Nonprofits have been posited to have benefits for communities and neighborhoods, including reduction of crime. Empirical research has provided mixed results. Drawing on both criminological and theories of public organization and organizational ecology, this article examines the effects of nonprofit density on neighborhood crime in Denver, Colorado, between 2010 and 2015. Controlling for demographic and environmental influences, as well as the effects of spatiotemporal autoregression, results suggest that a higher density of both place-based and generic nonprofits ameliorate rates of crime. In contrast, nonprofits focused on crime reduction have a significant positive curvilinear effect on several types of crime. Findings also suggest that while nonprofits at the micro-ecological level increase crime to a point, the impact is negligible compared with other factors. Moreover, a relatively high density of place-based or generic nonprofits may have some benefits at higher densities, indicating a synergistic effect.
AnselinLuc. 2010. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht: Springer.
2.
AustinJames E.2000. The Collaboration Challenge: How Nonprofits and Businesses Succeed Through Strategic Alliances. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
BaumJoel A.C.HavemanHeather A.1997. “Love Thy Neighbor Differentiation and Agglomeration in the Manhattan Hotel Industry, 1989-1990.” Administrative Science Quarterly42 (2): 304–334. doi: 10.2307/2393922.
4.
BaumOliverC.1996. “Toward an Institutional Ecology of Organizational Founding.” Academy of Management Journal39: 1378–427. doi: 10.5465/257003.
5.
BernascoWimBlockRichard. 2011. “Robberies in Chicago: A Block-Level Analysis of the Influence of Crime Generators, Crime Attractors, and Offender Anchor Points.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency48 (1): 33–57. doi:10.1177/0022427810384135.
6.
BeyerleinKraigHippJohn R.2005. “Social Capital, Too Much of a Good Thing? American Religious Traditions and Community Crime.” Social Forces84 (2): 995–1013. Accessed February 15, 2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3598488.
7.
BielefeldWolfgangMurdochJames C.2004. “The Locations of Nonprofit Organizations and Their for-Profit Counterparts: An Exploratory Analysis.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly33 (2): 221–46. doi:10.1177/0899764003260589.
8.
BielefeldWolfgangMurdochJames C.WaddellPaul. 1997. “The Influence of Demographics and Distance on Nonprofit Location.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly26 (2): 207–25. doi:10.1177/0899764097262007.
9.
BrantinghamPatricia L.BrantinghamPaul J.1993. “Environment, Routine and Situation: Toward a Pattern Theory of Crime: Advances in Criminological Theory.” In Routine Activity and Rational Choice, edited by ClarkeRonald V.FelsonMarcus, vol. 5, 259–94. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
10.
BrantinghamPatricia L.BrantinghamPaul J.1995. “Criminality of Place.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research33:5–26. doi:10.1007/BF02242925.
11.
BrownWilliam A.YoshiokaCarlton F.2003. “Mission Attachment and Satisfaction as Factors in Employee Retention.” Nonprofit Management & Leadership14 (1): 5–18.
12.
BursikRobert J.1988. “Social Disorganization and Theories of Crime and Delinquency: Problems and Prospects.” Criminology264:519–52. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1988.tb00854.x.
13.
BursikRobert J.GrasmickHarold G.1993. “Economic Deprivation and Neighborhood Crime Rates, 1960-1980.” Law & Society Review27 (2): 263–83. doi:10.2307/3053937.
14.
ChambréSusan M.FattNaomi. 2002. “Beyond the Liability of Newness: Nonprofit Organizations in an Emerging Policy Domain.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly31 (4): 502–24. doi:10.1177/0899764002238098.
15.
CohenLawrence E.FelsonMarcus. 1979. “Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach.” American Sociological Review44 (4): 588–608. Accessed February 15, 2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2094589.
16.
ColemanJames S.1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology94:S95–120. Accessed February 15, 2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780243.
17.
da CostaMarcelo M.2016. “What Influences the Location of Nonprofit Organizations? A Spatial Analysis in Brazil.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations273:1064–90. doi:10.1007/s11266-016-9682-7.
18.
FelsonMarcusBobaRachel. 2010. Crime and Everyday Life. 4th ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
FrumkinPeterAndre-ClarkAlice. 2000. “When Missions, Markets, and Politics Collide: Values and Strategy in the Nonprofit Human Services.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly29 (1): 141–63.
20.
GroffElizabeth R.LockwoodBrian. 2014. “Criminogenic Facilities and Crime across Street Segments in Philadelphia: Uncovering Evidence About the Spatial Extent of Facility Influence.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency51 (3): 277–314. doi:10.1177/0022427813512494.
21.
GrønbjergKirsten A.1994. “Using NTEE to Classify Non-profit Organisations: An Assessment of Human Service and Regional Applications.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations53:301–28. doi:10.1007/BF02354038.
22.
HallPeter D.1992. Inventing the Nonprofit Sector and Other Essays on Philanthropy, Voluntarism, and Nonprofit Organizations. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
23.
HarrisonXavier A.2014. “Using Observation-Level Random Effects to Model Overdispersion in Count Data in Ecology and Evolution.” PeerJ2:e616. doi:10.7717/peerj.616.
24.
HeLiPáezAntonioLiuDesheng. 2017. “Persistence of Crime Hot Spots: An Ordered Probit Analysis.” Geographical Analysis49 (1): 3–22. doi:10.1111/gean.12107.
25.
HippJohn R.2007. “Block, Tract, and Levels of Aggregation: Neighborhood Structure and Crime and Disorder as a Case in Point.” American Sociological Review72: 659–80. doi: 10.1177/000312240707200501.
26.
HuangGuowen.2016. “Quantification of Air Quality in Space and Time and Its Effects on Health.” PhD thesis, Univ. of Glasgow, Glasgow.
27.
HughesLori A.SchaibleLonnie M.JimmersonKatherine. 2019. “Marijuana Dispensaries and Neighborhood Crime and Disorder in Denver, Colorado.” Justice Quarterly. Published electronically February. doi:10.1080/07418825.2019.1567807.
28.
IngrahamPatricia W.DonahueAmy K.2000. “Dissecting the Black Box Revisited: Characterizing Government Management Capacity.” In Government and Performance: New Perspectives, edited by HeinrichCarolyn J.LynnLaurence E. Jr., 292–318. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.
29.
JacobyAnnette. 2018. “Social Service Organizations, Discretionary Funding, and Neighborhood Crime Rates.” Crime & Delinquency64 (9): 1193–214. doi:10.1177/0011128716688884.
30.
KauttPaula M.RoncekDennis W.2007. “Schools as Criminal ‘Hot Spots’: Primary, Secondary, and Beyond.” Criminal Justice Review32(4): 339–57. doi:10.1177/0734016807311559.
31.
KeatingElizabeth K.FrumkinPeter. 2003. “Reengineering Nonprofit Financial Accountability: Toward a More Reliable Foundation for Regulation.” Public Administration Review63 (1): 3–15. Accessed February 15, 2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/977517.
32.
KirkGaryNolanShabnam Beth. 2010. “Nonprofit Mission Statement Focus and Financial Performance.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership20 (4): 473–90.
33.
LamMarcusMcDougleLindsey. 2016. “Community Variation in the Financial Health of Nonprofit Human Service Organizations: An Examination of Organizational and Contextual Effects.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly45 (3): 500–25. doi:10.1177/0899764015591365.
34.
LampkinLinda M.BorisElizabeth T.2002. “Nonprofit Organization Data: What We Have and What We Need.” American Behavioral Scientist45 (11): 1675–1715. doi:10.1177/0002764202045011005.
35.
LeeDuncanRushworthAlastairNapierGary. 2018. “Spatio-Temporal Areal Unit Modeling in R with Conditional Autoregressive Priors Using the CARBayesST Package.” Journal of Statistical Software84 (9): 1–39. doi:10.18637/jss.v084.i09.
36.
LeRouxBrian G.2000. “Modelling Spatial Disease Rates Using Maximum Likelihood.” Statistics in Medicine19(17–18):2321–32. doi:10.1002/1097-0258(20000915/30)19:17/18<2321::AID-SIM572>3.0.CO;2-#.
37.
LevineDaniel J.KimMirae. 2016. “When Missions, Markets, and Politics Collide: Values and Strategy in the Nonprofit Human Services.” Administration & Society50 (7): 947–72.
38.
McCordEric S.RatcliffeJerry H.GarciaR. MarieTaylorRalph B.2007. “Nonresidential Crime Attractors and Generators Elevate Perceived Neighborhood Crime and Incivilities.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency44 (3): 295–320. doi:10.1177/0022427807301676.
39.
McDonaldRobert E.2007. “An Investigation of Innovation in Nonprofit Organizations: The Role of Organizational Mission.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly36 (2): 256–81.
40.
McDougleLindsey M.2015. “The Accuracy of the Core Files for Studying Nonprofit Location: How Many Nonprofits Are There?”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly44 (3): 609–24. doi:10.1177/0899764015573873.
41.
McDougleLindsey M.LamMarcus. 2014. “Individual- and Community-Level Determinants of Public Attitudes Toward Nonprofit Organizations.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly43 (4): 672–92. doi:10.1177/0899764013479830.
42.
McQuarrieMichaelMarwellNicole P.2009. “The Missing Organizational Dimension in Urban Sociology.” City & Community8 (3): 247–68. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6040.2009.01288.x.
43.
MoldavanovaAlisaGoerdelHolly T.2018. “Understanding the Puzzle of Organizational Sustainability: Toward a Conceptual Framework of Organizational Social Connectedness and Sustainability.” Public Management Review20 (1): 1–27. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1293141.
44.
MorenoffJeffrey D.SampsonRobert J.RaudenbushStephen W.2001. “Neighborhood Inequality, Collective Efficacy, and the Spatial Dynamics of Urban Violence.” Criminology39:517–58. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00932.x.
National Center for Charitable Statistics. 2019. “National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities (NTEE) Codes.” The Urban Institute, National Center for Charitable Statistics, Washington, DC. Accessed February 15, 2020. http://nccs.urban.org/classification/national-taxonomy-exempt-entities.
47.
PeckLaura R.2008. “Do Antipoverty Nonprofits Locate Where People Need Them? Evidence from a Spatial Analysis of Phoenix.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly37 (1): 138–51. doi:10.1177/0899764006298963.
48.
PetersonRuth D.KrivoLauren J.HarrisMark A.2000. “Disadvantage and Neighborhood Violent Crime: Do Local Institutions Matter?”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency37 (1): 31–63. doi:10.1177/0022427800037001002.
49.
PutnamRobert D.2000. “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital.” In Culture and Politics, edited by CrothersLaneLockhartCharles, 223–34. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
50.
QiuFangZhangCaiyunZhouYuhong. 2012. “The Development of an Areal Interpolation ArcGIS Extension and a Comparative Study.” GIScience & Remote Sensing49 (5): 644–63. doi:10.2747/1548-1603.49.5.644.
51.
RatcliffeJerry H.2004. “Geocoding Crime and a First Estimate of a Minimum Acceptable Hit Rate.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science18: 61– 72. doi: 10.1080/13658810310001596076.
52.
RomanCaterina GouvisMooreGretchen E.2004. “Measuring Local Institutions and Organizations: The Role of Community Institutional Capacity in Social Capital.”Washington, DC: Urban Institute Justice Policy Center.
53.
RoncekDennis W.FaggianiDonald. 1985. “High Schools and Crime: A Replication.” The Sociological Quarterly26:491–505. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1985.tb00240.x.
54.
RushworthAlastairLeeDuncanMitchellRichard. 2014. “A Spatio-Temporal Model for Estimating the Long-Term Effects of Air Pollution on Respiratory Hospital Admissions in Greater London.” Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Epidemiology10:29–38. doi:10.1016/j.sste.2014.05.001.
55.
SampsonRobert J.GrovesW. Byron. 1989. “Community Structure and Crime: Testing Social-Disorganization Theory.” American Journal of Sociology94 (4): 774–802. Accessed February 15, 2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780858.
56.
SampsonRobert J.RaudenbushStephen W.EarlsFelton. 1997. “Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy.” Science277 (5328): 918–24. doi:10.1126/science.277.5328.918.
57.
SchneiderJo Anne. 2009. “Organizational Social Capital and Nonprofits.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly38 (4): 643–62. doi:10.1177/0899764009333956.
58.
SharkeyPatrickTorrats-EspinosaGerardTakyarDelaram. 2017. “Community and the Crime Decline: The Causal Effect of Local Nonprofits on Violent Crime.” American Sociological Review82 (6): 1214–40. doi:10.1177/0003122417736289.
59.
ShawClifford R.McKayHenry D.1942. Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
60.
SkoganWesley G.1988. “Community Organizations and Crime.” Crime and Justice10:39–78. doi:10.1086/449143.
61.
SlocumLee AnnRengifoAndres F.ChoiTiffanyHerrmannChristopher R.2013. “The Elusive Relationship Between Community Organizations and Crime: An Assessment Across Disadvantaged Areas of the South Bronx.” Criminology51 (1): 167–216. doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12001.
62.
SmallMario LuisMcDermottMonica. 2006. “The Presence of Organizational Resources in Poor Urban Neighborhoods: An Analysis of Average and Contextual Effects.” Social Forces84 (3): 1697–724. doi:10.1353/sof.2006.0067.
63.
SmallMario LuisStarkLaura. 2005. “Are Poor Neighborhoods Resource Deprived? A Case Study of Child Care Centers in New York.” Social Science Quarterly86 (s1): 1013–36. doi:10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00334.x.
64.
SmallMario LuisJacobsErin M.MassengillRebekah Peeples. 2008. “Why Organizational Ties Matter for Neighborhood Effects: Resource Access through Childcare Centers.” Social Forces1: 387–414. doi: 10.1353/sof.0.0079.
65.
SmithWilliam R.FrazeeSharon GlaveDavisonElizabeth L.2000. “Furthering the Integration of Routine Activity and Social Disorganization Theories: Small Units of Analysis and the Study of Street Robbery as a Diffusion Process.” Criminology38: 489– 524. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb00897.x.
66.
SteenbeekWouterVölkerBeateFlapHenkOortFrank van. 2012. “Local Businesses as Attractors or Preventers of Neighborhood Disorder.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency49 (2): 213–48. doi:10.1177/0022427810397948.
67.
StuckyThomas D.OttensmannJohn R.2009. “Land Use and Violent Crime.” Criminology47 (4): 1223–64. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00174.x.
WalkerEdward T.McCarthyJohn D.2010. “Legitimacy, Strategy, and Resources in the Survival of Community-Based Organizations.” Social Problems57 (3): 315–40. Accessed February 15, 2020. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/sp.2010.57.3.315.
WoJames C.2016. “Community Context of Crime: A Longitudinal Examination of the Effects of Local Institutions on Neighborhood Crime.” Crime & Delinquency62 (10): 1286–312. doi:10.1177/0011128714542501.
74.
WoJames C.HippJohn R.BoessenAdam. 2016. “Voluntary Organizations and Neighborhood Crime: A Dynamic Perspective.” Criminology54 (2): 212–41. doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12101.
75.
YuSung-Suk VioletMaxfieldMichael G.2013. “Ordinary Business: Impacts on Commercial and Residential Burglary.” British Journal of Criminology54 (2): 298–320. doi:10.1093/bjc/azt064.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
