Much of the research on residents’ responses to urban development projects focuses on their self-interests, specifically economic position or quality of life. We know comparatively little about how social and cultural factors help influence and explain these behaviors, especially under conditions of gentrification. Based on an analysis of people’s reactions toward a development project in Newburgh, New York, an impoverished small city experiencing gentrification, this article reveals the importance of framing for understanding how and why groups support and oppose controversial projects. Although residents largely vary in their stance along lines of social class and race/ethnicity, their perspectives are intertwined with their perceptions of the city either as a place of mistreatment and a collective memory of local injustices (supporters), or as a place of opportunity and a local identity as place entrepreneurs (opponents). This article reveals new explanations for the complex dynamics behind residents’ reactions to urban growth initiatives.
Abu-LughodJanet. 1994. From Urban Village to East Village: The Battle for New York’s Lower East Side. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
2.
BainAlison L. 2017. “Neighbourhood Artistic Disaffiliation in Hamilton, Ontario.” Urban Studies54 (13):2935–54.
3.
BainAlison L. 2018. “Artists as Property Owners and Small-Scale Developers.” Urban Geography39 (6):844–67.
4.
BasoloVictoriaHastingsDorian. 2003. “Obstacles to Regional Housing Solutions: A Comparison of Four Metropolitan Areas.” Journal of Urban Affairs25 (4):449–72.
5.
BeenVickiMadarJosiahMcDonnellSimon. 2014. “Urban Land-use Regulation: Are Homevoters Overtaking the Growth Machine?” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies11 (2):227–65.
6.
BenfordRobertSnowDavid. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology26:611–39.
7.
BondsAnne. 2013. “Economic Development, Racialization, and Privilege: ‘Yes in My Backyard’ Prison Politics and the Reinvention of Madras, Oregon.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers103 (6):1389–405.
8.
BotetzagiasIosefKaramichasJohn. 2009. “Grassroots Mobilisations Against Waste Disposal Sites in Greece.” Environmental Politics18:939–59.
9.
BoudetHilary. 2011. “From NIMBY to NIABY: Regional Mobilization Against Liquefied Natural Gas in the United States.” Environmental Politics20 (6):786–806.
10.
BoudetHilaryBugdenDylanZanoccoChadMaibachEdward. 2016. “The Effect of Industry Activities on Public Support for ‘Fracking’.” Environmental Politics25 (3):593–612.
11.
Brown-SaracinoJaponica. 2009. A Neighborhood that Never Changes: Gentrification, Social Preservation, and the Search for Authenticity. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
12.
Brown-SaracinoJaponica. 2010. The Gentrification Debates. New York: Routledge.
13.
Brown-SaracinoJaponica. 2018. How Places Make Us: Novel LBQ Identities in Four Small Cities. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
14.
CahillCaitlin. 2006. “‘At Risk’? The Fed Up Honeys Re-present the Gentrification of the Lower East Side.” Women’s Studies Quarterly34 (1/2):334–63.
15.
CainColleen. 2014. “Negotiating with the Growth Machine: Community Benefits Agreements and Value-Conscious Growth.” Sociological Forum29 (4):937–58.
16.
CharmazKathy. 2001. “Grounded Theory.” In Contemporary Field Research: Perspectives and Formulations, edited by EmersonRobert, 335–52. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press.
17.
CroweJessicaSilvaTonyCeresolaRyan G.BudayAmandaLeonardCharles. 2015. “Differences in Public Perceptions and Leaders’ Perceptions on Hydraulic Fracturing and Shale Development.” Sociological Perspectives58 (3):441–63.
18.
DavisBelindaBaliValentina. 2008. “Examining the Role of Race, NIMBY, and Local Politics in FEMA Trailer Park Placement.” Social Science Quarterly89 (5):1175–94.
19.
DearMichael. 1992. “Understanding and Overcoming the NIMBY Syndrome.” Journal of the American Planning Association58:288–302.
20.
DengLan. 2009. Assessing Changes in Neighborhoods Hosting the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Projects. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy.
21.
DokshinFedor A. 2016. “Whose Backyard and What’s at Issue? Spatial and Ideological Dynamics of Local Opposition to Fracking in New York State, 2010 to 2013.” American Sociological Review81 (5):921–48.
22.
DonnellyKathleen. 2018. “The Gentrifier’s Dilemma: Narrative Strategies and Self-Justifications of Incoming Residents in Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn.” City & Community17 (4):374–93.
23.
DuckWaverly. 2015. No Way Out: Precarious Living in the Shadow of Poverty and Drug Dealing. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
24.
EllenIngrid GouldSchwartzAmy EllenVoicuIoanSchillMichael H.2007. “Does Federally Subsidized Rental Housing Depress Neighborhood Property Values” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management26:257–80.
25.
ElwoodSarahLawsonVictoriaNowakSamuel. 2015. “Middle Class Poverty Politics: Making Place, Making People.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers105 (1):123–43.
26.
ErantiVeikko. 2017. “Re-visiting NIMBY: From Conflicting Interests to Conflicting Valuations.” Sociological Review65 (2):285–301.
27.
FischelWilliam. 2001. The Homevoter Hypothesis. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
28.
FladHarvey K.GriffenClyde. 2009. Main Street to Mainframes: Landscape and Social Change in Poughkeepsie. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
29.
FloridaRichard. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class, and How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community, and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
30.
FreemanLanceBoteinHillary. 2002. “Subsidized Housing and Neighborhood Impacts: A Theoretical Discussion.” Journal of Planning Literature16:359–78.
31.
FreemanLanceBraconiFrank. 2004. “Gentrification and Displacement: New York City in the 1990s.” Journal of the American Planning Association70 (1):39–52.
32.
FreudenburgWilliam R.PastorSusan K.1992. “NIMBYs and LULUs: Stalking the Syndromes.” Journal of Social Issues48 (4):39–61.
33.
GibsonTimothy A. 2005. “NIMBY and the Civic Good.” City & Community4 (4):381–401.
34.
GoffmanErving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper Colophon.
35.
GravelleTimothy B.LachapelleErick. 2015. “Politics, Proximity and the Pipeline: Mapping Public Attitudes Toward Keystone XL.” Energy Politics83:99–108.
36.
HagerCarolHaddadMary Alice. 2015. NIMBY is Beautiful: Cases of Local Activism and Environmental Innovation around the World. New York: Berghahn Books.
37.
HallMelvin F.HallLeda McIntyre. 1994. “A Growth Machine for Those who Count.” Critical Sociology20 (1):79–102.
38.
HalleDavidTisoElizabeth. 2014. New York’s New Edge: Contemporary Art, the High Line, and Urban Megaprojects on the Far West Side. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
39.
HarrisonJill Ann. 2017. “Rust Belt Boomerang: The Pull of Place in Moving Back to a Legacy City.” City & Community16:263–83.
40.
HinesJ. Dwight. 2010. “In Pursuit of Experience: The Postindustrial Gentrification of the Rural American West.” Ethnography11 (2):285–308.
41.
HoldenMegScerriAndyEsfahaniAzadeh H.2015. “Justifying Redevelopment ‘Failures’ Within Urban ‘Success Stories’: Dispute, Compromise, and a New Test of Urbanity.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research39 (3):451–70.
42.
HoyleBrian. 2000. “Confrontation, Consultation, Cooperation? Community Groups and Urban Change in Canadian Port-City Waterfronts.” Canadian Geographer44 (3):228–43.
43.
HyraDerek. 2015. “The Back-to-the-City Movement: Neighbourhood Redevelopment and Processes of Political and Cultural Displacement.” Urban Studies52:1753–73.
44.
JonasAndrew E. G.DavidWilson, eds. 1999. The Urban Growth Machine: Critical Perspectives Two Decades Later. New York: State Univ. of New York Press.
45.
KimelbergShelley McDonough. 2011. “Inside the Growth Machine: Real Estate Professionals on the Perceived Challenges of Urban Development.” City & Community10 (1):76–99.
46.
LeesLoretta. 2003. “Super-gentrification: The Case of Brooklyn Heights, New York City.” Urban Studies40 (12):2487–92.
47.
LeesLoretta. 2008. “Gentrification and Social Mixing: Towards an Inclusive Urban Renaissance?” Urban Studies45 (12):2449–70.
48.
LloydRichard D. 2006. Neo-bohemia: Art and Commerce in the Postindustrial City. New York: Routledge.
49.
LoganJohnMolotchHarvey. 1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
50.
LondonJeffrey. 2017. “Portland Oregon, Music Scenes, and Change: A Cultural Approach to Collective Strategies of Empowerment.” City & Community16 (1):47–65.
51.
MarkusenAnn. 2006. “Urban Development and the Politics of a Creative Class: Evidence from a Study of Artists.” Environment and Planning A38 (10):1921–40.
52.
MartinLeslie. 2007. “Fighting for Control: Political Displacement in Atlanta’s Gentrifying Neighborhoods.” Urban Affairs Review42 (5):603–28.
53.
MartinezMiranda J. 2010. Power at the Roots: Gentrification, Community Gardens, and the Puerto Ricans of the Lower East Side. Lexington: Lexington Books.
54.
MasseyDouglas. 2008. New Faces in New Places: The Changing Geography of American Immigration. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
55.
McLeanHeatherRahderBarbara. 2013. “The Exclusionary Politics of Creative Communities: The Case of Kensington Market Pedestrian Sundays.” Canadian Journal of Urban Research22 (1):90–110.
56.
MeleChristopher. 2000. Selling the Lower East Side: Culture, Real Estate, and Resistance in New York City. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
57.
MencherSamuel. 1962. “Newburgh: The Recurrent Crisis of Public Assistance.” Social Work7 (1):3–11.
58.
MichaudKristyCarlisleJulietSmithEric. 2008. “Nimbyism vs. Environmentalism in Attitudes toward Energy Development.” Environmental Politics17 (1):20–39.
59.
MiraftabFaranak. 2016. Global Heartland: Displaced Labor, Transnational Lives, and Local Placemaking. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.
60.
MolotchHarvey. 1976. “The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place.” American Journal of Sociology82 (2):309–32.
61.
Mulligan-HanselKathleenLeRoyGreg. 2008. “Community Benefits: An Idea on a Roll!” Neighborhood Funders Group Reports15 (1):4–5.
62.
NeubeckKenneth J.CazenaveNoel A.2001. Welfare Racism: Playing the Race Card Against America’s Poor. New York: Routledge.
63.
NewmanKatheWylyElvin K.2006. “The Right to Stay Put, Revisited: Gentrification and Resistance to Displacement in New York City.” Urban Studies43 (1):23–57.
64.
NguyenMai T. 2005. “Does Affordable Housing Detrimentally Affect Property Values? A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Planning Literature20 (1):15–26.
65.
OcejoRichard E. 2014. Upscaling Downtown: From Bowery Saloons to Cocktail Bars in New York City. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
66.
PaccoudAntoineMaceAlan. 2018. “Tenure Change in London’s Suburbs: Spreading Gentrification or Suburban Upscaling?” Urban Studies55 (6):1313–28.
67.
PalmerGeraldine L. 2016. “Examining the Effects of Scattered Site Supportive Housing on the Social and Economic Integration of Men who Are Formerly Homeless and Primarily Black/African American.” Journal of Black Studies47 (8):846–68.
68.
PattilloMary. 2007. Black on the Block: The Politics of Race and Class in the City. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
69.
PendallRolf. 1999. “Opposition to Housing: NIMBY and beyond.” Urban Affairs Review35:112–36.
70.
PendallRolf. 2008. “From Hurdles to Bridges: Local Land-use Regulations and the Pursuit of Affordable Rental Housing.” In Revisiting Rental Housing: Policies, Programs, and Priorities, edited by RetsinasN. P.BelskyE. S., 225–69. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press and Joint Center for Housing Studies.
71.
RitzJoseph P. 1966. The Despised Poor: Newburgh’s War on Welfare. Boston: Beacon Press.
72.
RoseDamaris. 2004. “Discourses and Experiences of Social Mix in Gentrifying Neighbourhoods: A Montreal Case Study.” Canadian Journal of Urban Research13:278–316.
73.
ScallyCorianne Payton. 2013. “The Nuances of NIMBY: Context and Perceptions of Affordable Rental Housing Development.” Urban Affairs Review49 (5):718–47.
74.
SchivelyCarissa. 2007. “Understanding the NIMBY and LULU Phenomena: Reassessing Our Knowledge Base and Informing Future Research.” Journal of Planning Literature21 (3):255–66.
75.
SchlichtmanJohn JoePatchJason. 2014. “Gentrifier? Who, Me? Interrogating the Gentrifier in the Mirror.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research38 (4):1491–1508.
76.
SchlichtmanJohn JoePatchJasonHillMarc Lamont. 2017. Gentrifier. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.
77.
SchwartzMaryWilsonEllen. 2007. Who Can Afford to Live in a Home? A Look at Data from the 2006 American Community Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
78.
ShawSamuel C.SullivanDaniel Monroe. 2011. “White Night: Gentrification, Racial Exclusion, and Perceptions and Participation in the Arts.” City and Community10 (2):241–64.
79.
SmallMario Luis. 2004. Villa Victoria: The Transformation of Social Capital in a Boston Barrio. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
80.
SmithNeil. 1996. The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. New York: Routledge.
81.
SnowDavid A.BenfordRobert. 1992. “Master Frames and Cycles of Protest.” In Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, edited by MorrisA.MuellerC., 133–55. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
82.
SnowDavid A.BurkeRochford E.WordenSteven K.BenfordRobert D.1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review51:464–81.
83.
StabrowskiFilip. 2014. “New-Build Gentrification and the Everyday Displacement of Polish Immigrant Tenants in Greenpoint, Brooklyn.” Antipode46 (3):794–815.
84.
StockdaleAileen. 2010. “The Diverse Geographies of Rural Gentrification in Scotland.” Journal of Rural Studies26 (1):31–40.
85.
SunXiayiHuangRonggui. 2016. “Extension of State-Led Growth Coalition and Grassroots Management.” Urban Affairs Review52 (6):917–43.
86.
TigheJ. Rosie. 2010. “Public Opinion and Affordable Housing: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Planning Literature25:3–17.
87.
TigheJ. RosieMuellerElizabeth. 2013. The Affordable Housing Reader. New York: Routledge.
88.
van HulstMerlijnYanowDvora. 2016. “From Policy ‘Frames’ to ‘Framing’: Theorizing a More Dynamic, Political Approach.” The American Review of Public Administration46 (1):92–112.
89.
Villarrubia-MendozaJ. 2016. “Tú Velas por los Tuyos: Weak Labor Markets and the Importance of Social Networks.” International Migration and Integration17:631–48.
90.
WiltonRobert D. 2002. “Colouring Special Needs: Locating Whiteness in NIMBY Conflicts.” Social & Cultural Geography3 (3):303–21.
91.
WrightRachel A.BoudetHilary S.2012. “To Act or Not to Act: Context, Capability, and Community Response to Environmental Risk.” American Journal of Sociology118 (3):728–77.
92.
YungEsther H. K.ChanEdwin H.2016. “Re-examining the Growth Machine Ideology of Cities.” Urban Affairs Review52 (2):182–210.
93.
ZukinSharon. 1982. Loft Living: Culture and Capital in Urban Change. New Brunswick: Rutgers Univ. Press.
94.
ZukinSharon. 2008. “Consuming Authenticity: From Outposts of Difference to Means of Exclusion.” Cultural Studies22 (5):724–48.
95.
ZukinSharon. 2010. Naked City: The Death and Life of Authentic Urban Places. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
