Local governments are leading sustainability efforts through a range of initiatives, often voluntarily. While a spate of research exists to explain what drives these voluntary decisions, we are still limited in understanding how localities follow through with the resources to implement their adopted plans. This is particularly the case for environment and climate protection programs that are transboundary in nature and thus require more innovative and longer-term approaches than those that are relatively low-cost and easier to implement with future savings. This research examines local investment in promoting three of these program areas: air quality, biodiversity preservation, and ecological restoration. It investigates how local governments vary according to resource commitment and what factors explain those variations. We find several factors significant, including community capacity, political ideology, and institutional arrangements for service production and delivery. Variations are, however, found across different types of resource commitment, suggesting a more complex picture of local resource availability for advancing sustainability efforts.
AallCarloGrovenKyrreLindsethGard. 2007. “The Scope of Action for Local Climate Policy: The Case of Norway.” Global Environmental Politics7 (2): 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2007.7.2.83.
2.
AgranoffRobertMcGuireMichael. 2004. “Another Look at Bargaining and Negotiating in Intergovernmental Management.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory14 (4): 495–512. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh033.
3.
AllenRichelle S.CastanoEmanueleAllenPriscilla D.. 2007. “Conservatism and Concern for the Environment.” Quarterly Journal of Ideology30 (3–4): 1–25.
4.
AllenBarbaraTamindaelLouise E.BickertonSarah H.ChoWonhyuk. 2020. “Does Citizen Coproduction Lead to Better Urban Services in Smart Cities Projects? An Empirical Study on E-Participation in a Mobile Big Data Platform.” Government Information Quarterly37 (1): 101412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101412.
5.
AngristJoshua D.PischkeJörn-Steffen. 2008. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400829828.
BerkePhilip R.ConroyMaria Manta. 2000. “Are We Planning for Sustainable Development? An Evaluation of 30 Comprehensive Plans.” Journal of the American Planning Association66 (1): 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360008976081.
8.
BetsillMichele M. 2001. “Mitigating Climate Change in U.S. Cities: Opportunities and Obstacles.” Local Environment6: 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830120091699.
9.
BetsillMichele M.BulkeleyHarriet. 2007. “Looking Back and Thinking Ahead: A Decade of Cities and Climate Change Research.” Local Environment12 (5): 447–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830701659683.
BrownTrevor L.PotoskiMatthew. 2005. “Transaction Costs and Contracting: The Practitioner Perspective.” Public Performance & Management Review28 (3): 326–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2005.11051842.
12.
CarleySanyaKrauseRachel M.LaneBradley W.GrahamJohn D.. 2013. “Intent to Purchase a Plug-In Electric Vehicle: A Survey of Early Impressions in Large US Cites.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment18: 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2012.09.007.
13.
ChaeSumi. 2018. “Climate Change, Public Perception of Well-Being, and Role Of Government.” KIHASA Issue & Focus349: 1–8.
14.
ChoWonhyuk. 2017. “Institution, Legitimacy, and Democratization.” In The Experience of Democracy and Bureaucracy in South Korea (Public Policy and Governance, Vol. 28), edited by ImTobin, 113–130. Bingley, U.K.: Emerald Publishing Limitedhttps://doi.org/10.1108/S2053-769720170000028005.
15.
ChoWonhyukMelisaWinda Dwi. 2021. “Delivering a Municipal Government's Urban Services Through Digital Participation.” Administrative Sciences11: 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020059.
16.
DaleyDorothy M.SharpElaine B.BaeJungah. 2013. “Understanding City Engagement in Community-Focused Sustainability Initiatives.” Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research15 (1): 143–61.
17.
DavidsonRussellMacKinnonJames G. 1993. Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press .
DempseyNicolaBramleyGlenPowerSinéadBrownCaroline. 2011. “The Social Dimension of Sustainable Development: Defining Urban Social Sustainability.” Sustainable Development19 (5): 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.417.
21.
DeslatteAaronStokanEric. 2019. “Hierarchies of Need in Sustainable Development: A Resource Dependence Approach for Local Governance.” Urban Affairs Review55 (4): 1125–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087417737181.
22.
DeslatteAaronSwannWilliam L. 2020. “Elucidating the Linkages Between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Local Government Sustainability Performance.” The American Review of Public Administration50 (1): 92–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019869376.
FurlongKathrynBakkerKaren. 2010. “The Contradictions in ‘Alternative’ Service Delivery: Governance, Business Models, and Sustainability in Municipal Water Supply.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy28 (2): 349–68. https://doi.org/10.1068/c09122.
25.
GrantJill L.BeedTimothyManuelPatricia M.. 2018. “Integrated Community Sustainability Planning in Atlantic Canada: Green-Washing an Infrastructure Agenda.” Journal of Planning Education and Research38 (1): 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X16664788.
26.
HawkinsChristopher V.KrauseRachel M.FeiockRichard C.CurleyCali. 2016. “Making Meaningful Commitments: Accounting for Variation in Cities’ Investments of Staff and Fiscal Resources to Sustainability.” Urban Studies53 (9): 1902–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015580898.
27.
HawkinsChristopher V.WangXiaoHu. 2013. “Policy Integration for Sustainable Development and the Benefits of Local Adoption.” Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research15 (1): 63–82.
28.
HefetzAmirWarnerMildred. 2004. “Privatization and Its Reverse: Explaining the Dynamics of the Government Contracting Process.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory14 (2): 171–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh012.
29.
HefetzAmirWarnerMildred E.. 2012. “Contracting or Public Delivery? The Importance of Service, Market, and Management Characteristics.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory22 (2): 289–317. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur006.
30.
HillRosemaryGrantChrissyGeorgeMelissaRobinsonCatherine J.JacksonSueAbelNick. 2012. “A Typology of Indigenous Engagement in Australian Environmental Management: Implications for Knowledge Integration and Social-Ecological System Sustainability.” Ecology and Society17 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04587-170123.
HolzingerKatharinaKnillChristoph. 2004. “Competition and Cooperation in Environmental Policy: Individual and Interaction Effects.” Journal of Public Policy24 (1): 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X04000029.
33.
HomsyGeorge C.WarnerMildred E.. 2015. “Cities and Sustainability: Polycentric Action and Multilevel Governance.” Urban Affairs Review51 (1): 46–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087414530545.
34.
HortonDouglasAlexakiAnastasiaBennett-LarteySamuelBriceKim NoeleCampilanDindoCardenFredde Souza SilvaJose, et al.2003. Evaluating Capacity Development: Experiences from Research And Development Organizations Around the World. The Hague, The Netherlands: International Service for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR).
35.
HuangWan LingWelchEric W.CorleyElizabeth A.. 2014. “Public Sector Voluntary Initiatives: The Adoption of the Environmental Management System by Public Waste Water Treatment Facilities in the United States.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management57 (10): 1531–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2013.816630.
36.
ImTobinChoWonhyuk. 2011. “Performance Tools and Their Impact on Pollution Reduction: An Assessment of Environmental Taxation and R&D.” International Review of Public Administration15 (3): 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2011.10805179.
37.
ImTobinLeeHyunkukChoWonhyukCampbellJesse W.. 2014. “Citizen Preference and Resource Allocation: The Case for Participatory Budgeting in Seoul.” Local Government Studies40 (1): 102–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2013.812963.
38.
JeongJoon-Keum. 2007. Korean Environmental Policy. Seoul: Daeyoung Press.
39.
KatzBruceBradleyJennifer. 2013. The Metropolitan Revolution. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
40.
KimDoo-Rae. 2011. “Do Local Policy Networks Deter the Race to the Bottom in Environmental Regulation? The Case of South Korea.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy29 (6): 1037–53. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1158j.
41.
KimDoo-Rae. 2013. “Local Government Policy Diffusion in a Decentralised System: Childbirth Support Policy in South Korea.” Local Government Studies39 (4): 582–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2012.726200.
42.
KimJungbu. 2017. “Local Elected Administrators’ Career Characteristics and Revenue Diversification as a Managerial Strategy.” Local Government Studies43 (1): 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2016.1235560.
43.
KimHongWhanChungSoonGwan. 2018. “A Study on Extension of the Autonomous Right to Tax: Focusing on the Limit of Utilization of Flexible Tax Rate.” Korean Governance Review25 (2): 103–22.
44.
KrauseRachel M. 2011. “Policy Innovation, Intergovernmental Relations, and the Adoption of Climate Protection Initiatives by U.S. Cities.” Journal of Urban Affairs33 (1): 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00510.x.
45.
KrauseRachel M.HawkinsChristopher V.ParkAngela Y.S.. 2021. “The Perfect Amount of Help: An Examination of the Relationship Between Capacity and Collaboration in Urban Energy and Climate Initiatives.” Urban Affairs Review57 (2): 583–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419884650.
46.
KrauseRachel M.HawkinsChristopher V.ParkAngela Y.S.FeiockRichard C.. 2019. “Drivers of Policy Instrument Selection for Environmental Management by Local Governments.” Public Administration Review79 (4): 477–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13025.
47.
LaurianLucieWalkerMarkCrawfordJan. 2017. “Implementing Environmental Sustainability in Local Government: The Impacts of Framing, Agency Culture, and Structure in US Cities and Counties.” International Journal of Public Administration40 (3): 270–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1107738.
48.
LeeSang-Bum. 2019. “A Study on Improvement Strategy of Upper-Tier and Lower-Tier Local Governments’ Municipal/Provincial Subsidy System.” Korean Local Government Law Association Journal19 (4): 165–92. https://doi.org/10.21333/.
49.
LimJoon HyoungTangShui–Yan. 2002. “Democratization and Environmental Policy–Making in Korea.” Governance15 (4): 561–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0491.00201.
50.
LongJ ScottErvinLaurie H.. 2000. “Using Heteroscedasticity Consistent Standard Errors in the Linear Regression Model.” The American Statistician54 (3): 217–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2000.10474549.
51.
LowndesVivienPratchettLawrence. 2012. “Local Governance Under the Coalition Government: Austerity, Localism and the ‘Big Society’.” Local Government Studies38 (1): 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2011.642949.
52.
MarchJames G.SimonHerbert A.. 1958. Organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
53.
MilwardH. Brinton. 1996. “Symposium on the Hollow State: Capacity, Control, and Performance in Interorganizational Settings.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory6 (2): 193–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024306.
54.
NemetzAnnette M. 2015. “A Global Investigation of Government and Community Stakeholder Influences on Large Company Engagement in Sustainability.” International Journal of Business and Management10 (2): 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v10n2p1.
O'LearyRosemaryBinghamLisa B.. 2003. The Promise and Performance of Environmental Conflict Resolution. New York: Resources for the Future Press.
57.
O’LearyRosemaryVijNidhi. 2012. “Collaborative Public Management: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going?” The American Review of Public Administration42 (5): 507–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012445780.
58.
PannoAngeloCarrusGiuseppeBriziAmbraMaricchioloFridannaGiacomantonioMauroMannettiLucia. 2018. “Need for Cognitive Closure and Political Ideology.” Social Psychology49 (2): 103–12. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000333.
59.
ParkAngela Y.S.KrauseRachel M.. 2021. “Exploring the Landscape of Sustainability Performance Management Systems in U.S. Local Governments.” Journal of Environmental Management279: 111764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111764.
60.
ParkAngela Y.S.KrauseRachel M.HawkinsChristopher V.. 2021. “Institutional Mechanisms for Local Sustainability Collaboration: Assessing the Duality of Formal and Informal Mechanisms in Promoting Collaborative Processes.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory31 (2): 434–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa036.
61.
PeiferJared L.KhalsaSimranjitEcklundElaine Howard. 2016. “Political Conservatism, Religion, And Environmental Consumption in the United States.” Environmental Politics25 (4): 661–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1159604.
62.
PortneyKent E. 2013. Taking Sustainable Cities Seriously Economic Development, the Environment, and Quality of Life in American Cities. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Mass: MIT Press.
63.
PortneyKent E.BerryJeffrey M.. 2010. “Participation and the Pursuit of Sustainability in U.S. Cities.” Urban Affairs Review46 (1): 119–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087410366122.
64.
PortneyKent E.BerryJeffrey M.. 2016. “The Impact of Local Environmental Advocacy Groups on City Sustainability Policies and Programs.” Policy Studies Journal44 (2): 196–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12131.
65.
PotoskiMatthew. 2001. “Clean Air Federalism: Do States Race to the Bottom?” Public Administration Review61 (3): 335–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00034.
66.
Ramirez de la CruzEdgar E.2009. “Local Political Institutions and Smart Growth: An Empirical Study of The Politics of Compact Development.” Urban Affairs Review45 (2): 218–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087409334309.
67.
RosenzweigCynthiaSoleckiWilliamHammerStephen A.MehrotraShagun. 2010. “Cities Lead the Way in Climate–Change Action.” Nature467 (7318): 909–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/467909a.
68.
SahaDevashreePatersonRobert G.. 2008. “Local Government Efforts to Promote the “Three Es” of Sustainable Development: Survey in Medium to Large Cities in the United States.” Journal of Planning Education and Research28 (1): 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X08321803.
69.
SharpElaine B.DaleyDorothy M.LynchMichael S.. 2011. “Understanding Local Adoption and Implementation of Climate Change Mitigation Policy.” Urban Affairs Review47 (3): 433–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087410392348.
70.
StokanEricDeslatteAaron. 2019. “Beyond Borders: Governmental Fragmentation and the Political Market for Growth in American Cities.” State and Local Government Review51 (3): 150–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X20915497.
71.
StokanEricDeslatteAaronHatchMegan E.. 2021. “Exploring the Trade-Offs Local Governments Make in the Pursuit of Economic Growth and Equity.” Urban Affairs Review57 (4): 1084–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087420926648.
72.
SvaraJames H.WattTanya C.. 2013. “How Are U.S. Cities Doing Sustainability? Who s Getting on the Sustainability Train, and Why?.” Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research15 (1): 9–44.
73.
TaylorJenniferKlenkNicole. 2019. “The Politics of Evidence: Conflicting Social Commitments and Environmental Priorities in the Debate Over Wind Energy and Public Health.” Energy Research & Social Science47: 102–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.09.001.
74.
ThompsonBarton H.Jr2005. “Conservative Environmental Thought: The Bush Administration and Environmental Policy.” Ecology Law Quarterly32: 307.
75.
Van GenugtenMariekeVan ThielSandraVoornBart. 2020. “Local Governments and Their Arm's Length Bodies.” Local Government Studies46 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2019.1667774.
76.
ViningAidan R. 2011. “Public Agency External Analysis Using a Modified “Five Forces” Framework.” International Public Management Journal14 (1): 63–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2011.547819.
77.
ViningAidan R.WeimerDavid L.. 1992. “Welfare Economics as the Foundation for Public Policy Analysis: Incomplete and Flawed but Nevertheless Desirable.” The Journal of Socio-Economics21 (1): 25–37.
78.
VoornBartvan GenugtenMarieke. 2021. “Dealing with Multiple Principals in at Arm's Length Organizations: A Qualitative Study of Dutch Municipally Owned Corporations.” Public Administration: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12746.
WalkerHelenBrammerStephen. 2016. “Sustainable Procurement, Institutional Context and Top Management Commitment: An International Public Sector Study.” In Sustainable Value Chain Management, 67–86. London: Routledge.
81.
WangXiao HuHawkinsChristopher V.LebredoNickBermanEvan M.. 2012. “Capacity to Sustain Sustainability: A Study of U.S. Cities.” Public Administration Review72 (6): 841–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02566.x.
82.
WarnerMildredHebdonRobert. 2001. “Local Government Restructuring: Privatization and Its Alternatives.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management20 (2): 315–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.2027.
83.
ZahranSammyBrodySamuel D.VedlitzArnoldGroverHimanshuMillerCaitlyn. 2008. “Vulnerability and Capacity: Explaining Local Commitment to Climate-Change Policy.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26 (3): 544–62. https://doi.org/10.1068/c2g.
