U.S. cities transform public housing. Black municipal leadership (BML) may influence the scale and character of public housing removal and redevelopment. Informed by the “Black urban regime” literature, this study assesses whether presence and duration of BML, coupled with other factors, explains variation in public housing transformation for a sample of large cities. Its findings suggest that, controlling for other factors, BML is associated with moderately greater scales of public housing removal in the 1990s and 2000s, but BML is not associated with the “rate of return” by former public housing residents or new residence by public housing eligible households in Housing Opportunities for People Everywhere (HOPE VI) communities as of 2016. The findings invite further research on the intraracial dynamics and policy consequences of BML. They build, too, on public housing transformation scholarship, raising new questions about how municipal politics shape public housing and other sites of subsidized residence for low-income denizens of cities.
ArenaJohn. 2012. Driven from New Orleans: How Nonprofits Betray Public Housing and Promote Privatization. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
2.
BanksManley E.2000. “A Changing Electorate in a Majority-Black City: The Emergence of a Neo-conservative Black Urban Regime in Contemporary Atlanta.” Journal of Urban Affairs22 (3): 265–78.
3.
BennettLarryReedAdolphJr.1999. “The New Face of Urban Renewal: The Newer North Redevelopment Initiative and the Cabrini-Green Neighborhood.” In Without Justice for All: The New Liberalism and Our Retreat from Racial Equality, edited by ReedAdolph, Jr., 175–211. Boulder: Westview Press.
4.
BoboLawrenceGilliamFranklin D.1990. “Race, Sociopolitical Participation, and Black Empowerment.” American Political Science Review84 (2): 377–93.
5.
BrownRobert A.2007. “Race and Politics Matter: Black Urban Representation and Social Spending During the Urban Crisis.” National Political Science Review11:17–42.
6.
BrowningRufus P.MarshallDale RogersTabbDavid H.1984. Protest Is Not Enough: The Struggle of Blacks and Hispanics for Equality in Urban Politics. University of California Press.
7.
BurnsPeterThomasMatthew. 2015. Reforming New Orleans: The Contentious Politics of Change in the Big Easy. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.
8.
ClingermayerJames C.1994. “Electoral Representation, Zoning Politics, and the Exclusion of Group Homes.” Political Research Quarterly47 (4): 969–84.
9.
CohenCathy J.1999. The Boundaries of Blackness: AIDS and the Breakdown of Black Politics. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
10.
ConwayBrian P.HachenDavis S.Jr.2005. “Attachments, Grievances, Resources, and Efficacy: The Determinants of Tenant Association Participation Among Public Housing Tenants.” Journal of Urban Affairs27 (1): 25–52.
11.
EnosRyan. 2016. “What the Demolition of Public Housing Teaches Us About the Impact of Racial Threat on Political Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science60 (1): 123–42.
12.
FergusonKaren. 2002. Black Politics in New Deal Atlanta. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
13.
GayClaudine. 2012. “Moving to Opportunity: The Political Effects of a Housing Mobility Experiment.” Urban Affairs Review48 (2): 147–79.
14.
GillespieAndra. 2012. The New Black Politician: Cory Booker, Newark, and Post-racial America. New York: New York Univ. Press.
15.
GilliamFranklinJr.KauffmanKaren M.1998. “Is There an Empowerment Life Cycle? Long-term Black Empowerment and Its Influence on Voter Participation.” Urban Affairs Review33 (3): 741–66.
16.
GinwrightShawn A.2002. “Classed Out: The Challenges of Social Class in Black Community Change.” Social Problems49 (4): 544–62.
17.
GoetzEdward G.2003. Clearing the Way: Deconcentrating the Poor. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
18.
GoetzEdward G.2011. “Where Have All the Towers Gone? The Dismantling of Public Housing in U.S. Cities.” Journal of Urban Affairs33 (3): 267–87.
19.
GoetzEdward G.2013. New Deal Ruins: Race, Economic Justice, and Public Housing. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.
20.
GoetzEdward G.SidneyMara. 1994. “Revenge of the Property Owners: Community Development and the Politics of Property.” Journal of Urban Affairs16 (4): 319–34.
21.
GressTarynChoSeungjongJosephMark. 2016. HOPE VI Data Compilation and Analysis. Cleveland: National Initiative on Mixed-income Communities, Case Western Reserve Univ.
22.
HackworthJason. 2003. “Public Housing and the Rescaling of Regulation in the USA.” Environment and Planning A35 (3): 531–49.
23.
HackworthJason. 2007. The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology, and Development in American Urbanism. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.
24.
HankinsKatherinePuckettMechelleOakleyDeirdreRuelErin. 2014. “Forced Mobility: The Relocation of Public-housing Residents in Atlanta.” Environment and Planning A46 (12): 2932–49.
25.
HanlonJames. 2012. “Beyond HOPE VI: Demolition/Disposition and the Uncertain Future of Public Housing in America.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment27 (3): 373–88.
26.
HarrisFredrick C.Sinclair-ChapmanValeriaMcKenzieBrian D.2006. Countervailing Forces in African-American Civic Activism, 1973-1994. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
27.
HopkinsDaniel J.McCabeKatherine T.2012. “After It’s Too Late: Estimating the Policy Impacts of Black Mayoralties in U.S. Cities.” American Politics Research40 (4): 665–700.
28.
HyraDerek. 2015. “The Back-to-the-city Movement: Neighbourhood Redevelopment and Processes of Political and Cultural Displacement.” Urban Studies52 (10): 1753–73.
29.
ImbroscioDavid. 2008. “‘[U]nited and Actuated by Some Common Impulse of Passion’: Challenging the Dispersal Consensus in American Housing Research.” Journal of Urban Affairs30 (2): 111–30.
30.
JosephMark L.ChaskinRobert J.WebberHenry S.2007. “The Theoretical Basis for Addressing Poverty Through Mixed-income Development.” Urban Affairs Review42 (3): 369–409.
31.
KeiserRichard. 1997. Subordination or Empowerment? African-American Leadership and the Struggle for Urban Political Power. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
32.
KerrBrinckMillerWillSchreckhiseWilliam D.ReidMargaret. 2013. “When Does Politics Matter? A Reexamination of the Determinants of African-American and Latino Municipal Employment Patterns.” Urban Affairs Review49 (6): 888–912.
33.
KhareAmyJosephMark L.ChaskinRobert J.2015. “The Enduring Significance of Race in Mixed-income Developments.” Urban Affairs Review51 (4): 474–503.
34.
MarschallMelissa J.RuhilAnirudh V. S.2007. “Substantive Symbols: The Attitudinal Dimension of Black Political Incorporation in Local Government.” American Journal of Political Science51 (1): 17–33.
35.
MooreLeonard. 2002. “Class Conflict Over Residential Space in an African American Community: Cleveland’s Lee-Seville Public Housing Controversy.” Ohio History111 (Winter–Spring): 25–43.
36.
OwensMichael Leo. 2004. “Homo Politicus in the ‘Projects’: Political and Civic Participation by Public Housing Residents.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September 2–5.
37.
OwensMichael LeoBrownJacob Robert. 2014. “Weakening Strong Black Political Empowerment: Implications from Atlanta’s 2009 Mayoral Election.” Journal of Urban Affairs36 (4): 663–81.
38.
OwensMichael LeoRichMichael J.2003. “Is Strong Incorporation Enough? Black Empowerment and the Fate of Atlanta’s Low Income Blacks.” In Racial politics in American cities, edited by BrowningRufus P.MarshallDale RogersTabbDavid H., 201–26. New York: Longman.
39.
ParkSunggeunMosleyJennifer E.GroganColleen M.2018. “Do Residents of Low Income Communities Trust Organizations to Speak on Their Behalf? Differences by Organizational Type.” Urban Affairs Review54 (1): 137–64.
40.
PattilloMary. 2007. Black on the Block: The Politics of Race and Class in the City. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
41.
PopkinSusan J.2010. “A Glass Half Empty? New Evidence from the HOPE VI Panel Study.” Housing Policy Debate20 (1): 43–63.
42.
ReedAdolphJr.1999. Stirrings in the Jug: Black Politics in the Post-segregation Era. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
43.
RodriguezAkira Drake. Forthcoming. Deviants in Divergent Spaces: The Politics of Atlanta ’s Public Housing. Athens: Univ. of Georgia Press.
44.
ShamsuddinShomon. 2017. “Preserved for Posterity: Public Housing Redevelopment and Replacement in HOPE VI.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, New York, October5–7.
45.
ShawTodd. 2009. Now Is the Time! Detroit Black Politics and Grassroots Activism. Durham: Duke Univ. Press.
46.
SossJoeFordingRichardSchramSanford. 2011. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
47.
SpenceLester K.2015. Knocking the Hustle: Against the Neoliberal Turn in Black Politics. Brooklyn: Punctum Books.
48.
SpenceLester K.McClerkingHarwood K.BrownRobert A.2009. “Revisiting Black Political Incorporation and Local Political Participation.” Urban Affairs Review45 (2): 274–85.
StrolovitchDara. 2006. “Do Interest Groups Represent the Disadvantaged? Advocacy at the Intersections of Race, Class, and Gender.” Journal of Politics68 (4): 894–910.
51.
ThompsonJ. Phillip. 2006. Double Trouble: Black Mayors, Black Communities, and the Call for a Deep Democracy. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
ValeLawrence J.2013. Purging the Poorest: Public Housing and the Design Politics of Twice-cleared Communities. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
54.
ValeLawrence J.2019. After the Projects: Public Housing Redevelopment and the Governance of the Poorest Americans. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
55.
ValeLawrence J.ShamsuddinShomon. 2017. “All Mixed up: Making Sense of Mixed-income Housing Development.” Journal of the American Planning Association83 (1): 56–67.
56.
ValeLawrence J.ShamsuddinShomonKellyNicholas. 2018. “Broken Promises or Selective Memory Planning: A National Picture of HOPE VI Plans and Realities.” Housing Policy Debate28 (5): 746–69.
57.
WeaverTimothy P.2018. “By Design or By Default: Varieties of Neoliberal Urban Development.” Urban Affairs Review54 (2): 234–66.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
