Many scholars paint a somber picture of the political status of racially and economically marginalized groups in the United States. In particular, seminal studies on cities—places where race and class strikingly intersect—emphasize economic and political elites as primary drivers of urban politics, underscoring the disempowerment of those at the margins. This article offers a different, theoretically instructive perspective. Through a qualitative analysis of two major expansions of the legal right to counsel in civil courts, I describe political processes that afforded race–class subjugated communities pivotal influence over urban policy. I demonstrate how groups that many theories of political science do not expect to have substantive political influence, nonetheless profoundly shaped the course of urban policy development in the civil legal domain. I find an especially crucial role for membership-driven local organizations focused on building equitable community power.
BartelsLarry M.2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
4.
BaumgartnerFrank R.LeechBeth L.1998. Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
5.
BezdekBarbara. 1991. “Silence in the Court: Participation and Subordination of Poor Tenants’ Voices in Legal Process.” Hofstra Law Review20 (3): 533–608.
6.
BrowningRufus P.MarshallDale RogersTabbDavid H.1984. Protest Is Not Enough: The Struggle of Blacks and Hispanics for Equality in Urban Politics. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
7.
ButlerDaniel M.2014. Representing the Advantaged: How Politicians Reinforce Inequality. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
8.
CohenCathy J.2006. “African American Youth: Broadening our Understanding of Politics, Civic Engagement and Activism.” Social Science Research Council. Accessed May 26, 2019. http://ya.ssrc.org/african/Cohen/.
9.
DahlRobert A. 1961. Who Governs?: Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
DesmondMatthew. 2016. Evicted: Poverty and Profit in an American City. New York: Broadway Books.
11.
EinsteinKatherine LevineKoganVladimir. 2016. “Pushing the City Limits: Policy Responsiveness in Municipal Government.” Urban Affairs Review52 (1): 3–32.
12.
ElkinStephen L. 1987. City and Regime in the American republic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
EnglerRussell. 1997. “Out of Sight and Out of Line: The Need for Regulation of Lawyers’ Negotiations with Unrepresented Poor Persons.” California Law Review85 (1): 79–158.
14.
Esping-AndersenGosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
15.
FlavinPatrick. 2012. “Income Inequality and Policy Representation in the American States.” American Politics Research40 (1): 29–59.
16.
FrankoWilliam W.2013. “Political Inequality and State Policy Adoption: Predatory Lending, Children’s Health Care, and Minimum Wage.” Poverty & Public Policy5 (1): 88–114.
17.
GardnerDebra. 2006. “Pursuing a Right to Counsel in Civil Cases: Introduction and Overview.” Clearinghouse Review Journal of Poverty Law and Policy40 (3–4): 166–69.
18.
GardnerDebraCoeWard B.III. 2014. “A Right to Counsel in Critical Civil Cases and the Role of the Private Bar.” Maryland Bar Journal, July/August, 12–17. Accessed May 26, 2019. http://www.publicjustice.org/news/pjc-news/90.
19.
GilensMartin. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
20.
GilensMartinPageBenjamin I.2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” Perspectives on Politics12 (3): 564–81.
21.
GisselquistRachel M.2014. “Paired Comparison and Theory Development: Considerations for Case Selection.” PS: Political Science and Politics47 (2): 477–84.
22.
GoldschmidtJona. 2002. “The Pro Se Litigant’s Struggle for Access to Justice: Meeting the Challenge of Bench and Bar Resistance.” Family Court Review40 (1): 36–62.
23.
GriffinJohn D.NewmanBrian. 2012. “Voting Power, Policy Representation, and Disparities in Voting’s Rewards.” The Journal of Politics75 (1): 52–64.
24.
HajnalZoltan. L2009. America’s Uneven Democracy: Race, Turnout, and Representation in City Politics. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
25.
HajnalZoltan L.TrounstineJessica. 2005. “Where Turnout Matters: The Consequences of Uneven Turnout in City Politics.” The Journal of Politics67 (2): 515–35.
26.
HajnalZoltan L.TrounstineJessica. 2010. “Who or What Governs? The Effects of Economics, Politics, Institutions, and Needs on Local Spending.” American Politics Research38 (6): 1130–63.
27.
HajnalZoltan L.TrounstineJessica. 2014. “What Underlies Urban Politics? Race, Class, Ideology, Partisanship and the Urban Vote.” Urban Affairs Review51 (1): 63–99.
28.
HajnalZoltan L.TrounstineJessica. 2016. “Race and Class Inequality in Local Politics.” In The Double Bind: The Politics of Racial and Class Inequalities in the Americas, edited by HookerJulietTilleryAlvin B. Jr., pp. 139-155. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
29.
HanHahrie. 2009. Moved to Action: Motivation, Participation, and Inequality in American Politics. Palo Alto: Stanford Univ. Press.
30.
HanHahrie. 2014. How Organizations Develop Activists: Civic Associations and Leadership in the 21st Century. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
31.
HanHahrie. 2016. “The Organizational Roots of Political Activism: Field Experiments on Creating a Relational Context.” American Political Science Review110 (2): 296–307.
32.
HayesThomas J.2013. “Responsiveness in an Era of Inequality: The Case of the U.S. Senate.” Political Research Quarterly66 (3): 585–99.
33.
HillKim QuaileLeighleyJan E.1999. “Racial Diversity, Voter Turnout, and Mobilizing Institutions in the United States.” American Politics Quarterly27 (3): 275–95.
HojnackiMarieKimballDavid C.BaumgartnerFrank R.BerryJeffrey M.LeechBeth L.2012. “Studying Organizational Advocacy and Influence: Reexamining Interest Group Research.” Annual Review of Political Science15:379–99.
KleinSusan. 1999. “Redrawing the Criminal-Civil Boundary.” Buffalo Criminal Law Review2 (2): 681–723.
41.
KorpiWalter. 1983. The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
42.
Legal Services Corporation. 2016. “Grant Activity Report.” Legal Services Corporation Office of Data Governance and Analysis, Washington, DC.
43.
Legal Services Corporation. 2017. “The Justice Gap: Measuring the Unmet Civil Legal Needs of Low-Income Americans.” Prepared by NORC at the University of Chicago for Legal Services Corporation, Washington, DC, June.
44.
LevineJeremy R.2016. “The Privatization of Political Representation: Community-Based Organizations as Nonelected Neighborhood Representatives.” American Sociological Review81 (6): 1251-1275.
45.
MannKenneth. 1992. “Punitive Civil Sanctions: The Middleground Between Criminal and Civil Law.” Yale Law Journal101 (8): 1795–1873.
46.
MarwellNicole P.2009. Bargaining for Brooklyn: Community Organizations in the Entrepreneurial City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47.
McCannMichael. 2004. “Law and Social Movements.” In The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, edited by SaratAustin, 506–22. Malden: Blackwell.
48.
MetcalfGabriel. 2018. “Sand Castles Before the Tide? Affordable Housing in Expensive Cities.” Journal of Economic Perspectives32 (1): 59–80.
49.
MichenerJamila. 2016. “Race, Poverty, and the Redistribution of Voting Rights.” Poverty & Public Policy8 (2): 106–28.
50.
MichenerJamilaWongDiane. 2018. “Gentrification, Demobilization, and Participatory Possibilities.” In Neighborhood Change and Neighborhood Action: The Struggle to Create Neighborhoods that Serve Human Needs, edited by HayesRichard Allen, 123–46. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
51.
MillerLisa L. 2008. The Perils of Federalism: Race, Poverty, and the Politics of Crime Control. New York: Oxford University Press.
52.
MolotchHarvey. 1976. “The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place.” American Journal of Sociology82 (2): 309–32.
53.
MorelDomingo. 2018. Takeover: Race, Education, and American Democracy. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
54.
PalusChristine Kelleher. 2010. “Responsiveness in American Local Governments.” State and Local Government Review42 (2): 133–50.
55.
PetersonPaul E.1981. City Limits. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press.
56.
PivenFrances FoxMinniteLorraine CarolGroarkeMargaret. 2009. Keeping Down the Black Vote: Race and the Demobilization of American Voters. New York: New Press.
57.
PollackJohn. 2012. “Where We’ve Been, Where We’re Going: A Look at the Status of the Civil Right to Counsel, and Current Efforts.” Management Information Exchange Journal26: 29–53.
PollockJohnGardnerDebra. 2011. “Civil Right to Counsel’s Relationship to Antipoverty Advocacy: Further Reflections.” Clearinghouse Review Journal of Poverty and Law Policy45 (3–4): 150–53.
60.
PortneyKent E.BerryJeffrey M.1997. “Mobilizing Minority Communities: Social Capital and Participation in Urban Neighborhoods.” American Behavioral Scientist40 (5): 632–44.
RastJoel. 1999. Remaking Chicago: The Political Origins of Urban Industrial Change. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.
63.
RhodeDeborah L.2004. Access to Justice. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
64.
RigbyElizabethWrightGerald C.2013. “Political Parties and Representation of the Poor in the American States.” American Journal of Political Science57(3): 552–65.
65.
SandefurRebecca L.2008. “Access to Civil Justice and Race, Class, and Gender Inequality.” Annual Review of Sociology34:339–58.
66.
SandelowskiMargarete. 2000. “Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description?”Research in Nursing & Health23 (4): 334–40.
67.
SandelowskiMargarete. 2010. “What’s in a Name? Qualitative Description Revisited.” Research in Nursing & Health33 (1): 77–84.
68.
SchlozmanKay LehmanVerbaSidneyBradyHenry E.2012. The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
69.
SeronCarrollFrankelMartinVan RyzinGreggKovathJean. 2001. “The Impact of Legal Counsel on Outcomes for Poor Tenants in New York City’s Housing Court: Results of a Randomized Experiment.” Law & Society Review35 (2): 419–34.
70.
SharpElaine B.Maynard-MoodySteven. 1991. “Theories of the Local Welfare Role.” American Journal of Political Science35 (4): 934–50.
SimmonsErica S.SmithNicholas Rush. 2017. “Comparison with an Ethnographic Sensibility.” PS: Political Science & Politics50 (1): 126–30.
73.
SlaterDanZiblattDaniel. 2013. “The Enduring Indispensability of the Controlled Comparison.” Comparative Political Studies46 (10): 1301–27.
74.
SmallMario Luis. 2009. “‘How Many Cases Do I Need?’ On Science and the Logic of Case Selection in Field-Based Research.” Ethnography10 (1): 5–38.
75.
SossJoeWeaverVesla. 2017. “Police Are Our Government: Politics, Political Science, and the Policing of Race–Class Subjugated Communities.” Annual Review of Political Science20:565–91.
76.
SteinbergJessica K.2015. “Demand Side Reform in the Poor People’s Court.” Connecticut Law Review47 (3): 741–808.
77.
StoneClarence N.1989. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
78.
StrolovitchDara Z. 2008. Affirmative advocacy: Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
79.
SuCelina. 2009. Streetwise for Book Smarts: Grassroots Organizing and Education Reform in the Bronx. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.
80.
TrounstineJessica. 2010. “Representation and Accountability in Cities.” Annual Review of Political Science13:407–23.
81.
TrounstineJessica. 2018. Segregation by Design: Local Politics and Inequality in American Cities. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
82.
WarrenMark R.2001. Dry Bones Rattling: Community Building to Revitalize American Democracy. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
83.
WarrenMark R.MappKaren L.2011. A Match on Dry Grass: Community Organizing as a Catalyst for School Reform. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
WhiteLucie E.1990. “Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G.” Buffalo Law Review38 (1): 1–58.
86.
WilsonJames Q.1995. Political Organizations. Vol. 46. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
87.
ZemansFrances Khan. 1983. “Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System.” American Political Science Review77 (3): 690–703.
