In this article, the determinants of collective action on local issues are studied. A theoretical model is developed in which organized neighborhood action is a function of neighborhood environmental concerns, the social composition of residents, and political incentives available to the community. The model is tested using data collected from neighborhood associations. Concerns with potential neighborhood change increase the number of actions taken to influence decision makers. The more the political incentives allocated by the city government, the less likely is the association to engage in collective action. Political incentives are allocated to associations located in wealthy neighborhoods, and these associations are less active.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berry, J. M. , K. E. Portney, and K. Thomson. 1991. The political behavior of poor people. In The urban underclass, edited by C. Jenks and P. Peterson, 357-375. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
2.
Berry, J. M. , K. E. Portney, and K. Thomson. 1993. The rebirth of urban democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
3.
Bollen, K. A. , and R. W. Jackman. 1985. Regression diagnostics. Sociological Methods and Research13 (4): 510-542.
4.
Crenshaw, E. , and C. St. John. 1989. The organizationally dependent community: A comparative study of neighborhood attachment. Urban Affairs Quarterly24:412-434.
Fainstein, N. , and S. Fainstein. 1983. Regime strategies, communal resistance and economic forces. In Restructuring the city: The political economy of urban development, edited by S. Fainstein, N. Fainstein, R. Hill, D. Judd, and M. Smith, 245-282. New York: Longman.
7.
Fainstein, S. , and N. Fainstein. 1991. The effectiveness of community politics: New York City. Comparative Urban and Community Research3:108-133.
8.
Gottdiener, M. , and J. Feagan. 1988. The paradigm shift in urban sociology. Urban Affairs Quarterly23:163-187.
9.
Green B. , and Y. Schreuder. 1991. Growth, zoning and neighborhood organizations: Land use and conflict in Wilmington, Delaware. Journal of Urban Affairs13:97-110.
10.
Guest, A. , and R. Oropesa. 1986. Informal social ties and political activity in the metropolis. Urban Affairs Quarterly21:550-574.
11.
Haberle, S.1989. Planting the grassroots: Structuring citizen participation. New York: Praeger.
12.
Henig, J.1982. Neighborhood mobilization: Redevelopment and response. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press.
13.
Heskin, A. D.1991. The struggle for community. Boulder, CO: Westview.
14.
Hogan, R.1986. Community opposition to group homes. Social Science Quarterly67 (2): 442-449.
15.
Hutcheson, J. D. , and J. E. Prather. 1988. Community mobilization and participation in the zoning process. Urban Affairs Quarterly23:346-368.
16.
Jenkins, C. , and C. Perrow. 1977. Insurgency of the powerless: Farm workers' movements 1947-1972. American Sociological Review42:229-248.
17.
Jenkins, J. C.1983. Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology9:527-553.
18.
Jonas, A. G.1991. Postwar growth and the politics of annexation in metropolitan Columbus. Urban Geography12:197-225.
19.
Kasarda, J. , and M. Janowitz. 1974. Community attachment in mass society. American Sociological Review39:328-339.
20.
Knoke, D.1990. The political economy of voluntary associations. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press.
21.
Knoke, D. , and J. Wood. 1981. Organized for action. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press.
22.
Kweit, R. W. , and M. G. Kweit. 1990. People and politics in urban America. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
23.
Lee, B. A. , and P. B. Wood. 1991. Is neighborhood racial succession place specific?Demography28:21-40.
24.
Logan, J. R. , and H. Molotch. 1987. Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
25.
Logan, J. R. , and G. Rabrenovic. 1990. Neighborhood associations: Their issues, their allies, and their opponents. Urban Affairs Quarterly26 (1): 68-94.
26.
Milofsky, C.1988. Community organizations: Studies in resource mobilization and exchange. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
27.
Oropesa, S. R.1989. The social and political foundations of effective neighborhood improvement associations. Social Science Quarterly70:723-743.
28.
Oropesa, S. R.1992. Social structure, social solidarity and involvement in neighborhood improvement associations. Sociological Inquiry62:107-118.
29.
Perkins, D. , P. Florin, R. Rich, and A. Wandersman. 1990. Participation and the social and physical environment in residential blocks. American Journal of Community Psychology18:83-115.
30.
Sampson, R. J.1988. Local friendship ties and community attachment in mass society: A multilevel systemic model. American Sociological Review53:766-779.
31.
Sampson, R. J.1991. Linking micro and macrolevel dimensions of community social organization. Social Forces70:43-64.
32.
Sampson, R. J. , and W. B. Groves. 1989. Community structure and crime: Testing social disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology98:774-802.
33.
Schwirian, K. P.1983. Models of neighborhood change. Annual Review of Sociology9:83-102.
34.
Schwirian, K. P. 1991. Neighborhood research in the 90's: Substantive and methodological issues. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Pittsburgh, September.
35.
Schwirian, K. P. , and G. S. Mesch. 1993. Embattled neighborhoods: The political ecology of neighborhood change. In Research in urban sociology, Vol. 3, edited by R. Hutchinson, 83-110. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
36.
Skogan, W. G.1990. Disorder and decline, crime and the spiral of decay of American neighborhoods. New York: Free Press.
37.
Suttles, G.1968. The social order of the slum. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press.
38.
Taub, R. , G. Surgeon, S. Lindholm, O. Phyllis, and A. Bridges. 1977. Urban voluntary associations, locality based and externally induced. American Journal of Sociology83:425-443.
39.
Thomas, J. C.1986. Between citizen and city. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
40.
Wiewel, W. , and A. Hunter. 1985. The interorganizational network as a resource: A comparative case study on organizational genesis. Administrative Science Quarterly30:482-496.
