The leading current proposal for surface transportation reform, congestion pricing, is consistent with the tradition of user pay rather than redistributive equity in transportation policy. Strong versions have recently been adopted for Inner London and Stockholm but not so far in the United States, though one recently came close in New York City. The special U.S. obstacles include ample opportunities for minority veto and the equity concept do no harm (no one should be victimized by new initiatives). High occupancy toll lanes, though, which include congestion pricing elements, enjoy growing acceptance in the United States. While their benefits are modest, so are their costs and, above all politically, they do no harm.
Altshuler, Alan, with James P. Womack and John R. Pucher.1979. The urban transportation system: Politics and policy innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
Altshuler, Alan.1999. The ideo-logics of urban land use politics. In Dilemmas of scale in America’s federal democracy, edited by Martha Derthick, 189-226. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
3.
Altshuler, Alan, and David Luberoff.2003. Megaprojects: The changing politics of urban public investment. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
4.
Barter, Paul.2008. Singapore’s urban transport: Sustainability by design or necessity. In Spatial planning for a sustainable Singapore , edited by T. C. Wong, B. Yuen, and C. Goldblum , 95-112. New York: Springer.
5.
Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission.2009. HOT lanes aim to zap traffic, cool the planet. http://www.mtc.ca.gov/news/transactions/ta01-0209/HOT_lanes.htm
6.
Buckeye, Kenneth R., and Lee W. Munnich , Jr.2004. Value pricing outreach and education: Key steps in reaching high-occupancy toll lane consensus in Minnesota. Transportation Research Record1864:16-21.
Colorado Department of Transportation.2009 . I-25 HOV Express Lanes: Reports. http://www.coloradodot.info/travel/tolling/i-25-hov-express-lanes/Reports .
9.
Eilperin, Juliet.2010. Emissions limits, greater fuel efficiency, light trucks made official. Washington Post, April 2.
10.
Federal Highway Administration.2003. A guide for HOT lane development. FHWA-OP-03-009.
11.
Federal Highway Administration.2006. Priced new lanes-California: Extension of I-15 HOT lanes in San Diego. Highway Community Exchange, press release, July 2006.
12.
Federal Highway Administration.2008a. Income-based equity impacts of congestion pricing: A primer. FHWA-HOP-08-040 .
13.
Federal Highway Administration.2008b. Lessons learned from international experience in congestion pricing.
14.
Federal Highway Administration.2009. Current toll road activity in the U.S.: A survey and analysis.
15.
Florida Department of Transportation. 2010. www.95express.com.
16.
Friedland, Roger, and Robert R. Alford .1991. Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, edited by Walter W. Powell and Paul J. Dimaggio, 232-66. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
17.
Fuhs, Chuck, and Jon Ohrenberger .2002. HOV facility development: A review of national trends. Transportation Research Record1781:1-9.
18.
Garcia, Robert.2003. Transportation equity inLos Angeles : The MTA and beyond. Environmental Defense Fund.http://www.edf.org/article.cfm?contentID=1238 .
19.
Garrett, Mark, and Brian Taylor.1999. Reconsidering social equity in public transit. Berkeley Planning Journal13:6-27.
20.
Gomez-Ibanez, Jose A.2005. Congestion charging in London (A): The western extension. Case Program CR14-05-1787.0, Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, MA.
21.
Harris County Toll Road Authority. 2010. https://www.hctra.org/katymanagedlanes/faq.html.
22.
Hawley, Steve.2009. Stimulus money likely to fund HOT lanes after all. Houston Tomorrow, April 24. http://www.houstontomorrow.org/topic/tag/hot-lanes/ .
23.
Klosko, George.1991. The principles of fairness and political obligation. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
24.
Leong, Ho Khai.2003. Shared responsibilities, unshared power: The politics of policy-making in Singapore. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press.
25.
Meyer, John R., and Jose A. Gomez-Ibanez .1981. Autos transit and cities . Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press .
26.
Minnesota Department of Transportation. 2010. http://www.dot.state.mn.us/upa/.
National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission.2009. Final report: Paying our way: A new framework for transportation finance. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
30.
National Transportation Policy Project.2009 . Final report: Performance driven: A new vision for U.S. transportation policy. Washington, DC: Bipartisan Policy Center.
31.
Neo, Boong Siong, and Geraldine Chen.2007. Dynamic culture: Embedding culture, capabilities and change in Singapore. Singapore: World Scientific.
32.
NY1.com.2008. Congestion pricing plan dies in Albany. April 7.
33.
Orange County Transportation Authority. 2010. www.91expresslanes.com.
34.
Orski, Ken.2010. Two bold predictions. Innovation News Briefs, May 3.
35.
Paaswell, R., and J. Zupan.2007. Transportation infrastructure investments: New York and its global peers. Working paper, City College of New York.
36.
Pucher, John.1981. Equity in transit finance: Distribution of transit subsidy benefits and costs among income classes. Journal of the American Planning Association47 (4): 387-407.
37.
Pucher, John, and John L. Rennie .2003. Socioeconomics of urban travel: Evidence from the 2001 NHTS. Transportation Quarterly57 (Summer): 49-77.
38.
Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.2008 . Release March 24 (poll on New York City congestion pricing proposal). www.quinnipiac.edu/x1318.xml?ReleaseID)=1162 .
39.
Rawls, John.2001. Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
40.
Richards, Martin D.2006. Congestion pricing in London: The policy and the politics . New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
41.
San Diego Regional Planning Agency.2010. I-15 Express lanes. http://www.sandag.org/index.asp?projectid=34&fuseaction=projects.detail .
42.
Schwartz, Gary T.1976. Urban freeways and the interstate system. Southern California Law Review49 (March): 406-513.
43.
Sen, Amartya.1992. Inequality reexamined. Cambridge, MA : Harvard Univ. Press.
44.
Taylor, Brian D.2009. How fair is road pricing? Evaluating equity in transportation pricing and finance. White paper, Bipartisan Policy Center , Washington, DC.
45.
Taylor, Brian D.2010. Paying for transportation: What’s a fair price?Journal of Planning Literature24 (August): 22-36.
46.
Tollroadsnews.2007. Minnesota to do second toll express lanes. December 9. http://www.tollroadsnews.com/node/3296.
47.
Transportation Research Board.2000. Highway capacity manual 2000. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
48.
Transportation Research Board, Committee for the Study of the Long-Term Viability of Fuel Taxes for Transportation Finance. 2006. The fuel tax and alternatives for transportation funding. Special Report 285, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
U.S. Department of Transportation.2010. Budget estimates fiscal year 2011. Exhibit II-5, Federal Highway Administration; Exhibit II-5, Federal Transit Administration.
51.
Utah Department of Transportation. 2010. http://www.udot.utah.gov/main.
52.
Vladisavljevic, Ivana, Peter T. Martin, Dejan Jovanovic, and Aleksandar Stevanovic .2008. High occupancy-toll experiment on I-15 in Salt Lake City metropolitan region: Traffic flow evaluation. Conference paper, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
53.
Washington State Department of Transportation. 2010. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/projects/SR167/HOTLanes.
54.
Washington State Department of Transportation, Urban Corridors Office.2009. Eight month performance summary of SR167 high occupancy toll lanes pilot project. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/projects/SR167/HOTLanes.
55.
World Bank.2009. Gross national income, international comparisons. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DATASTATISTICS/Resources/GNIPC.pdf .
56.
World Bank.2010. Passenger cars (per 1,000 people). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IS.VEH.PCAR.P3.
