Transforming a Day-Laborer's Quarter into a Service Hub: An Analysis of the Case of Kotobuki in Yokohama,Japan,Using Public Choice and Neo-Hegelian Theories
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2025
Transforming a Day-Laborer's Quarter into a Service Hub: An Analysis of the Case of Kotobuki in Yokohama,Japan,Using Public Choice and Neo-Hegelian Theories
The inadequate provision of welfare services has long represented a persisting issue in addressing urban poverty, especially in districts where poverty converges. One such district, once a day laborer's quarter, is Kotobuki of Yokohama. However, given that Kotobuki is now recognized as a welfare center, this study analyzes why the abovementioned transformation occurred. Previous research examining this question focused especially on the role of civil society, neglecting that of the city government, despite its crucial role in providing welfare services. Furthermore, few studies have employed robust theories in their analysis. Against this background, this study aims to bridge these gaps, conducting in-depth interviews with city government officials and civil society personnel while using public choice and neo-Hegelian theories. The findings provide useful implications for policymakers in day laborers’ quarters worldwide, as well as insight into future welfare strategies, informing the development of public policies to address urban poverty.
AokiHideo. 2003. “Homelessness in Osaka: Globalisation, Yoseba, and Disemployment.” Urban Studies40 (2): 361–78.
2.
AokiHideo. 2006. Japan’s Underclass: Day Laborers and the Homeless. Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.
3.
BoldyrevIvanHerrmann-PillathCarsten. 2013. “Moral Sentiments, Institutions, and Civil Society: What Can Hegel Contribute to Sen’s Theory of Justice?” Review of Social Economy71 (4): 502–25.
4.
BoothPhilip. 2013. “State Pension Reform in a Public Choice Framework.” North American Actuarial Journal17 (1): 82–97.
5.
BoyneGeorge A. 1997. “Public Choice Theory and Local Government Structure: an Evaluation of Reorganisation in Scotland and Wales.” Local Government Studies23 (3): 56–72.
6.
BrennanGeoffreyHamlinAlan. 2008. “Revisionist Public Choice Theory.” New Political Economy13 (1): 77–88.
7.
BuchananJames M.1987. “The Constitution of Economic Policy.” Science236 (4807): 1433–36.
8.
BuchananJames M.MusgraveA. M.. 1999. Public Finance and Public Choice: Two Contrasting Visions of the State. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
CaldarolaCarlo. 1968. “The Doya-Gai: A Japanese Version of Skid Row.” Pacific Affairs41 (4): 511–25.
DearMichaelWolchJenniferWiltonRobert. 1994. “The Service Hub Concept in Human Services Planning.” Progress in Planning42 (3): 173–271.
12.
DeVerteuilGeoff. 2023. “Service Hubs: Stuck in Time, Stuck in Place.” In Diversity of Urban Inclusivity: Perspectives Beyond Gentrification in Advanced City-Regions, edited by MizuuchiT.KornatowskiG.FukumotoT., 121–35. Berlin: Springer.
13.
DeVerteuilGeoffKienerJohannesMizuuchiToshio. 2022. “The Service Hub as Bypassed Social Infrastructure: Evidence From Inner-City Osaka.” Urban Geography43 (5): 669–87.
14.
DeVerteuilGeoffMarrMatthew D.KienerJohannes. 2022. “Managing Service Hubs in Miami and Osaka: Between Capacious Commons and Meagre Street-Level Bureaucracies.” EPC: Politics and Space40 (6): 1256–71.
15.
EcclestonSara M. PerishoGuptaJyotiPerkinsDouglas. 2018. “Critical Perspectives on Neighborhood Engagement and Participatory Development.” In Neighborhood Change and Neighborhood Action: The Struggle to Create Neighborhoods that Serve Human Needs, edited by Allen HayesR., 1–25. Lanham, Boulder, New York, and London: Lexington Books.
16.
FikeRosemarieGwartneyJames. 2015. “Public Choice, Market Failure, and Government Failure in Principles Textbooks.” The Journal of Economic Education46 (2): 207–18.
17.
FrasureLorrie A.Jones-CorreaMichael. 2010. “The Logic of Institutional Interdependency: The Case of Day Laborer Policy in Suburbia.” Urban Affairs Review45 (4): 451–82.
18.
FreyBruno S.StutzerAlois. 2010. “Happiness and Public Choice.” Public Choice144 (3-4): 557–73.
19.
FukuyamaFrancis. 2001. “Social Capital, Civil Society and Development.” Third World Quarterly22 (1): 7–20.
20.
GibbsLindaBainbridgeJayRosenblattMuzzyMammoTamiru. 2021. How Ten Global Cities Take on Homelessness: Innovations that Work. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
21.
GillTom. 2015. Yokohama Street Life: The Precarious Life of a Japanese Day Laborer. Blue Ridge Summit, PA: Lexington Books.
22.
GlassMichael R.2018. “Navigating the Regionalism-Public Choice Divide in Regional Studies.” Regional Studies52 (8): 1150–61.
23.
GurkanCeyhun. 2021. “The Constitution of Neoliberal Governmentality from Early Neoclassical Economics to Public Choice Theory.” In Power and Influence of Economies, edited by MaesseJ.PühringerS.RossierT.BenzP., 73–89. London and New York: Routledge.
24.
HarveyD.WachsmuthD.. 2009. “What Is To Be Done? And Who the Hell Is Going To Do It?” In Cities for People, Not for Profit: Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City, edited by BrennerN.MarcuseP.MayerM., 246–74. London and New York: Routledge.
25.
HasegawaMiki. 2005. “Economic Globalization and Homelessness in Japan.” American Behavioral Scientist48 (8): 989–1012.
26.
HasegawaMiki. 2006. We Are Not Garbage: The Homeless Movement in Tokyo, 1994–2002. New York and London: Routledge.
27.
HashitoShinjiroHsiaoHongweiKanaKoichi. 2021. “Study on the Regional Transformation of Local Community Caused by Tourism Development in Flophouse Area of Airin District Nishinari Ward, Osaka City.” Journal of the City Planning Institute of Japan56 (3): 1451–58.
28.
HayashiMahito. 2024. Rescaling Urban Poverty: Homeless, State Restructuring and City Politics in Japan. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
29.
HayesR. Allen. 2018a. “Neighborhood Action: Organization, Context, and Learning.” In Neighborhood Change and Neighborhood Action: The Struggle to Create Neighborhoods that Serve Human Needs, vii–xvi. Lanham, Boulder, New York, and London: Lexington Books.
30.
HayesR. Allen. 2018b. “Neighborhood Networks, Collective Action, and Public Safety.” In Neighborhood Change and Neighborhood Action: The Struggle to Create Neighborhoods that Serve Human Needs, 27–48. Lanham, Boulder, New York, and London: Lexington Books.
31.
HegelGeorge Wilhelm Friedrich. 2023. Elements of Philosophy of Right. London: Newcomb Livraria Press.
HochschildArlie Russell. 2018. Strangers in Their Own Land. New York: The New Press.
34.
IwataMasami. 2003. “Homelessness in Contemporary Japan.” In Comparing Social Policies: Exploring New Perspectives in Britain and Japan, edited by IzuharaM., 191–210. Policy Press.
KimJieun. 2016. “Necrosociality: Isolated Death and Unclaimed Cremains in Japan.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute22 (4): 843–63.
37.
KimJieun. 2018. “The Other City: Alternative Infrastructures of Care for the Underclass in Japan.” Asian Anthropology17 (1): 1–23.
38.
KitagawaYukihiko. 2021. “Homeless Policy as a Policy for Controlling Poverty in Tokyo: Considering the Relationship Between Welfare Measures and Punitive Measures.” Critical Sociology47 (1): 91–110.
39.
Kotobuki History Study Group. 2022. Yokohama Kotobuki-cho: Chiiki katsudo no syakai shi [Yokohama Kotobuki-cho: Social History of Local Activities]. Tokyo: Syakai Hyoron Sya.
40.
LipskyMichael. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
41.
MarrMatthew D.1997. “Maintaining Autonomy: The Plight of the American Skid Row and Japanese Yoseba.” Journal of Social Distress & the Homeless6 (3): 229–50.
42.
MarrMatthew D.2015. Better Must Come: Exiting Homelessness in Two Global Cities. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
43.
MorikawaMieKikuchiHideaki. 2013. “Seeking New Strategies: Recent Challenges for Social Work in Public Measures Targeting Poverty in Japan.” Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work & Development23 (1): 12–23.
44.
NishizawaAkihiko. 1990. “Yoseba-rodosya no syakai kankei to aidentiti [Day Laborers in Yoseba: Their Social Relationship and Identity in Sanya Area, Tokyo].” Japanese Sociological Review41 (3): 248–60.
45.
Osaka City. 2024. “Population, Aging Rate, and Welfare Recipient Rate of the Airin District.” Handout During the Meeting with Osaka City Hall on February 5, 2024.
46.
OsawaMachikoKimMyoung JungKingstonJeff. 2013. “Precarious Work in Japan.” American Behavioral Scientist57 (3): 309–34.
47.
PaganelliMaria Pia. 2008. “The Adam Smith Problem in Reverse: Self-Interest in the Wealth of Nations and the Theory of Moral Sentiments.” History of Political Economy40 (2): 365–82.
48.
PetachLuke. 2023. “The Samuels-Buchanan Correspondence and the Lost Opportunity for a Positive Public Choice Scholarship.” Journal of Economic Issues57 (3): 760–76.
49.
PianoEnnio E.2019. “State Capacity and Public Choice: A Critical Survey.” Public Choice178 (1-2): 289–309.
50.
PressmanSteven. 2004. “What Is Wrong with Public Choice.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics27 (1): 3–18.
51.
RidderHans-Gerd. 2017. “The Theory Contribution of Case Study Research Designs.” Business Research10 (2): 281–305.
52.
SamuelsWarren J.2000. “Buchanan and Musgrave on Public Finance and Public Choice: A Review Essay.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought22 (4): 499–507.
53.
ScaramuzzinoRobertoSuterBrigitte. 2020. “Holding Course: City Society Organizations’ Value Expressions in the Swedish Legislative Consultation System Before and After 2015.” In Europe and the Refugee Response, edited by GozdziakElzbieta M.MainIzabellaSuterBrigitte, 166–84. London: Routledge.
54.
SmithRebecca. 2008. “Legal Protections and Advocacy for Contingent or “Casual” Workers in the United States: A Case Study in Day Labor.” Social Indicators Research88 (1): 197–213.
55.
SmithAdam. 2009. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. New York: Penguin Books.
56.
StevensCarolyn. S.1997. On the Margins of Japanese Society. London and New York: Routledge.
57.
StillmanPeter G.1980. “Hegel’s Civil Society: A Locus of Freedom.” Polity12 (4): 622–46.
58.
SuzukiTomiyuki. 2011. “Evolution of Accommodations in the Sanya District, Tokyo Metropolis.” Journal of Geography120 (3): 466–85.
59.
TodaNoriki. 2020. “Historical Transition of Policy Trends Regarding Independence and Self-Help in the Welfare System.” Social Policy11 (3): 77–90.
60.
TrägårdhLars. 2010. “Rethinking the Nordic Welfare State Through A neo-Hegelian Theory of State and Civil Society.” Journal of Political Ideologies15 (3): 227–39.
WillseCraig. 2015. The Value of Homelessness: Managing Surplus Life in the United States. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
63.
WoolstonSavannah. 2016. “Homelessness on Los Angeles’ Skid Row: A Theory of [Responsibility].” University Honors Program of Loyola Marymount University, Honors Thesis.
64.
YamadaSeiki. 2020. Kotobuki-cho on hitobito [People in Kotobuki]. Tokyo: Asahi Shinbun sya.
65.
YamamotoKaoruko. 2013. “Changes and Restructuring of Social Issues of the Urban Underclass Area with Increasing Welfare Needs in Kotobuki Yokohama.” The Annals of Japan Association for Urban Sociology2013 (31): 95–110.
66.
YamamotoKaoruko. 2014. “Social Inclusion/Exclusion in Urban Underclass Area for Those Experiencing Welfare Dependency: Focusing on ‘Housing First’ Approach for the Homeless People in Vancouver, Canada.” The Annual Review of Sociology2014 (27): 208–19.
67.
YamamotoKaoruko. 2023. “The Impact of Increasing Welfare Needs on the Social Structure of Urban Underclass Communities: A Case of Kotobuki, Yokohama.” In Diversity of Urban Inclusivity: Perspectives Beyond Gentrification in Advanced City-Regions, edited by MizuuchiT.KornatowskiG.FukumotoT., 121–35. Berlin: Springer.
68.
YinRobert K.2018. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
69.
Yokohama City. 2022. “Transition of the Number of Guests at Simple Lodging Houses.” Handout during the Meeting with Yokohama City Hall on July 25, 2022.
