During the COVID-19 pandemic, school board members played a prominent role in deciding reopening plans. Using an original large-scale survey of board members, our goal is to understand how the polarized, political context of pandemic responses shaped the decision-making processes of members as they experienced dramatic increases in workload. We find school board members are much more likely to identify at the extremes of partisan identity, as strong Democrats or strong Republicans. How they identified mattered in who they trusted to tell them information, how much control they felt the board should have in the process of reopening plans, and who should interpret data about COVID. If the other party was in power at the state level, members from opposing parties had less trust in state sources. Most school board elections are nonpartisan, but that does not mean that the members themselves do not strongly identify with a party.
AchenChristopher H.BartelsLarry M.. 2017. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections do not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
AlsburyThomas L.2008. “School Board Member and Superintendent Turnover and the Influence on Student Achievement: An Application of the Dissatisfaction Theory.” Leadership and Policy in Schools7 (2): 202–29.
3.
AnziaSarah F.2011. “Election Timing and the Electoral Influence of Interest Groups.” The Journal of Politics73 (2): 412–27.
4.
AnziaSarah F.2021. “Party and Ideology in American Local Government: An Appraisal.” Annual Review of Political Science24: 133–50.
5.
AsenRobertGurkeDebConnersPamelaSolomonRyanGummElsa. 2013. “Research Evidence and School Board Deliberations: Lessons from Three Wisconsin School Districts.” Educational Policy27 (1): 33–63.
6.
BanducciSusan A.DonovanToddKarpJeffrey A.. 2004. “Minority Representation, Empowerment, and Participation.” The Journal of Politics66 (2): 534–56.
BerkmanMichaelPlutzerEric. 2005. Ten Thousand Democracies: Politics and Public Opinion in America’s School Districts. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
9.
BlissettRichard SLAlsburyThomas L. 2018. “Disentangling the Personal Agenda: Identity and School Board Members’ Perceptions of Problems and Solutions.” Leadership and Policy in Schools17 (4): 454–86.
10.
BrownNadia E.2017. “Black Women’s Pathways to the Statehouse: The Impact of Race/Gender Identities.” In Black Women in Politics, 81–96. New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
CareyJohn M.NiemiRichard G.PowellLynda W.MoncriefGary.. 2008. “2002 State Legislative Survey.” Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [Distributor]. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20960.v1.
12.
ChettyRajFriedmanJohn N.HendrenNathanielStepnerMichael. 2020. “The Economic Impacts of COVID-19: Evidence from a New Public Database Built Using Private Sector Data.” National Bureau of Economic Research.Working Paper 27431.
13.
ChristianAlvinJacobBrianSingletonJohn D.. 2022. Assessing School District Decision-Making: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Working Paper 30520 National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w30520.
14.
CollinsJonathan E. 2021b. “Who wants to reopen schools in a pandemic? Explaining public preferences reopening schools and public compliance with reopening orders during the COVID-19 pandemic.” Annenberg Ed Working Papers.https://www.edworkingpapers.com/ai21–448.
15.
CollinsJonathan.2021a. “Should School Boards be in Charge? The Effects of Exposure to Participatory and Deliberative School Board Meetings.” Peabody Journal of Education96 (3): 341–55.
16.
DanzbergerJacqueline P.CarolLila N.CunninghamLuvern L.KirstMichael W.McCloudBarbara A.UsdanMichael D.. 1987. “School Boards: The Forgotten Players on the Education Team.” The Phi Delta Kappan69 (1): 53–9.
17.
de Benedictis-KessnerJustinWarshawChristopher. 2020. “Politics in Forgotten Governments: The Partisan Composition of County Legislatures and County Fiscal Policies.” The Journal of Politics82 (2): 460–75.
18.
DeckmanMelissa.2007. “School Board Candidates and Gender: Ideology, Party, and Policy Concerns.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy28 (1): 87–117.
19.
DelagardelleMary L.2008. “The Lighthouse Inquiry: Examining the Role of School Board Leadership in the Improvement of Student Achievement.” In The Future of School Board Governance: Relevancy and Revelation, edited by AlsburyT. L., 191–223. Plymouth, MA: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
20.
DiemSarahFrankenbergEricaClearyColleen. 2015. “Factors That Influence School Board Policy Making: The Political Context of Student Diversity in Urban-Suburban Districts.” Educational Administration Quarterly51 (5): 712–52.
21.
DriscollDonnaHalcoussisDennisSvornyShirley. 2003. “School District Size and Student Performance.” Economics of Education Review22 (2): 193–201.
22.
FordMichael R.IhrkeDouglas M.. 2016. “Do School Board Governance Best Practices Improve District Performance? Testing the key Work of School Boards in Wisconsin.” International Journal of Public Administration39 (2): 87–94.
23.
FordMichael R.IhrkeDouglas M.. 2021. “Determinants of Priority Conflict on City School Boards.” Urban Education56 (10): 1815–35.
24.
GoldsteinDaniel ANWiedemannJohannes. 2022. “Who do you Trust? The Consequences of Partisanship and Trust for Public Responsiveness to COVID-19 Orders.” Perspectives on Politics20 (2): 412–38.
25.
GolosAleksandra M.HopkinsDaniel J.BhanotSyon P.ButtenheimAlison M.. 2022. “Partisanship, Messaging, and the COVID-19 Vaccine: Evidence from Survey Experiments.” American Journal of Health Promotion36 (4): 602–11.
26.
GrissomJason A.2010. “The Determinants of Conflict on Governing Boards in Public Organizations: The Case of California School Boards.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory20 (3): 601–27.
GrossmannMattReckhowSarahStrunkKatharine O.TurnerMeg. 2021. “All States Close but Red Districts Reopen: The Politics of In-Person Schooling During the COVID- 19 Pandemic.” Educational Researcher50 (9): 637–48. URL: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211048840.
29.
HartneyMichael T.FingerLeslie K.. 2022. “Politics, Markets, and Pandemics: Public Education’s Response to COVID-19.” Perspectives on Politics20 (2): 457–73.
30.
HessFrederick M.MeeksOlivia. 2010. School Boards Circa 2010: Governance in the Accountability Era. Washington D.C.: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
31.
HopkinsDaniel J.2018. The Increasingly United States.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Accessed September 10:2019.
32.
HowellSusan E.FaganDeborah. 1988. “Race and Trust in Government: Testing the Political Reality Model.” Public Opinion Quarterly52 (3): 343–50.
33.
ImaiKosukeKhannaKabir. 2016. “Improving Ecological Inference by Predicting Individual Ethnicity from Voter Registration Records.” Political Analysis24 (2): 263–72.
34.
JansaJoshua M.HansenEric R.GrayVirginia H.. 2019. “Copy and Paste Lawmaking: Legislative Professionalism and Policy Reinvention in the States.” American Politics Research47 (4): 739–67.
35.
KathleneLyn.1994. “Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” American Political Science Review88 (3): 560–76.
36.
KitchensKarin E.2021. “Partisan Politics and Public Education: Finding the Formula for (Electoral) Success.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly21 (1): 55–79.
37.
KitchensKarin E.HarrisSabrinaMillerKatherine. 2023. “What Matters in School Re-Opening Plans: An Analysis of the Impact of School Board Demographics.” Politics, Groups, and Identities: 1–33.
38.
LawlessJennifer L.2004. “Politics of Presence? Congresswomen and Symbolic Representation.” Political Research Quarterly57 (1): 81–99.
39.
LowandeKennethRitchieMelindaLauterbachErinn. 2019. “Descriptive and Substantive Representation in Congress: Evidence from 80,000 Congressional Inquiries.” American Journal of Political Science63 (3): 644–59.
40.
MacartneyHughSingletonJohn D.. 2018. “School Boards and Student Segregation.” Journal of Public Economics164: 165–82.
41.
MasonLilliana.2013. “The Rise of Uncivil Agreement: Issue Versus Behavioral Polarization in the American Electorate.” American Behavioral Scientist57 (1): 140–59.
42.
MasonLilliana.2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43.
McDermottMonika LJonesDavid R.. 2022. “Gender, Sex, and Trust in Government.” Politics & Gender18 (2): 297–320.
44.
MeierKenneth J.EnglandRobert E.. 1984. “Black Representation and Educational Policy: Are They Related?” The American Political Science Review78 (2): 392–403.
45.
MeierKenneth J.RutherfordAmanda. 2014. “Partisanship, Structure, and Representation: The Puzzle of African American Education Politics.” American Political Science Review108 (2): 265–80.
46.
MorelDomingo.2018. Takeover: Race, Education, and American Democracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47.
MountfordMeredithBrunnerC. Cryss. 2010. “Gendered Behavior Patterns in School Board Governance.” Teachers College Record112 (8): 2067–117.
NCES. 2021. Local Education Agency (School District) Universe Survey, v.1a—Provisional. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. 2021, v.1a. https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/files.asp#Fiscal:2,LevelId:5,SchoolYearId:35,Page:1.
50.
NortonRichard K.2007. “Planning for School Facilities: School Board Decision Making and Local Coordination in Michigan.” Journal of Planning Education and Research26 (4): 478–96.
51.
OliverJ. EricHaShang E.CallenZachary. 2012. Local Elections and the Politics of Small-Scale Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
PaysonJulia A.2017. “When Are Local Incumbents Held Accountable for Government Performance? Evidence from US School Districts.” Legislative Studies Quarterly42 (3): 421–48.
53.
ReckhowSarahHenigJeffrey R.JacobsenRebeccaLittJamie Alter. 2017. ““Outsiders with Deep Pockets”: The Nationalization of Local School Board Elections.” Urban Affairs Review53 (5): 783–811.
54.
ReingoldBeth.2008. “Women as Office Holders: Linking Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Political Women and American Democracy9: 128–47.
55.
Richardson JrLilliard E.FreemanPatricia K.. 1995. “Gender Differences in Constituency Service among State Legislators.” Political Research Quarterly48 (1): 169–79.
56.
ShoberArnold F.HartneyMichael T.. 2014. Does School Board Leadership Matter?Washington D.C.: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
57.
SlavinRobert E.2002. “Evidence-Based Education Policies: Transforming Educational Practice and Research.” Educational Researcher31 (7): 15–21.
58.
SquirePeverill.2007. “Measuring State Legislative Professionalism: The Squire index Revisited.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly7 (2): 211–27.
SwersMichele L. 2013. Women in the Club. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
61.
TaiDon Bambino GenoShahAdityaDoubeniChyke A.SiaIrene G.WielandMark L.. 2021. “The Disproportionate Impact of COVID-19 on Racial and Ethnic Minorities in the United States.” Clinical Infectious Diseases72 (4): 703–6.
62.
TausanovitchChrisWarshawChristopher. 2014. “Representation in Municipal Government.” American Political Science Review108 (3): 605–41.
63.
TillyLouise A.GurinPatricia. 1990. Women, Politics and Change. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
64.
TrounstineJessica.2009. “All Politics is Local: The Reemergence of the Study of City Politics.” Perspectives on Politics7 (3): 611–8.
65.
VoldenCraigWisemanAlan E.WittmerDana E.. 2013. “When are Women More Effective Lawmakers Than Men?” American Journal of Political Science57 (2): 326–41.
66.
WisemanAlexander W.2010. “The Uses of Evidence for Educational Policymaking: Global Contexts and International Trends.” Review of Research in Education34 (1): 1–24.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
