Relatively little is known about the remarkable increase in the use of special districts for urban service delivery. The author assesses the utility of four alternative theoretical perspectives on the uneven use of districts in metropolitan areas. Empirical analysis of district patterns in more than 300 metropolitan areas in 1987 reveals multiple influences on district use. Local government structure and legal factors emphasized by institutional-reform and metropolitan-ecology perspectives are especially important relative to the service-demand factors asserted by public-choice and critical political-economy perspectives. Of particular note are different motivations associated with use of different geographic and financial subtypes of districts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR) . 1964. The problem of special districts in American government. Report A-22. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
2.
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR) . 1981. The federal influence on state and local roles in the federal system. Report A-89. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
3.
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR) . 1982. State and local roles in the federal system. Report A-88. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
4.
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR) . 1987. The organization of local public economies. Report A-109. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
5.
Biggs, J. H.1990. No drip, no flush, no growth: How cities can control growth beyond their boundaries by refusing to extend utility services. The Urban Lawyer22 (2): 285-305.
6.
Bish, R. L.1971. The public economy of metropolitan areas. Chicago: Markham.
7.
Bollens, J. C.1961. Special district governments in the United States. 2d ed.Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
8.
Bollens, S. A.1986. Examining the link between state policy and the creation of local special districts. State and Local Government Review18 (3): 117-124.
9.
Burns, N.1994. The formation of American local government. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
10.
Chicoine, D. L. , and N. Walzer. 1985. Governmental structure and local public finance. Boston: Oelgeschlager, Gunn, & Hain.
11.
Clark, G. L. , and M. Dear. 1984. State apparatus. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
12.
Committee for Economic Development . 1970. Reshaping government in metropolitan areas. New York: Author.
13.
Cox, K. R. , and F. Z. Nartowicz. 1980. Jurisdictional fragmentation in the American metropolis: Alternative perspectives. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research4 (2): 196-211.
14.
Cummings, S. , ed. 1988. Business elites and urban development. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
15.
Danielson, M. N. , ed. 1965. Metropolitan politics. 2d ed.Boston: Little, Brown.
16.
Danielson, M. N. , and J. W. Doig. 1982. New York: The politics of urban regional development. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
17.
Danielson, M. N. , A. M. Hershey, and J. M. Bayne. 1977. One nation, so many governments. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
18.
Dye, T. R. , and J. A. Garcia. 1978. Structure, function and policy in American cities. Urban Affairs Quarterly14 (1): 103-122.
19.
Fainstein, S. S. , N. I. Fainstein, R. C. Hill, D. Judd, and M. P. Smith. 1983. Restructuring the city: The political economy of urban development. New York: Longman.
20.
Feagin, J. R.1988. Free enterprise city: Houston in political-economic perspective. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press.
21.
Fesler, J. W.1949. Area and administration. Tuscaloosa: Univ. of Alabama Press.
22.
Fisher, R. C.1988. State and local public finance. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
23.
Flickinger, T. , and P. M. Murphy. 1990. Special districts. In Illinois local government, edited by J. F. Keane and G. Koch, 151-181. Carbondale: Southern Illinois Univ. Press.
24.
Gottdiener, M.1985. The social production of urban space. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.
25.
Gottlieb, R. , and M. FitzSimmons. 1991. Thirst for growth: Water agencies as hidden government in California. Tucson: Univ. of Arizona Press.
26.
Greer, S.1963. Metropolitics: A study of political culture. New York: John Wiley.
27.
Harvey, D.1973. Social justice and the city. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
28.
Hawkins, B. W. , and T. R. Dye. 1971. Metropolitan "fragmentation": A research note. In Politics in the metropolis, 2d ed., edited by T. R. Dye and B. W. Hawkins, 493-499. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
29.
Hawkins, R. B., Jr.1976. Self-government by district: Myth and reality. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
30.
Heiman, M. K.1989. The quiet evolution: Power, planning and profits in New York State. New York: Praeger.
31.
Hill, M. B., Jr.1978. State laws governing local government structure and administration. Athens: Institute of Government, Univ. of Georgia.
32.
Hoch, C.1984. City limits: Municipal boundary formation and class segregation. In Marxism and the metropolis, 2d ed., edited by W. K. Tabb and L. Sawers, 101-119. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
33.
Jones, V.1942. Metropolitan government. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
34.
Jones, V.1953. Local government organization in metropolitan areas: Its relation to urban redevelopment. In The future of cities and urban redevelopment, edited by C. Woodbury, 481-608. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
35.
Keating, A. D.1988. Building Chicago: Suburban developers and the creation of a divided metropolis. Columbus: Ohio State Univ. Press.
36.
Kenyon, D. A. , and J. Kincaid, eds. 1991. Competition among states and local governments. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
37.
Leutwiler, N. R.1987. Playing taps for urban growth control: Restricting public utility access to manage growth. State and Local Government Review19 (1): 8-14.
38.
Liebert, R.1976. Disintegration and political action. New York: Academic Press.
39.
Logan, J. R. , and H. L. Molotch. 1987. Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
40.
Lyons, W. E. , and D. Lowery. 1989. Governmental fragmentation versus consolidation: Five public-choice myths about how to create informed, involved, and happy citizens. Public Administration Review49 (6): 533-543.
41.
MacManus, S. A.1981. Special district governments: A note on their use as property tax relief mechanisms in the 1970s. Journal of Politics43 (12): 1207-1214.
42.
MacManus, S. A.1983. State government: The overseer of municipal finance. In The municipal money chase, edited by A. M. Sbragia, 145-184. Boulder, CO: Westview.
43.
Marando, V. L. , and M. M. Reeves. 1988. State responsiveness and local government reorganization. Social Science Quarterly69 (4): 996-1004.
44.
Maxey, C. C.1922. The political integration of metropolitan communities. National Municipal Review11 (8): 229-252.
45.
McKenzie, E.1994. Privatopia: Homeowner associations and the rise of residential private government. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
46.
Mueller, D. C.1989. Public choice II. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
47.
National Municipal League, Committee on Metropolitan Government . 1930. The government of metropolitan areas in the United States. New York: Author.
48.
Nelson, M. A.1990. Decentralization of the subnational public sector: An empirical analysis of the determinants of local government structure in metropolitan areas in the U.S. Southern Economic Journal57 (2): 443-457.
49.
Nice, D. C.1983. An intergovernmental perspective on urban fragmentation. Social Science Quarterly64 (1): 111-118.
50.
Norton, R. D.1979. City life-cycles and American urban policy. New York: Academic Press.
51.
O'Connor, J.1973. The fiscal crisis of the state. New York: St. Martin's.
52.
Olin, S.1991. Intraclass conflict and the politics of a fragmented region. In Postsuburban California: The transformation of Orange County since World War II, edited by R. Kling, S. Olin, and M. Poster, 223-253. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
53.
Orum, A. M.1991. Apprehending the city: The view from above, below, and behind. Urban Affairs Quarterly26 (4): 589-609.
54.
Ostrom, E.1972. Metropolitan reform: Propositions derived from two traditions. Social Science Quarterly53 (3): 474-493.
55.
Ostrom, V. , C. Tiebout, and R. Warren. 1961. The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review55:831-842.
56.
Peiser, R. B.1983. The economics of municipal utility districts for land development. Land Economics59 (1): 43-57.
57.
Pennsylvania Department of Community Affairs . 1988. Municipal authorities in Pennsylvania. Harrisburg, PA: Author.
58.
Perrenod, V. M.1984. Special districts, special purposes: Fringe governments and urban problems in the Houston area. College Station: Texas A&M Univ. Press.
59.
Peterson P. E.1981. City limits. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
60.
Piven, F. F. , and R. Friedland. 1984. Public-choice and private power: A theory of fiscal crisis. In Public service provision and urban development, edited by A. Kirby, P. Knox, and S. Pinch, 390-420. New York: St. Martin's.
61.
Reed, T. H.1930. The government of metropolitan areas. Public Management12 (3): 75-78.
62.
Reed, T. H.1949. Progress in metropolitan integration. Public Administration Review9:1-10.
63.
Rusk, D.1993. Cities without suburbs. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
64.
Smith, R. G.1964. Public authorities, special districts and local government. Washington, DC: National Association of Counties Research Foundation.
65.
Stein, R. M.1980. Federally supported substate regional governments: The maintenance of governmental structure. Urban Interest2 (spring): 74-81.
66.
Stephens, G. R.1974. State centralization and the erosion of local autonomy. Journal of Politics36 (February): 44-76.
67.
Stone, C. N.1980. Systemic power in community decision-making. American Political Science Review74:978-990.
68.
Stone, C. N. , and H. T. Sanders, eds. 1987. The politics of urban development. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
69.
Teaford, J. C.1979. City and suburb: The political fragmentation of metropolitan America, 1850-1970. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
70.
Tiebout, C. M.1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy64:416-424.
71.
U.S. Bureau of the Census . 1981. 1980 census of population, general social and economic characteristics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
72.
U.S. Bureau of the Census . 1983a. 1982 census of governments: Government organization. GC82(1)-1. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
73.
U.S. Bureau of the Census . 1983b. County business patterns. Various state issues. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
74.
U.S. Bureau of the Census . 1988. 1987 census of governments: Government organization. GC87(1)-1. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
75.
U.S. Bureau of the Census . 1989. Computer tapes of the 1987 census of governments. Washington, DC: Author.
76.
U.S. Bureau of the Census . 1994.1992 census of governments: Government organization. GC92(1)-1. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
77.
Vogel, R. K.1992. Urban political economy, Broward County, Florida. Gainesville: Univ. Press of Florida.
78.
Vogel, R. K. , and B. E. Swanson. 1989. The growth machine versus the antigrowth coalition. Urban Affairs Quarterly25 (1): 63-85.
79.
Warren, R. O.1964. A municipal services market model of metropolitan organization. Journal of the American Institute of Planners30 (3): 193-204.
80.
Weiss, M. A. , and J. W. Watts. 1989. Community builders and community associations: The role of real estate developers in private residential governance. In Residential community associations: Private governments in the intergovernmental system?, Report A-112, edited by Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, 95-104. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
81.
Williams, O. P. , H. Herman, C. S. Liebman, and T. R. Dye. 1965. Suburban differences and metropolitan policies. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
82.
Wood, R. C.1961. 1400 governments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
