How do crises impact national policy debates? We map the discursive field around rental housing policy in the USA via online speech between 2015–2023 with a framework of six policy areas : (1) private rental, (2) subsidized rental, (3) state-owned, (4) pro-supply, (5) antidevelopment, and (6) fair housing. We measure activity on social media with 36 keywords to create a corpus of 12.7 million posts on the platform Twitter (now X), which proxies public discussion. We find that the crisis of COVID-19 expanded and changed the structure of discourse: from a smaller conversation pre-COVID-19 in which public and subsidized housing prevailed toward an explosion during the pandemic on eviction protections and rent controls, followed by a larger emphasis on discrimination. These differ from stated priorities of local elected officials. Our findings show that the crisis shifted policy debates toward greater government involvement and stronger tenant protections, suggesting that attention to state intervention intensifies during periods of crisis. We emphasize the growing significance of social media as data for understanding how ideas circulate about policy today, with repercussions for the public, researchers, and policymakers.
AbidAmanRoySanjit K.Lees-MarshmentJenniferDeyBidit L.MuhammadSyed S.KumarSatish. 2023. “Political Social Media Marketing: A Systematic Literature Review and Agenda for Future Research.” Electronic Commerce Research 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09636-7.
3.
AboodMeredith.2017. “Securitizing Suburbia : The Financialization of Single-Family Rental Housing and the Need to Redefine ‘Risk.’.” Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/111349.
AnimPatrick AmfoAsieduFrederick OkyereAdamsMatildaAcheampongGeorgeBoakyeErnestina. 2019. “‘Mind the Gap’: To Succeed in Marketing Politics, Think of Social Media Innovation.” Journal of Consumer Marketing36 (6): 806–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-10-2017-2409.
BailChristopher A.2012. “The Fringe Effect: Civil Society Organizations and the Evolution of Media Discourse About Islam Since the September 11th Attacks.” American Sociological Review77 (6): 855–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412465743.
8.
BarberáPabloCasasAndreuNaglerJonathanEganPatrick J.BonneauRichardJostJohn T.TuckerJoshua A.. 2019. “Who Leads? Who Follows? Measuring Issue Attention and Agenda Setting by Legislators and the Mass Public Using Social Media Data.” American Political Science Review113 (4): 883–901. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000352.
9.
BenferEmily A.VlahovDavidLongMarissa Y.Walker-WellsEvanPottengerJ. L.GonsalvesGreggKeeneDanya E.. 2021. “Eviction, Health Inequity, and the Spread of COVID-19: Housing Policy as a Primary Pandemic Mitigation Strategy.” Journal of Urban Health98 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-020-00502-1.
10.
BennettW. Lance. 2017. “Press–Government Relations in a Changing Media Environment.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. edited by KenskiKateJamiesonKathleen Hall. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.40.
BonillaYarimarRosaJonathan. 2015. “#Ferguson: Digital Protest, Hashtag Ethnography, and the Racial Politics of Social Media in the United States.” American Ethnologist42 (1): 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12112.
ByrneMichael.2020. “Generation Rent and the Financialization of Housing: A Comparative Exploration of the Growth of the Private Rental Sector in Ireland, the UK and Spain.” Housing Studies35 (4): 743–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2019.1632813.
16.
CardKenton.2022. “From the Streets to the Statehouse: How Tenant Movements Affect Housing Policy in Los Angeles and Berlin.” Housing Studies6 (39): 1395–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2022.2124236.
ChappleKarenLoukaitou-SiderisAnastasiaMillerAndrewZegerCody. 2022a. “The Role of Local Housing Policies in Preventing Displacement: A Literature Review.” Journal of Planning Literature38(2): 08854122221137859. November. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122221137859.
20.
ChappleKarenPoorthuisAteZookMatthewPhillipsEva. 2022b. “Monitoring Streets Through Tweets: Using User-Generated Geographic Information to Predict Gentrification and Displacement.” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science49 (2): 704–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083211025309.
21.
ChristophersBrett.2022. “The Role of the State in the Transfer of Value from Main Street to Wall Street: US Single-Family Housing After the Financial Crisis.” Antipode54 (1): 130–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12760.
DadasCaroline.2018. “Hashtag Activism: The Promise and Risk of ‘Attention.’.” In Social Writing/ Social Media: Publics, Presentations, and Pedagogies, edited by WallsDouglasVieStephanie, 17–36. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Press.
25.
DeFilippisJames (ed) 2016. Urban Policy in the Time of Obama. Minneapolis, MN: University Of Minnesota Press.
26.
DiasMarika.2021. “Paradox and Possibility: Movement Lawyering During the COVID-19 Housing Crisis.” CUNY Law Review24: 173.
27.
DicksonEric S.ScheveKenneth. 2006. “Social Identity, Political Speech, and Electoral Competition.” Journal of Theoretical Politics18 (1): 5–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629806059594.
DownsAnthony.1957. “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy.” Journal of Political Economy65 (2): 135–50. https://doi.org/10.1086/257897.
FieldsDesiree.2017. “Unwilling Subjects of Financialization.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research41 (4): 588–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12519.
35.
FieldsDesireeRaymondElora Lee. 2021. “Racialized Geographies of Housing Financialization.” Progress in Human Geography 45(6): 03091325211009299. April. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325211009299.
FreemarkYonah.2023. “Zoning Change: Upzonings, Downzonings, and Their Impacts on Residential Construction, Housing Costs, and Neighborhood Demographics.” Journal of Planning Literature 38(4): 08854122231166961. April. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122231166961.
GerberElisabeth R.LewisJeffrey B.. 2004. “Beyond the Median: Voter Preferences, District Heterogeneity, and Political Representation.” Journal of Political Economy112 (6): 1364–83. https://doi.org/10.1086/424737.
GrahamRoderickSmithShawn. 2016. “The Content of Our #Characters: Black Twitter as Counterpublic.” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity2 (4): 433–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649216639067.
45.
GranovetterMark.1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology91 (3): 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311.
46.
HackerJacob S.Hertel-FernandezAlexanderPiersonPaulThelenKathleen. 2021. “The American Political Economy: A Framework and Agenda for Research.” In The American Political Economy: Politics, Markets, and Power. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics, edited by Hertel-FernandezAlexanderHackerJacob S.ThelenKathleenPiersonPaul, 1–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009029841.001.
47.
HackerJacob S.Hertel-FernandezAlexanderPiersonPaulThelenKathleen. 2022. “The American Political Economy: Markets, Power, and the Meta Politics of US Economic Governance.” Annual Review of Political Science 25: 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-013916.
48.
HackerJacob S.PiersonPaul. 2019. “Policy Feedback in an Age of Polarization.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science685 (1): 8–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716219871222.
49.
HallMatthewCrowderKyleSpringAmy. 2015. “Neighborhood Foreclosures, Racial/Ethnic Transitions, and Residential Segregation.” American Sociological Review80 (3): 526–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415581334.
50.
HaperenSander vanUitermarkJustusNichollsWalter. 2023. “The Swarm Versus the Grassroots: Places and Networks of Supporters and Opponents of Black Lives Matter on Twitter.” Social Movement Studies22 (2): 171–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2022.2031954.
51.
HatchMegan E.2017. “Statutory Protection for Renters: Classification of State Landlord–Tenant Policy Approaches.” Housing Policy Debate27 (1): 98–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2016.1155073.
52.
HessDaniel BaldwinIacobucciEvanVäikoAnnika. 2017. “Network Connections and Neighbourhood Perception: Using Social Media Postings to Capture Attitudes among Twitter Users in Estonia.” Architecture and Urban Planning13 (1): 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1515/aup-2017-0010.
53.
ImbroscioDavid.2021. “Rethinking Exclusionary Zoning or: How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love It.” Urban Affairs Review57 (1): 214–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419879762.
54.
JacobsKeith.2015. “The ‘Politics’ of Australian Housing: The Role of Lobbyists and Their Influence in Shaping Policy.” Housing Studies30 (5): 694–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2014.1000833.
55.
JacobsKeithManziTony. 1996. “Discourse and Policy Change: The Significance of Language for Housing Research.” Housing Studies11 (4): 543–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673039608720874.
56.
JacobsKeithKemenyJimManziTony. 2023. “Power, discursive space and institutional practices in the construction of housing problems.” Housing Studies18 (4): 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030304252.
Le GalèsPatrickPiersonPaul. 2019. “‘Superstar Cities’ & the Generation of Durable Inequality.” Daedalus148 (3): 46–72. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01750.
64.
LeungLillianHepburnPeterDesmondMatthew. 2021. “Serial Eviction Filing: Civil Courts, Property Management, and the Threat of Displacement.” Social Forces100 (1): 316–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soaa089.
65.
LiuXinshengLindquistEricVedlitzArnoldVincentKenneth. 2010. “Understanding Local Policymaking: Policy Elites’ Perceptions of Local Agenda Setting and Alternative Policy Selection.” Policy Studies Journal38 (1): 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00345.x.
66.
ManvilleMichaelLensMichaelMonkkonenPaavo. 2020. “Zoning and Affordability: A Reply to Rodríguez-Pose and Storper.” Urban Studies 59(1): 0042098020910330. August. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020910330.
67.
ManvilleMichaelMonkkonenPaavo. 2021. “Unwanted Housing: Localism and Politics of Housing Development.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 44(2): 0739456X21997903. March. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X21997903.
68.
ManvilleMichaelMonkkonenPaavoLensMichael. 2020. “It’s Time to End Single-Family Zoning.” Journal of the American Planning Association86 (1): 106–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1651216.
69.
McCombsMaxwell E.ShawDonald L.. 1972. “The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly36 (2): 176–87. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990.
70.
MessamoreAndrew. 2014. “Housing movement coalitions in the United States: Trends from big networks among urban civil society leaders.” Urban Studies 61, no. 9 (2024): 1645–1665. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231213204
71.
MichenerJamilaSoRelleMallory. 2022. “Politics, Power, and Precarity: How Tenant Organizations Transform Local Political Life.” In Interest Groups in US Local Politics, edited by Sarah Anzia. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41309-021-00148-7.
72.
MyersDowellLeeHyojungSimmonsPatrick A.. 2020. “Cohort Insights into Recovery of Millennial Homeownership after the Great Recession.” Journal of Housing Economics, Life Cycle Consumption, Housing, and Homeownership 47 (March): 101619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2019.01.004
73.
NichollsWalterUitermarkJustusvan HaperenSander. 2021. “Dynamics of Distinction and Solidarity within Social Movements: Explaining Relations between Privileged and Underprivileged Groups in the U.S. Immigrant Rights Movement.” .” Sociological Perspectives 64(6l): 0731121421990067. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121421990067.
74.
PalmerMaxwellEinsteinKatherine Levine. 2019. Mayoral Views on Housing Production: Do Planning Goals Match Reality?December. https://open.bu.edu/handle/2144/39174.
PikettyThomasSaezEmmanuelZucmanGabriel. 2022. “Twenty Years and Counting: Thoughts about Measuring the Upper Tail.” The Journal of Economic Inequality20 (1): 255–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-022-09536-8.
78.
PolanyiKarl.1944. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
79.
PreeceJennyCrawfordJoeMcKeeKimFlintJohnRobinsonDavid. 2020. “Understanding Changing Housing Aspirations: A Review of the Evidence.” Housing Studies35 (1): 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2019.1584665.
80.
Rodriguez-PoseAndresStorperMichael. 2019. “Housing, Urban Growth and Inequalities: The Limits to Deregulation and Up-Zoning in Reducing Economic and Spatial Inequality.” Urban Studies 57(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019859458.
SchwartzAlex F.2021. Housing Policy in the United States. Milton Park: Routledge.
83.
SchweitzerLisa.2014. “Planning and Social Media: A Case Study of Public Transit and Stigma on Twitter.” Journal of the American Planning Association80 (3): 218–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2014.980439.
84.
SheltonTaylorPoorthuisAteZookMatthew. 2015. “Social Media and the City: Rethinking Urban Socio-Spatial Inequality Using User-Generated Geographic Information.” Landscape and Urban Planning142 (October): 198–211. Special Issue: Critical Approaches to Landscape Visualization. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.020.
85.
ShepherdEdMyersJohn. 2021. “Planning Reform–a ‘Tetralogue’.” Town & Country Planning312.
86.
Steinert-ThrelkeldZachary C. 2018. Twitter as Data. Elements in Quantitative and Computational Methods for the Social Sciences. Cambrige: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108529327.
87.
StieglitzStefanDang-XuanLinh. 2013. “Social Media and Political Communication: A Social Media Analytics Framework.” Social Network Analysis and Mining3 (4): 1277–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-012-0079-3.
88.
StoycheffElizabethPingreeRaymond J.PeiferJason T.SuiMingxiao. 2018. “Agenda Cueing Effects of News and Social Media.” Media Psychology21 (2): 182–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1311214.
89.
Stromer-GalleyJenniferRossiniPatríciaHemsleyJeffBoldenSarah E.McKernanBrian. 2021. “Political Messaging Over Time: A Comparison of US Presidential Candidate Facebook Posts and Tweets in 2016 and 2020.” Social Media + Society7 (4): 20563051211063465. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211063465.
90.
TausanovitchChrisWarshawChristopher. 2014. “Representation in Municipal Government.” American Political Science Review108 (3): 605–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000318.
TillyCharles.1999. “From Interactions to Outcomes in Social Movements.” In How Social Movements Matter, edited by GiugniMarcoMcAdamDougTillyCharles. Vol. 10, 253–70. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
VerseyH. Shellae. 2021. “The Impending Eviction Cliff: Housing Insecurity During COVID-19.” American Journal of Public Health111 (8): 1423–27. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306353.
97.
WangQiPhillipsNolan EdwardSmallMario L.SampsonRobert J.. 2018. “Urban Mobility and Neighborhood Isolation in America’s 50 Largest Cities.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115 (30): 7735–40. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1802537115.
YoderJesse.2020. “Does Property Ownership Lead to Participation in Local Politics? Evidence from Property Records and Meeting Minutes.” American Political Science Review114 (4): 1213–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000556.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
