In big cities across the nation, there is a general consensus that fundamental change is needed to improve the nation's urban schools. This author examines the contemporary politics of school reform in Baltimore. The concept civic capacity is used to study the ability of local educational stakeholders to form effective alliances to shape and carry out meaningful systemic school reform. The strengths and weaknesses of Baltimore's leaders' capacity to reform the Baltimore City Public Schools are assessed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abell Foundation . 1989. A growing inequality: A report on the financial condition of the Baltimore City Public Schools. Baltimore: Author.
2.
Abell Foundation . 1994. Grants report by organization name, 1988-1994. Baltimore: Author.
3.
Advocates for Children and Youth, Inc.1991. Who negotiates for the children?: The importance of teachers union agreements in the quality of education in Maryland's public schools. Baltimore: Author.
4.
American Federation of Teachers (AFT) . 1994. The private management of public schools: An analysis of the EAI experience in Baltimore. Washington, DC: Author.
5.
Arnold, J.1976. The last of the good old days: Politics in Baltimore, 1920-1950. Maryland Historical Magazine71:443-448.
6.
Asayesh, G.1991. Baltimore board weighs private school operation. The Sun, 17 May, B1.
7.
Asayesh, G.1992. Search for a school superintendent: Walter G. Amprey. The Sun, 28 April, 8B.
8.
Associated Black Charities . 1992. A report of a management study of the Baltimore City Public Schools. Baltimore: Author.
9.
Bard, H.1958. Observations on desegregation in Baltimore: Three years later. Teachers' College Record59 (February): 268-281.
10.
Blackshear, P.1993. The tides of change: Privatization in education. School Business Affairs23 (June): 26-30.
11.
Bomster, M.1992. Amprey's first year closes with praise, higher expectations. The Sun, 2 August, 1E.
12.
Bowler, M.1991. The lessons of change: Baltimore schools in the modern era. A report commissioned by the Fund for Educational Excellence, Baltimore.
13.
Boyte, H.1989. Commonwealth. New York: Free Press.
14.
BUILD's influence in political arena gaining . 1987. The Sun, 8 June, B1.
15.
Callcott, G.1985. Maryland and America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
16.
Cellis, W.1994. Hartford seeking a company to run its public schools. The New York Times, 19 April, A1.
17.
Chavkin, N. , ed. 1993. Families and schools in a pluralistic society. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
18.
Christian, C. , and Keith, G. n.d. The decline of manufacturing jobs and the growing underclass in Baltimore. In Maryland policy studies: Blacks in Maryland, No. 2, 7-16. College Park, MD: Bureau of Governmental Research.
19.
City of Baltimore . 1992. Professional services agreement with Education Alternatives, Inc.Baltimore: Department of Education.
20.
City school plan criticized as too vague and timid . 1990. The Sun, 11 September, B 1.
21.
Civic Capacity and Urban Education Project . 1993. Field research guide. College Park, MD: Author.
22.
Comer, J.1980. School power: Implications of an intervention project. New York: Free Press.
23.
Comer, J.1986. Parent participation in the schools. Phi Delta Kappan67:442-446.
Crain, R.1968. The politics of desegregation. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
26.
Crew, J. , E. Nolan, G. Eugene, and R. Newton, 1982. Effective public education: The Baltimore story. New York: New Dimensions.
27.
Dauber, S. , and J. L. Epstein. 1993. Parents' attitudes and practices of involvement in inner-city elementary and middle schools. In Families and schools in a pluralistic society, edited by N. F. Chavkin, 53-71. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
28.
David, E.1994. Blurring the color line: The desegregation of the Baltimore City Public Schools, 1954-1994. Urban Review26:243-255.
29.
Edelson, M.1994. Cool hand Don. Baltimore Magazine87 (March): 44.
30.
Elam, S. M. , L. C. Rose, and A. M. Gallup. 1992. The 24th annual Gallup/Phi Delta Kappa poll of the public's attitude toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan74 (September): 41-53.
31.
Elkin, S.1987. City and regime in the American republic. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
32.
Epstein, J.1986. Parents' reactions to teacher practices of parent involvement. Elementary School Journal86:277-294.
33.
Epstein, J.1987. Parent involvement: What research says to administrators. Education and Urban Society19:119-136.
34.
Epstein, J. 1992. Baltimore school and family connections project. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April.
35.
Epstein, J. , and S. Dauber. 1991. School programs and practices of parent involvement in inner-city elementary and middle schools. Elementary School Journal91:289-303.
36.
Fee, E. , L. Shopes, and L. Zeidman, eds. 1991. The Baltimore book: New views of local history. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.
37.
Firestone, W. A. , S. Rosenblum, B. Bader, and D. Massell. 1990. Education reform from 1983 to 1990: State action and district response. Rutgers, NJ: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
38.
Freedman, S.1993. Upon this rock. New York: Harper-Collins.
39.
Friend, A.1992. The kingdom and the power: Inside the Abell Foundation, a bastion of wealth—and change. Warfield's Business Record7 (December): 1-2.
40.
Garland, E.1980. The end of Baltimore as a blue-collar town. Baltimore Magazine20 (December): 52-58.
41.
Gately, G.1994a. Amprey wants EAI to run more schools. The Sun, 6 May, B1.
42.
Gately, G.1994b. Coalition seeks to influence school decisions. The Sun, 1 July, B2.
43.
Gately, G.1994c. Parents ask to open school of their own. The Sun, 3 March, A1.
44.
Gately, G.1994d. Teachers' union asks for federal EAI investigation. The Sun, 31 March, B4.
45.
Gately, G.1995. The "Calvert way" gets high marks. The Sun, 22 January, A1.
46.
Gittell, M.1994. School reform in New York and Chicago: Revisiting the ecology of local games. Urban Affairs Quarterly30:136-151.
47.
Gittell, M. , and T. E. Hollander. 1968. Six urban school districts: A comparative study of institutional response. New York: Praeger.
48.
Goldstein, L.1994. Harnessing the force of faith: Movement spreads the gospel of community power. Washington Post, 6 February, B1.
49.
Governor's Commission on School Funding . 1993. Final report. Baltimore: Maryland Department of Education.
50.
Greater Baltimore Committee (GBC) . 1992. Baltimore, where sciences comes to life. Baltimore: Author.
51.
Haynes N. , and J. Comer. 1993. The Yale school development program: Process, outcomes, and policy implications. Urban Education28:166-199.
52.
Hess, G. A. , ed. 1992. Empowering teachers and parents: School restructuring through the eyes of anthropologists. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
53.
Hess, G. A.1994. Introduction: School-based management as a vehicle for school reform. Education and Urban Society26:203-219.
54.
Horwitt, S.1989. Let them call me rebel: Saul Alinsky, his life and legacy. New York: Knopf.
55.
Horwitz, S.1994. A public defeat on privatization. Washington Post, 3 March, B1.
56.
Hula, R.1990. The two Baltimores. In Leadership and urban regeneration, edited by D. Judd and M. Parkinson, 191-215. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
57.
Hula, R. , A. DiGaetano, R. Jelier, and M. Schauer. 1994. The politics of school reform in Detroit. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Urban Affairs Association, New Orleans, March.
58.
Jackson, B. , and J. Cibulka. 1991. Leadership turnover and business mobilization. In The politics of urban education in the United States: The 1991 yearbook of the politics of education association, edited by C. G. Cibulka, R. J. Reed, and K. Wong, 71-86. Washington, DC: Falmer.
59.
Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies . 1991. Moving up with Baltimore: Creating career ladders for blacks in the private sector. Washington, DC: Author.
60.
Jones, R. 1994. Civic capacity and urban education: Pittsburgh. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Urban Affairs Association, New Orleans, March.
61.
Kennelly, J.1993. I taught at Tesseract. Baltimore Magazine86 (June): 31-35.
62.
Kent, F.1923. The story of Maryland politics. Baltimore: Thomas & Evans.
63.
Klingaman, M.1992. Special report: Bright faces, fading dreams. The Sun, 6-13 June, A1.
64.
Krefetz, S.1976. Welfare policy-making and city politics. New York: Praeger.
65.
Leff, L.1986. Schaefer, coalition square off. Washington Post, 17 November, B1.
66.
Levine, M.1987. Downtown redevelopment as an urban growth strategy: A critical appraisal of the Baltimore renaissance. Journal of Urban Affairs9:103-123.
67.
Lieberman, M.1986. Beyond public education. New York: Praeger.
68.
Little difference shown in schools managed by EAI . 1995. The Sun, 2 August, B1.
69.
Lyall, K.1982. A bicycle built for two: Public-private partnership in Baltimore. In Public-private partnerships in American cities, edited by R. S. Fowler and R. Berger, 17-57. Lexington, MA: Heath.
70.
Mahtesian, C.1994. The precarious politics of privatizing schools. Governing12 (June): 46-51.
71.
Marquez, B.1993. The Industrial Areas Foundation and the Mexican-American community in Texas: The politics of issue mobilization. In Minority group influence: Agenda setting, formulation, and public policy, edited by P. D. McClain, 127-146. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
72.
Marris, P. , and M. Rein. 1973. Dilemmas of social reform: Poverty and community action in the United States. 2d ed.Chicago: Aldine.
73.
Maryland State Department of Education . 1993. Maryland school performance program report. Baltimore: Author.
74.
McDougall, H.1993. Black Baltimore: A theory of community. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.
75.
McGuire, K.1990. Business involvement in the 1990s. In Education politics for the new century: The 1989 yearbook of the politics of education association, edited by D. Mitchell and M. Goertz, 107-117. New York: Falmer.
76.
Moles, O. C.1987. Who wants parent involvement?Education and Urban Society19:137-145.
77.
Moore, D. R.1992. The case for parent and community involvement. In Empowering teachers and parents, edited by G. A. Hess, Jr., 131-155. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
78.
Morley, J.1994. Taking public schools private: How it would work and why D.C. didn't do it. Washington Post, 20 March, C1.
79.
Noah, T.1990. The testing of Kurt Schmoke. Washington Post Magazine, 27 May, 13-17, 29-32.
Orr, M.1992. Urban regimes and human capital policies: A study of Baltimore. Journal of Urban Affairs14:173-187.
82.
Orr, M. , R. Hula, F. Guerra, and M. Cohen. 1994. Sources of educational reform: Changing actors in shifting arenas. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York, September.
83.
Orr, M. , and G. Stoker, 1994. Urban regimes and leadership in Detroit. Urban Affairs Quarterly30:48-73.
84.
Peterson, P.1981. City limits. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
85.
Power, G.1983. Apartheid Baltimore style: The residential segregation ordinances of 1910-1913. Maryland Law Review42:289-328.
86.
Putnam, R.1993a. Making Democracy Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
87.
Putnam, R.1993b. The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospect13 (Spring): 35-42.
88.
Ray, C. A. , and R. A. Mickelson. 1990. Business leaders and the politics of school reform. In Education politics for the new century: The 1989 yearbook of the politics of education association, edited by D. Mitchell and M. Goertz, 119-135. New York: Falmer.
89.
Reid, I.1935. The negro community in Baltimore. Baltimore: Baltimore Urban League.
90.
Ruffini, S. , L. Howe, and D. Borders. 1994. The early implementation of Tesseract: 1992-93 evaluation report. Baltimore: Baltimore City Public Schools.
91.
Salisbury, R.1967. Schools and politics in the big city. Harvard Educational Review37:408-24.
92.
Schmoke asked board not to renew Hunter's contract . 1990. The Sun, 20 December, A1.
93.
Schmoke facing challenge tonight on school reform . 1992. The Sun, 20 JulyB1.
94.
Schmoke K.1987. Inaugural address of Mayor Kurt L. Schmoke, Baltimore.
95.
Schmoke K.1991. Education: The path to urban greatness. National Civic Review8:25-30.
96.
School plan rates a D-minus . 1990. The Sun, 10 October, A11.
97.
Skerry, P.1993. Mexican Americans. New York: Free Press.
98.
Slavin, R.1991. Funding inequities among Maryland school districts: What do they mean in practice?Baltimore: Center for Research on Effective Schooling for Disadvantaged Students, Johns Hopkins Univ.
99.
Slavin, R.1993. After the victory: Making funding equity make a difference. Baltimore: Center for Research on Effective Schooling for Disadvantaged Students, Johns Hopkins Univ.
100.
Smith, M. S. , and J. O'Day. 1991. Systemic school reform. In The politics of curriculum and testing: The 1990 yearbook of the politics of education association, edited by S. Fuhrman and B. Malen, 233-267. New York: Falmer.
101.
Stone, C.1989. Regime politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
102.
Stone, C. , M. Orr, and D. Imbroscio. 1991. The reshaping of urban leadership in U.S. cities: A regime analysis. In Urban life in transition, edited by M. Gottdiener and C. G. Pickvance, 222-227. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
103.
Swanstrom, T.1985. The crisis of growth politics: Cleveland, Kucinich, and the challenge of urban populism. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.
104.
Szanton, P.1986. Baltimore 2000: A choice of futures. Baltimore: Morris Goldseker Foundation.
105.
Vobejda, B. , and G. Ifill. 1986. Education issue may spell trouble for Schaefer. Washington Post, 28 July, C1.
106.
Wong, K.1990. City choices. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
107.
Wong, K.1992. The politics of urban education as a field of study: An interpretive analysis. In The politics of urban education in the United States: The 1991 yearbook of the politics of education association, edited by J. G. Cibulka, R. Reed, and K. Wong, 3-26. Washington, DC: Falmer.
108.
Wong, K. , and S. Rollow. 1990. A case study of the recent Chicago school reform. Administrators Notebook34:3-8.
