Financial support for affordable housing competes with many other municipal priorities. This work seeks to explain the variation in support for affordable housing among U.S. cities with populations of 100,000 or more. Using multivariate statistical analysis, this research investigates political explanations for the level of city expenditures on housing and community with a particular interest in the influence of housing advocacy organizations (AOs). Data for the model were gathered from secondary sources, including the U.S. Census and the National Center for Charitable Statistics. Among other results, the analysis indicates that, on average, the political maturity of AOs has a statistically significant, positive effect on local housing and community development expenditures.
AmentaEdwin. 2006. When Movements Matter: The Townsend Plan and the Rise of Social Security. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
2.
AmentaEdwinGardnerBeth G.TierneyAmber C.YerenaAnaidElliottThomas. 2012. “A Story-Centered Approach to the Newspaper Coverage of High-Profile SMOs.” Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change33:83–107.
3.
AndrewsKenneth T.2001. “Social Movements and Policy Implementation: The Mississippi Civil Rights Movement and the War on Poverty, 1965 to 1971.” American Sociological Review66 (1): 71–95.
4.
AndrewsKenneth T.EdwardsBob. 2004. “Advocacy Organizations in the U.S. Political Process.” Annual Review of Sociology30 (1): 479–506.
5.
AurandAndrew. 2007. “The Impact of Regional Government Structure on the Concentration and Supply of Affordable Housing.” Housing Policy Debate18 (2): 393–430.
6.
BasoloVictoria. 1997. “Housing Policy in the Local Political Economy: Understanding the Support for Affordable Housing Programs in Cities.” Doctoral dissertation, Univ. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
7.
BasoloVictoria. 1999a. “Passing the Housing Policy Baton in the US: Will Cities Take the Lead?” Housing Studies14 (4): 433–52.
8.
BasoloVictoria. 1999b. “The Impacts of Intercity Competition and Intergovernmental Factors on Local Affordable Housing Expenditures.” Housing Policy Debate10:659–88.
9.
BasoloVictoria. 2000. “City Spending on Economic Development Versus Affordable Housing: Does Inter-city Competition or Local Politics Drive Decisions?” Journal of Urban Affairs22 (3): 317–32.
10.
BasoloVictoria. 2003. “US Regionalism and Rationality.” Urban Studies40 (3): 447–62.
11.
BasoloVictoriaHuangChihyen. 2001. “Cities and Economic Development: Does the City Limits Story Still Apply?” Economic Development Quarterly15 (4): 327–39.
12.
BasoloVictoriaLoweryDavid. 2010. “Delineating the Regional Market in Studies of Inter-city Competition.” Urban Geography31 (3): 369–84.
13.
BerryJeffrey M.1977. Lobbying for the People: The Political Behavior of Public Interest Groups. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
14.
BewleyTruman F.1981. “A Critique of Tiebout’s Theory of Local Public Expenditures.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society49 (3): 713–40.
15.
BlomquistWilliam. 2007. “The Policy Process and Large-N Comparative Studies.” In Theories of Policy Process, edited by SabatierPaul A., 161–293. Boulder: Westview Press.
16.
BogdonAmy S.CanAyse. 1997. “Indicators of Local Housing Affordability: Comparative and Spatial Approaches.” Real Estate Economics25 (1): 43–80.
17.
BohrnstedtGeorge W.KnokeDavid. 1988. Statistics for Social Data Analysis. Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock Publishers.
18.
BosticRaphaelEllenIngrid G.2014. “Introduction: Special Issue on Housing Policy in the United States.” Journal of Housing Economics24:1–3.
19.
BrattRachel G.2012. “The Quadruple Bottom Line and Nonprofit Housing Organizations in the United States.” Housing Studies27 (4): 438–56.
20.
BrattRachel G.KeatingW. Dennis. 1993. “Federal Housing Policy and HUD Past Problems and Future Prospects of a Beleaguered Bureaucracy.” Urban Affairs Review29 (1): 3–27.
21.
BrowneWilliam P.1998. Groups, Interests, and U.S. Public Policy. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.
22.
CampbellJohn L.1988. The Collapse of an Industry: Nuclear Power and the Contradictions of U.S. Policy. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.
23.
CampbellRebecca J.2004. “Leviathan and Fiscal Illusion in Local Government Overlapping Jurisdictions.” Public Choice120:301–29.
24.
ClarkCalWalterB. Oliver. 1991. “Urban Political Cultures, Financial Stress, and City Fiscal Austerity Strategies.” The Western Political Quarterly44 (3): 676–97.
25.
ClarkTerry N.1998. “Overview of the Book.” In The New Political Culture, edited by ClarkTerry N.Hoffmann-MartinotVincent, 3–7. Boulder: Westview Press.
26.
ClarkTerry N.FergusonLorna C.1983. City Money: Political Processes, Fiscal Strain, and Retrenchment. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
27.
ClayPhillip N.1995. “Community Organizations as Housing Developers.” In Philanthropy and Economic Development, edited by AmericaRichard F., 97–111. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
28.
CohenDavidde la VegaRosaWatsonGabrielle. 2001. Advocacy for Social Justice: A Global Action and Reflection Guide. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
29.
CraigSteven G.InmanRobert P.1986. “Education, Welfare, and the New Federalism: State Budgeting in a Federalist Public Economy.” In Fiscal Federalism: Quantitative Studies, edited by RosenHarvey S., 33–78. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press.
30.
CrutchfieldLeslie R.GrantHeather M.2012. Forces for Good, Revised and Updated: The Six Practices of High-Impact Nonprofits. Vol. 403.Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
DawsonRichard E.RobinsonJames A.1963. Inter-party Competition, Economic Variables, and Welfare Policies in the American States.” The Journal of Politics25:265–89.
33.
DowdingKeithJohnPeterBiggsSteven. 1994. “Tiebout: A Survey of the Empirical Literature.” Urban Studies31 (4–5): 767–97.
34.
DownsAnthony. 1994. New Visions for Metropolitan America. Brookings Institution Press Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
35.
DuncanH. Daniels. 2004. “Advocacy and Nonprofit Organizations.” In Philanthropy in America: A Comprehensive Historical Encyclopedia, edited by BurlingameDwight F., 9–11. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
36.
DyeThomas R.1965. “Malapportionment and Public Policy in the States.” The Journal of Politics27 (3): 586–601.
37.
ElazarDaniel J.1966. American Federalism: A View from the States. New York: Crowell.
38.
EppleDennisZelenitzAllan. 1981. “The Implications of Competition Among Jurisdictions: Does Tiebout Need Politics?”The Journal of Political Economy89 (6): 1197–217.
39.
FischelWilliam A.2001. The Homevoter Hypothesis: How Home Values Influence Local Government Taxation, School Finance, and Land-Use Policies. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
40.
FraserLeah M.2005. “Participation and Policy: A Case Study of Environmental Justice Government-Social Movement Interaction.” Univ. of California, Irvine.
41.
GerardiKristopherRossStephen L.WillenPaul. 2011. “Understanding the Foreclosure Crisis.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management30 (2): 382–88.
42.
GittellRossWilderMargared. 2002. “Community Development Corporations: Critical Factors that Influence Success.” Journal of Urban Affairs21 (3): 341–61.
43.
GoetzEdward G.1995. Shelter Burden: Local and Progressive Housing Policy. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.
44.
GrønbjergKristen. 1994. “Using NTEE to Classify Non-profit Organisations: An Assessment of Human Service and Regional Applications.” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations5 (3): 301–28.
45.
HorrigmoAase Marthe J.2013. “Can Culture Explain Culture? The Influence of Cultural Change on Municipal Spending on Cultural Policies.” Urban Affairs Review49 (3): 408–34.
InnesJudith E.BooherDavid E.2004. “Reframing Public Participation: Strategies for the 21st Century.” Planning Theory & Practice5 (4): 419–36.
49.
IversenRoberta R.NapolitanoLauraFurstenbergFrank F.2011. “Middle-Income Families in the Economic Downturn: Challenges and Management Strategies Over Time.” Longitudinal and Life Course Studies2 (3): 286–300.
50.
JenkinsJ. Craig. 1995. The Politics of Social Protest: Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Movements. Minneapolis, MN: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
51.
JimenezBenedict. 2009. “Fiscal Stress and the Allocation Expenditure Responsibilities Between State and Local Governments: An Exploratory Study.” State and Local Government Review41 (2): 81–94.
52.
KimberlinSara E.2010. “Advocacy by Nonprofits: Roles and Practices of Core Advocacy Organizations and Direct Service Agencies.” Journal of Policy Practice9 (3–4): 164–82.
53.
KriesiHanspeter. 1995. “The Political Opportunity Structure of New Social Movements: Its Impact on Their Mobilization.” In The Politics of Social Protest: Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Movements, edited by JenkinsJ. Craig, 167–98. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
54.
LeRouxKellyKrawczykKelly. 2014. “Can Nonprofit Organizations Increase Voter Turnout? Findings from an Agency-Based Voter Mobilization Experiment.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly43 (2): 272–92.
55.
LevineCharles H.RubinIrene S.WolohojianGeorge G.1981. The Politics of Retrenchment: How Local Governments Manage Fiscal Stress. Beverly Hills: Sage.
56.
LieskeJoel. 2010. “The Changing Regional Subcultures of the American States and the Utility of a New Cultural Measure.” Political Research Quarterly63 (3): 538–52.
LongoriaThomas. 1994. “Empirical Analysis of the City Limits Typology.” Urban Affairs Review30 (1): 102–13.
59.
LowiTheodore J.1972. “Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice.” Public Administration Review32 (4): 298–310.
60.
LucioJoannaDe la CruzEdgar Ramirez. 2012. “Affordable Housing Networks: A Case Study in the Phoenix Metropolitan Region.” Housing Policy Debate22 (2): 219–40.
61.
LyonsWlliam E.LoweryDavidDe HoogRuth H.1992. The Politics of Dissatisfaction: Citizens, Services, and Urban Institutions. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
62.
MacIndoeHeatherWhalenRyan. 2013. “Specialists, Generalists, and Policy Advocacy by Charitable Nonprofit Organizations.” Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare40:119–49.
63.
MaherCraigDellerSteven. 2007. “Municipal Responses to Fiscal Stress.” International Journal of Public Administration30:1549–72.
64.
MeyerDavid S.2012. “Democracy and Democratization: Social Movements.” In The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology, edited by AmentaEdwinNashKateScottAlan, 395–407. Hoboken: John Wiley.
65.
MeyerDavid S.TarrowSidney G.1998. The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
66.
MuellerDennis. 2008. “Public Choice: An Introduction.” In Readings in Public Choice and Constitutional Political, edited by RowleyCharles K.FriedrichSchneider, Vol. 1, 31–46. New York, NY: Springer US.
National Low Income Housing Coalition. 2011. “Resource Library.” http://nlihc.org/library (accessed September 25, 2011).
70.
NewmanKatheAshtonPhilip. 2013. “Neoliberal Urban Policy and New Paths of Neighborhood Change in the American Inner City.” In The affordable housing reader, edited by MuellerElizabethTigheRosie, 316–37. London: Routledge.
71.
O’ConnellLenahan. 2012. “Exploring the Contribution of State and Local-Level Conditions to the Adoption of Different Types of Smart Growth Policies and Impact Fees in the United States.” International Journal of Public Administration35 (3): 194–203.
72.
OlsonMancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Vol. 124. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
73.
ParksRoger B.OakersonRonald J.1989. “Metropolitan Organization and Governance: A Local Public Economy Approach.” Urban Affairs Review25 (1): 18–29.
74.
PercyStephen L.HawkinsBrett W.MaierPeter E.1995. “Revisiting Tiebout: Moving Rationales and Interjurisdictional Relocation.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism25 (4): 1–17.
75.
PetersonPaul E.1981. City Limits. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
76.
PierreJon. 2014. “Can Urban Regimes Travel in Time and Space? Urban Regime Theory, Urban Governance Theory, and Comparative Urban Politics.” Urban Affairs Review50 (6): 864–889.
77.
PrakashAseemGugertyMary Kay. 2010. “Trust but Verify? Voluntary Regulation Programs in the Nonprofit Sector.” Regulation & Governance4 (1): 22–47.
78.
QuigleyJohn M.RaphaelSteven. 2004. “Is Housing Unaffordable? Why Isn’t It More Affordable?”Journal of Economic Perspectives18 (1): 191–214.
79.
RhodesRoderick A.2007. “Understanding Governance: Ten Years On.” Organization Studies28 (8): 1243–64.
80.
RosdilDonald. 2011. “Civic Culture, Sub-cultures, Non-traditionalism and Progressive Policy Using Value Change to Explain New US Development Strategies in the 21st Century.” Urban Studies48 (16): 3467–86.
81.
RuskDavid. 1995. Cities Without Suburbs. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
82.
SandercockLeonie. 1998. “The Death of Modernist Planning: Radical Praxis for a Postmodern Age.” In Cities for Citizens: Planning and the Rise of Civil Society in a Global Age, edited by DouglassMikeFriedmannJohn, 163–267. New York: John Wiley.
83.
SchmitterPhilippe. 2002. “Participation in Governance Arrangements: Is There Any Reason to Expect It Will Achieve ‘Sustainable and Innovative Policies in a Multi-level Context?’” In Participatory Governance: Political and Societal Implications, edited by GroteJürgen R.GbikpiBernard, 51–69. Germany: Leske + Budrich.
84.
SchneiderMark. 1989. The Competitive City: The Political Economy of Suburbia. Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.
85.
SchwartzAlex F.2010. Housing Policy in the United States. 2nd ed.New York: Routledge.
86.
SharkanskyIra. 1969. “The Utility of Elazar’s Political Culture: A Research Note.” Polity2 (1): 66–83.
87.
SharpElaine B.2005. “Cities and Subcultures Exploring Validity and Predicting Connections.” Urban Affairs Review41 (2): 132–56.
88.
SharpElaine B.2007. “Revitalizing Urban Research: Can Cultural Explanation Bring Us Back from the Periphery?”Urban Affairs Review43 (1): 55–75.
89.
SlaterRachelAikenMike. 2014. “Can’t you count? Public service delivery and standardized measurement challenges—the case of community composting.” Public Management Review. Epub ahead of print 6February2014. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2014.881532.
StokerGerry. 1998. “Governance as Theory: Five Propositions.” International Social Science Journal50 (155): 17–28.
92.
StokerGerry. 2000. “Urban Political Science and the Challenge of Urban Governance.” In Debating Governance Authority, Steering, and Democracy, edited by PierreJ., 91–109. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
93.
StoneClarence N.1976. Economic Growth and Neighborhood Discontent. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.
94.
SwyngedouwErik. 2005. “Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-Beyond-the-State.” Urban Studies42 (11): 1991–2006.
U.S. Census Bureau. n.d.-a. “2010 Decennial Census.” Various Tables (accessed May 12, 2012).
100.
U.S. Census Bureau. n.d.-b “Five-Year American Community Survey 2005-2010.” Various Tables (accessed April 13, 2014).
101.
VidalAvis. 1992. Rebuilding Communities: A National Study of Urban Community Development Corporations. New York: New School for Social Research, Communist Development Center.
102.
VidalAvis. 1997. “Can Community Development Reinvent Itself?”Journal of the American Planning Association63 (4): 429–38.
103.
WassmerRobert W.2011. “The Recent Pervasive External Effects of Residential Home Foreclosure.” Housing Policy Debate21 (2): 247–65.
104.
WasteRobert J.1989. The Ecology of City Policy Making. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
105.
WeiherGregory. 1991. The Fractured Metropolis: Political Fragmentation and Metropolitan Segregation. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
106.
WongKenneth K.1990. City Choices: Education and Housing. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
