Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study evaluates the impact of state planning environments on urban sprawl over a 20-year period. Leveraging the recent state planning policy evaluation by APA, we employed structural equation modeling to investigate the complex pathways influencing urban sprawl. Key mediating variables include urban population growth, expansion of developed areas, and changes in natural resource areas, while controlling shifts in service-sector employment. Our findings suggest that state-level planning significantly influences urban density and reduces urban sprawl. Thus, rather than relying only on special sprawl control tools, whose adoption and implementation are often politically contentious, communities could use a slew of common land use planning tools, supported by a strong state planning mandate. Stronger state planning can amplify the effectiveness of common planning tools and, support targeted instruments such as urban growth boundaries; this portfolio approach is less divisive and more feasible in many contexts yet still accommodates stronger controls where warranted.

Keywords

state planning mandate urban sprawl policy evaluation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahlquist

Delahanty

Frankel

Guest

. 2007. Smarten Up, Georgia! Georgia Planning Association, 32. www.tinyurl.com/jazn8js.

American Planning Association. 2022. “Survey of State Planning Laws: Land Use, Hazard Mitigation, and Climate Action.” ArcGIS StoryMaps. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/142eec1ae7fe42be915b6767ac811e40

Anthony

2003. “The Effects of Florida’s Growth Management Act on Housing Affordability.” Journal of the American Planning Association 69 (3): 282–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360308978020

Anthony

2004. “Do State Growth Management Regulations Reduce Sprawl?” Urban Affairs Review 39 (3): 376–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087403257798

Anthony

2017. “State Growth Management and Urban Sprawl Reduction: Lessons from Florida.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development 143 (4): 04017013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000393

Been

. 2005. “Impact Fees and Housing Affordability.” Cityscape 8 (1): 139–85. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20868573

Bollens

1992. “State Growth Management: Inter-Governmental Frameworks and Policy Objectives.” Journal of the American Planning Association 58: 454–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369208975829

Boyle

Mohamed

. 2007. “State Growth Management, Smart Growth and Urban Containment: A Review of the US and a Study of the Heartland.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 50 (5): 677–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560701475337

Bruekner

Jan

. 1997. “Infrastructure Financing and Urban Development: The Economics of Impact Fees.” Journal of Public Economics 66 (3): 383–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00036-4

10.

Burchell

R. W.

1997. “Economic and Fiscal Costs (and Benefits) of Sprawl.” The Urban Lawyer 29 (2): 159–80. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27895055

11.

Burge

Ihlanfeldt

Keith

. 2006. “Impact Fees and Single-Family Home Construction.” Journal of Urban Economics 60 (2): 284–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2006.03.002 .

12.

Burge

G. S.

Trosper

T. L.

Nelson

A. C.

Juergensmeyer

J. C.

Nicholas

J. C.

. 2013. “Can Development Impact Fees Help Mitigate Urban Sprawl?” Journal of the American Planning Association 79 (3): 235–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2014.901116 .

13.

Callies

D. L.

1992. “Dealing with Scarcity: Land use and Planning.” In Politics and Public Policy, edited by Smith

Z. A.

Pratt

, 130–45. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.

14.

Carruthers

J. I.

2002. “The Impacts of State Growth Management Programmes: A Comparative Analysis.” Urban Studies 39 (11): 1959–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098022000011317 .

15.

DeGrove

1984. Land, Growth and Politics. Chicago: Planners Press. 1989. Florida’s greatest challenge: Managing massive growth. In Implementation of the 1985 Growth Management Act: From planning to development regulations, edited by B. Brumback and M. J. Marvin, 1-8. Fort Lauderdale, FL: FAU/FIU Center for the Study of Environmental Problems.

16.

Dempsey

J. A.

Plantinga

A. J.

. 2013. “How Well do Urban Growth Boundaries Contain Development? Results for Oregon Using a Difference-in-Difference Estimator.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 43 (6): 996–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.10.002

17.

Dong

Gliebe

. 2012. “Assessing the Impacts of Smart Growth Policies on Home Developers in a Bi-State Metropolitan Area: Evidence from the Portland Metropolitan Area.” Urban Studies 49 (10): 2219–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011422575

18.

Downs

1999. “Some Realities About Sprawl and Urban Decline.” Housing Policy Debate 10: 955–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.1999.9521356

19.

Ewing

1994. “Characteristics, Causes and Effects of Sprawl: A Literature Review.” Environmental and Urban Issues 21: 1–15. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-387-73412-5_34

20.

Ewing

. 1997. “Is Los Angeles-Style Sprawl Desirable?” Journal of The American Planning Association 63 (1): 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369708975728

21.

Ewing

Lyons

Siddiq

Sabouri

Kiani

Hamidi

Choi

Ameli

. 2022. “Growth Management Effectiveness: A Literature Review.” Journal of Planning Literature 37 (3): 433–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122221077457 .

22.

Ewing

Reid

Meakins

Gail

Hamidi

Shima

Nelson

Arthur C.

. 2014. “Relationship Between Urban Sprawl and Physical Activity, Obesity, and Morbidity–Update and Refinement.” Health & Place 26: 118–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.12.008 .

23.

Fisher

1994. State and Local Public Finance. Chicago: Irwin Publishers.

24.

Gale

1992. “Eight State Sponsored Growth Management Programs—A Comparative Analysis.” Journal of the American Planning Association 58: 425–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369208975827

25.

Galster

Hanson

Ratcliffe

Wolman

Coleman

Freihage

. 2001. “Wrestling Sprawl to the Ground: Defining and Measuring an Elusive Concept.” Housing Policy Debate 12: 681–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2001.9521426

26.

Gordon

Richardson

. 2000. Critiquing sprawl’s critics (Cato Policy Analysis No. 365). Washington, DC: Cato Institute.

27.

Healy

R. G.

Rosenberg

J. S.

. 1979. Land Use and the States. 2d ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.

28.

Howell-Moroney

2007. “Studying the Effects of the Intensity of US State Growth Management Approaches on Land Development Outcomes.” Urban Studies 44 (11): 2163–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980701518958 .

29.

Huang

Liu

. 2018. “Delimiting Urban Growth Boundaries Using the CLUE-S Model with Village Administrative Boundaries.” Land Use Policy 82 (82): 422–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.028 .

30.

Kasowski

1991. “Oregon: Fifteen Years of Land use Planning.” In Balanced Growth: A Planning Guide for Local Government, edited by DeGrove

, 125–29. Washington, DC: International City Management Association.

31.

Kim

Steiner

R. L.

Yang

. 2014. “The Evolution of Transportation Concurrency and Urban Development Pattern in Miami-Dade County, Florida.” Urban Affairs Review 50 (5): 672–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087413518178 .

32.

Kim

J. Hong

. 2013. “Measuring the Containment and Spillover Effects of Urban Growth Boundaries: The Case of the Portland Metropolitan Area.” Growth and Change 44 (4): 650–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12028 .

33.

Klas

2011. “Florida Lawmakers Wipe Out 30 Years of Growth Management Law,” Tampa Bay Times, May 7. www.tinyurl.com/jhednw7

34.

Kline

J. D.

Thiers

Ozawa

C. P.

Yeakley

J. A.

Gordon

S. N.

. 2014. “How Well has Land-use Planning Worked Under Different Governance Regimes? A Case Study in the Portland, OR-Vancouver, WA Metropolitan Area, USA.” Landscape and Urban Planning 131: 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.07.013

35.

Knaap

Song

Nedovic-Budic

. 2007. “Measuring Patterns of Urban Development: New Intelligence for the War on Sprawl.” Local Environment 12 (3): 239–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830601183412

36.

Knaap

G. J.

Lewis

Chakraborty

June-Friesen

. 2022. Handbook on Smart Growth: Promise, Principles, and Prospects for Planning. Edward Elgar Publishing.

37.

Kozel

French

. 2000. Nation's Governors See Smart Growth as a Major Issue. Preservation frontline. Washington, DC: National Trust for Historic Preservation.

38.

Laidley

2016. “Measuring Sprawl: A New Index.” Recent Trends, and Future Research. Urban Affairs Review 52 (1): 66–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087414568812

39.

Landis

J. D.

1992. “Do Growth Controls Work?: A New Assessment.” Journal of the American Planning Association 58 (4): 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369208975831

40.

Landis

J. D.

2017. “The End of Sprawl? Not so Fast.” Housing Policy Debate 27 (5): 659–97. 10.1080/10511482.2017.1296014

41.

Landis

J. D.

2021. “Fifty Years of Local Growth Management in America.” Progress in Planning 145 (1): 100435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2019.100435

42.

Lopez

Hynes

H. P.

. 2003. “Sprawl in the 1990s: Measurement, Distribution and Trends.” Urban Affairs Review 38: 325–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087402238805

43.

McDonald

R. P.

1996. “Path Analysis with Composite Variables.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 31 (2): 239–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3102_5

44.

Moore

Nelson

A. C.

. 1994. “Lessons for Effective Urban-Containment and Resource-Land—Preservation Policy.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development 120: 157–71. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1994)120:4(157)

45.

Mullen

2015. State Impact Fee Enabling Acts. Duncan Associates. www.impactfees.com

46.

Nelson

A. C.

1986. “Using Land Markets to Evaluate Urban Containment Programs.” Journal of the American Planning Association 52 (2): 156–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368608976615

47.

Nelson

A. C.

1999. “Comparing States with and Without Growth Management Analysis Based on Indicators with Policy Implications.” Land Use Policy 16: 121–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(99)00009-5

48.

Nelson

A. C.

Nicholas

J. C.

Juergensmeyer

J. C.

. 2017. “Impact Fees and the Planning Connection.” In Impact Fees, 155–70. New York, NY: Routledge.

49.

Nelson

A. C.

Sanchez

. 2003. “Periodic Atlas of the Metroscape: Lassoing Urban Sprawl.” Metroscape. http://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/16141.

50.

O’Toole

2016. Why States must repeal Growth Management Laws. Cato Institute. https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/new-feudalism-why-states-must-repeal-growth-management-laws

51.

Paulsen

. 2013. “The Effects of Growth Management on the Spatial Extent of Urban Development, Revisited.” Land Economics 89 (2): 193–210. https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/landec/v89y2013ii1p193-210.html

52.

Pelham

. 1992. “Adequate Public Facilities Requirements: Reflections on Florida’s Concurrency System for Managing Growth.” Florida State University Law Review 19: 973–1052. https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol19/iss4/5/

53.

Pendall

1999. “Do Land-Use Controls Cause Sprawl?” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 26 (4): 555–71. https://doi.org/10.1068/b260555 .

54.

Pendall

2000. “Local Land Use Regulations and The Chain of Exclusion.” Journal of The American Planning Association 66 (2): 125–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360008976094

55.

Plantinga

A. J.

Bernell

. 2007. “The Association Between Urban Sprawl and Obesity: Is It a Two-Way Street?” Journal of Regional Science 47 (5): 857–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2007.00533.x .

56.

Ringle

Christian M.

Wende

Sven

Becker

Jan-Michael

. 2024. SmartPLS 4. Bönningstedt: SmartPLS. https://www.smartpls.com

57.

Rusk

. 2001. Inside Game/Outside Game. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

58.

Saiz

2010. “The Geographic Determinants of Housing Supply.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 125 (3): 1253–96. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.3.1253

59.

Salkin

1999. Smart Growth at Century’s end: The State of the States. Albany, NY: Government Law Center of the Albany Law School.

60.

Skidmore

Peddle

. 1998. “Do Development Impact Fees Reduce the Rate of Residential Development?” Growth and Change 29 (4): 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.1998.tb00026.x .

61.

Squires

2002. Urban Sprawl—Causes, Consequences and Policy Responses. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

62.

Staley

1999. The Sprawling of America: In Defense of the Dynamic City. Los Angeles: Reason Public Policy Institute.

63.

Steiner

1994. “Sprawl Can be Good.” Planning 60: 14–7.

64.

Tsou

K.-W.

. 2009. “Study of the Time-Spatial Influence of Urban Growth Boundary Strategy on Urban Land Development Patterns.” Journal of Planning 35: 43–64. https://doi.org/10.6404/jp.200901.0043

65.

Weitz

1999. “From Quiet Revolution to Smart Growth: State Growth Management Programs, 1960 to 1999.” Journal of Planning Literature 14: 266–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854129922092694

66.

Wright

1921. “Correlation and Causation.” Journal of Agricultural Research 20: 557–85. https://books.google.co.ao/books?id=lNNdIV_qpwIC&pg=PA557&hl=pt-PT&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=2#v=onepage&q&f=false

Influence of State Planning Environments on Urban Sprawl

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References