Prior research has established race as a factor in annexation decisions in the American South; however, there is very little research that examines the influence of ethnicity on annexation patterns. We consider a sample of incorporated places and their adjacent unincorporated blocks in 10 midwestern states to understand the relationship of ethnicity to annexation and possible differences in the drivers of annexation in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan contexts. The determinants of annexation in the Midwest differ in nonmetropolitan areas with existing population pressure and factors associated with capturing future growth as key drivers. Ethnicity appears to play a limited role in understanding annexation in the Midwest, but only within the nonmetropolitan context.
AikenC. S.1987. Race as a factor in municipal underbounding. Annals of the Association of American Geographers77 (4): 564-79.
2.
AikenC. S.1990. A new type of black ghetto in the plantation south. Annals of the Association of American Geographers80 (2): 223-46.
3.
AndersonM. W.2008. Cities inside out: Race, poverty and exclusion at the urban fringe. UCLA Law Review55 (5): 1095-160.
4.
AustinD. A.1999. Politics vs. economics: Evidence from municipal annexation. Journal of Urban Economics45 (3): 501-32.
5.
BabbB. H.UngerS. C.2008. Setting the annexation record straight: The myth underlying annexation reform in Indiana. Res Gestae, March, 36-41.
6.
BaumleA.FossettM.WarrenW.2008. Strategic annexation under the Voting Rights Act: Racial dimensions of annexation practices. Harvard Blackletter Law Journal24:81-115.
7.
BollensJ.1949. Annexation of fringe areas. Public Management31 (4): 98-102.
8.
CarruthersJ. I.2003. Growth at the fringe: The influence of political fragmentation in United States metropolitan areas. Papers in Regional Science82 (4): 475-99.
9.
ChoY. H.1969. Fiscal implications of annexation: The case of metropolitan central cities in Texas. Land Economics45 (August): 368-72.
10.
ClarkW. A. V.1991. Residential preferences and neighborhood racial segregation: A test of the Schelling segregation model. Demography28 (1): 1-19.
11.
ClarkW. A. V.FossettM.2008. Understanding the social context of the Schelling segregation model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences105 (11): 4109-14.
12.
CotrellC. L.StevensR. M.1979. The 1975 Voting Rights Act, annexation policy and growth in the sunbelt. The Urban Law Review3:1-37.
13.
EmersonM. O.YanceyG.ChaiK. J.2001. Does race matter in residential segregation? Exploring the preferences of white Americans. American Sociological Review66 (6): 922-35.
14.
EnnisS.Rios-VargasM.Albert.N. G.2011. The Hispanic population: 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Census Bureau.
15.
FleischmannA.1986. The goals and strategies of local boundary changes: Government organization or private gain?Journal of Urban Affairs21 (Fall): 63-75.
16.
FlorestanoP. S.Marando.V. L.1981. The states and the metropolis. New York: Marcel Dekker.
17.
GablerL. R.1971. Population size as a determinant of city expenditures and employment-some further evidence. Land Economics47 (May): 130-38.
18.
HarwoodS. A.2012. Planning in the face of anti-immigrant sentiment: Latino immigrants and land-use conflict in Orange County, California. In Diálogos: Placemaking in Latinos communities, edited by RiosM.VazquezL., 36-49. Oxford: Routledge.
19.
HeimC. E.2006. Border wars: Tax revenue, annexation and urban growth in Phoenix. Amherst: Political Economy Research Institute, Univ. of Massachusetts.
20.
JaccardJ.2001. Interaction effects in logistic regression. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
21.
JacksonK. T.1985. Crabgrass frontier: The suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
22.
JohnsonJ. H.JrParnellA.JoynerA. M.ChristmanC. J.MarshB.2004. Racial apartheid in a small North Carolina town. The Review of Black Political Economy31 (4): 89-107.
23.
JonasA.1991. Urban growth coalitions and urban development policy: Postwar growth and the politics of annexation in metropolitan Columbus. Urban Geography12 (3): 197-225.
24.
JordanM.2012. Heartland draws Hispanics to help revive small towns. Wall Street Journal, November8, A1.
25.
KandelW.CromartieJ.2004. New patterns of Hispanic settlement in rural America. Rural Development Research Report No. 99. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
26.
KellyE. D.1993. Managing community growth: Policies, techniques, and impacts. Westport: Praeger.
27.
KnaapG.Juelich.S.1992. The fiscal impacts of detachment: Is it better to give than to receive?State and Local Government Review24 (1): 28-35.
28.
KutnerM. H.NachtsheimC. J.NeterJ.Li.W.2005. Applied linear statistical models. 5th ed.Boston: McGraw-Hill.
29.
LichterD. T.ParisiD.GriceS. M.Taquino.M. C.2007a. Municipal underbounding: Annexation and racial exclusion in small southern towns. Rural Sociology72 (1): 47-68.
30.
LichterD. T.ParisiD.GriceS. M.Taquino.M. C.2007b. National estimates of racial segregation in rural and small-town America. Demography44 (3): 563-81.
31.
LichterD. T.ParisiD.TaquinoM. C.GriceS. M.2010. Residential segregation in new Hispanic destinations: Cities, suburbs, and rural communities compared. Social Science Research39 (2): 215-30.
32.
LinerG.1990. Annexation rates and institutional constraints. Growth and Change21 (4): 80-94.
33.
LinerG.1992. Annexation impact on municipal efficiency. The Review of Regional Studies22:75-87.
34.
LongJ. S.1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
35.
MacManusS.ThomasR. D.1979. Expanding the tax base: Does annexation make a difference?The Urban Interest1 (2): 15-28.
36.
MaindonaldJ.Braun.W. J.2011. DAAG: Data analysis and graphics data and functions. R package version 1.08. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DAAG (accessed March 20, 2013).
37.
MartinezR. O.2011. Latinos in the Midwest. East Lansing: Michigan State Univ. Press.
38.
MasseyD. S.RothwellJ.DominaT.2009. The changing bases of segregation in the United States. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science626 (1): 74-90.
39.
MillardA. V.ChapaJ.2004. Apple pie and enchiladas: Latino newcomers in the rural Midwest. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.
40.
MoeserJ. V.1982. The politics of annexation: Oligarchic power in a southern city. Cambridge: Schenkman Publishing.
41.
MullerT.Dawson.G.1976. The economic effects of annexation: A second case study in Richmond, Virginia. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
42.
MurphyT. P.1978. Race-base accounting: Assigning the costs and benefits of a racially motivated annexation. Urban Affairs Quarterly14 (2): 169-94.
43.
MushkatelA. H.Mushkatel.L. G.1978. Annexation policy: Remedy or problem?State and Local Government Review10 (1): 20-27.
44.
MushkatelA. H.WilsonL. A.IIMushkatelL. G.1973. A model of citizen response to annexation. Urban Affairs Quarterly9:139-63.
45.
OrfieldM.2002. American metropolitics: The new suburban reality. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
46.
PampelF. C.2000. Logistic regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
PortesA.2009. The new Latin nation: Immigration and the Hispanic population of the United States. In Global connections and local receptions: New Latino immigration to the southeastern United States, edited by AnsleyF.ShefnerJ., 3-34. Knoxville: Univ. of Tennessee Press.
49.
ReynoldsL.1992. Rethinking municipal annexation powers. The Urban Lawyer24 (2): 247-303.
50.
RuskD.2003. Cities without suburbs: A Census 2000 update. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
51.
SaenzR.2011. The changing demography of Latinos in the Midwest. In Latinos in the Midwest, edited by MartinezR. O.33-56. East Lansing: Michigan State Univ. Press.
52.
SchellingT. C.1971. Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology1 (2): 143-86.
53.
SmithJ.BromleyD.Manton.K.1979. Changes in the coincidence of the boundaries and populations of central cities. Social Forces57:931-51.
54.
SpainA. O.1949. Politics of recent municipal annexation in Texas. The Southwestern Social Science Quarterly30 (June): 18-28.
55.
SulzbergerA. G.2011. Hispanics reviving faded towns on the plains. The New York Times, November13, A1.
56.
VitielloD.2009. The migrant metropolis and American planning. Journal of the American Planning Association75 (2): 245-55.
57.
ZhangJ.2011. Tipping and residential segregation: A unified Schelling model. Journal of Regional Science51 (1): 167-93.
