Recent opposition to Olympic bids in American cities underscores some residents’ disapproval of their cities hosting mega-events. In this study, I test whether partisanship plays a role in residents’ support for a local Olympics bid using survey data from Houston, Texas in 2001 and Colorado statewide surveys from 2022 and 2023. I find that Republicans and conservatives were indeed less supportive of using public funds for the Houston 2012 bid. However, the Colorado 2022 survey indicates Republicans were more supportive of Denver entering a host bid. To test whether explicitly priming residents to consider public spending activates partisanship, respondents of the 2023 Colorado survey received one of two versions of the Olympics bid question, the second of which explicitly mentions spending public funds to win a bid. Results demonstrate that interacting partisanship with the public spending treatment indeed leads to less support for such projects, particularly among Republicans and independents.
AhlfeldtGabrielMaennigWolfgang. 2010. “Stadium Architecture and Urban Development from the Perspective of Urban Economics.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research34 (3): 629–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00908.x.
American Politics Research Lab. 2022. “Colorado Political Climate Survey.” University of Colorado Boulder.
5.
American Politics Research Lab. 2023. “Colorado Political Climate Survey.” University of Colorado Boulder.
6.
AndranovichGregBurbankMatthew J.. 2021. “Chicago 2016 Olympic Bid and Opposition.” Contesting the Olympics in American Cities: Chicago 2016, Boston 2024, Los Angeles2028: 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5094-9_2.
BaadeRobert A.MathesonVictor A.. 2004. “The Quest for the Cup: Assessing the Economic Impact of the World Cup.” Regional Studies38 (4): 343–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/03434002000213888.
BartelsLarry M.2005. “Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind.” Perspectives on Politics3 (1): 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592705050036.
BergAdam.2016. Denver 76’: The Winter Olympics and the Politics of Growth. State College, PA: Penn State University.
13.
BernstockPenny.2013. “Tensions and Contradictions in London’s Inclusive Housing Legacy.” International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development5 (2): 154–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2013.847839.
14.
BorgersJulieVanreuselBartScheerderJeroen. 2013. “The Diffusion of World Sports Events Between 1891 and 2010: A Study on Globalisation.” European Journal for Sport and Society10 (2): 101–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/16138171.2013.11687914.
15.
BreckenridgeJames N.MoghaddamFathali M.. 2012. “Globalization and a Conservative Dilemma: Economic Openness and Retributive Policies.” Journal of Social Issues68 (3): 559–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01763.x.
16.
BuckmanStephenMackElizabeth A.. 2012. “The Impact of Urban Form on Downtown Stadium Redevelopment Projects: A Comparative Analysis of Phoenix and Denver.” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability5 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2012.659071.
17.
BurbankMatthew J.HeyingCharles H.AndranovichGreg. 2000. “Antigrowth Politics or Piecemeal Resistance? Citizen Opposition to Olympic-Related Economic Growth.” Urban Affairs Review35 (3): 334–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/107808740003500303.
18.
CheYiLuYiPierceJustin R.SchottPeter K.TaoZhigang. 2022. “Did Trade Liberalization with China Influence US Elections?” Journal of International Economics139: 103652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2022.103652.
CoatesDennisWickerPamela. 2015. “Why Were Voters Against the 2022 Munich Winter Olympics in a Referendum?” International Journal of Sport Finance10 (3): 267–83.
21.
CopeMichael R.FlahertyJeremyYoungKirk D.BrownRalph B.. 2015. “Olympic Boomtown: The Social Impacts of a One-Time Mega-Event in Utah’s Heber Valley.” Sociological Spectrum35 (2): 136–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2014.1000553.
22.
EssexStephenChalkleyBrian. 2004. “Mega-Sporting Events in Urban and Regional Policy: A History of the Winter Olympics.” Planning Perspectives19 (2): 201–04. https://doi.org/10.1080/0266543042000192475.
23.
FloridaRichard.2012. The Rise of the Creative Class Revisited, 10th Anniversary ed.New York: Basic Books.
24.
FrenchSteven P.DisherMike E.. 1997. “Atlanta and the Olympics: A One-Year Retrospective.” Journal of the American Planning Association63 (3): 379–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369708975930.
25.
GerberAlan S.HuberGregory A.DohertyDavidDowlingConor M.. 2012. “Personality and the Strength and Direction of Partisan Identification.” Political Behavior34: 653–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-011-9178-5.
26.
GoldJohn R.GoldMargaret M.. 2010. “Introduction.” In Olympic Cities City Agendas, Planning, and the World’s Games, 1896–2016, 2nd ed., edited by GoldJohn R.GoldMargaret M., 21–34. London: Routledge.
27.
GuerraFernando J.GilbertBrianneSolisBerto. 2017. “LA Residents and the 2028 Olympics.” Data Briefs. 16.
28.
GursoyDoganMilitoMarcelo ChiarelliNunkooRobin. 2017. “Residents’ Support for a Mega-Event: The Case of the 2014 FIFA World Cup, Natal, Brazil.” Journal of Destination Marketing & Management6 (4): 344–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.09.003.
HayesDanny.2005. “Candidate Qualities Through a Partisan Lens: A Theory of Trait Ownership.” American Journal of Political Science49 (4): 908–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00163.x.
31.
HillerHarry H.2021. “The Calgary 2026 Olympic Bid Plebiscite as Affective Urbanism.” Journal of Sport and Social Issues45 (6): 487–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/019372352096497.
32.
HillerHarry H.WannerRichard A.. 2018a. “Public Opinion in Olympic Cities: From Bidding to Retrospection.” Urban Affairs Review54 (5): 962–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087416684036.
33.
HillerHarry H.WannerRichard A.. 2018b. “The Psycho-Social Impact of the Olympics as Urban Festival: A Leisure Perspective.” In Leveraging Mega-Event Legacies, edited by GrixJonathan, 58–74. London: Routledge.
JuddDennis R.2015. “Building the Tourist City: Editor’s Introduction.” In The Infrastructure of Play, edited by JuddDennis R., 3–16. London: Routledge.
39.
KaradakisKostasKaplanidouKikiKarlisGeorge. 2016. “Host and Non-Host Resident Awareness and Perceptions of Legacies for the 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympic Games.” Loisir et Société/Society and Leisure39 (2): 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.2016.1198594.
40.
Kassens-NoorEva.2010. “Olympic Transport.” In Olympic Cities City Agendas, Planning, and the World’s Games, 1896–2016, 2nd ed., edited by GoldJohn R.GoldMargaret M., 273–286. London: Routledge.
41.
KennellyJacquelineWattPaul. 2011. “Sanitizing Public Space in Olympic Host Cities: The Spatial Experiences of Marginalized Youth in 2010 Vancouver and 2012 London.” Sociology45 (5): 765–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511413425.
42.
KimHyun JeongGursoyDoganLeeSoo-Bum. 2006. “The Impact of the 2002 World Cup on South Korea: Comparisons of Pre-and Post-Games.” Tourism Management27 (1): 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2004.07.010.
43.
KlarSamaraKrupnikovYanna. 2016. Independent Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
KlinebergStephen L.2015. Kinder Houston Area Survey, 1982-2014: Successive Representative Samples of Harris County Residents. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20428.v4
45.
LauermannJohn.2022. “The Declining Appeal of Mega-Events in Entrepreneurial Cities: From Los Angeles 1984 to Los Angeles 2028.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space40 (6): 1203–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544211066101.
46.
LeeChoong-KiTaylorTracy. 2005. “Critical Reflections on the Economic Impact Assessment of a Mega-Event: The Case of 2002 FIFA World Cup.” Tourism Management26 (4): 595–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2004.03.002.
47.
LewisPaul G.2015. “Moral Intuitions and Smart Growth: Why Do Liberals and Conservatives View Compact Development So Differently?” Journal of Urban Affairs37 (2): 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12172.
48.
LoweryDavidSigelmanLee. 1981. “Understanding the Tax Revolt: Eight Explanations.” American Political Science Review75 (4): 963–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962296.
49.
MuñozFrancesc.2006. “Olympic Urbanism and Olympic Villages: Planning Strategies in Olympic Host Cities, London 1908 to London 2012.” The Sociological Review54 (2_suppl): 175–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00660.
50.
PR Newswire. 2001a. “Houston Makes the ‘Short List’ of U.S. City Candidates for the 2012 Olympic Games Bid.” PR Newswire Association LLC. October 26. link.gale.com/apps/doc/A79480790/GRNR?u=coloboulder&sid=ebsco&xid=02ca928f.
51.
PR Newswire. 2001b. “Houston’s Bid for the 2012 Olympic Games Gathers Steam, Endorsements Former President Bush, James Baker Among Leaders Announcing Support.” PR Newswire Association LLC. November 19.link.gale.com/apps/doc/A80166703/GRNR?u=coloboulder&sid=ebsco&xid=938f5591.
52.
PropheterGeoffrey.2014. “Local Sales Tax Revenue Redistribution and Sports: The Case of Major League Soccer in Bridgeview.” Public Budgeting & Finance34 (3): 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12041.
RosinoMichael L.HugheyMatthew W.. 2016. “Who’s Invited to the (Political) Party: Race and Party Politics in the USA.” Ethnic and Racial Studies39 (3): 325–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2016.1096413.
ShovalNoam.2002. “A New Phase in the Competition for the Olympic Gold: The London and New York Bids for the 2012 Games.” Journal of Urban Affairs24 (5): 583–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9906.00146.
59.
SkocpolThedaTervoCarolineWaltersKirsten. 2022. “Social Justice Campaigns and Democratic Party Gains: How Georgia’s Partisan Reformers Overtook North Carolina’s Moral Advocates.” Studies in American Political Development36 (2): 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X22000050.
60.
SmithAndrew.2010. “Urban Regeneration.” In Olympic Cities City Agendas, Planning, and the World’s Games, 1896–2016, 2nd ed., edited by GoldJohn R.GoldMargaret M., 237–249. London: Routledge.
61.
TeetzelSarahDichterHeather L.. 2021. “Olympic History and Legacy: New Research in Bidding for and Hosting the Olympic Winter Games.” The International Journal of the History of Sport38 (13-14): 1299–1311. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2021.2010928.
62.
TeslerMichael.2020. Post-Racial or Most-Racial? Race and Politics in the Obama Era. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
63.
Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. 2020. “Who Bears the Burden of a National Retail Sales Tax?” Tax Policy Center Briefing Book. Tax Policy Center: Urban Institute & Brookings Institution.
64.
VierhausChristopher.2019. “The International Tourism Effect of Hosting the Olympic Games and the FIFA World Cup.” Tourism Economics25 (7): 1009–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548166188143.
65.
VuolteenahoJaniWolnyMatthiasPuzeyGuy. 2021. “‘This Venue is Brought to You By…’: The Diffusion of Sports and Entertainment Facility Name Sponsorship in Urban Europe.” In Naming Rights, Place Branding, and the Cultural Landscapes of Neoliberal Urbanism, edited by Rose-RedwoodReubenVuolteenahoJaniYoungCraigLightDuncan, 16–37. London: Routledge.
WardStephen V.2010. “Promoting the Olympic City.” In Olympic Cities City Agendas, Planning, and the World’s Games, 1896–2016, 2nd ed., edited by GoldJohn R.GoldMargaret M., 168–186. London: Routledge.
WeedMike.2010. “Olympic Tourism.” In Olympic Cities City Agendas, Planning, and the World’s Games, 1896–2016, 2nd ed., edited by GoldJohn R.GoldMargaret M., 250–272. London: Routledge.
70.
WeilerStephan.2000. “Pioneers and Settlers in Lo-Do Denver: Private Risk and Public Benefits in Urban Redevelopment.” Urban Studies37 (1): 167–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/004209800234.
71.
WolakJenniferStapletonCarey E.. 2020. “Self-Esteem and the Development of Partisan Identity.” Political Research Quarterly73 (3): 609–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591291985155.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
