Every student of city politics knows the class theory of city government—that middle-class voters supported municipal reform and working-class voters supported machine politics. Although historical narratives support this theory, systematic evidence has been elusive. Historians and political scientists alike have recognized very strong regional differences in styles of city government but lacked an explanation. The authors argue that the class theory, historical narratives, and regional differences may be reconciled. Presence of immigrants and turnout account both for adoption or rejection of reform and for the regional pattern of those decisions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Almaguer, T.1994. Racial fault lines: The historical origins of white supremacy in CaliforniaBerkeley: Univ. of California Press.
2.
Bakken, G. M.1990. Constitutional debates in the West. Western Legal Studies3 (2): 213-244.
3.
Banfield, E. C. , and J. Q. Wilson. 1963. City politics. New York: Vintage.
4.
Bernard, R. M. , and B. R. Rice. 1975. Political environment and the adoption of progressive municipal reform. Journal of Urban History1 (2): 149-174.
5.
Bridges, A.1986. A city in the Republic: Antebellum New York and the origins of machine politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.
6.
Bridges, A.1997a. Morning glories: Municipal reform in the Southwest. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
7.
Bridges, A. . 1997b. Textbook municipal reform. Urban Affairs Review33 (1): 97-119.
8.
Childs, R. S.1965. The first fifty years of the council-manager plan of municipal government. New York: American Book–Stratford Press.
9.
Dahl, R.1960. Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
10.
David, P. T.1972. Party strength in the United States, 1872-1970. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
11.
Davidson, C.1992. The Voting Rights Act: A brief history. In Controversies in minority voting: The Voting Rights Act in perspective, edited by B. Grofman and C. Davidson, 7-51. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
12.
Dye, T. R. , and S. A. McManus. 1976. Predicting city government structure. American Journal of Political Science20 (2): 257-271.
13.
Finegold, K.1995. Experts and politicians: Reform challenges to machine politics in New York, Cleveland, and Chicago. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
14.
Gordon, D. N.1968. Immigrants and urban governmental form in American cities, 1944-60. American Journal of Sociology74: 158-171.
15.
Hofstadter, R.1955. The age of reform: From Bryan to FDR. New York: Vintage.
16.
Holli, M. G.1969. Reform in Detroit: Hazen S. Pingree and urban politics. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
17.
Isaac, P. E.1975. Municipal reform in Beaumont, Texas, 1902-1909. Southwestern Historical Quarterly78 (4): 409-430.
18.
Kessel, J. H.1962. Governmental structure and political environment: A statistical note about American cities. American Political Science Review56 (3): 615-670.
19.
Key, V. O.1949. Southern politics in state and nation. New York: Vintage.
20.
Knoke, D.1982. The spread of municipal reform: Temporal, spatial, and social dynamics. American Journal of Sociology87: 1314-1339.
21.
Kousser, J. M.1974. The shaping of southern politics: Suffrage restriction and the establishment of the one-party South, 1880-1910. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
22.
Lineberry, R. , and E. A. Fowler. 1967. Reformism and public policies in American cities. American Political Science Review61 (3): 701-716.
23.
McGovney, D. O.1949. The American suffrage medley. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
24.
Mitchell, J. P.1979. Boss Speer and the city functional: Boosters and businessmen versus commission government in Denver. Pacific Northwest Quarterly, October, 155-164.
25.
Municipal year book. 1934. Chicago: International City Managers’ Association.
26.
Platt, Harold L.1983. City building in the New South, the growth of public services in Houston, 1830-1910. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.
27.
Rice, B. R.1975. The Galveston plan of city government by commission: The birth of a progressive idea. Southwestern Historical Quarterly78 (4): 366-408.
28.
Rice, B. R.1977. Progressive cities: The commission government movement in America, 1901-1920. Austin: Univ. of Texas.
29.
Shefter, M.1983. Regional receptivity to reform: Legacy of the Progressive era. Political Science Quarterly98 (3): 459-483.
30.
Staniszewski, F.1977. Ideology and practice in municipal government reform: A case study of Austin. Mimeo, University of Texas at Austin, Studies in Politics.
31.
Violas, P.1973. Progressive social philosophy: Charles Horton Cooley and Edward Alsworth Ross. In Roots of crisis: The American education in the twentieth century, edited by C. J. Karier, P. Violas, and J. Spring, 163-176. New York: Rand McNally.
32.
Weinstein, J.1968. The corporate ideal in the liberal state. Boston: Beacon.
33.
Wolfinger, R. , and J. O. Field. 1966. Political ethos and the structure of city government. American Political Science Review60 (1): 306-326.
