It is well established that incumbents win reelection at high rates. But we know less about the ways in which institutional variation affects the incumbency advantage. Using data from more than 4,000 cities, evidence in this article indicates that institutions generating low-participation environments increase the proportion of city council incumbents who run for reelection and the proportion who win. These low-turnout environments are shown to have spending patterns that benefit particular subgroups in the population who have good reason to participate even when the costs are high.
BerryChristopherGersenJacob. 2010. “The timing of elections.”The University of Chicago Law Review77 (Winter): 37-64.
2.
BradyDavidBuckleyKaraRiversDoug. 1999. The roots of careerism in the U.S. House of Representatives. Legislative Studies QuarterlyXXIV:489-510.
3.
BriansCraig. 1997. Voter registration laws and turnout in America: The last two decades. Doctoral diss., Univ. of California, Irvine.
4.
BridgesAmy. 1997. Morning glories: Municipal reform in the Southwest. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
5.
Bueno de MesquitaBruceSmithAlastairSiversonRandolphMorrowJames. 2003. The logic of political survival. Cambridge: MIT Press.
6.
BurnhamWalter Dean. 1965. The changing shape of the American political universe. The American Political Science Review59:7-28.
7.
CarsonJamie. 2005. Strategy, selection, and candidate composition in U.S. House and Senate elections. Journal of Politics67 (1): 1-28.
8.
DeNardoJames. 1980. Turnout and the vote: The joke’s on the democrats. American Political Science Review74 (2): 206-420.
9.
DunneStephanieReedW. RobertWilbanksJames. 1995. Endogenizing the median voter: Public choice goes to school. Public Choice93:99-118.
10.
FischelWilliam. 2001. The homevoter hypothesis: How home values influence local government taxation, school finance, and land-use policies. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
11.
HajnalZoltan. 2010. America’s uneven democracy. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
12.
HajnalZoltan L.LewisPaul G.2003. Municipal institutions and voter turnout in local elections. Urban Affairs Review38 (5): 645-68.
13.
HajnalZoltan L.LewisPaul G.LouchHugh. 2002. Municipal elections in California: Turnout, timing, and competition. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
14.
HansfordThomasGomezBrad. 2010. Estimating the electoral effects of voter turnout. The American Political Science Review104 (2): 268-88.
15.
KrebsTimothy B.1998. The determinants of candidates’ vote share and the advantages of incumbency in city council elections. American Journal of Political Science42 (3): 921-35.
16.
LeighleyJan E.NaglerJonathan. 1992. Socioeconomic class bias in turnout, 1964-1988: The voters remain the same. American Political Science Review86:725-36.
17.
LieskeJoel. 1989. The political dynamics of urban voting behavior. American Journal of Political Science33 (1): 150-74.
18.
NiskanenWilliam. 1971. Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
19.
OatesWallace. 2001. Property taxation and local government finance. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
20.
OliverJ. Eric. 2001. Democracy in suburbia. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
21.
OliverJ. EricHaShang E.2007. Vote choice in suburban elections. American Political Science Review101 (3): 393-408.
22.
RosenstoneStephenWolfingerRaymond. 1978. The effect of registration laws on voter turnout. American Political Science Review72 (1): 22-45.
23.
StoneWalterFultonSarahMaestasCherieMaiselL. Sandy. 2010. Incumbency reconsidered: Prospects, strategic retirement, and incumbent quality in U.S. House Elections. Journal of Politics72 (1): 178-90.
24.
TrebbiFrancescoAghionPhilippeAlesinaAlberto. 2008. “Electoral rules and minority representation in U.S. cities.”Quarterly Journal of Economics123 (1): 325-57.
25.
TrounstineJessica. 2011. Evidence of a local incumbency advantage. Legislative Studies Quarterly36 (2): 255-80.
26.
WolfingerRaymondHightonBenjaminMullinMegan. 2005. How postregistration laws affect the turnout of citizens registered to vote. State Politics & Policy Quarterly5 (1): 1-23
27.
WolmanHaroldPageEdwardReavleyM.1990. Mayors and mayoral careers. Urban Affairs Review25(3): 500-14.
