairs11 (3): 201-223.
38.
Shlay, A. B.1993. Shaping place: Institutions and metropolitan development patterns. Journal of Urban Affairs15 (5): 387-404.
39.
Shlay, A. B. , and S. Freedman. 1986. Islands of opportunities: Mortgage banker residential lending within the Chicago SMSA from 1980-1983. Chicago: Woodstock Institute.
40.
Shlay, A. B. , and I. Goldstein. 1992. Proving disinvestment: The CRA research experience. Institute for Public Policy Studies Working Paper No. 1. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Institute for Public Policy Studies.
41.
Squires, G. D.1992. From redlining to reinvestment: Community responses to urban disinvestment. Philadelphia, PA: Temple Univ. Press.
42.
Squires, G. D.1999. Color and money: How financial institutions create, perpetuate, and eliminate dual housing markets. American Prospect42:67-70.
43.
Squires, G. D. , and W. Velez. 1987. Neighborhood racial composition and mortgage lending: City and suburban differences. Journal of Urban Affairs9 (3): 217-232.
44.
Stengel, M., and D. Glennon. 1995. Evaluating statistical models of mortgage lending discrimination: A bank-specific analysis. U.S. Comptroller of the Currency, Economic and Policy Analysis Working Paper No. 95-3, May.
45.
U.S. Department of Justice. 1993. As a result of corrective actions, Justice Department settles with Shawmut for alleged discriminatory lending practices. Press release, 13 December.
46.
Walker, R.1981. A theory of suburbanization: Capitalism and the construction of urban space in the United States. In Urbanization and urban planning in capitalist society, edited by M. Dear and A. J. Scott. London: Methuen.
47.
Williams, P. , W. Brown, and E. Simmons. 1988. Race and mortgage lending in New York City: A study on redlining. Brooklyn, NY: Medgar Evers College, Center for Law and Social Justice.
48.
Williams, R. A. , and R. Nesiba. 1997. Race, economic and institutional differences in home mortgage loans: St. Joseph County, Indiana. Journal of Urban Affairs19 (1): 73-103.
49.
Yinger, J.1995. Closed doors, opportunities lost: The continuing costs of housing discrimination. New York: Russell Sage.
