Research on the relation between cities and democracy focuses on the city as an urban form and as a democratic imaginary generative of radical democratic practices. Established institutions of local and state government are often construed as barriers to such practices. There is a need to explore possible forms of territorial government bodies and modes of governance that could be supportive to them instead. This paper traces the revival of local self-government in Poland as an emancipatory strategy against the communist regime and analyzes its recent resistance to the democratic backsliding of the authoritarian central government. By way of historical ontology and policy instrument analysis it shows that appropriately designed institutions of local government can spur democratic practices, and, if given time, these in turn can engender a robust culture of self-governance. It proposes that local self-government envisioned by Polish anti-communist opposition prefigures institutions supportive to radical urban democracy.
AngelJames. 2021. “New Municipalism and the State: Remunicipalising Energy in Barcelona, from Prosaics to Process.” Antipode53 (2): 524–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12687.
AntkowiakPaweł. 2011. “Decentralizacja Władzy Publicznej w Polsce Na Przykładzie Samorządu Terytorialnego.” Środkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne (2): 155–74. ISSN: 1731-7517.
ArpiniEmiliaPanezAlexanderCumbersAndrewPearsonBethia. 2022. “New Municipalism in South America? Developing Theory from Experiences in Argentina and Chile.” Urban Studies60 (11): 2290–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980221126269.
BeissingerMark. 2022. The Revolutionary City. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9.
BertolinMassimoSaloneCarlo. 2024. “Fixing New Municipalism Discretely and Discreetly. Power, Participation, and the Possibilities of Progressive Regimes.” Urban Geography: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2024.2355064.
BlancoIsmaelSalazarYunailisBianchiIolanda. 2019. “Urban Governance and Political Change Under a Radical Left Government: The Case of Barcelona.” Journal of Urban Affairs42 (1): 18–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1559648.
12.
BlaubergerMichaelNaurinDanielSedelmeierUlrichWunschNatasha. 2025. “The Multi-Level Politics of Countering Democratic Backsliding: State of the Art and New Research Directions.” Journal of European Public Policy32 (2): 323–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2418957.
13.
BookchinMurray. 1992. Urbanization Without Cities—The Rise and Decline of Citizenship. New York: Black Rose Books.
———. 2016. “Prawne Problemy Samorządu Terytorialnego z Perspektywy 25-Lecia Jego Funkcjonowania—Ujęcie Aksjologiczne.” In Prawne Problemy Samorządu Terytorialnego z Perspektywy 25-Lecia Jego Funkcjonowania, edited by BudziszRafałJaworska-DębskaBarbara, 3–17. C.H. Beck.
16.
BuzogányAronSpöriTobias. 2024. “Cities Against Democratic Backsliding: Democratic Resilience Through Urban Resistance in the Visegrád 4 Capitals.” Contemporary Politics: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2024.2394345.
———. 2024. “The Dialectic of the Urban Democracy: The Post-Democratic or the Democratizing City?” In Reclaiming Democracy in Cities, edited by CoşkunGülçinİnal-ÇekiçTubaTombuşErtuğ, 15–29. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003404736-3.
19.
DąbrowskaAnna. 2024. “Narzędzia partycypacji lokalnej w Polsce w 2023 roku.” Stefan Batory Foundation, Warsaw.
20.
DolewkaZofia. 2017. “Funkcjonowanie spółek komunalnych w Polsce.” Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego We Wrocławiu (477): 59–72. https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2017.477.05.
21.
EurEau. 2021. Europe’s Water in Figures. Brussels: European Federation of National Associations of Water Services.
22.
Fernández-MartínezJosé LuisGarcía-EspínPatriciaAlarcónPau. 2023. “Assessing the New Municipalism Reform of Advisory Councils: The Cases of Madrid and Barcelona (2015–2019).” Urban Affairs Review59 (5): 1567–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874221109444.
GendźwiłłAdamWiszejko-WierzbickaDorota. 2022. “Polki i Polacy o Samorządności. W Poszukiwaniu Obywatelskiej Opowieści o Samorządzie Lokalnym: Raport z Badań.” Stefan Batory Foundation, Warsaw.
25.
GiovanniniAriannaGriggsSteven. 2024. “Addressing the Elephant in the Room: What’s the Local in Local Government Studies?” Local Government Studies50 (6): 989–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2024.2359456.
26.
HackingIan. 2002. Historical Ontology. Harvard University Press.
———. 2019. “The Self-Government Constitutes an Essential Element of the Civil Security in Polish Political Thought After 1989.” Polish Political Science Yearbook2 (48): 232–41. https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2019203.
29.
———. 2020. “Changes in Local Autonomy Index in Central and Eastern Europe After 1990.” Studia Politologiczne53 (September): 11–27. https://doi.org/10.33896/SPolit.2019.53.1.
JanoschkaMichaelMotaFabiola. 2021. “New Municipalism in Action or Urban Neoliberalisation Reloaded? An Analysis of Governance Change, Stability and Path Dependence in Madrid (2015–2019).” Urban Studies58 (13): 2814–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020925345.
32.
JelačaDijanaLugarićDanijela. 2018. “The ‘Radiant Future’ of Spatial and Temporal Dis/Orientations.” In The Future of (Post)Socialism, edited by BailynJohn FrederickJelačaDijanaLugarićDanijela, 1–16. State University of New York Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.18254539.6.
33.
KassimHusseinLe GalèsPatrick. 2010. “Exploring Governance in a Multi-Level Polity: A Policy Instruments Approach.” West European Politics33 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380903354031.
34.
———. 2022. “Komisja Nadzwyczajna Do Spraw Klimatu (77.), Komisja Samorządu Terytorialnego i Administracji Państwowej (187.) Oraz Komisja Środowiska (87.).” October 24.
35.
KuleszaMichał. 2008. Budowanie Samorządu: Wybór Tekstów Ze “Wspólnoty” 1990-2007. Municipium.
36.
LascoumesPierreLe GalèsPatrick. 2007. “Introduction: Understanding Public Policy Through Its Instruments—From the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation.” Governance20 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00342.x.
37.
LipowiczIrena. 2009. “Ustrojowe Aspekty Reformy Samorządowej w Latach 1990-1998 w Świetle Współczesnych Wyzwań Wobec Administracji Publicznej.” Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny (2): 143–60.
38.
———. 2024. “Local Data Bank.”
39.
MarchartOliver. 2007. Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh University Press.
40.
MarstonSallie AJonesJohn PaulWoodwardKeith. 2005. “Human Geography Without Scale.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers30 (4): 416–32. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3804505.
41.
McDonaldDavid A.2018. “Remunicipalization: The Future of Water Services?” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences91: 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.02.027.
42.
MerényiMiklós M.2020. “Empowering Local Self-Government—Cooperation Between Advocacy Groups and Local Governments in Hungary, Poland and Romania.” K-Monitor, Budapest.
43.
MilanChiara. 2022. “From the Streets to the Town Halls: Municipalist Platforms in the Post-Yugoslav Space.” Urban Studies60 (11): 2158–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980221090134.
44.
———, MilburnKeirHeronKai. 2022. “Strategies for a New Municipalism: Public–Common Partnerships Against the New Enclosures.” Urban Studies60 (11): 2133–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980221094700.
45.
MisztalBarbaraMisztalBronisław. 1984. “Urban Social Problems in Poland: The Macrosocial Determinants.” Urban Affairs Quarterly19 (3): 315–28.
MullerDenis. 2021. “Enemies of Democracy: Populism and Scapegoating.” In Journalism and the Future of Democracy, 27–38. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76761-7_3.
48.
NoringLuiseOhlerLaura PriscaStruthersDavid. 2020. “City Government Capacity and Patterns in Urban Development Project Governance.” Urban Affairs Review57(5): 1343–71.
49.
O’DwyerConorStenbergMatthew. 2022. “Local-Level Democratic Backsliding? The Consolidation of Aspiring Dominant-Party Regimes in Hungary and Poland.” Government and Opposition57 (3): 508–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.12.
50.
OstDavid. 2018. “The Endless Innovations of the Semiperiphery and the Peculiar Power of Eastern Europe.” In The Future of (Post)Socialism. Vol. 1, edited by BailynJohn FrederickJelačaDijanaLugarićDanijela, 19–50. State University of New York Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.18254539.7.
PaulFranziska ChristinaCumbersAndrew. 2021. “The Return of the Local State? Failing Neoliberalism, Remunicipalisation, and the Role of the State in Advanced Capitalism.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space55 (1): 165–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211050407.
RadomskiGrzegorz. 2017. Spory o Samorząd Terytorialny w Polskiej Myśli Politycznej Po 1989 Roku. 1st ed. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
57.
RegulskaJoanna. 1996. “Building Democracy at the Local Level: The Case of Poland.” In Fortifying the Foundation: U.S. Support for Developing and Strengthening Democracy in East Central Europe, edited by LazarM, 32–9. New York: International Institute of Education.
58.
RegulskiJerzy. 2003. Local Government Reform in Poland; an Insider’s Story. Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative, Open Society Institute.
59.
RothLauraRussellBertieThompsonMatthew. 2023. “Politicising Proximity: Radical Municipalism as a Strategy in Crisis.” Urban Studies60 (11): 2009–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231173825.
60.
Rubio-PueyoVicente. 2017. “Municipalism in Spain: From Barcelona to Madrid, and Beyond.” New York. https://www.rosalux-nyc.org.
61.
RussellBertie. 2019. “Beyond the Local Trap: New Municipalism and the Rise of the Fearless Cities.” Antipode51 (3): 989–1010. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12520.
62.
———, KeirMilburnHeronKai. 2023. “Strategies for A New Municipalism: Public–Common Partnerships Against the New Enclosures.” Urban Studies60 (11): 2133–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980221094700.
63.
SadurskiWojciech. 2019. “Polish Constitutional Tribunal Under PiS: From an Activist Court, to a Paralysed Tribunal, to a Governmental Enabler.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law11 (1): 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40803-018-0078-1/METRICS.
SørensenRune J.2007. “Does Dispersed Public Ownership Impair Efficiency? The Case of Refuse Collection in Norway.” Public Administration85 (4): 1045–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-9299.2007.00681.X.
SwianiewiczPaweł. 2014. “Samorząd Jako Część Państwa i Samorząd Jako Wspólnota Obywateli –Ile Spójności, Ile Autonomii?” In 25 Lat Odrodzonego Samorządu w Polsce—Osiągnięcia, Porażki i Zadania Na Przyszłość, 24–5. Warsaw: Kancelaria Senatu.
69.
SwyngedouwErik. 2000. “Authoritarian Governance, Power, and the Politics of Rescaling.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18 (1): 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1068/d9s.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
