This article examines the effects of accomplishments on the career paths of big-city mayors. Using data from 104 cities with populations over 160,000 from 1992 to 2012, this study examines the extent to which performance in economics, crime, and recruiting mega-events affects mayors’ decisions to seek reelection or other offices, or retire. Results indicate those mayors of cities with population growth, a decrease in the crime rate, and that host certain mega-events (presidential nominating conventions) are more likely to seek another office than other mayors. A decrease in the crime rate seems to help mayors win reelection while none of the other accomplishments appear to improve their chances of winning campaigns for other offices.
ArceneauxKevinSteinRobert M.2006. “Who Is Held Responsible When Disaster Strikes? The Attribution of Responsibility for a Natural Disaster in an Urban Election.”Journal of Urban Affairs28 (1): 43–53.
2.
ArnoldR. DouglasCarnesNicholas. 2012. “Holding Mayors Accountable: New York’s Executives from Koch to Bloomberg.”American Journal of Political Science56 (4): 949–63.
3.
AtkesonLonna RaeMaestasCherie D.2012. Catastrophic Politics: How Extraordinary Events Redefine Perceptions of Government. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
4.
BerkmanMichael B.EisensteinJames. 1999. “State Legislators as Congressional Candidates: The Effects of Prior Experience on Legislative Recruitment and Fundraising.”Political Research Quarterly52 (3): 481–98.
5.
BlackGordon S.1972. “A Theory of Political Ambition: Career Choices and the Role of Structural Incentives.”American Political Science Review66 (1): 144–59.
6.
BowmanAnn O’M. 1987. Tools and Targets: The Mechanics of City Economic Development. Washington, DC: National League of Cities.
7.
BurdenBarry C.2002. “United States Senators as Presidential Candidates.”Political Science Quarterly117 (1): 81–102.
8.
Delli CarpiniMichael X.KeeterScott. 1997. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
9.
EisingerPeter K.1988. The Rise of the Entrepreneurial State. Madison: The Univ. of Wisconsin Press.
10.
EisingerPeter K.2000. “The Politics of Bread and Circuses: Building the City of the Visitor Class.”Urban Affairs Review35 (3): 316–33.
11.
ElkinStephen. 1987. City and Regime in the American Republic. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
12.
FennoRichard F.1978. Home Style. New York: HarperCollins.
13.
FiorinaMorris P.1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
14.
FowlerLinda. 1993. Candidates, Congress, and the American Democracy. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.
15.
FrancisWayne L.KennyLawrence W.2000. Up the Political Ladder. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
16.
GaddieRonald Keith. 2004. Born to Run: Origins of the Political Career. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
17.
GerberElizabeth R.HopkinsDaniel J.2011. “When Mayors Matter: Estimating the Impact of Mayoral Partisanship on City Policy.”American Journal of Political Science55 (2): 326–39.
18.
HeberligEric S.LelandSuzanne M.SwindellDavid A. Forthcoming. American Cities and the Politics of Party Conventions. Albany: SUNY Albany Press.
19.
HerrickRebekahMooreMichael K.1993. “Political Ambition’s Effect on Legislative Behavior: Schlesinger’s Typology Reconsidered and Revisited.”Journal of Politics55 (3): 765–76.
20.
HoodRich. 1992. “Political Conventions’ Importance Is Debated; They Are Criticized as Anachronisims to Be Scrapped or Modified.”Kansas City Star, July, A7.
21.
JacobsonGary C.KernellSamuel. 1983. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. 2nd ed.New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
22.
JuddDennis R.2003. The Infrastructure of Play: Building the Tourist City. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
23.
JuddDennis R.SwanstromTodd. 2014. City Politics. 9th ed.New York: Routledge.
24.
KahnKim FridkinKenneyPatrick J.1999. The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
25.
KiewietRoderick D.ZengLangche. 1993. “An Analysis of Congressional Career Decisions, 1947-1986.”American Political Science Review87 (4): 928–41.
26.
KrasnoJonathonGreenDonald Philip. 1988. “Preempting Quality Challengers in House Elections.”Journal of Politics50 (4): 920–36.
27.
KrauseGeorge A.MeluskyBenjamin F.2014. “Retrospective Economic Voting and the Intertemporal Dynamics of Electoral Accountability in the American States.”Journal of Politics76 (4): 1102–15.
28.
LascherEdward L.Jr.1993. “Explaining the Appeal of Local Legislative Office.”State and Local Government Review25 (1): 28–38.
29.
LauermannJohn. 2015. “Temporary Projects, Durable Outcomes: Urban Development Through Failed Olympic Bids?”Urban Studies53:1885–901. doi:10.1177/0042098015585460.
30.
LoganJohnMolotchHarvey. 1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
31.
MaestasCherie D.FultonSarahMaiselL. SandyStoneWalter J.2006. “When to Risk It? Institutions, Ambitions, and the Decision to Run for the U.S. House.”American Political Science Review100 (2): 195–208.
32.
MayhewDavid R.1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
33.
McCabeBarbara CoyleFeiockRichard C.ClingermayerJames C.StreamChristopher. 2008. “Turnover Among City Managers: The Role of Political and Economic Change.”Public Administration Review68 (2): 380–86.
34.
McNittAndrew Douglas. 2010. “Tenure in Office of Big City Mayors.”State and Local Government Review42 (1): 36–47.
35.
MondakJeffery J.1995. “ Competence, Integrity, and the Electoral Success of Congressional Incumbents. Journal of Politics57 (4): 1043–69.
36.
MurphyRussell D.1980. “Whither the Mayors? A Note on Mayoral Careers.”Journal of Politics42 (1): 277–90.
37.
OliverJ. Eric. 2001. Democracy in Suburbia. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
38.
OliverJ. Eric. 2012. Local Election and the Politics of Small Scale Democracy. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
39.
PetersonPaul. 1981. City Limits. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
40.
ProvostColin. 2010. “When Is AG Short of Aspiring Governor? Ambition and Policy Making Dynamics in the Office of State Attorney General.”Publius40 (4): 597–616.
41.
RohdeDavid C.1979. “Risk-Bearing and Progressive Ambition: The Case of Members of the United States House of Representatives.”American Journal of Political Science23 (1): 1–26.
42.
RosentraubMarkSwindellDavid. 2009. “Doing Better: Sports, Economic Impact Analysis, and Schools of Public Policy and Administration.”Journal of Public Affairs Education15 (2): 219–42.
43.
SanbonmatsuKira. 2002. “Political Parties and the Recruitment of Women to State Legislatures.”Journal of Politics64 (3): 791–809.
44.
SavitchH. V.KantorPaul. 2002. Cities in the International Marketplace: The Political Economy of Urban Development. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
45.
SchlesingerJoseph A.1966. Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally.
46.
SchneiderMarkTeskePaul. 1992. “Toward a Theory of the Political Entrepreneur: Evidence from Local Government.”American Political Science Review86 (3): 737–47.
47.
SokolowAlvin D.1989. “Legislators Without Ambition: Why Small-Town Citizens Seek Political Office.”State and Local Government Review21 (1): 23–30.
48.
StoneClarence. 1989. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
49.
StoneWalter J.MaiselL. Sandy. 2003. “The Not-so-Simple Calculus of Winning: Potential U.S. House Candidates’ Nomination and General Election Prospects.”Journal of Politics65 (4): 951–77.
50.
WrightJohn R.2012. “Unemployment and the Democratic Electoral Advantage.”American Political Science Review106 (4): 685–702.
