Cities are key in urban climate mitigation. Since the early 2000s, a trend of urban climate governance experimentation has been observed in which cities, and especially city governments, are trialing novel governance interventions, processes, and instruments to learn from their development and implementation. This article explores the role of the government of the city of Seoul, South Korea, in a range of local experiments. It particularly focuses on the factors that contribute to the success (or lack thereof) of urban climate governance experimentation. It finds that the city’s government has been successful in developing and trialing some but not all experiments and that the overall results of these are promising in certain areas of city development and use. The article also highlights some less promising results, indicating the fragile nature of urban climate governance experimentation—in both the scientific and political senses of the term.
AyresIanRasemanSophieShihAlice. 2013. “Evidence from Two Large Field Experiments that Peer Comparison Feedback Can Reduce Residential Energy Usage.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization29 (5): 992–1022.
5.
BaekJong HackYunSun-Jin. 2015. “The Mini-PV Project as a Strategic Niche for One Less Nuclear Power Plant of Seoul and Changes in Energy Citizenship: Based on the Survey of Residents’ Awareness in Nowon-gu, Seoul.” Seoul Studies16 (3): 91–111.
6.
BernsteinStevenHoffmannMatthew. 2018. “The Politics of Decarbonization and the Catalytic Impact of Subnational Climate Experiments.” Policy Sciences51 (2): 189–211.
7.
BirnbaumSimon. 2015. “Environmental Co-Governance, Legitimacy, and the Quest for Compliance: When and Why Is Stakeholder Participation Desirable?” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning18 (3): 306–23.
8.
BlokAndersTschötschelRobin. 2016. “World Port Cities as Cosmopolitan Risk Community: Mapping Urban Climate Policy Experiments in Europe and East Asia.” Environment and Planning C34 (4): 717–36.
9.
BradyHenry E., eds. 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry. Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
10.
BulkeleyHarriet. 2013. Cities and Climate Change. New York: Routledge.
11.
BulkeleyHarrietCastán BrotoVanesaEdwardsGareth. 2015. An Urban Politics of Climate Change: Experimentation and the Governing of Socio-Technical Transitions. Abingdon: Routledge.
C40 Cities. 2017b. Urban Efficiency II: Seven Innovative City Programmes for Existing Building Energy Efficiency. London: C40 Cities.
14.
CampbellDonald. 1969. “Reforms as Experiments.” American Psychologist24 (4): 409–29.
15.
Castán BrotoVanessa. 2017. “Urban Governance and the Politics of Climate Change.” World Development93 (1): 1–15.
16.
Castán BrotoVanessaBulkeleyHarriet. 2013. “A Survey of Urban Climate Change Experiments in 100 Cities.” Global Environmental Change23 (1): 92–102.
17.
CerveroRobertDeokChang Kang. 2011. “Bus Rapid Transit Impacts on Land Uses and Land Values in Seoul, Korea.” Transport Policy18 (1): 102–16.
18.
ChuEricAnguelovskiIsabelleCarminJoann. 2016. “Inclusive Approaches to Urban Climate Adaptation Planning and Implementation in the Global South.” Climate Policy16 (3): 372–92.
19.
CotterillSarahJohnPeterLiuHanhuaNomuraHisako. 2009. “Mobilizing Citizen Effort to Enhance Environmental Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Door-to-Door Recycling Campaign.” Journal of Environmental Management91 (2): 403–10.
20.
De BurcaGrainne. 2010. “New Governance and Experimentalism: An Introduction.” Wisconsin Law Review227 (2): 227–38.
21.
DruckmanJamesDonaldGreenJamesKuklinskiArthurLupia, eds. 2011. Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
22.
EnrightTheresaUgoRossi, eds. 2018. The Urban Political: Ambivalent Spaces of Late Neoliberalism. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
23.
EumJeong-HeeSchererDieterFehrenbachUteKöppelJohannWooJung-Hun. 2013. “Integrating Urban Climate into Urban Master Plans Using Spatially Distributed Information—The Seoul Example.” Land Use Policy34 (1): 223–32.
24.
EvansJamesAndrewKarvonenRobRave, eds. 2016. The Experimental City. London: Routledge.
25.
GascóMila. 2017. “Living Labs: Implementing Open Innovation in the Public Sector.” Government Information Quarterly34 (1): 90–98.
26.
Global Green Growth Institute. 2015. Korea’s Green Growth Experience: Process, Outcomes and Lessons Learned. Seoul: Global Green Growth Institute.
27.
GoertzGaryMahonyJames. 2012. A Tale of Two Cultures. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
28.
GordonDavid. 2018. “Global Urban Climate Governance in Three and a Half Parts: Experimentation, Coordination, Integration (and Contestation).” WIREs Climate Change9 (6): e546.
29.
GreenbergDavidSchroderMark. 2003. The Digest of Social Experiments. 3rd ed.Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
30.
GrossmanJason. 2005. “The Randomized Controlled Trial Gold Standard, or Merely Standard?” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine48 (4): 516–34.
31.
GuptaJoyeetaKarinPfefferHebeVerrestMirjamRos-Tonen, eds. 2015. Geographies of Urban Governance. New York: Springer.
32.
HaSeoung-Kyu. 2011. “Seoul as a World City: The Challenge of Balanced Development.” In Planning Asian Cities: Risk and Resilience, edited by HamnettStephenForbesDean, 170–91. London: Routledge.
33.
HausMichaelErling KlausenJan. 2011. “Urban Leadership and Community Involvement: Ingredients for Good Governance?” Urban Affairs Review47 (2): 256–79.
34.
HéritierAdrienneLehmkuhlDirk. 2008. “The Shadow of Hierarchy and New Modes of Governance.” Journal of Public Policy28 (1): 1–17.
35.
HoffmannMatthew. 2011. Climate Governance at the Crossroads. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
36.
HolleyCameronGunninghamNeilShearingClifford. 2012. The New Environmental Governance. London: Routledge.
37.
HughesSara. 2017. “The Politics of Urban Climate Change Policy: Toward a Research Agenda.” Urban Affairs Review53 (2): 362–80.
38.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2018. Global Warming of 1.5 ºC. Incheon: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
39.
JandaKathrynParagYael. 2013. “A Middle-Out Approach for Improving Energy Performance in Buildings.” Building Research & Information41 (1): 39–50.
40.
JayneMarkKevinWard, eds. 2017. Urban Theory: New Critical Perspectives. London: Routledge.
41.
JohnsonCraigNoahTolySchroederHeike, eds. 2015. The Urban Climate Challenge. Abingdon: Routledge.
42.
JonesRandallYooByungseo. 2012. Achieving the “Low Carbon, Green Growth” Vision in Korea. Paris: OECD Publishers.
43.
KalafatisScottLemonMaria. 2017. “The Emergence of Climate Change Policy Entrepreneurs in Urban Regions.” Regional Environmental Change17 (6): 1791–99.
44.
Kamal-ChaouiLamiaGraziFabioJooJongwanPlouinMarissa. 2011. The Implementation of the Korean Green Growth Strategy in Urban Areas. Paris: OECD Publishers.
45.
KarvonenAndrewEvansJamesvan HeurBas. 2014. “The Politics of Urban Experiments: Radical Change or Business as Usual?” In After Sustainable Cities? edited by HodsonMikeMarvinSimon, 104–15. London: Routledge.
46.
KarvonenAndrewvan HeurBas. 2014. “Urban Laboratories: Experiments in Reworking Cities.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research38 (2): 379–92.
47.
KernKristineMolArthur. 2013. “Cities and Global Climate Governance: From Passive Implementers to Active Co-Decision-Makers.” In The Quest for Security: Protection Without Protectionism and the Challenge of Global Governance, edited by StiglitzJ. E.KaldorM., 288–304. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
48.
KimHa-naParkHun. 2017. “The Efforts of Local Governments for Energy Transition and Climate Change Response: Status and Recommendations for Expansion.” GRI Review19 (2): 201–30.
49.
KimYong-GunYooJonghyunOhWankeun. 2015. “Driving Forces of Rapid CO2 Emissions Growth: A Case of Korea.” Energy Policy82:144–55.
50.
KnielingJörg, ed. 2016. Climate Adaptation Governance in Cities and Regions: Theoretical Fundamentals and Practical Evidence. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
51.
KwonMyungjunJangHee SounFeicockRichard. 2014. “Climate Protection and Energy Sustainability Policy in California Cities: What Have We Learned?” Journal of Urban Affairs36 (5): 905–24.
52.
LeeJoo Hun. 2017. “Explaining One Less Nuclear Energy Policy from Governance Perspective: Energy Transition and Effectiveness of Urban Energy Policy.” Legislative Studies50 (1): 152–85.
53.
LeeTaehwaLeeTaedongLeeYujin. 2014. “An Experiment for Urban Energy Autonomy in Seoul: The One ‘Less’ Nuclear Power Plant policy.” Energy Policy74:311–18.
54.
LeeYujinJinSanghyun. 2015. “A Study on the Social Capital in Energy Self-Sufficient Villages: Focusing on the Government or Resident Leading Cases.” Korean Journal of Local Government Studies19 (3): 153–76.
55.
LindblomCharles. 1959. “The Science of ‘Muddling Through.’”Public Administration Review19 (2): 79–88.
56.
MarvinSimonSilverJonathan. 2016. “The Urban Laboratory and Emerging Sites of Urban Experimentation.” In The Experimental City, edited by EvansJamesKarvonenAndrewRavenRob, 47–60. London: Routledge.
57.
MoonTae Hoon. 2006. “Sustainable Development in Korea, Key Issues and Government Response.” International Review of Public Administration11 (1): 1–18.
58.
MoriAkihisa, ed. 2012. Democratization, Decentralization, and Environmental Governance in Asia. Kyoto: Kyoto Univ. Press.
59.
NewellPeterPattbergPhilippSchroederHeike. 2012. “Multiactor Governance and the Environment.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources37 (1): 365–87.
60.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2012a. Compact City Policies: Korea—Towards Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Paris: OECD Publishing.
61.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2012b. OECD Urban Policy Reviews: Korea. Paris: OECD Publishing.
62.
OverdevestChristineZeitlinJonathan. 2012. “Assembling an Experimentalist Regime: Transnational Governance Interactions in the Forest Sector.” Regulation & Governance8 (1): 22–48.
63.
PanditArkaCritterdenJohn. 2015. “Resilient Urban Systems: Where We Stand Now and Where We Need to Go.” Solutions Journal6 (1): 74–81.
64.
ParagYaelJandaKathryn. 2014. “More than Filler: Middle Actors and Socio-Technical Change in the Energy System from the ‘Middle-Out.’”Energy Research & Social Science3 (1): 102–12.
65.
ParkKwang-KookLeeWonheeLeeSeok-Hwan. 2016. Understanding Korean Public Administration: Lessons Learned from Practice. London: Routledge.
66.
PierreJon. 2011. The Politics of Urban Governance. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
67.
RiiHae UnAhnJae-Seob. 2002. “Urbanization and Its Impact on Seoul, Korea.” In Urbanization, East Asian and Habitat II, edited by DouglasIanHuangShu-Li, 47–70. Taipei: Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.
68.
RosenzweigCynthiaSoleckiWilliamRomero-LankaoPatriciaMehrotraShagunDhakalShobhakarIbrahimSomayya Ali. 2018. Climate Change and Cities: Second Assessment Report of the Urban Climate Change Research Network. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
69.
Sanchez-RodriguezRoberto. 2009. “Learning to Adapt to Climate Change in Urban Areas. A Review of Recent Contributions.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability1 (1): 201–206.
70.
SassenSaskia. 2012. Cities in a World Economy. 4th ed.Los Angeles: SAGE.
71.
SchroederHeikeBulkeleyHarriet. 2009. “Global Cities and the Governance of Climate Change: What Is the Role of Law in Cities?” Fordham Urban Law Review36 (1): 313–59.
72.
ScottTyler. 2015. “Does Collaboration Make Any Difference? Linking Collaborative Governance to Environmental Outcomes.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management34 (3): 537–66.
SeoJoon-Kyo. 2016. “Housing Policy and Urban Sustainable Development: Evaluating the Process of High-Rise Apartment Development in Korea.” Urban Policy and Research34 (4): 330–42.
ShinHwa-KyoungJoIn-SookJiYe-Jin. 2017. “The Study on the Characteristic of the Ordinances Related to Community Planning in Seoul Focusing on the Activation of Community Planning.” Journal of the Korean Housing Association28 (3): 23–33.
77.
SidikiSabaCarboniJuliaKoskiChrisSadiqAbdul. 2015. “How Policy Rules Shape the Structure and Performance of Collaborative Governance Arrangements.” Public Administration Review74 (4): 536–47.
Seoul Metropolitan Government. 2009. Urban Planning of Seoul. Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Government.
80.
Seoul Metropolitan Government. 2012. One Less Nuclear Power Plant. Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Government.
81.
Seoul Metropolitan Government. 2014a. City Energy Cultivators. Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Government.
82.
Seoul Metropolitan Government. 2014b. One Less Nuclear Power Plant—Phase 2. Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Government.
83.
Seoul Metropolitan Government. 2019a. Change “Mileage System” on Car Daytime and Get Benefits. Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Government.
84.
Seoul Metropolitan Government. 2019b. How Can I Participate in “Car Mileage” as Much as I Reduce?Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Government.
85.
Seoul Metropolitan Government. 2019c. Resilient Seoul: A Strategy for Urban Resilience 2019. Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Government.
86.
Seoul Metropolitan Government. 2019d. Seoul to Introduce the Seasonal Particle Pollution Control Measures from December to March. Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Government.
87.
SprainLeah. 2016. “Paradoxes of Public Participation in Climate Change Governance.” The Good Society25 (1): 62–80.
88.
Sustainia. 2015. Sustaina 100: A Guide to 100 Sustainable Solutions. Copenhagen: Sustainia.
van der HeijdenJeroen. 2015. “On the Potential of Voluntary Environmental Programmes for the Built Environment: A Critical Analysis of LEED.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment30 (4): 553–67.
91.
van der HeijdenJeroen. 2016. “Opportunities and Risks of the ‘New Urban Governance’ in India: To What Extent Can It Help Addressing Pressing Environmental Problems?” Journal of Environment and Development25 (3): 251–75.
92.
van der HeijdenJeroen. 2017. Innovations in Urban Climate Governance: Voluntary Programs for Low Carbon Buildings and Cities. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
93.
van der HeijdenJeroenvan BuerenEllen. 2013. “Regulating Sustainable Con-struction in Europe: An Inquiry into the European Commission’s Harmonization Attempts.” International Journal of Law in the Built Environment5 (1): 5–20.
94.
WaltersWilliam. 2004. “Some Critical Notes on Governance.” Studies in Political Economy73:27–46.
