Female representation may be a key factor in improving the quality of governance. In fact, the literature considers that the presence of women in organisations tends to improve performance. In this context, this paper attempts to analyse whether the presence of women in municipal councils has an influence on the efficiency of public services for a sample of 141 Spanish municipalities with more than 50,000 inhabitants for the period 2014–2018. Our results show a U-shaped relationship between the number of female councillors and the level of efficiency in Spanish municipalities. This means that the presence of women is positively associated with municipal efficiency but only if the number of female councillors is relatively high. On the contrary, their voice and personal characteristics are diluted among their male counterparts, and efficiency may be reduced.
AfonsoAntónioFernandesSónia. 2008. “Assessing and Explaining the Relative Efficiency of Local Government.” The Journal of Socio-Economics37 (5): 1946–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2007.03.007.
2.
AgasistiTommasoDal BiancoAntonioGriffiniMassimo. 2016. “The Public Sector Efficiency in Italy: The Case of Lombardy Municipalities in the Provision of the Essential Public Services.” Economia Pubblica: Mensile Di Studi e d”Informazione Del Ciriec (1): 59–84. https://doi.org/10.3280/ep2016-001004.
3.
AignerDennisLovellC. A. KnoxSchmidtPeter. 1977. “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models.” Journal of Econometrics6 (1), 21–37.
4.
AlesinaAlbertoGiulianoPaola. 2011. “Preferences for Redistribution.” In Handbook of Social Economics, edited by Benhabib, Jess, Alberto Bisin, and Matthew O. Jackson, 93–131. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
5.
AlvarezR. MichaelMcCafferyEdward J.. 2003. “Are There Sex Differences in Fiscal Political Preferences?” Political Research Quarterly56 (1): 5. https://doi.org/10.2307/3219879.
6.
AndreoniJamesVesterlundLise. 2001. “Which is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics116 (1): 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556419.
7.
AndrewsRhysEntwistleTom. 2015. “Public–Private Partnerships, Management Capacity and Public Service Efficiency.” Policy and Politics43 (2): 273–90. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557314x13917703359707.
8.
AraujoJoaquim Filipe Ferraz EstevesTejedo-RomeroFrancisca. 2016. “Women's Political Representation and Transparency in Local Governance.” Local Government Studies42 (6): 885–906. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2016.1194266.
9.
AraujoJoaquim Filipe Ferraz EstevesTejedo-RomeroFrancisca. 2018. “Does Gender Equality Affect Municipal Transparency: The Case of Spain”. Public Performance & Management Review41 (1): 69–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2017.1362350.
10.
Balaguer-CollMaría TeresaIvanova-TonevaMariya. 2019. “The impact women’s leadership in LGs: The case of Spain”. Working Papers, No. 2019/05, Economics Department, Castellón (Spain).
11.
Balaguer-CollMaria TeresaPriorDiegoTortosa-AusinaEmili. 2007. “On the Determinants of Local Government Performance: A Two-Stage Nonparametric Approach.” European Economic Review51 (2): 425–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2006.01.007.
12.
BassBernard M.AvolioBruce J.. 1993. “Transformational Leadership and Organizational Culture.” Public Administration Quarterly17 (1): 112–21.
13.
BatteseGeorge E.CoelliTim J.. 1988. “Prediction of Firm-Level Technical Efficiencies with a Generalized Frontier Production Function and Panel Data.” Journal of Econometrics38 (3): 387–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(88)90053-x.
14.
BatteseG. E.CoelliTim J.. 1992. “Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data: With Application to Paddy Farmers in India.” Journal of Productivity Analysis3 (1–2): 153–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00158774.
15.
BatteseG. E.CoelliTim J.. 1995. “A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data.” Empirical Economics20 (2): 325–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01205442.
16.
BauhrMonikaCharronNicholasWängnerudLena. 2019. “Exclusion or Interests? Why Females in Elected Office Reduce Petty and Grand Corruption.” European Journal of Political Research58 (4): 1043–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12300.
17.
BelottiFedericoDaidoneSilvioIlardiGiuseppeAtellaVincenzo. 2013. “Stochastic Frontier Analysis Using Stata.” The Stata Journal13 (4): 719–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1301300404.
18.
BenitoBernardinoBastidaFranciscoGarcíaJosé A.. 2010. “Explaining Differences in Efficiency: An Application to Spanish Municipalities.” Applied Economics42 (4): 515–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840701675560.
19.
BesleyTimothyCoateStephen. 1997. “An Economic Model of Representative Democracy.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics112 (1): 85–114.
20.
BoettiLorenzoTuratiGilbertoPiacenzaMassimiliano. 2012. “Decentralization and Local Governments” Performance: How Does Fiscal Autonomy Affect Spending Efficiency?” Finanz-Archiv: Zeitschrift Für Das Gesamte Finanzwesen68 (3): 269. https://doi.org/10.1628/001522112x653840.
21.
BolzendahlCatherine. 2009. “Making the Implicit Explicit: Gender Influences on Social Spending in Twelve Industrialized Democracies, 1980–99.” Social Politics16 (1): 40–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxp002.
22.
BolzendahlCatherine. 2011. “Beyond the Big Picture: Gender Influences on Disaggregated and Domain-Specific Measures of Social Spending, 1980–1999.” Politics & Gender7 (1): 35–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x10000553.
23.
BolzendahlCatherineBrooksClem. 2007. “Women”s Political Representation and Welfare State Spending in 12 Capitalist Democracies.” Social Forces; a Scientific Medium of Social Study and Interpretation85 (4): 1509–34. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2007.0061.
24.
BorgeLars-ErikFalchTorbergTovmoPer. 2008. “Public Sector Efficiency: The Roles of Political and Budgetary Institutions, Fiscal Capacity, and Democratic Participation.” Public Choice136 (3–4): 475–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9309-7.
25.
BoschNúriaEspasaMartaMoraToni. 2012. “Citizen Control and the Efficiency of Local Public Services.” Environment and Planning. C, Government & Policy30 (2): 248–66. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1153r.
26.
BrudneyJ. L.HebertF. T.WrightD. S.. 2000. “From Organizational Values to Organizational Roles: Examining Representative Bureaucracy in State Administration.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory10 (3): 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024278.
27.
BrunsChristianHimmlerOliver. 2011. “Newspaper Circulation and Local Government Efficiency: Newspaper Circulation and Local Government Efficiency.” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics113 (2): 470–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2010.01633.x.
28.
Buch-GómezEnrique J.Cabaleiro-CasalRoberto. 2020. “Turnout, Political Strength, and Cost Efficiency in Spanish Municipalities of the Autonomous Region of Galicia: Evidence from an Alternative Stochastic Frontier Approach.” Papers in Regional Science: The Journal of the Regional Science Association International99 (3): 533–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12491.
29.
Cabaleiro-CasalRobertoBuch-GómezEnrique J.. 2020. “Women in Spanish Municipal Councils and Budgetary Policies.” Urban Affairs Review56 (6): 1715–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419869844.
30.
Cabaleiro CasalRobertoBuch GómezEnrique. 2018. “Adjustments in Municipal Fiscal Crises. Are They Different According to the Gender of the Mayor?” Local Government Studies44 (2): 255–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1387538.
Clots-FiguerasIrma. 2011. “Women in Politics. Evidence from the Indian States.” Journal of Public Economics95 (7–8): 664–90.
33.
CorderoJosé ManuelCaroCarlos DíazFernándezCristina Polo. 2017. “Measuring Efficiency in Catalan Municipalities Using a Dynamic Conditional Model.” Revista de Economía Aplicada25 (75): 29–51.
34.
Cuadrado-BallesterosB.García-SánchezIsabel M.Prado-LorenzoJosé M.. 2013. “Effect of Modes of Public Services Delivery on the Efficiency of LGs: A two-Stage Approach.” Utilities Policy26: 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2013.04.005
35.
Cuadrado-BallesterosBeatrizGuillamónMaría DoloresRíosAna María. 2021. “Does Gender Matter in Budget Deviations? An Empirical Assessment of Spanish Local Governments.” Public Management Review, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1912816.
36.
Da CruzNuno FerreiraMarquesRui Cunha. 2014. “Revisiting the Determinants of Local Government Performance.” Omega44: 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.09.002
37.
Dahlerup, D. 2006. Women, Quotas and Politics. London: Routledge.
38.
Dahlerup, D., and L. Freidenvall. 2005. “Quotas as a ‘Fast Track’ to Equal Political Representation for Women: Why Scandinavia is No Longer the Model.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 7 (1): 26–48.
DaraioCinziaSimarLéopoldWilsonPaul W.. 2018. “Central Limit Theorems for Conditional Efficiency Measures and Tests of the “Separability” Condition in Non-parametric, Two-stage Models of Production: CLTs for Conditional Efficiency Measures.” The Econometrics Journal21 (2): 170–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/ectj.12103.
41.
De BorgerBrunoKerstensKristiaan. 1996. “Cost Efficiency of Belgian LGs: A Comparative Analysis of FDH, DEA, and Econometric Approaches.” Regional Science and Urban Economics26 (2): 145–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(95)02127-2.
42.
DoumposMichaelCohenSandra. 2014. “Applying Data Envelopment Analysis on Accounting Data to Assess and Optimize the Efficiency of Greek Local Governments.” Omega46: 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.02.004.
43.
EaglyAlice H.Johannesen-SchmidtMary C.. 2001. “The Leadership Styles of Women and Men.” Journal of Social Issues57 (4): 781–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00241.
44.
EaglyAlice H.WoodWendy. 2012. “Social Role Theory.” In Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, edited by Van LangePaul A. M.KruglanskiArie W.HigginsE. Tory, 458–76. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
45.
FallanLars. 1999. “Gender, Exposure to Tax Knowledge, and Attitudes Towards Taxation: An Experimental Approach.” Journal of Business Ethics18 (2): 173–84.
46.
FarrellMichael J.1957. “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society120 (3): 253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100.
47.
FerreiraFernandoGyourkoJoseph. 2014. “Does Gender Matter for Political Leadership? The Case of US Mayors.” Journal of Public Economics112: 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.01.006
48.
FunkPatricia.GathmannChristina. 2015. “Gender Gaps in Policy Making: Evidence from Direct Democracy in Switzerland.” Economic Policy30 (81): 141–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiu003.
49.
FunkKendall D.PhilipsAndrew Q.. 2019. “Representative Budgeting: Women Mayors and the Composition of Spending in LGs.” Political Research Quarterly72 (1): 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918775237.
50.
GagliarducciStefanoPasermanM. Daniele. 2012. “Gender Interactions Within Hierarchies: Evidence from the Political Arena.” The Review of Economic Studies79 (3): 1021–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdr046.
51.
GeysBenny. 2006. “Looking Across Borders: A Test of Spatial Policy Interdependence Using Local Government Efficiency Ratings.” Journal of Urban Economics60 (3): 443–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2006.04.002.
52.
GeysBennyHeinemannFriedrichKalbAlexander. 2010. “Voter Involvement, Fiscal Autonomy and Public Sector Efficiency: Evidence from German Municipalities.” European Journal of Political Economy26 (2): 265–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2009.11.002.
53.
GeysBennyMoesenWim. 2009. “Measuring Local Government Technical (in)Efficiency: An Application and Comparison of FDH, DEA, and Econometric Approaches.” Public Performance & Management Review32 (4): 499–513. https://doi.org/10.2753/pmr1530-9576320401.
54.
GilliganCarol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
55.
GiménezVictor M.PriorDiego. 2007. “Long- and Short-Term Cost Efficiency Frontier Evaluation: Evidence from Spanish Local Governments.” Fiscal Studies28 (1): 121–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2007.00050.x.
56.
Greene, W.H. 1993. “The Econometric Approach to Efficiency Analysis.” In The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications, 68–119. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57.
GreeneWilliam H.2008. “The Econometric Approach to Efficiency Analysis.” In The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Growth, edited by FriedHarold O.LovellC. A. KnoxSchmidtShelton S., 92–250. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58.
GuerriniAndreaCarvalhoPedroRomanoGiuliaMarquesRui CunhaLeardiniChiara. 2017. “Assessing Efficiency Drivers in Municipal Solid Waste Collection Services Through a Non-Parametric Method.” Journal of Cleaner Production147: 431–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.079.
59.
GuillamónMaría DoloresBastidaFranciscoBenitoBernardino. 2013. “The Electoral Budget Cycle on Municipal Police Expenditure.” European Journal of Law and Economics36 (3): 447–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-011-9271-6.
60.
GuillamónMaría DoloresBenitoBernardinoBastidaFrancisco. 2011. “Evaluación de la Deuda Pública Local en España.” Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting / Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad40 (150): 251–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2011.10779703.
61.
GuillamónMaría DoloresCuadrado-BallesterosBeatriz. 2021. “Is Transparency a Way to Improve Efficiency? An Assessment of Spanish Municipalities.” Regional Studies55 (2): 221–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1772964.
62.
HamidullahMadinah F.RiccucciNorma M.PandeySanjay K.. 2015. “Women in City Hall: Gender Dimensions of Managerial Values.” American Review of Public Administration45 (3): 247–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074013498464.
63.
Hernández-NicolásCarmen MaríaMartín-UgedoJuan FranciscoMínguez-VeraAntonio. 2018. “Women Mayors and Management of Spanish Councils: An Empirical Analysis.” Feminist Economics24 (1): 168–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2017.1347695.
64.
HessamiZohalda FonsecaMariana Lopes. 2020. “Female Political Representation and Substantive Effects on Policies: A Literature Review.” European Journal of Political Economy63 (101896): 101896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101896.
65.
HolmanMirya R. 2017. “Women in Local Government: What We Know and Where We Go from Here.” State and Local Government Review49 (4): 285–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x17732608.
66.
HolmanMirya R. 2014b. “Sex and the City: Female Leaders and Spending on Social Welfare Programs in US Municipalities.” Journal of Urban Affairs36 (4): 701–15.https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12066
67.
HolmanMirya R.2014a. Women in Politics in the American City. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.
68.
JacobsonWillow S.PalusChristine K.BowlingCynthia J.. 2010. “A Woman’s Touch? Gendered Management and Performance in State Administration.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory20 (2): 477–504. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup017.
69.
KalbAlexander. 2010. “The Impact of Intergovernmental Grants on Cost Efficiency: Theory and Evidence from German Municipalities.” Economic Analysis and Policy40 (1): 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0313-5926(10)50002-x.
70.
KalbAlexanderGeysBennyHeinemannFriedrich. 2012. “Value for Money? German Local Government Efficiency in a Comparative Perspective.” Applied Economics44 (2): 201–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2010.502110.
71.
KanterRosabeth Moss. 1977. “Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women.” American Journal of Sociology82 (5): 965–90. https://doi.org/10.1086/226425.
72.
KarpowitzChristopher F.MendelbergTaliMattioliLauren. 2015. ““Why Women”s Numbers Elevate Women”s Influence, and When They Do Not: Rules, Norms, and Authority in Political Discussion”.” Politics, Groups & Identities3 (1): 149–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2014.999804.
73.
KumbhakarSubal C.LienGudbrandHardakerJ. Brian. 2014. “Technical Efficiency in Competing Panel Data Models: A Study of Norwegian Grain Farming.” Journal of Productivity Analysis41 (2): 321–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-012-0303-1.
74.
LoikkanenHeikki A.SusiluotoIlkkaFunkMichael. 2011. “The role of city managers and external variables in explaining efficiency differences of Finnish municipalities”. Technical Report No. 312, Helsinki Centre for Economic Research (HECER). Finland: University of Helsinki.
75.
LottJohn R.Jr.KennyLawrence W.. 1999. “Did Women”s Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government?” The Journal of Political Economy107 (6): 1163–98. https://doi.org/10.1086/250093.
76.
MarquesRui CunhaSimõesPedro. 2009. “Incentive Regulation and Performance Measurement of the Portuguese Solid Waste Management Services.” Waste Management & Research: The Journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA27 (2): 188–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X08095025.
77.
MastracciSharonBowmanLauren. 2015. “Public Agencies, Gendered Organizations: The Future of Gender Studies in Public Management.” Public Management Review17 (6): 857–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.867067.
78.
MeierKenneth J.O’TooleLaurence J.Jr.GoerdelHolly T.. 2006. “Management Activity and Program Performance: Gender as Management Capital.” Public Administration Review66 (1): 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00553.x
79.
MendelbergTaliKarpowitzChristopher F.. 2016. “Women's Authority in Political Decision-Making Groups.” The Leadership Quarterly27 (3): 487–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.11.005.
80.
MendelbergTaliKarpowitzChristopher F.MattioliLauren. 2015. “Gender and Women’s Influence in Public Settings.” Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource1: 1–14.
MooreAdrianNolanJamesSegalGeoffrey F.. 2005. “Putting out the Trash: Measuring Municipal Service Efficiency in U.S. Cities.” Urban Affairs Review41 (2): 237–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087405279466.
83.
Narbón-PerpiñáIsabelDe WitteKristof. 2018a. “Local Governments' Efficiency: A Systematic Literature Review—Part I.” International Transactions in Operational Research: A Journal of The International Federation of Operational Research Societies25 (2): 431–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12364.
84.
Narbón-PerpiñáIsabelDe WitteKristof. 2018b. “Local Governments' Efficiency: A Systematic Literature Review-Part II.” International Transactions in Operational Research: A Journal of The International Federation of Operational Research Societies25 (4): 1107–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12389.
85.
OpstrupNielsVilladsenAnders R.. 2015. “The Right Mix? Gender Diversity in Top Management Teams and Financial Performance.” Public Administration Review75 (2): 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12310.
86.
OsborneMartin J.SlivinskiAl. 1996. “A Model of Political Competition with Citizen-Candidates.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics111 (1): 65–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946658.
87.
ParkSanghee. 2020. “Gender and Performance in Public Organizations: A Research Synthesis and Research Agenda.” Public Management Review, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1730940.
88.
Pérez-LópezGemmaPriorDiegoZafra-GómezJosé L.. 2015. “Rethinking New Public Management Delivery Forms and Efficiency: Long-Term Effects in Spanish Local Government: Table 1.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory25 (4): 1157–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu088.
89.
PougkakiotiIfigeneia-DimitraTsamadiasConstantinos. 2020. “Measuring The Efficiency and Productivity Change Of Municipalities: Empirical Evidence From Greek Municipalities Over The Time Period 2013–2016.” Regional Science Inquiry12 (1): 55–74.
90.
Rodríguez-BolívarManuel PedroNavarro-GaleraAndrésAlcaide-MuñozLauraLópez-SubiresMaría Deseada. 2016. “Analyzing Forces to the Financial Contribution of LGs to Sustainable Development.” Sustainability8 (9): 925. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090925.
91.
SlegtenCarolineGeysBennyHeyndelsBruno. 2019. “Sex Differences in Budgetary Preferences among Flemish Local Politicians.” Acta Politica54 (4): 540–63. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-018-0090-4.
92.
SlegtenCarolineHeyndelsBruno. 2020. “Within-Party Sex Gaps in Expenditure Preferences among Flemish Local Politicians.” Politics & Gender16 (3): 768–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x18000685.
93.
SmithAdrienne R. 2014. “Cities Where Women Rule: Female Political Incorporation and the Allocation of Community Development Block Grant Funding.” Politics & Gender10 (03): 313–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x14000208.
94.
SørensenRune J. 2014. “Political Competition, Party Polarization, and Government Performance.” Public Choice161 (3–4): 427–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-014-0168-0.
95.
StevensPhilip Andrew. 2005. “Assessing the Performance of Local Government.” National Institute Economic Review193 (1): 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027950105058565.
96.
SuzukiKoheiAvellanedaClaudia N.. 2018. “Women and Risk-Taking Behaviour in Local Public Finance.” Public Management Review20 (12): 1741–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1412118.
