Urban redevelopment governances are commonly treated as singular, monolithic entities that are interactively homogeneous, deploying uniform ensembles of policies and practices across their respective cities. This study, alternatively, reveals these formations as adroitly proactive and interactively heterogeneous across their respective cities. Through a racial economy lens, we empirically examine the racial contours of this “governance heterogeneity” in one urban setting: Chicago, Illinois. In this frame, a comparative analysis of Chicago’s Bronzeville and Pilsen neighborhoods is presented. Both neighborhoods are constituted by different racial profiles: Bronzeville is home to a predominantly African-American population, whereas Pilsen is mostly Mexican and Mexican-American. The study reveals that redevelopment governances are differentially responsive to established, deeply rooted racialized conceptions of “Blackness” and “Latinoness.” As a result, the form and trajectory of redevelopment in both settings has unfolded in markedly different ways.
AndersonM.2007. Tillman’s downfall all in the family. Chicago Sun-Times Editorials, March11, B7.
2.
AndersonM.2012. The temporal dynamics of neoliberal redevelopment governance and the restructuring of urban space: Chicago’s Bronzeville (1989-Present). Doctoral diss., Department of Geography, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/30919 (accessed October 24, 2012).
3.
AppaduraiA.1991. Global ethnoscapes: Notes and queries for a transnational anthropology. In Recapturing anthropology: Working in the present, edited by FoxR. G., 191-210. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
4.
AvilaO.2005. Hispanic condo buyers seen as Pilsen threat: Plan for pricier lofts has neighbors wary. Chicago Tribune, April22 [News, Zone C, 1,].
5.
BakerA.1995. The social production of space of two Chicago neighborhoods: Pilsen and Lincoln Park. PhD. diss., Univ. of Illinois at Chicago.
6.
BarracloughL.2009. South central farmers and shadow hills homeowners: Land use policy and relational racialization in Los Angeles. Professional Geographer61 (2): 164-86.
7.
BeauregardR.1993. Voices of decline: The postwar fate of U.S. cities. New York: Routledge.
8.
BennettL.SmithJ.WrightP., eds. 2006. Where are poor people to live? Transforming public housing communities. London: M.E. Sharpe.
9.
BetancurJ.2005. Gentrification before gentrification? The plight of Pilsen in Chicago. Nathalie P. Voorhees Center for Neighborhood and Community Improvement White paper, Urban Planning and Policy Program, Univ. of Illinois at Chicago.
10.
BoydM.2008. Jim Crow Nostalgia: Reconstructing race in Bronzeville. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
11.
BrennerN.PeckJ.TheodoreN.2010. After neoliberalization?Globalizations7 (3): 327-45.
12.
BrennerN.TheodoreN., eds. 2002. Spaces of neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe. London: Basil Blackwell.
13.
Brown-SaracinoJ.RumpfC.2011. Diverse imaginaries of gentrification: Evidence from newspaper coverage. Journal of Urban Affairs33 (3): 289-315.
14.
ChandlerS.2007. Retail rehab gets started on cottage grove. Chicago Tribune, December17 [Business, Zone C, 1].
15.
Chicago Sun-Times. 2010. Restaurant specialties at Annual Pilsen Celebration; 20 eateries join in event honoring Mexican holiday. September16 [Easy, B3].
16.
Chicago Tribune. 2005. Preserving Pilsen. November23 [Editorial, 28].
17.
CopeM.LatchamF.2009. Narratives of decline: Race, poverty, and youth in the context of postindustrial angst. Professional Geographer61 (2): 150-63.
18.
CromidasR.2010. Failed Olympic bid leaves neighborhood in flux. New York Times, January10, A33A.
19.
CurranW.HagueE.2008. Building inventory project, Pilsen [available in pdf]. Chicago: DePaul University.
20.
DavilaA.2004. Barrio dreams, Puerto Ricans, Latinos and the neoliberal city. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
21.
DelgadoT.1999. Exiles, migrants, settlers, and natives: Literary representations of Chicano/as and Mexicans in the Midwest, Occasional Paper 64. Los Angeles: Julian Samora Research Institute, Univ. of California.
22.
DiesenhouseS.2007. You can go home again. Chicago Tribune, October28 [Real Estate, Zone C, 1].
23.
DrakeS.CaytonH.[1945] 1993. Black Metropolis: A study of Negro life in a Northern City. Revised ed. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
24.
DreierP.2005. How the media compound urban problems. Journal of Urban Affairs27 (2): 193-201.
25.
EscalonaA.2010. End of an era: Pilsen bar was home to artists. Chicago Sun-Times, December30 [Commentary, 27].
26.
FormanT.LewisA.2006. Racial apathy and hurricane Katrina: The social anatomy of prejudice in the post-civil rights era. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race3 (1): 175-202.
27.
GarveyG.2011. Pilsen appeal: A neighborhood that is many things to many people finds itself at a crossroads. Chicago Tribune, September14, 6.
28.
GilmoreR.2002. Fatal couplings of power and difference: Notes on racism and geography. The Professional Geographer54:15-24.
29.
GilmoreR.2006. Golden gulag. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
30.
Gomberg-MunozR.2011. Labor and legality: An ethnography of a Mexican immigrant network (Issues of Globalization: Case Studies in Contemporary Anthropology). New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
31.
GrammenosD.2006. Latino Chicago. In Chicago’s geographies: Metropolis for the 21st century, edited by GreeneR.BaumanM.GrammenosD., 205-16.Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.
32.
HackworthJ.2001. Inner city real estate investment, gentrification, and economic recession in New York City. Environment and Planning A33 (5): 863-80.
33.
HackworthJ.2002. Post recession gentrification in New York City. Urban Affairs Review37 (6): 815-43.
34.
HackworthJ.2007. The neoliberal city: Governance, ideology, and development in American urbanism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.
35.
HackworthJ.RekersJ.2005. Ethnic packaging and gentrification: The case of four neighborhoods in Toronto. Urban Affairs Review41 (2): 211-36.
36.
HagueC.HagueE.BreitbachC.2011. Regional and local economic development. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
37.
HallT.HubbardP., eds. 1998. The entrepreneurial city: Geographies of politics, regime, and representation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
38.
HarveyD.1989. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler B71:3-17.
39.
HirschA.[1983] 1998. Making the second ghetto: Race and housing in Chicago, 1940-1960. 2nd ed.Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
40.
HoffmanA. V.2003. House by house, block by block: The rebirth of America’s urban neighborhoods. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
41.
HyraD.2008. The new urban renewal: The economic transformation of Harlem and Bronzeville. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
42.
InwoodJ.2010. Sweet auburn: Constructing Atlanta’s Auburn Avenue as a heritage tourist destination. Urban Geography31 (5): 573-94.
43.
JenkinsM.2009. Pilsen is gaining a taste of Italy. Chicago Tribune, March5 [Chicagoland Extra, Zone C, 1].
KonkolM.2010. Graffiti critic invites world to laugh at Pilsen taggers. Chicago Sun-Times, September26 [News, A11].
46.
KraseJ.2012. Seeing cities change: Local culture and class. Burlington: Ashgate.
47.
KrysanM.2000. Prejudice, politics, and public opinion: Understanding the sources of racial policy attitudes. Annual Review of Sociology26:135-68.
48.
KrysanM.2002. Community undesirability in Black and White: Examining racial residential preferences through community perceptions. Social Problems49 (4): 421-543.
49.
KrysanM.LewisA., eds. 2006. The changing terrain of race and ethnicity. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
50.
LeesL.SlaterT.WylyE.2008. Gentrification. New York: Routledge.
51.
LeitnerH.1990. Cities in pursuit of economic growth: The local state as entrepreneur. Political Geography Quarterly9 (2): 146-70.
52.
LeitnerH.PeckJ.SheppardE., eds. 2007. Contesting neoliberalism. New York: Guilford Press.
53.
LeyD.1986. Alternative explanations for inner-city gentrification: A Canadian assessment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers70:521-35.
54.
LeyD.1996. The new middle class and the remaking of the central city. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
55.
MacleodG.2002. From entrepreneurialism to a revanchist city? On the spatial injustices of Glasgow’s renaissance. Antipode34 (3): 602-24.
56.
MeleC.1996. Globalization, culture and neighborhood change: Reinventing the lower east side of New York. Urban Affairs Review32 (1): 3-22.
57.
MeleC.2000. Selling the lower east side: Real estate, culture and resistance in New York City. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
58.
MitchellD.2003. The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. New York: Guilford Press.
59.
MitchellK.2004. Crossing the neoliberal line: Pacific Rim migration and the Metropolis. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.
60.
MooreK.2005. What’s class got to do with it? Community development and racial identity. Journal of Urban Affairs27 (4): 437-51.
61.
MooreK.2009. Gentrification in Black face? The return of the Black middle class to urban neighborhoods. Urban Geography30 (2): 118-42.
62.
OlivoA.2009. No encore for the blues. Chicago Tribune, February27 [Chicagoland Extra, Zone C, 1].
63.
PattersonS.2005. Pilsen residents could get tax break to fix up homes: Alderman wants families to stay, not sell to developers. Chicago Sun-Times, May31 [News, 14].
64.
PattilloM.2007. Black on the block: The politics of race and class in the city. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
65.
PeckJ.TheodoreN.2001. Contingent Chicago: Restructuring the spaces of temporary labor. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research25 (3): 471-96.
66.
PeckJ.TheodoreN.2008. Carceral Chicago: Making the ex-offender employability crisis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research32 (2): 251-81.
67.
PeetR.1975. Inequality and poverty: A Marxist geographic theory. Annals of the Association of American Geographers65:564-71.
68.
PerezG.2004. The near northwest side story: Migration, displacement, and Puerto Rican families. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
69.
PhelpsN.WoodA.2011. The new post-suburban politics?Urban Studies48 (12): 2591-610.
70.
Pilsen Planning Committee. 2006. Quality-of-life plan document: A Center of Mexican Life. Chicago: LISC/Chicago’s New Communities Program.
PulidoL.2000. Rethinking environmental racism: White privilege and urban development in southern California. Annals of the Association of American Geographers90:12-40.
73.
PulidoL.2006. Black, brown, yellow, and left: Radical activism in Los Angeles. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
74.
RastJ.1999. Remaking Chicago: The political origins of urban industrial change. DeKalb: Northern Illinois Univ. Press.
75.
ReedC.2005. Upscale Blacks drive prices up, forcing longtime residents out: Few in gentrifying S. side neighborhoods have qualms about displacing the poor. Chicago Sun-Times, November14 [News, 12].
76.
RobertsD.MahtaniM.2010. Neoliberalizing race, racing neoliberalism: Placing “race” in neoliberal discourses. Antipode42 (2): 248-57.
77.
SchaefferR.SmithN.1986. The gentrification of Harlem?Annals of the Association of American Geographers76 (3): 347-65.
78.
SmithN.1979. Toward a theory of gentrification: A back to the city movement by capital, not people. Journal of the American Planning Association45:538-48.
79.
SmithN.1996. The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city. New York: Routledge.
80.
SorkinM.1992. Introduction: Variations on a theme park. In Variations on the theme park: The new American city and the end of public space, edited by SorkinM.xi. New York: Hill & Wang.
VenkateshS.2000. American project: The rise and fall of a modern Ghetto. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
90.
WacquantL.2008. Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of advanced marginality. New York: Polity.
91.
WacquantL.2009. Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Durham: Duke Univ. Press.
92.
WebberM.2003. Pilsen’s new look. Chicago Sun-Times, March17, 49.
93.
WeberR.2002. Extracting value from the city: Neoliberalism and urban redevelopment. In Spaces of neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe, edited by BrennerN.TheodoreN., 173–193. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
94.
WilsonB.2000. America’s Johannesburg: Industrialization and racial transformation in Birmingham. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
95.
WilsonD.1991. Urban change, circuits of capital, and urban development. Professional Geographer43 (4): 403-15.
96.
WilsonD.2004a. Making historic preservation in Chicago: Space, discourse, and neoliberalism. Space & Polity8 (1): 43-59.
97.
WilsonD.2004b. Toward a contingent urban neoliberalism. Urban Geography25:771-83.
98.
WilsonD.2007. Cities and race: America’s new Black Ghetto. New York: Routledge.
99.
WilsonD.2009. Racialized poverty in US cities: Toward a refined racial economy perspective. The Professional Geographer61 (2): 139-50.
100.
WilsonD.2011. Performative parasitic-neoliberal economic: The Chicago case. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research35 (4): 691-711.
101.
WilsonD.BeckD.BaileyA.2009. Neoliberal-parasitic economies and space building: Chicago’s southwest side. Annals of the Association of American Geographers99 (3): 604-26.
102.
WilsonD.GrammenosD.2005. Gentrification, discourse, and the body: Chicago’s Humboldt park. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space23:295-312.
103.
WilsonD.GrammenosD.WoutersJ.2004. Neighborhood restructuring and political conflict: Chicago’s Pilsen neighborhood. Environment and Planning A36 (2): 114-31.
104.
WilsonD.SternbergC.2012. Changing realities: The new racialized redevelopment rhetoric in Chicago. Urban Geography33 (7): 979-99.
105.
WilsonW.1996. When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York: Vintage Books.
106.
WylyE.AtiaM.FoxcroftH.HammelD.Phillips-WattsK.2006. American home: Predatory mortgage capital and neighborhood spaces of race and class exploitation in the United States. Geografiska Annaler: B88:105-32.
107.
WylyE.HammelD.2004. Gentrification, segregation, and discrimination in the American urban system. Environment and Planning A36:1215-41.
108.
WylyE.MoosM.HammelD.KabahiziE.2009. Cartographies of race and class: Mapping the class-monopoly rents of America’s subprime mortgage capital. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research33:332-54.
109.
ZukinS.1982. Loft living: Culture and capital in urban change. New Brunswick: Rutgers Univ. Press.
110.
ZukinS.1995. The cultures of cities. Oxford: Blackwell.
