Do voters punish incumbent legislators for raising service costs? Concern about electoral punishment is considered a leading obstacle to increasing taxes and fees to fund service provision, but empirical evidence of such backlash is surprisingly sparse. This paper examines whether voters hold local elected officials accountable for raising water service costs. Using 10 years of panel data on municipal elections and water rates in North Carolina, we find rate increases do not reduce incumbent city council members’ vote shares. Local politicians may overestimate their electoral risk from raising taxes and fees to fund public services.
AchenChristopher H.BartelsLarry M.2004. “Musical Chairs: Pocketbook Voting and the Limits of Democratic Accountability.” Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September1-5, 2004, 1–55. https://sites.fas.harvard.edu/~gov2000/Handouts/AchenBartels.pdf.
2.
AllaireMauraWuHaoweiLallUpmanu. 2018. “National Trends in Drinking Water Quality Violations.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America115 (9): 2078–83.
3.
ArceneauxKevin. 2006. “The Federal Face of Voting: Are Elected Officials Held Accountable for the Functions Relevant to Their Office?” Political Psychology27 (5): 731–54.
4.
ArnoldR. DouglasCarnesNicholas. 2012. “Holding Mayors Accountable: New York’s Executives from Koch to Bloomberg.” American Journal of Political Science56 (4): 949–63.
5.
BerryChristopher R.HowellWilliam G.2007. “Accountability and Local Elections: Rethinking Retrospective Voting.” The Journal of Politics69 (3): 844–58.
6.
BesleyTimothyCaseAnne. 1995. “Incumbent Behavior: Vote-Seeking, Tax-Setting, and Yardstick Competition.” The American Economic Review85 (1): 25–45.
7.
BoschNúriaSolé-OlléAlbert. 2007. “Yardstick Competition and the Political Costs of Raising Taxes: An Empirical Analysis of Spanish Municipalities.” International Tax and Public Finance14 (1): 71–92.
8.
BoyneGeorge A.JamesOliverJohnPeterPetrovskyNicolai. 2009. “Democracy and Government Performance: Holding Incumbents Accountable in English Local Governments.” The Journal of Politics71 (4): 1273–84.
9.
BurnettCraig M.KoganVladimir. 2017. “The Politics of Potholes: Service Quality and Retrospective Voting in Local Elections.” The Journal of Politics79 (1): 302–14.
10.
CampbellAndrea L.SancesMichael W.2013. “State Fiscal Policy during the Great Recession: Budgetary Impacts and Policy Responses.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science650 (1): 252–73.
11.
CaseAnne. 1994. “Taxes and the Electoral Cycle: How Sensitive Are Governors to Coming Elections?” Business Review March/April: 17–26.
Congressional Budget Office. 2018. “Public Spending on Transportation and Water Infrastructure, 1956 to 2017.” Washington, D.C. http://www.cbo.gov/publication/49910.
14.
de Benedictis-KessnerJustin. 2018. “How Attribution Inhibits Accountability: Evidence from Train Delays.” The Journal of Politics80 (4): 1417–22.
HealyAndrew J.PerssonMikaelSnowbergErik. 2017. “Digging into the Pocketbook: Evidence on Economic Voting from Income Registry Data Matched to a Voter Survey.” American Political Science Review111 (4): 771–85.
20.
HolbeinJohn. 2016. “Left Behind? Citizen Responsiveness to Government Performance Information.” American Political Science Review110 (2): 353–68.
21.
HopkinsDaniel J.PettingillLindsay M.2017. “Retrospective Voting in Big-City US Mayoral Elections.” Political Science Research and Methods6 (4): 697–714.
22.
HughesSaraPincetlStephanieBooneChristopher. 2013. “Triple Exposure: Regulatory, Climatic, and Political Drivers of Water Management Changes in the City of Los Angeles.” Cities32: 51–59.
23.
JacobsonGary C.1987. “Running Scared: Elections and Congressional Politics in the 1980s.” In Congress: Structure and Policy, edited by McCubbinsMathewSullivanTerry, 34–81. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24.
JamesOliverJohnPeter. 2007. “Public Management at the Ballot Box: Performance Information and Electoral Support for Incumbent English Local Governments.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory17 (4): 567–80.
25.
KoganVladimirLavertuStéphanePeskowitzZachary. 2016. “Do School Report Cards Produce Accountability Through the Ballot Box?”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management35 (3): 639–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21912.
26.
LevinRonnie B.EpsteinPaul R.FordTim E.HarringtonWinstonOlsonErikReichardEric G.2002. “U.S. Drinking Water Challenges in the Twenty-First Century.” Environmental Health Perspectives110 (Suppl. 1): 43–52.
MartinWilliam E.IngramHelen M.LaneyNancy K.GriffinAdrian H.2015. Saving Water in a Desert City. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
29.
MeansEdward G.BrueckTenryDixonLloydManningAllanMilesJanetPatrickRoger. 2002. “Drinking Water Quality in the New Millennium: The Risk of Underestimating Public Perception.” American Water Works Association94 (8): 28.
30.
MullinMegan. 2009. Governing the Tap: Special District Governance and the New Local Politics of Water. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
MullinMegan. 2014. “Local Boundaries.” In The Oxford Handbook of State and Local Government, edited by Haider-MarkelDonald P., 397–414. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
NelsonMichael A.2000. “Electoral Cycles and the Politics of State Tax Policy.” Public Finance Review28 (6): 540–60.
33.
NiemiRichard G.StanleyHarold W.VogelRonald J.1995. “State Economies and State Taxes: Do Voters Hold Governors Accountable?” American Journal of Political Science39 (4): 936–57.
OliverJ. EricHaShang E.2007. “Vote Choice in Suburban Elections.” American Political Science Review101 (3): 393–408.
36.
OliverJ. EricHaShang E.CallenZachary. 2012. Local Elections and the Politics of Small-Scale Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
PaysonJulia A.2017. “When Are Local Incumbents Held Accountable for Government Performance? Evidence from US School Districts.” Legislative Studies Quarterly42 (3): 421–48.
38.
PeltzmanS.1992. “Voters as Fiscal Conservatives.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics107 (2): 327–61.
39.
PhilipsAndrew Q.2016. “Seeing the Forest through the Trees: A Meta-Analysis of Political Budget Cycles.” Public Choice168 (3–4): 313–41.
40.
RevelliFederico. 2002. “Local Taxes, National Politics and Spatial Interactions in English District Election Results.” European Journal of Political Economy18 (2): 281–99.
41.
RoySiddharthaPhetxumphouKatherineDietrichAndrea M.EstabrooksPaul A.YouWenDavyBrenda M.2015. “An Evaluation of the Readability of Drinking Water Quality Reports: A National Assessment.” Journal of Water and Health13 (3): 645–53.
42.
SakuraiSergio NaruhikoMenezes-FilhoNaercio Aquino. 2008. “Fiscal Policy and Reelection in Brazilian Municipalities.” Public Choice137 (1–2): 301–14.
SwitzerDavidTeodoroManuel P.2018. “Class, Race, Ethnicity, and Justice in Safe Drinking Water Compliance.” Social Science Quarterly99 (2):524–35.
46.
SwitzerDavid. 2020. “The Context of Responsiveness: Resident Preferences, Water Scarcity, and Municipal Conservation Policy.” Review of Policy Research37 (2): 260-279.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
