Citizens’ local initiatives that are inconsistent with current policy challenge local authorities to act in response. How does local government react and what considerations are involved? Analysis draws on a recent trend in Israel: Dissatisfied parents have been establishing schools even though legal mechanisms enabling such initiatives are absent and central government continues to resist. Findings indicate that local authority reaction is a continuing process, constituting a series of responses. Influenced by societal, operational, and professional considerations, this evolving reaction illuminates that local authorities have been trapped between responsiveness to their communities, compliance with central policy, and maintenance of existing local services.
Administrative Petition. 2001. Atid School v. Ministry of Education (Tel Aviv) 1294/01 [in Hebrew].
2.
Administrative Petition. 2004. Ehud v. Tirosh (Haifa) 1292/03 [in Hebrew].
3.
ArnsteinSherry R.1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners35 (4): 216-24.
4.
BogasonPeterMussoJuliet A.2006. “The Democratic Prospects of Network Governance.” The American Review of Public Administration36 (1): 3-18.
5.
BoydAlanNelsonAdrian. 2011. “Knowing and Doing: The Value of Intelligent Application in Local Government Improvement.” Public Money & Management31 (4): 249-56.
6.
BrannanTessaJohnPeterStokerGerry. 2006. “Active Citizenship and Effective Public Services and Programmes: How Can We Know What Really Works?” Urban Studies43 (5–6): 993-1008.
7.
Bresler-GonenRotem. 2010. “Local House of Representatives: The Interaction between Mayors and Council Members Following the Direct Voting Legislation and the New Municipal Act Proposal.” In City and State in Israel: Local Government towards the Seventh Decade, edited by BrichtaAvrahamVigoda-GadotEranPadeGuy, 476-504. Jerusalem: Carmel Publications.
8.
Bresler-GonenRotemDowdingKeith. 2009. “Shifting and Shirking Political Appointments for Contracting Out Services in Israeli Local Government.” Urban Affairs Review44 (6): 807-31.
9.
BrichtaAvraham. 1998. “The New Premier-Parliamentary System in Israel.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science555:180-92.
10.
BrichtaAvrahamVigoda-GadotEranPadeGuy. 2010. “The Seventh Decade of Local Government in Israel: Continuity and Change.” In City and State in Israel: Local Government towards the Seventh Decade, edited by BrichtaAvrahamVigoda-GadotEranPadeGuy, 7-17. Jerusalem: Carmel Publications.
11.
BuchananJames M.TullockGordon. 1965. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Vol. 100. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.
12.
CampaneraJosep M.NobajasAlexandreHigginsPaul. 2013. “The Relationship between Residential Quality of Life and Socioeconomic Status in England.” Urban Affairs Review. Published electronically April 29, doi:10.1177/1078087413485204.
13.
CastellsManuel. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society, Vol. I of the Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
14.
CharmazKathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
15.
CochraneAllan. 1993. Whatever Happened to Local Government?Buckingham: Open Univ. Press.
16.
DaltonRussell J.2008. “Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation.” Political Studies56 (1): 76-98.
17.
DentersBasMossbergerKaren. 2006. “Building Blocks for a Methodology for Comparative Urban Political Research.” Urban Affairs Review41 (4): 550-71.
18.
DentersBasRoseLawrence E.2005. Comparing Local Governance-Trends and Developments. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
19.
DeryDavid. 1998. “Elected Mayors and De Facto Decentralisation, Israeli Style.” Local Government Studies24 (2): 45-55.
20.
DeryDavid. 2002. “Fuzzy Control.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory12 (2): 191-216.
21.
De TocquevilleAlexis. 1968. Democracy in America. New York: Vintage Books.
22.
DowdingKeithJohnPeter. 2008. “The Three Exit, Three Voice and Loyalty Framework: A Test with Survey Data on Local Services.” Political Studies56 (2): 288-311.
23.
DuroseCatherineGreasleyStephenRichardsonLiz. 2009. “Changing Local Governance, Changing Citizens: Introduction.” In Changing Local Governance, Changing Citizens, edited by DuroseCatherineGreasleyStephenRichardsonLiz, 1-12. Bristol: Policy Press.
24.
EisenschitzAramGoughJamie. 1993. The Politics of Local Economic Policy: The Problems and Possibilities of Local Initiative. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
25.
EvansKathy. 2011. “‘Big Society’ in the UK: A Policy Review.” Children & Society25 (2): 164-71.
26.
GlaserBarney G.StraussAnselm L.1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine de Gruyter.
27.
GofenAnat. 2012. “Entrepreneurial Exit Response to Dissatisfaction with Public Services.” Public Administration90 (4): 1088-1106.
28.
GreenerIan. 2008. “Choice and Voice: A Review.” Social Policy and Society7 (2): 255-65.
29.
HartleyJeanAllisonMaria. 2000. “The Modernization and Improvement of Government and Public Services: The Role of Leadership in the Modernization and Improvement of Public Services.” Public Money & Management20 (2): 35-40.
30.
HirschmanAlbert O.1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
31.
HirstPaul. 1995. “Quangos and Democratic Government.” Parliamentary Affairs48 (2): 341-59.
32.
JohnPeter. 2001. Local Governance in Western Europe. London: Sage.
33.
JohnPeter. 2009. “Citizen Governance: Where It Came from, Where It’s Going.” In Changing Local Governance, Changing Citizens, edited by DuroseCatherineGreasleyStephenRichardsonLiz, 1-12. Bristol: Policy Press.
34.
JohnPeterFieldhouseEdwardLiuHanhua. 2011. “How Civic Is the Civic Culture? Explaining Community Participation Using the 2005 English Citizenship Survey.” Political Studies59 (2): 230-52.
35.
KeilRogerYoungDouglas. 2003. “A Charter for the People? A Research Note on the Debate about Municipal Autonomy in Toronto.” Urban Affairs Review39 (1): 87-102.
36.
KingCheryl SimrellFelteyKathryn M.O’Neill SuselBridget. 1998. “The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration.” Public Administration Review58 (4): 317-26.
37.
KisbyBen. 2010. “The Big Society: Power to the People?” The Political Quarterly81 (4): 484-91.
38.
LCrimApp. 2004. Mazorski v. State of Isreal-Ministry of Education. 5931/04 [in Hebrew].
39.
LeviMargaret. 2006. “Why We Need a New Theory of Government.” Perspectives on Politics4 (1): 5-19.
LowndesVivienPratchettLawrenceStokerGerry. 2001. “Trends in Public Participation: Part 1-Local Government Perspectives.” Public Administration79 (1): 205-22.
42.
LowndesVivienPratchettLawrenceStokerGerry. 2006. “Local Political Participation: The Impact of Rules-in-Use.” Public Administration84 (3): 539-61.
43.
MillJohn StuartO’GradyJeanRobsonJohn M.1991. Collected Works of John Stuart Mill: Indexes. Vol. 33. Toronto, ON: Univ. of Toronto Press, c1963-c1991.
44.
Ministry of the Interior. 2008. Local Representatives’ Hand Book. Publication by the Instruction Unit, 220–29 [in Hebrew].
45.
OsborneStephen P.2010. “Delivering Public Services: Time for a New Theory?” Public Management Review12 (1): 1-10.
46.
PratchettLawrence. 2004. “Local Autonomy, Local Democracy and the ‘New Localism.’” Political Studies52 (2): 358-75.
47.
RichardsonLiz. 2008. DIY Community Action: Neighbourhood Problems and Community Self-Help. Bristol: Policy Press.
48.
RitchieJaneSpencerLizO’ConnorWilliam. 2003. “Carrying Out Qualitative Analysis.” In Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers, edited by RitchieJaneLewisJane, 219-62. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
SandercockLeonieLysiottisPeter. 1998. Towards Cosmopolis: Planning For Multicultural Cities. Chichester: Wiley.
50.
SkelcherChrisTorfingJacob. 2010. “Improving Democratic Governance through Institutional Design: Civic Participation and Democratic Ownership in Europe.” Regulation & Governance4 (1): 71-91.
51.
StewartJohn. 2000. “The Nature of British Local Government.” Public Administration78 (3): 715-22.
52.
StewartJohn. 2003. Modernising British Local Government: An Assessment of Labour’s Reform Programme. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
53.
StokerGerry. 1996. “Redefining Local Democracy.” In Local Democracy and Local Government, edited by PratchettLawrenceWilsonDavid, 188-210. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
54.
StokerGerry. 2003. Transforming Local Governance: From Thatcherism to New Labour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
55.
StokerGerry. 2011. “Was Local Governance Such a Good Idea? A Global Comparative Perspective.” Public Administration89 (1): 15-31.
56.
StraussAnselmCorbinJuliet. 1994. “Grounded Theory Methodology: An Overview.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by DenzinNorman K.LincolnYvonna S., 273-85. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
57.
VallerDavidWoodAndrewNorthPeter. 2000. “Local Governance and Local Business Interests: A Critical Review.” Progress in Human Geography24 (3): 409-28.
WelchEric W.HinnantCharles C.MoonM. Jae. 2005. “Linking Citizen Satisfaction with e-Government and Trust in Government.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory15 (3): 371-91.
60.
YangKaifengCallahanKathe. 2007. “Citizen Involvement Efforts and Bureaucratic Responsiveness: Participatory Values, Stakeholder Pressures, and Administrative Practicality.” Public Administration Review67 (2): 249-64.
61.
YoungIris Marion. 1990. “The Ideal of Community and the Politics of Difference.” In Feminism and Community, edited by NicholsonLinda J., 233-58. New York: Routledge.
