Why are cities acting against inequality? We attribute the growth of municipal economic policy to multi-city urban policy entrepreneurship networks. These networks combine activists who create pressure to address inequality with policy experts who supply the legislative means to do so. We illustrate the concept through the Fight for $15 campaign in Seattle and Chicago. Drawing on more than 100 interviews, participant observation and secondary documents, we show that advocates for municipal policy reform use national policy entrepreneurship networks to develop policy-specific and generalized policy advocacy techniques. Centering urban policy entrepreneurship brings into focus three important aspects of current municipal public policy: 1) The two-way interaction between national and local policy campaigns. 2) Partnerships between activists who set the political agenda and policy entrepreneurs who act on political opportunity. 3) The role of national advocacy and policy entrepreneurship networks in converting new policy ideas into routine, off-the-shelf policy solutions.
BrennerN. 2001. “World City Theory, Globalization and the Comparative-Historical Method: Reflections on Janet Abu-Lughod’s Interpretation of Contemporary Urban Restructuring.” Urban Affairs Review37: 124–47.
5.
CairneyPaulJonesMichael D.. 2016. “Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Approach: What Is the Empirical Impact of This Universal Theory?” Policy Studies Journal44 (1): 37–58.
6.
CairneyPaulZahariadisNikolaos. 2016. “Multiple Streams Approach: A Flexible Metaphor Presents an Opportunity to Operationalize Agenda Setting Processes.” In Handbook of Public Policy Agenda Setting, edited by ZahariadisNikolaos, 87–105. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
7.
CarefCarolHaindsSarahHilgendorfKurtJankovPavlynRussellKevin. 2012. The Black and White of Education in Chicago’s Public Schools: Class, Charters and Chaos. Chicago: Chicago Teachers Union.
8.
ClavelPierre. 2010. Activists in City Hall: The Progressive Response to the Reagan Era in Boston and Chicago. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
9.
Cohen-VogelLoraSadlerJamesLittleMichael H.MerrillBeccaChris CurranF.. 2020. “The Adoption of Public Pre-Kindergarten among the American States: An Event History Analysis.” Educational Policy, https://doi.org/0895904820961002.
10.
College Promise. 2020. College Promise: Catalog of Local and State College Promise Programs. Washington, D.C.: College Promise.
11.
CoxKevin R. 1993. “The Local and the Global in the New Urban Politics: A Critical View.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space11 (4): 433–48.
12.
DeFilippisJamesWilliamsOlivia R.PierceJosephMartinDeborah G.KrugerRichEsfahaniAzadeh Hadizadeh. 2019. “On the Transformative Potential of Community Land Trusts in the United States.” Antipode51 (3): 795–817.
13.
DoussardMarc. 2021. “Racial Justice Is Economic Justice: Chicago’s Grassroots Collaborative Expands Economic Fairness by Prioritizing Racial Equity.” In Igniting Justice and Progressive Power: The Partnership for Working Families Cities, edited by ReynoldsDavid B.SimmonsLouise, 179–92. New York: Routledge.
14.
DoussardMarcGamalAhmad. 2016. “The Rise of Wage Theft Laws: Can Community-Labor Coalitions Win Victories in State Houses?” Urban Affairs Review52 (5): 780–807.
15.
DoussardMarcSchrockGreg. 2022. Justice at Work: The Rise of Economic and Racial Justice Coalitions in Cities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
16.
DubeArindrajitLesterThomas W.ReichMichael. 2010. “Wage Effects Across State Borders: Estimates Using Contiguous Counties.” The Review of Economics and Statistics92 (4): 945–64.
FultonBrad R.DoussardMarc. 2021. “Sustaining the Grassroots: How Community Organizations Mitigate the Downsides of Collaborating with Unions.” Journal of Urban Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2021.1874246
22.
GentWhitney R. 2018. The Rhetorical Circulation of the Housing First Model in the United States. Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Wisconsin-Madison.
HarveyD.1989. The Urban Experience. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27.
HwangJackelyn. 2020. “Gentrification Without Segregation? Race, Immigration, and Renewal in a Diversifying City.” City & Community19 (3): 538–72.
28.
JonesMichael D.PetersonHolly L.PierceJonathan J.HerwegNicoleBernalAmielRaneyHolly LambertaZahariadisNikolaos. 2016. “A River Runs Through It: A Multiple Streams Meta-Review.” Policy Studies Journal44 (1): 13–36.
29.
JoyMeghanVogelRonald K.. 2021. “Beyond Neoliberalism: A Policy Agenda for a Progressive City.” Urban Affairs Review57 (5): 224–48.
30.
JuddDennis R.HinzeAnnika M.. 2018. City Politics: The Political Economy of Urban America. New York: Routledge.
31.
KatznelsonIra. 1982. City Trenches: Urban Politics and the Patterning of Class in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
KearneyMelissa S.MogstadMagne. 2019. “Universal Basic Income (UBI) as a Policy Response to Current Challenges.” The Aspen Institute: Author.
33.
KimYunjiAldagAustin M.WarnerMildred E.. 2020. “Blocking the Progressive City: How State Pre-Emptions Undermine Labour Rights in the USA.” Urban Studies58 (6): 1158–75.
34.
KingdonJohn W.1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
35.
LeeuwEvelyne deHoeijmakersMarjanPetersDorothee T. J. M.. 2016. “Juggling Multiple Networks in Multiple Streams.” European Policy Analysis2 (1): 196–217.
36.
LeitnerHelgaSheppardEricSziartoKristin M.. 2008. “The Spatialities of Contentious Politics.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers33 (2): 157–72.
37.
LesniewskiJacobDoussardMarc. 2017. “Crossing Boundaries, Building Power: Chicago Organizers Embrace Race, Ideology, and Coalition.” Social Service Review91 (4): 585–620.
38.
LesterThomas W. 2020. “Restructuring Restaurant Work: Employer Responses to Local Labor Standards in the Full-Service Restaurant Industry.” Urban Affairs Review56 (2): 605–39.
ManzoFrankIV. 2021. “Testimony of Frank Manzo IV.” Presented at the Labor and Commerce Committee, Illinois House of Representatives, Springfield, IL, February 5.
41.
MarkusenAnn R.1980. Regions and Regionalism: A Marxist View. Berkeley, Calif.: Institute of Urban and Regional Development Dept. of City and Regional Plannings University of California.
42.
MartinIsaac. 2001. “Dawn of the Living Wage the Diffusion of a Redistributive Municipal Policy.” Urban Affairs Review36 (4): 470–96.
MilesMatthew B.HubermanA. MichaelSaldañaJohnny. 2018. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Fourth Edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
45.
MolotchHarveyLoganJohn. 1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
46.
NessImmanuel. 2010. Immigrants Unions & The New Us Labor Market. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
47.
NessImmanuelEimerStuart. 2015. Central Labor Councils and the Revival of American Unionism: Organizing for Justice in Our Communities. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
48.
NichollsWalterMillerByronBeaumontJustin. 2014. Spaces of Contention. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
RastJoel. 2015. “Urban Regime Theory and the Problem of Change.” Urban Affairs Review51 (1): 138–49.
56.
ReeseLaura A.SandsGarySkidmoreMark. 2014. “Memo from Motown: Is Austerity Here to Stay?” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society7 (1): 99–118.
RomichJennifer L.AllardScott W.ObaraEmmi E.AlthauserAnne K.BuskiewiczJames H.. 2020. “Employer Responses to a City-Level Minimum Wage Mandate: Early Evidence from Seattle.” Urban Affairs Review56 (2): 451–79.
61.
SchmittJohn. 2015. “Explaining the Small Employment Effects of the Minimum Wage in the United States.” Industrial Relations54 (4): 547–81.
62.
SchneiderDaniel. 2019. “They’re Back: Municipal Responses to the Resurgence of Bed Bug Infestations.” Journal of the American Planning Association85 (2): 96–113.
63.
SchraggerRichard. 2016. City Power: Urban Governance in a Global Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64.
ScottAllen John. 2014. “Beyond the Creative City: Cognitive–Cultural Capitalism and the New Urbanism.” Regional Studies48 (4): 565–78.
65.
ShipanCharles R.VoldenCraig. 2008. “The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science52 (4): 840–57.
66.
ShipanCharles R.VoldenCraig. 2012. “Policy Diffusion: Seven Lessons for Scholars and Practitioners.” Public Administration Review72 (6): 788–96.
67.
StoneClarence. 1989. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946–1988. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
68.
StoneClarence. 2015. “Reflections on Regime Politics: From Governing Coalition to Urban Political Order.” Urban Affairs Review51 (1): 101–37.
69.
StoneClarence. 2017. “Trends in the Study of Urban Politics: A Paradigmatic View.” Urban Affairs Review53 (1): 3–39.
70.
TattersallAmanda. 2013. Power in Coalition: Strategies for Strong Unions and Social Change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
UitermarkJustusNichollsWalter. 2017. “Planning for Social Justice: Strategies, Dilemmas, Tradeoffs.” Planning Theory16 (1): 32–50.
73.
Vallestero KeenanNicoleGreenwichHoward. 2014. Economic Impacts of SeaTac Living Wage. Seattle: Puget Sound Sage.
74.
VogelpohlAnneBuchholzTino. 2017. “Breaking with Neoliberalization by Restricting the Housing Market: Novel Urban Policies and the Case of Hamburg.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research41 (2): 266–81.
75.
WeaverTimothy PR. 2021. “Charting Change in the City: Urban Political Orders and Urban Political Development.” Urban Affairs Review58 (2): 319–55.
76.
WoodLesley J.2012. Direct Action, Deliberation, and Diffusion: Collective Action After the WTO Protests in Seattle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77.
WoodsClyde. 2017. Development Drowned and Reborn: The Blues and Bourbon Restorations in Post-Katrina New Orleans. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
78.
ZahariadisNikolaos. 2014. “Ambiguity and Multiple Streams.” Theories of the Policy Process3: 25–59.
