Changes in housing policy have led to the geographic deconcentration of assisted housing, with assisted units now located in more and lower-poverty neighborhoods. Little research examines how the changing location of assisted housing shapes neighborhood poverty rates. I use propensity score matching to estimate how neighborhood poverty rates changed as assisted housing was gained or lost from 1977 to 2008 using a national panel data set. Neighborhood poverty rates increased when neighborhoods gained assisted housing units, with larger impacts when neighborhoods gained many assisted units. Neighborhoods that lost assisted units also became poorer. However, losing assisted units had a negative effect on poverty rates: Poverty rates increased less compared with neighborhoods that did not lose units. Therefore, removing assisted housing from high-poverty neighborhoods slowed, but did not reverse, poverty rate increases. These findings emphasize the durability of neighborhood poverty and inequality even in the face of drastic policy changes.
BangH.RobinsJ. M.2005. “Doubly Robust Estimation in Missing Data and Causal Inference Models.” Biometrics61 (4): 962–72.
2.
Baum-SnowN.MarionJ.2009. “The Effects of Low Income Housing Tax Credit Developments on Neighborhoods.” Journal of Public Economics93 (5–6): 654–66.
3.
BeauregardR. A.1990. “Trajectories of Neighborhood Change: The Case of Gentrification.” Environment and Planning A22:855–74.
4.
CarterW.SchillM.WachterS.1998. “Polarization, Public Housing, and Racial Minorities in U.S. Cities.” Urban Studies35 (10): 1889–911.
5.
DeFillipisJ.WylyE.2008. “Running to Stand Still: Through the Looking Glass with Federally Subsidized Housing in New York City.” Urban Affairs Review43 (6): 777–816.
6.
DevineD. J.GrayR. W.RubinL.TaghaviL. B.2003. Housing Choice Voucher Location Patterns: Implications for Participants and Neighborhood Welfare. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
7.
EllenI. G.2000. Sharing America’s Neighborhoods: The Prospects for Stable Racial Integration. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
8.
EllenI. G.2007. “Spillovers and Subsidized Housing: The Impact of Subsidized Rental Housing on Neighborhoods.” Working Paper RR07-3, Joint Center for Housing Studies, Harvard Univ., Cambridge.
9.
EllenI. G.LensM. C.O’ReganK.2012. “American Murder Mystery Revisited: Do Housing Voucher Households Cause Crime?”Housing Policy Debate22 (4): 551–72.
10.
EllenI. G.O’ReganK. M.VoicuI.2009. “Siting, Spillovers, and Segregation: A Reexamination of the Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program.” In Housing Markets and the Economy: Risk, Regulation, and Policy, edited by GlaeserE. L.QuigleyJ. M., 233–67. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
11.
FeinsJ. D.PattersonR.2005. “Geographic Mobility in the Housing Choice Voucher Program: A Study of Families Entering the Program, 1995–2002.” Cityscape8 (2): 21–47.
12.
FinkelM.BuronL.2001. Study on Section 8 Voucher Success Rates. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
13.
FrankK. A.2000. “Impact of a Confounding Variable on a Regression Coefficient.” Sociological Methods & Research29:147–94.
14.
FreemanL.2003. “The Impact of Assisted Housing Developments on Concentrated Poverty.” Housing Policy Debate14 (1): 103–41.
15.
FreemanL.BoteinH.2002. “Subsidized Housing and Neighborhood Impacts: A Theoretical Discussion and Review of the Evidence.” Journal of Planning Literature16:359–70.
16.
GalsterG. C.TatianP.SmithR.1999. “The Impact of Neighbors who Use Section 8 Certificates on Property Values.” Housing Policy Debate10 (4): 879–918.
17.
Geolytics. 2003. CensusCD Neighborhood Change Database. East Brunswick, NJ: Geolytics.
18.
GoeringJ.2005. “Expanding Housing Choice and Integrating Neighborhoods: The MTO Experiment.” In The Geography of Opportunity: Race and Housing Choice in Metropolitan America, edited by BriggsX. S., 127–50. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
19.
GoetzE. G.2003. Clearing the Way: Deconcentrating the Poor in Urban America. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
20.
GoetzE. G.2010. “Desegregation in 3D: Displacement, Dispersal and Development in American Public Housing.” Housing Studies25 (2): 137–58.
21.
GoetzE. G.2011. “Where Have All the Towers Gone? The Dismantling of Public Housing in U.S. Cities.” Journal of Urban Affairs33 (3): 267–87.
22.
GoetzE. G.ChappleK.2010. “Dispersal as Anti-poverty Policy.” In Critical Urban Studies: New Directions, edited by DaviesJ.ImbroscioD., 149–64. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
23.
HardingD. J.2003. “Counterfactual Models of Neighborhood Effects: The Effect of Neighborhood Poverty on Dropping Out and Teenage Pregnancy.” American Journal of Sociology109 (3): 676–719.
24.
HelmsA. C.2003. “Understanding Gentrification: An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of Urban Housing Renovation.” Journal of Urban Economics54:474–98.
25.
HirschA. R.1983. Making the Second Ghetto: Race and Housing in Chicago, 1940-1960. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago.
26.
HoD. E.ImaiK.KingG.StuartE. A.2007. “Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference.” Political Analysis15:199–236.
27.
HolinM. J.BuronL.LockeG.CortesA.2003. Interim Assessment of the HOPE VI Program Cross-Site Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
28.
HollowayS.BryanD.ChabotR.RogersD. M.RulliJ.1998. “Exploring the Effect of Public Housing on the Concentration of Poverty in Columbus, Ohio.” Urban Affairs Review33 (6): 767–89.
29.
HwangJ.SampsonR. J.2014. “Divergent Pathways of Gentrification: Racial Inequality and the Social Order of Renewal in Chicago Neighborhoods.” American Sociological Review79 (4): 726–51.
30.
KatzB.TurnerM. A.2008. “Rethinking U.S. Rental Housing Policy: A New Blueprint for Federal, State, and Local Action.” In Revisiting Rental Housing: Policies, Programs, and Priorities, edited by RetsinasN. P.BelskyE. S., 319–59. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
31.
KhadduriJ.2001. “Deconcentration: What Do We Mean? What Do We Want?”Cityscape5 (2): 69–84.
32.
KhadduriJ.MartinM.1997. “Mixed-Income Housing in the HUD Multifamily Stock.” Cityscape3 (2): 33–69.
33.
KhadduriJ.WilkinsC.2008. “Designing Subsidized Rental Housing Programs: What Have We Learned?” In Revisiting Rental Housing: Policies, Programs, and Priorities, edited by RetsinasN. P.BelskyE. S., 161–91. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
34.
KuchevaY.2013. “Subsidized Housing and the Concentration of Poverty, 1977-2008: A Comparison Between Eight U.S. Metropolitan Areas.” City & Community12 (2): 113–33.
35.
LeeC. M.CulhaneD. P.WachterS. M.1999. “The Differential Impacts of Federally Assisted Housing Programs on Nearby Property Values: A Philadelphia Case Study.” Housing Policy Debate10 (2): 75–93.
36.
LeyD.1996. The New Middle Class and the Remaking of the Central City. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
37.
LoganJ. R.MolotchH. L.1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
38.
MasseyD. S.DentonN. A.1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
39.
MasseyD. S.KanaiaupuniS. M.1993. “Public Housing and the Concentration of Poverty.” Social Science Quarterly74:109–22.
40.
McClureK.2006. “The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program Goes Mainstream and Moves to the Suburbs.” Housing Policy Debate17 (3): 419–46.
41.
O’ReganK.HornK.2013. “What Can We Learn About the Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program by Looking at the Tenants?”Housing Policy Debate23 (3): 596–613.
42.
OwensA.2012. “The New Geography of Subsidized Housing: Implications for Urban Poverty.” Doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology & Social Policy, Harvard Univ., Cambridge.
43.
PattilloM.2007. Black on the Block: The Politics of Race and Class in the City. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
44.
PopkinS. J.RichM. J.HendeyL.HayesC.ParilloJ.GalsterG.2012. “Public Housing Transformation and Crime: Making the Case for Responsible Relocation.” Housing Policy Debate14 (3): 137–60.
45.
SampsonR. J.2009. “Racial Stratification and the Durable Tangle of Neighborhood Inequality.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science621 (1): 260–80.
46.
SampsonR. J.2012. Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
47.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. D.2006. “Durable Inequality: Spatial Dynamics, Social Processes, and the Persistence of Poverty in Chicago Neighborhoods.” In Poverty Traps, edited by BowlesS.DurlaufS. N.HoffK., 176–203. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
48.
SchillM.WachterS.1995. “The Spatial Bias of Federal Housing Law and Policy: Concentrated Poverty in Urban America.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review143:1285–342.
49.
SchwartzA. F.2010. Housing Policy in the United States. 2nd ed.New York: Routledge.
50.
SchwirianK. P.1983. “Models of Neighborhood Change.” Annual Review of Sociology9:83–102.
51.
SkoganW.1986. “Fear of Crime and Neighborhood Change.” Crime and Justice8:203–29.
52.
SmithN.1979. “Toward a Theory of Gentrification: A Back to the City Movement by Capital, Not People.” Journal of the American Planning Association45 (4): 538–48.
53.
SureshG.VitoG. F.2007. “The Tragedy of Public Housing: Spatial Analysis of Hotspots of Aggravated Assaults in Louisville, KY (1989-1998).” American Journal of Criminal Justice32:99–115.
54.
TurnerM. A.1998. “Moving Out of Poverty: Expanding Mobility and Choice Through Tenant-Based Housing.” Housing Policy Debate9 (2): 373–94.
55.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2009. “A Compass for Understanding and Using American Community Survey Data: What Researchers Need to Know.” Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
56.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1977. “A Picture of Subsidized Households in the 1970s.” U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC. http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/assthsg.html (accessed January 29, 2013).
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2000. “A Picture of Subsidized Households—2000.” U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC. http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/assthsg.html (accessed January 29, 2013).
59.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2008. “A Picture of Subsidized Households—2008.” U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC. http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/assthsg.html (accessed January 29, 2013).
60.
ValeL.2000. From the Puritans to the Projects: Public Housing and Public Neighbors. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
61.
WilsonW. J.1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
62.
WoodS. N.2004. “Stable and Efficient Multiple Smoothing Parameter Estimation for Generalized Additive Models.” Journal of the American Statistical Association99:673–86.
63.
WylyE. K.HammelD. J.1999. “Islands of Decay in Seas of Renewal: Housing Policy and the Resurgence of Gentrification.” Housing Policy Debate10 (4): 711–71.
