This article presents an agent-based computational analysis of the effects of externality zoning on environmental justice (EJ). We experiment with two ideal types of externality zoning: proactive and reactive. In the absence of zoning, environmental injustice emerges and minority agents have lower average environmental quality than majority agents. With proactive zoning, which allows polluting firms only in designated zones, EJ problems are less severe and appear more tractable. With reactive zoning, which creates buffering zones around polluting firms, environmental injustice tends to emerge more quickly as compared with proactive zoning but tends to decline over time. This analysis examines a possible policy tool available for cities to ameliorate environmental injustice.
AnanatElizabethFuShiheRossStephen L.2013. Race-Specific Agglomeration Economies: Social Distance and the Black-White Wage Gap (NBER Working Paper No. 18933). http://www.nber.org/papers/w18933 (accessed October 5, 2013).
2.
BeenVickiGuptaFrancis. 1997. “Coming to the Nuisance or Going to the Barrios.” Ecology Law Quarterly24 (1): 1–56.
3.
BooneChristopher G.ModarresAli. 1999. “Creating a Toxic Neighborhood in Los Angeles County: A Historical Examination of Environmental Inequity.” Urban Affairs Review35 (2): 163–87.
4.
BowenWilliam M.AtlasMarkLeeSugie. 2009. “Industrial Agglomeration and the Regional Scientific Explanation of Perceived Environmental Injustice.” Annals of Regional Science43:1013–31.
5.
BowenWilliam M.WellsMichael V.2002. “The Politics and Reality of Environmental Justice: A History and Considerations for Administrators and Policy Makers.” Public Administration Review62 (6): 688–99.
6.
BrownDaniel G.PagesScottRioloRickZellnerMoriaRandWilliam. 2005. “Path Dependence and the Validation of Agent–Based Spatial Models of Land.” Intenational Journal of Geographical Information Science19:153–74.
7.
BrownDaniel G.RobinsonDerek T.2005. “Effects of Heterogeneity in Residential Preferences on an Agent-Based Model of Urban Sprawl.” Ecology and Society11 (1): 46–66.
8.
BullardRobert D.1990. Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality. Boulder: Westview Press.
9.
CampbellHeather E.PeckLaura R.TschudiMichael K.2010. “Justice for All? A Cross-Time Analysis of Toxics Release Inventory Facility Location.” Review of Policy Research27 (1): 1–25.
10.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2010. Census, United States.
11.
ClarkWillam A. V.1992. “Residential Preferences and Residential Choices in a Multiethnic Context.” Demography29 (3): 451–66.
12.
CoxKevin R.2007. “Housing Tenure and Neighborhood Activism.” Urban Affairs Review18:107–29.
13.
DearMichael. 1992. “Understanding and Overcoming the NIMBY Syndrome.” Journal of the American Planning Association58 (3): 288–300.
14.
DesaiAnand. 2012. Simulations for Policy Inquiry. New York: Springer.
15.
DowneyLiam. 1998. “Environmental Injustice: Is Race or Income a Better Predictor?” Social Science Quarterly79 (4): 766–78.
16.
EckerdAdamCampbellHeather E.KimYushim. 2012. “Helping Those Like Us or Harming Those Unlike Us: Illuminating Social Processes Leading to Environmental Injustice.” Environment and Planning B39 (5): 945–64. doi:10.1068/b38001.
17.
EpsteinJoshua M.2006. Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
18.
FischelWilliam A.1992. “Property Taxation and the Tiebout Model: Evidence for the Benefit View from Zoning and Voting.” Journal of Economic Literature30 (1): 171–77.
19.
FischelWilliam A.1997. The Economics of Zoning Laws: A Property Rights Approach to American Land Use Controls. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
HamiltonJames T.1995. “Testing for Environmental Racism: Prejudice, Profits, Political Power?”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management14 (1): 107–32.
22.
IhlanfeldtKeith R.2004. “Exclusionary Land-Use Regulations within Suburban Communities: A Review of the Evidence and Policy Prescriptions.” Urban Studies41 (2): 261–83.
23.
KraftMichael E.ClaryBruce B.1991. “Citizen Participation and the NIMBY Syndrome: Public Response to Radioactive Waste Disposal.” Political Research Quarterly44:299–328.
24.
KrieselWarrenCentnerTerence J.KeelerAndrew G.1996. “Neighborhood Exposure to Toxic Releases: Are There Racial Inequities?”Growth and Change27 (4): 479–99.
25.
KrugmanPaul. 1993. “On the Relationship between Trade Theory and Location Theory.” Review of International Economics1 (2): 110–22.
26.
LazeroArthur S.1971. “Discriminatory Zoning: Legal Battleground of the Seventies.” American University Law Review21:157–83.
27.
Ligmann-ZielinskaArikaJankowskiPiotr. 2010. “Exploring Normative Scenarios of Land Use Development Decisions with an Agent-Based Simulation Laboratory.” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems34:409–23.
28.
MaantayJuliana. 2002. “Zoning Law, Health, and Environmental Justice: What’s the Conclusion?”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics30:572–93.
29.
McAvoyGregory E.1998. “Partisan Probing and Democratic Decisionmaking: Rethinking the NIMBY Syndrome.” Policy Studies Journal26 (2): 274–92.
30.
NoonanDouglas S.2008. “Evidence of Environmental Justice: A Critical Perspective on the Practice of EJ Research and Lessons for Policy Design.” Social Science Quarterly89 (5): 1153–74.
31.
OhlsJames C.WeisbergRichard ChadbournWhiteMichelle J.1974. “The Effect of Zoning on Land Value.” Journal of Urban Economics1 (4): 428–44.
32.
ParkerDawn C.FilatovaTatiana2008. “A Conceptual Design for a Bilateral Agent-Based Land Market with Heterogeneous Economic Agents.” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems32 (6): 454–63.
33.
ParkerDawn C.MansonSteven M.JanssenMarco A.HoffmannMatthew J.DeadmanPeter. 2003. “Multi-agent Systems for the Simulation of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: A Review.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers93 (2): 314–37.
34.
ParkerDawn C.MeretskyVicky J.2004. “Measuring Pattern Outcomes in an Agent-Based Model of Edge-Effect Externalities Using Spatial Metrics.” Agriculture Ecosystem & Environment101:233–50.
35.
PastorManuelMorello-FroschRachelSaddJames L.2005. “The Air Is Always Cleaner on the Other Side: Race, Space, and Ambient Air Toxics Exposures in California.” Journal of Urban Affairs27 (2): 127–48.
36.
PastorManuelSaddJimHippJohn. 2001. “Which Came First? Toxic Facilities, Minority Move-In, and Environmental Justice.” Journal of Urban Affairs23 (1): 1–21.
37.
PendallRolf. 2000. “Local Land Use Regulation and the Chain of Exclusion.” Journal of the American Planning Association66 (2): 125–42.
38.
PogodzinskiJ. MikeSassTim R.1991. “Measuring the Effects of Municipal Zoning Regulations: A Survey.” Urban Studies28 (4): 591–621.
39.
PrattJohn W.1964. “Risk Aversion in the Small and the Large.” Econometrica32 (1–2): 122–36.
40.
PulidoLaura. 2000. “Rethinking Environmental Racism: White Privilege and Urban Development in Southern California.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers90 (1): 12–40.
41.
QianZou. 2011. “Shaping Urban Form Without Zoning: Investigating Three Neighborhoods in Houston.” Planning Practice & Research261 (1): 21–42.
42.
RandWilliamZellnerMoiraPageScott E.RioloRickBrownDaniel G.FernandezL. E.2002. “The Complex Interaction of Agents and Environments: An Example in Urban Sprawl.” In Proceedings of the Agent 2002 Conference on Social Agents: Ecology, Exchange and Evolution, edited by MacalCharlesSallachDavid, 149–61. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago and Argonne National Lab.
43.
RichardsonHarry W.GordonPeterJunM. J.KimmM. H.1993. “PRIDE and Prejudice: The Economic Impacts of Growth Controls in Pasadena.” Environment & Planning A25 (7): 987–1002.
44.
RingquistEvan J.2005. “Assessing Evidence of Environmental Inequities: A Meta-analysis.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management24 (2): 223–47.
45.
RothwellJonathanMasseyDouglas S.2009. “The Effect of Density Zoning on Racial Segregation in U.S. Urban Areas.” Urban Affairs Review44 (6): 779–806.
46.
SahaRobinMohaiPaul. 2005. “Historical Context and Hazardous Waste Facility Siting.” Social Problems52 (4): 618–48.
47.
SchellingThomas C.1971. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: Norton.
48.
SchillingJosephLintonLeslie S.2005. “The Public Health Roots of Zoning in Search of Active Living’s Legal Genealogy.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine28 (2, Suppl. 2): 96–104.
49.
SugrueThomas J.1996. The Origins of the Urban Crisis: Race and Inequality in Postwar Detroit. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
VeldkampA.VerburgP.2004. “Modeling Land Use Change and Environmental Impact.” Journal of Environmental Management72:1–3.
55.
WilsonSacobyHutsonMaloMujahidMahasin S.2008. “How Planning and Zoning Contribute to Inequitable Development, Neighborhood Health, and Environmental Injustice.” Environmental Justice1 (4): 211–16.
56.
WolvertonAnn. 2009. “Effects of Socio-economic and Input-Related Factors on Polluting Plants’ Location Decisions.” B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy9 (1): 1–32.
57.
WoodworthJames R.GumpW. RobertForresterJames R.2006. Camelot: A Role Playing Simulation of Political Decision Making. Belmont: Thompson.
58.
ZellnerMoira L.PageScott E.RandWilliamBrownDaniel G.RobinsonDerek T.NassauerdJoanLowdBobbi. 2009. “The Emergence of Zoning Policy Games in Exurban Jurisdictions: Informing Collective Action Theory.” Land Use Policy26:356–67.
59.
ZellnerMoira L.RioloRick L.RandWilliamBrownDaniel G.PageScott E.FernandezLuis E.2010. “The Problem with Zoning: Nonlinear Effects of Interaction Between Location Preferences and Externalities on Land Use and Utility.” Environment and Planning B37:408–28.
