This article focuses on policies seeking to address social inequalities in metropolitan areas, where the allocation of resources to places with needs often clashes with the politics of redistribution in fragmented local government systems. Scholarship on metropolitan governance has yet to overcome the opposition between proponents of consolidation and defenders of polycentrism. The crucial open question is whether and how intergovernmental cooperation and revenue-sharing can redress spatial equity in institutionally fragmented metropolitan areas. This article addresses this question by exploring the determinants of social expenditures in the 630 municipalities of seven major metropolitan areas in Switzerland, where revenue-sharing systems are common. The analysis shows that intergovernmental grants make a significant but limited contribution to reducing the mismatch between needs and resources in fragmented and decentralized metropolitan areas, depending on the redistributive efforts made by higher state levels.
AndrewSimon A.2009. “Regional Integration Through Contracting Networks: An Empirical Analysis of Institutional Collective Action Framework.” Urban Affairs Review44 (3): 378–402.
3.
BassandMichel. 2005. La métropolisation de la Suisse. [Metropolitanization of Switzerland]. Lausanne: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes.
4.
BochslerDaniel. 2010. “Horizontale Zusammenarbeit als Lösung des Problems der Kleinräumigkeit im Schweizer Föderalismus? Eine quantitative Perspektive.” [Horizontal cooperation as a solution to small scale? A quantitative perspective]. In Herausforderung HarmoS: Bildungspolitik, Föderalismus und Demokratie auf dem Prüfstand, edited by AuerAndreas, 124–46. Zürich: Schulthess.
5.
BoyneGeorgePowellMartinAshworthRachel. 2001. “Spatial Equity and Public Services.” Public Management Review3 (1): 19–34.
6.
BraunDietmar. 2003. “Dezentraler und unitarischer Föderalismus. Die Schweiz und Deutschland im Vergleich.” [Decentral and unitary federalism. Switzerland and Germany compared]. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft9 (1): 57–89.
7.
BuchananJames. 1971. “Principles of Urban Fiscal Strategy.” Public Choice11:1–16.
8.
Bundesamt für Statistik. 2014. Raum mit städtischem Charakter 2012 [Urban areas 2012]. Neuchâtel: Bundesamt für Statistik.
9.
CarrJered B.LeRouxKellyShresthaManoj. 2009. “Institutional Ties, Transaction Costs, and External Service Production.” Urban Affairs Review44 (3): 403–27.
10.
ChettyRajHendrenNathanielKlinePatrickSaezEmmanuel. 2015. “Where Is the Land of Opportunity? The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics129 (4): 1553–1623.
11.
CrawMichael. 2010. “Deciding to Provide: Local Decisions on Providing Social Welfare.” American Journal of Political Science54:906–20.
12.
CrawMichael. 2016. “Caught at the Bottom? Redistribution and Local Government in an Era of Devolution.” State and Local Government Review47 (1): 68–77.
13.
DownsAnthony. 1994. New Visions for Metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
14.
Eidgenössische Finanzverwaltung. 2012. Finanzstatistik der Schweiz, Jahresbericht 2010 [Public finance in Switzerland, annual report 2010]. Neuenburg: Bundesamt für Statistik.
15.
FainsteinSusan S.2010. The Just City. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.
FossatiFlaviaHäusermannSilja. 2014. “Social Policy Preferences and Party Choice in the 2011 Swiss Elections.” Swiss Political Science Review20 (4): 590–611.
18.
FreyRené L.1988. “Spillovers: Ursache von Agglomerationsproblemen und Lösungsmöglichkeiten.” [Spillovers: causes and solutions for metropolitan problems]. In Les enjeux de l’urbanisation/Agglomerationsprobleme in der Schweiz, edited by BassandMichelJoyeDominiqueSchulerMartin, 142–55. Bern: Peter Lang.
19.
FreyRené L.FreyMiriam. 2013. “Die NFA: Vorbild für Reformen der Kantone?” [The NFA: an example for cantonal reforms?]. In Irrgarten Finanzausgleich. Kantonsmonitoring Nr. 5: Wege zu mehr Effizienz bei der interkommunalen Solidarität, edited by SuisseAvenir, 13–26. Zürich: Avenir Suisse.
20.
GilardiFabrizioKüblerDanielWasserfallenFabio. 2013. “Cantonal Tax Autonomy in Switzerland: History, Trends and Challenges.” In Autonomy in Subnational Income Taxes: Evolving Powers, Existing Practices in Seven Countries, edited by AlmendralVioleta RuizVaillancourtFrançois, 121-140. Montréal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
21.
GilletteClayton. 2011. Local Redistribution and Local Democracy. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
22.
HermannMichaelHeyeCorinnaLeutholdHeiri. 2005. Soziokulturelle Unterschiede in der Schweiz. Vier Indizes zu räumlichen Disparitäten 1990-2000. [Socio-cultural differences in Switzerland: four indices of spatial disparities 1990-2000]. Neuchâtel: Bundesamt für Statistik.
23.
HillRichard Child. 1974. “Separate and Unequal: Governmental Inequality in the Metropolis.” American Political Science Review68:1557–68.
24.
Hoffmann-MartinotVincentSellersJeffrey, eds. 2005. Metropolitanization and Political Change. Opladen: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
25.
HöpflingerFrançois. 1994. Am Rande des Sozialstaats. Formen und Funktion öffentlicher Sozialhilfe im Vergleich [At the margins of the Welfare State. Forms and functions of social welfare compared]. Bern: Haupt.
26.
Howell-MoroneyMichael. 2008. “The Tiebout Hypothesis 50 Years Later: Lessons and Lingering Challenges for Metropolitan Governance in the 21st Century.” Public Administration Review68 (1): 97–109.
27.
HuissoudThérèseStoferSuzanneCunhaAntonioSchulerMartin. 1999. Structures et tendances de la différenciation dans les espaces urbains en Suisse [Structures and tendencies of spatial differenciation in Swiss urban areas]. Lausanne: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology.
28.
JimenezBenedict S.2014. “Separate, Unequal, and Ignored? Interjurisdictional Competition and the Budgetary Choices of Poor and Affluent Municipalities.” Public Administration Review74 (2): 246–57.
29.
KlötiUlrich. 2000. “Regieren im verflochtenen dreistufigen Föderalismus.” [Joint governance in three levels of federalism]. In Verwaltung, Regierung und Verfassung im Wandel. Gedächtnisschrift für Raimund E. Germann, edited by KnoepfelPeterLinderWolf, 17–30. Basel: Helbing und Lichtenhahn.
30.
KochPhilippeKüblerDaniel. 2011. “Aufbruch zu neuen Grenzen? Debatten um den Schweizer Föderalismus.” [Towards new frontiers? Debates on Swiss federalism]. Zeitschrift für Staats und Europawissenschaften9 (2): 262–80.
31.
Konferenz der kantonalen Finanzdirektorinnen und Finanzdirektoren. 2008. Handbuch Harmonisiertes Rechnungsmodell für die Kantone und Gemeinden [Handbook of standardized public sector accounting for cantons and municipalities]. Bern: Konferenz der kantonalen Finanzdirektorinnen und Finanzdirektoren.
32.
KüblerDanielSchwabBrigitte. 2007. “New Regionalism in Five Swiss Metropolitan Areas: An Assessment of Inclusiveness, Deliberation and Democratic Accountability.” European Journal of Political Research46 (4): 473–502.
33.
LinderWolf. 2010. Swiss Democracy: Possible Solutions to Conflict in Multi-cultural Societies. 3rd ed.New York: St. Martin’s Press.
34.
LoweryDavid. 1999. “Sorting in the Fragmented Metropolis: Updating the Social Stratification-Government Inequality Debate.” Public Management Review1 (1): 7–26.
35.
LoweryDavid. 2000. “A Transactions Costs Model of Metropolitan Governance: Allocation Versus Redistribution in Urban America.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory10 (1): 49–78.
36.
MasseyDouglas S.DentonNancy A.1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
37.
MilanovicBranko. 2016. Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
38.
MinkoffScott L.2009. “Minding Your Neighborhood: The Spatial Context of Local Redistribution.” Social Science Quarterly90 (3): 516–37.
39.
NeimanMax. 1976. “Social Stratification and Government Inequality.” American Political Science Review70 (March): 149–54.
40.
NewtonKen. 2012. “Metropolitan Governance.” European Political Science11 (3): 409–19.
41.
OatesWallace E.1999. “An Essay on Fiscal Federalism.” Journal of Economic Literature37 (3): 1120–49.
42.
OatesWallace E.2005. “Towards a Second-Generation Theory of Fiscal Federalism.” International Tax and Public Finance12:349–73.
43.
OatesWallace E.2011. Fiscal Federalism. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
44.
OrfieldMyron. 2002. American Metropolitics: The New Suburban Reality. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
45.
OrfieldMyronLuceThomas F.2010. Region: Planning the Future in the Twin Cities. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
46.
OstromElinor. 1983. “The Social Stratification-Government Inequality Thesis Explored.” Urban Affairs Review19 (1): 91–112.
47.
PetersonPaul E.1981. City Limits. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press.
48.
PikettyThomas. 2014. Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.
49.
PlüssLarissa. 2015. “Municipal Councillors in Metropolitan Governance: Assessing the Democratic Deficit of New Regionalism in Switzerland.” European Urban and Regional Studies22 (3): 261–84. doi:10.1177/0969776412469804.
50.
PressmannJeffreyWildavskyAaron. 1973. Implementation. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
51.
RühliLukasFreyMiriamFreyRené L.2013. Irrgarten Finanzausgleich. Wege zu mehr Effizienz bei der interkommunalen Solidarität [The financial compensation maze. Towards more efficiency in inter-municipal solidarity]. Zürich: Avenir Suisse.
52.
RuskDavid. 2003. Cities Without Suburbs. 3rd ed.Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
53.
SavitchHankVogelRonald K.2009. “Regionalism and Urban Politics.” In Theories of Urban Politics, edited by DaviesJonathan S.ImbroscioDavid L.106–24. London: SAGE.
54.
SchalteggerChristoph A.SomogyiFrankSturmJan-Egbert. 2011. “Tax Competition and Income Sorting: Evidence from the Zurich Metropolitan Area.” European Journal of Political Economy27:455–70.
55.
SchulerMartinDessemontetPierreJoyeDominique. 2005. Les niveaux géographiques de la Suisse. [Spatial scales of Switzerland]. Neuchâtel: Office fédéral de la statistique.
56.
SellersJefferey M.2017. Inequality and Governance in the Metropolis: Place Equality Regimes and Fiscal Choices in Eleven Countries. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
57.
SellersJefferey M.LidströmAnders. 2007. “Decentralization, Local Government, and the Welfare State.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration20 (4): 609–32.
58.
SteenbergenMarco R.JonesBradford S.2002. “Modeling Multilevel Data Structures.” American Journal of Political Science46 (1): 218–37.
59.
SwanstromTodd. 2001. “What We Argue About When We Argue About Regionalism.” Journal of Urban Affairs23 (5): 479–96.
60.
VogelRonald K.ImbroscioDavid L.2013. “Governing Metropolitan Regions in the United States.” In Governance and Finance of Metropolitan Regions in Federal Systems, edited by SlackEnidChattopadhyayRupak290–323. Toronto: Oxford Univ. Press.
61.
WallisAllan D.1994. “The Third Wave: Current Trends in Regional Governance.” National Civic Review83 (Summer–Fall): 290–310.
62.
WalterFelixAmacherMathias. 2013. Zentrums- und Sonderlasten in Agglomerationen. Grundlagenstudie im Rahmen des Monitorings urbaner Raum Schweiz [Centrality and other charges in metropolitan areas. Background study for the urban monitoring of Switzerland]. Bern: Bundesamt für Raumentwicklung.
63.
WrightBradley E.McGinnisMichael D.OstromElinor. 2011. “Reflections on Vincent Ostrom, Public Administration and Polycentricity.” Public Administration Review72 (1): 15–25.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
