The “choice” in the Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) program signals the mobility offered to voucher holders. However, some landlords use source of income (SOI) discrimination to exclude voucher holders—limiting their locational choices. We propose several factors likely to influence this landlord strategy including, market competitiveness, stereotypes, and racial discrimination. We examine the prevalence of express SOI discrimination and the effectiveness of SOI antidiscrimination laws. We utilize a novel dataset of 1,107,110 rental listings from the Craigslist pages of 77 mid-sized US cities. We find significant amounts of express SOI discrimination, even where there are SOI antidiscrimination laws. Using multilevel models, we find that landlords are more likely to expressly discriminate in lower-opportunity neighborhoods and when they own market-competitive units. We also find that these factors are moderated by the concentration of voucher holders. These findings underscore how landlord strategies can combine to undermine the choice afforded to voucher holders.
BasoloVictoriaNguyenMai Thi. 2005. “Does Mobility Matter? The Neighborhood Conditions of Housing Voucher Holders by Race and Ethnicity.” Housing Policy Debate16 (3–4): 297–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2005.9521546.
2.
BatesDouglasMächlerMartin Bolker BenWalkerSteve. 2015. “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software67 (1): 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
3.
BesbrisMaxKukJohnOwensAnnSchachterAriela. 2022. “Predatory Inclusion in the Market for Rental Housing: A Multicity Empirical Test.” Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World8: 237802312210790. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231221079001.
4.
BoeingGeoffWaddellPaul. 2017. “New Insights into Rental Housing Markets Across the United States: Web Scraping and Analyzing Craigslist Rental Listings.” Journal of Planning Education and Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X16664789.
ChettyRajHendrenNathanielKatzLawrence F.. 2016. “The Effects of Exposure to Better Neighborhoods on Children: New Evidence from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment.” American Economic Review106 (4): 855–902. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150572.
Clampet-LundquistSusanMasseyDouglas S.. 2008. “Neighborhood Effects on Economic Self-Sufficiency: A Reconsideration of the Moving to Opportunity Experiment.” American Journal of Sociology114 (1): 107–43. https://doi.org/10.1086/588740.
9.
ClarkWilliam. A.2005. “Intervening in the Residential Mobility Process: Neighborhood Outcomes for low-Income Populations.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences102 (43): 15307–12. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507308102.
10.
CunninghamMaryGalvezMarthaArandaClaudia L.SantosRobWissokerDougOnetoAlysePitingoloRobCrawfordJamesInstituteUrban. 2018. “A Pilot Study of Landlord Acceptance of Housing Choice Vouchers.” U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
FreemanLanceLiYunjing. 2014. “Do Source of Income Anti-Discrimination Laws Facilitate Access to Less Disadvantaged Neighborhoods?” Housing Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2013.824559.
GarbodenPhilip M. E.RosenEvaDeLucaStefanieEdinKathryn. 2018. “Taking Stock: What Drives Landlord Participation in the Housing Choice Voucher Program.” Housing Policy Debate28 (6): 979–1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2018.1502202.
16.
GreenleeAndrew J. 2014. “More Than Meets the Market? Landlord Agency in the Illinois Housing Choice Voucher Program.” Housing Policy Debate24 (3): 500–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2014.913649.
17.
Neighbors Together, Unlock NYC, Anti-Eviction Mapping Project, and Housing Data Coalition. 2022. “An Illusion of Choice: How Source of Income Discrimination and Voucher Policies Perpetuate Inequality.” https://weunlock.nyc/soi-report/.
18.
ImbroscioDavid. 2008. ““[U] nited and Actuated by Some Common Impulse of Passion”: Challenging the Dispersal Consensus in American Housing Policy Research.” Journal of Urban Affairs30 (2): 111–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2008.00381.x.
19.
Johnson-SprattKim. 1999. “Housing Discrimination and Source of Income: A Tenant’s Losing Battle.” Indiana Law Review32 (2): 457–80.
20.
LensMichael C.EllenIngrid GouldO’ReganKatherine. 2011. “Do Vouchers Help Low-Income Households Live in Safer Neighborhoods? Evidence on the Housing Choice Voucher Program.” Cityscape (Washington, D C ), 13(3): 135–59.
21.
McClureKirkJohnsonBonnie. 2015. “Housing Programs Fail to Deliver on Neighborhood Quality, Reexamined.” Housing Policy Debate25 (3): 463–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2014.944201.
Poverty and Race Research Action Center. 2020. Expanding Choice: Practical Strategies for Building a Successful Housing Mobility Program APPENDIX B: State, Local, and Federal Laws Barring Source-of-Income Discrimination.
25.
RosenEva. 2020. The Voucher Promise: “Section 8” and the Fate of an American Neighborhood. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
26.
RosenblattPeterDeLucaStephanie. 2012. ““We Don’t Live Outside, We Live in Here”: Neighborhood and Residential Mobility Decisions among Low–Income Families.” City & Community11 (3): 254–84. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1540-6040.2012.01413.x.
27.
SteilJustinKellyNicholas. 2019. “The Fairest of Them All: Analyzing Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Compliance.” Housing Policy Debate29 (1): 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2018.1469527.
28.
ThacherDavid. 2008. “The Rise of Criminal Background Screening in Rental Housing: The Rise of Criminal Background Screening in Rental Housing.” Law & Social Inquiry33 (1): 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2008.00092.x.
29.
TigheJ. RosieHatchMegan E.MeadJoseph. 2017. “Source of Income Discrimination and Fair Housing Policy.” Journal of Planning Literature. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412216670603.
30.
TjurTue. 2009. “Coefficients of Determination in Logistic Regression Models—A New Proposal: The Coefficient of Discrimination.” The American Statistician63 (4): 366–72. https://doi.org/10.1198/tast.2009.08210.
31.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2019. American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates.
32.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2020a. Fair Market Rents.
33.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2020b. Housing Choice Vouchers by Tract.
34.
VaradyDavid P.WalkerCarole C.. 1999. “Vouchering out Distressed Subsidized Developments: Does Moving Lead to Enhanced Feelings of Safety?” Environment and Behavior31 (1): 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139169921971976.
35.
WangRuoniu. 2018. “Tracking ‘Choice’ in the Housing Choice Voucher Program: The Relationship Between Neighborhood Preference and Locational Outcome.” Urban Affairs Review54 (2): 302–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087416646205.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
