In 2000, a deprived inner-city district of Enschede (the Netherlands) known as Roombeek was largely devastated by an explosion of a fireworks storage depot. This article evaluates the efforts made by the municipality of Enschede to actively involve the former residents in the reconstruction planning. The results indicate that through a well-ordered process and a considered mobilization campaign, the initiators of the participatory planning process have been successful in stimulating broad and representative public participation.
Arnstein, S.R.1969. Ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners35 (4): 216-24.
2.
Berry, J.M., K.E. Portney, and K. Thomson.1993. The rebirth of urban democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
3.
Birch, A.H.1993. The concepts and theories of modern democracies. London: Routledge.
4.
Box, R.C.1998. Citizen governance: Leading American communities into the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Brady, H.E., S. Verba, and K.L. Schlozman.1995. Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review89:271-94.
6.
Dahl, R.A.1989. Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
7.
Denters, S.A.H., and P.J. Klok2003. Rebuilding Roombeek: An institutional analysis of interactive governance in the context of representative democracy. In The rise of interactive governance and quasi-markets: A comparison of the Dutch experience with the developments in four Western countries, edited by B. Denters, O. van Heffen, J. Huisman, and P. J. Klok, 91-110. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
8.
Denters, B., and L. E. Rose, eds. 2005. Comparing local governance: Trends and developments. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave.
9.
Denters, B., O. Van Heffen, J. Huisman, and P.J. Klok.2003a. Introduction: The emergence of new forms of governance. In The rise of interactive governance and quasi-markets: A comparison of the Dutch experience with the developments in four Western countries, edited by B. Denters , O. van Heffen, J. Huisman, and P. J. Klok, 3-14. Dordrecht , Netherlands: Kluwer.
10.
Denters, B., O. Van Heffen , J. Huisman, and P. J. Klok, eds. 2003b. The rise of interactive governance and quasi-markets: A comparison of the Dutch experience with the developments in four Western countries. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
11.
Dryzek, J.S., and S. Niemeyer.2008. Discursive representation. American Political Science Review102 (4): 481-93.
12.
Edelenbos, J.2005. Institutional implications of interactive governance: Insights from Dutch practice. Governance18 (1): 111-34.
13.
Edelenbos, J., and E.H. Klijn.2006. Managing stakeholder involvement in decision making: A comparative analysis of six interactive processes in the Netherlands. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory16 (3): 417-46.
14.
Edelenbos, J., P.J. Klok, and J. van Tatenhove .2009. The institutional embedding of interactive policy making: Insights from a comparative research based on eight interactive projects in the Netherlands. American Review of Public Administration39 (2): 125-48.
15.
Fiorina, M.P.1999. Extreme voices: A dark side of civic engagement. In Civic engagement in American democracy, edited by T. Skocpol, 395-425. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Hajer, M.A.2005. Rebuilding Ground Zero. The politics of performance. Planning Theory & Practice6 (4): 445-64.
18.
John, P.2009. Can citizen governance redress the representative bias of political participation?Public Administration Review69 (3): 494-503.
19.
Judge, D.1999. Representation: Theory and practice in Britain. London: Routledge.
20.
Kates, R.W., C.E. Colten, S. Laska, and S.P. Leatherman .2006. Reconstruction of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina: A research perspective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences103 (40): 14653-60.
21.
Klok, P.J., B. Denters, O. Van Heffen, and M. Visser.2004. Monitor participatieproces voor de wederopbouw van Roombeek. Resultaten en conclusies. Enschede, Netherlands: KISS.
22.
Lowndes, V., L. Pratchett, and G. Stoker.2006Diagnosing and remedying the failings of official participation schemes: The CLEAR framework. Social Policy and Society5 (2): 281-91.
23.
Lowndes, V., G. Stoker, L. Pratchett, D. Wilson, S. Leach, and M. Wingfield.1998. Enhancing public participation in local government: A research report. London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.
24.
Mansbridge, J.1999. On the idea that participation makes better citizens. In Citizen competence and democratic institutions, edited by S. L. Elkin and K. E. Soltan, 291-325. University Park: Pennsylvania State Univ. Press.
25.
Olshansky, R.B.2006. Planning after Hurricane Katrina. Journal of the American Planning Association72 (2): 147-53.
26.
Ostrom, E., R. Gardner, and J. Walker.1994. Rules, games and common-pool resources . Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press .
27.
Parry, G., G. Moyser, and N. Day.1992. Political participation and democracy in Britain. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Rosenstone, S., and J. Hansen.1993. Mobilization, participation and American democracy. New York: Macmillan.
30.
Ross, B.H., and M.A. Levine.1996. Urban politics: Power in metropolitan America. 5th ed. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
31.
Schattschneider, E.E.1975. The semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.
32.
Sirianni, C., and L. Friedland.2001. Civic innovation in America: Community empowerment, public policy and the movement for civic renewal. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
33.
Tarrow, S.1994. Power in movement: social movements, collective action and politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
34.
Van de Peppel, R.A., and M.T. Prummel.2000. De selectiviteit van interactief beleid . Bestuurskunde9:15-24.
35.
Verba, S., and N.H. Nie.1987. Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
36.
Verba, S., N.H. Nie, and J.O. Kim.1978. Participation and political equality: A seven nation comparison. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
37.
Verba, S., K.L. Schlozman, and H.E. Brady.1995. Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
38.
Verba, S., K.L. Schlozman, H. Brady, and N.H. Nie.1993. Citizen activity: Who participates? What do they say? American Political Science Review87 (2): 303-18.
39.
Wigboldus, J.N.2005. Respect voor het verleden, ruimte voor de toekomst: Lessen van het wederopbouwproces in Roombeek, Enschede ( 2000-2004). Den Haag, Netherlands: VNG Uitgeverij.
40.
Wille, A.2001. Politieke participatie en representativiteit in het interactieve beleidsproces. In Lokale interactieve beleidsvorming: Een vergelijkend onderzoek naar de consequenties van interactieve beleidsvorming voor het functioneren van de lokale democratie, edited by J. Edelenbos and R. Monnikhof, 87-115. Utrecht , Netherlands: Lemma.
