Cities commonly serve as implementation agencies for the state, raising questions regarding compliance and adaptation. This paper asks why cities facing similar national demands sometimes choose different implementation strategies. It argues that local implementation strategies are a function of city council interests and local implementation conditions. The argument is tested through a comprehensive study of new Danish legislation on vulnerable social housing areas introduced in 2018, which required 10 Danish cities to develop radical physical redevelopment plans for 15 designated areas. Drawing on extensive public documents, internal archives (over 13,000 pages), and 11 key elite interviews, the analysis reveals how local implementation strategies were strongly shaped by how well the new policy aligned with city council interests and local implementation conditions. In doing so, the study contributes to a theoretical integration of urban politics scholarship with the customization argument developed in U.S. federal and EU implementation research.
BazurliRaffaeleKaufmannDavid. 2023. “Insurgent Asylum Policies in European Cities: A Multi-Level Governance Perspective.” Urban Affairs Review59 (4): 1129–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874221091594.
3.
BengtssonBo. 2013. Varför så olika?: nordisk bostadspolitik i jämförande historiskt ljus. Vol. 2. Malmö: Égalité.
4.
Blom-HansenJens. 1999. “Policy-Making in Central‒Local Government Relations: Balancing Local Autonomy, Macroeconomic Control, and Sectoral Policy Goals.” Journal of Public Policy19 (3): 237–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X99000690.
5.
BoadwayRobinShahAnwar. 2009. Fiscal Federalism: Principles and Practice of Multiorder Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BondaroukElenaLiefferinkDuncanMastenbroekEllen. 2019. “Politics or Management? Analysing Differences in Local Implementation Performance of the EU Ambient Air Quality Directive.” Journal of Public Policy40 (3): 449–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x19000035.
7.
BorzelTanja A.2000. “Why There Is No ‘Southern Problem': On Environmental Leaders and Laggards in the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy7 (1): 141–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/135017600343313.
8.
ChoiSang OkBaeSang-SeokKwonSung-WookFeiockRichard. 2010. “County Limits: Policy Types and Expenditure Priorities.” The American Review of Public Administration40 (1): 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074008328171.
9.
ClineKurt D. 2003. “Influences on Intergovernmental Implementation: The States and the Superfund.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly3 (1): 66–83. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40421479.
10.
de Benedictis-KessnerJustinJonesDanielWarshawChristopher. 2024. “How Partisanship in Cities Influences Housing Policy.” American Journal of Political Science69 (1): 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12856.
11.
de Benedictis-KessnerJustinWarshawChristopher. 2016. “Mayoral Partisanship and Municipal Fiscal Policy.” The Journal of Politics78 (4): 1124–38. https://doi.org/10.1086/686308.
12.
EinsteinKatherine LevineKoganVladimir. 2016. “Pushing the City Limits: Policy Responsiveness in Municipal Government.” Urban Affairs Review52 (1): 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087414568027.
13.
FalknerGerdaTreibOliverHartlappMiriamLeiberSimone. 2005. Complying with Europe: EU Harmonisation and Soft Law in the Member States, Themes in European Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
14.
FerraroGianlucaFaillerPierre. 2024. “Biodiversity, Multi-Level Governance, and Policy Implementation in Europe: A Comparative Analysis at the Subnational Level.” Journal of Public Policy44 (3): 546–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x24000072.
GerberElisabeth R.HopkinsDaniel J.. 2011. “When Mayors Matter: Estimating the Impact of Mayoral Partisanship on City Policy.” American Journal of Political Science55 (2): 326–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00499.x.
GogginMalcolm L.BowmanAnn O.LesterJames P.LaurenceJ. O.. 1990. Implementation Theory and Practice: Toward a Third Generation. New York: HarperCollins.
19.
GollataJudith A. M.NewigJens. 2017. “Policy Implementation Through Multi-Level Governance: Analysing Practical Implementation of EU Air Quality Directives in Germany.” Journal of European Public Policy24 (9): 1308–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1314539.
HillMichaelHupePeter. 2022. Implementing Public Policy: An Introduction to the Study of Operational Governance. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
22.
KüblerDanielPaganoMichael A.. 2012. “Urban Politics as Multilevel Analysis.” In The Oxford Handbook of Urban Politics, edited by JohnPeterMossbergerKarenClarkeSusan E., 114–30. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
23.
LadnerAndreasKeufferNicolasBaldersheimHaraldHlepasNikosSwianiewiczPawelSteyversKristofNavarroCarmen. 2018. Patterns of Local Autonomy in Europe. 1st ed. Governance and Public Management Series. Cham: Springer International.
24.
LadnerAndreasKeufferNicolasBastianenAlexander. 2023. “Local Autonomy Around the World: The Updated and Extended Local Autonomy Index (LAI 2.0).” Regional & Federal Studies35 (2): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2023.2267990.
25.
LiebermanEvan S.2005. “Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research.” American Political Science Review99 (3): 435–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055405051762.
26.
LijphartArend. 1971. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.” American Political Science Review65 (3): 682–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955513.
27.
MatlandRichard E.1995. “Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory5 (2): 145–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037242.
28.
OomenBarbaraBaumgärtelMoritzMielletSaraDurmusElifSabchevTihomir. 2022. “Strategies of Divergence: Local Authorities, Law, and Discretionary Spaces in Migration Governance.” Journal of Refugee Studies34 (4): 3608–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feab062.
29.
PetersonPaul E.1981. City Limits. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
30.
PiersonPaul. 1993. “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change.” World Politics45 (4): 595–628. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950710.
31.
PressmanJeffrey L.WildavskyAaron. 1984 [1973]. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland; Or, Why It's Amazing that Federal Programs Work at All: This Being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration. 3rd ed. Oakland Project Series.Berkeley: University of California Press.
32.
PülzlHelgaTreibOliver. 2007. “Implementing Public Policy.” In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods, edited by FischerFrankMillerGerald J., 89–107. Baton Rouge: Taylor & Francis Group.
SchneiderAnneIngramHelen. 1993. “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy.” American Political Science Review87 (2): 334–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/2939044.
35.
SwitzerDavid. 2019. “Citizen Partisanship, Local Government, and Environmental Policy Implementation.” Urban Affairs Review55 (3): 675–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087417722863.
36.
TausanovitchChrisWarshawChristopher. 2014. “Representation in Municipal Government.” American Political Science Review108 (3): 605–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000318.
37.
ThomannEvaZhelyazkovaAsya. 2017. “Moving Beyond (Non-)Compliance: The Customization of European Union Policies in 27 Countries.” Journal of European Public Policy24 (9): 1269–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1314536.
38.
Van MeterDonald S.Van HornCarl E.. 1975. “The Policy Implementation Process: A Conceptual Framework.” Administration & Society6 (4): 445–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977500600404.
39.
WilsonJames Q.2000. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.
40.
WinterSøren C. 2012. “Implementation Perspectives: Status and Reconsideration.” In The SAGE Handbook of Public Administration, edited by PetersBrainard GuyPierreJon, 265–78. London: Sage.
41.
WittwerStefanHoferKatrinKaufmannDavid. 2023. “An Urban Take on Sustainable Development Policies and Corresponding Positioning Strategies.” npj Urban Sustainability3 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-022-00080-y.
42.
ZgagaTizianoThomannEvaGoubierMathieu. 2023. “European Union Versus Core State Powers: The Customisation of EU Fiscal Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy31 (9): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2217234.
43.
ZhelyazkovaAsyaThomannEva. 2022. “'I Did It My Way': Customisation and Practical Compliance with EU Policies.” Journal of European Public Policy29 (3): 427–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1859599.
44.
ZhelyazkovaAsyaThomannEvaRuffingEvaPrincenSebastiaan. 2024. “Differentiated Policy Implementation in the European Union.” West European Politics47 (3): 439–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2023.2257963.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
