The “vote” urban residents cast when they make decisions about public services has implications for service delivery in local government. We utilize probability data from one of the nation’s largest municipalities to explore potential gender disparities in willingness to pay for local public services: whether men and women differ in their general orientation toward paying for services; whether any gender gaps are exacerbated in particular service areas; and whether any gender disparities have implications for community governance. Men and women report strong predisposition to paying generally, although glaring gender gaps exist that are both theoretically and practically insightful.
Arrington, T., and D. Jordan.1982. Willingness to pay per capita costs as a measure of support for urban services. Public Administration Review42:168-71.
2.
Beck, P., H. Rainey, H.K. Nicholls, and C. Traut.1987. Citizen views of taxes and services: A tale of three cities. Social Science Quarterly68:223-43.
3.
Beck, P., H. Rainey, and C. Traut.1990. Disadvantage, disaffection, and race as divergent bases for citizen fiscal policy preferences. Journal of Politics52:71-93.
4.
Burns, E., and P. Schumaker.1987. Gender differences in attitudes about the role of local government. Social Science Quarterly68:138-47.
5.
---. 1988. Gender cleavages and the resolution of local policy issues . American Journal of Political Science32:1070-95.
6.
Carroll, S., ed. 2003. Women and American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
DiMaggio, P., and M. Useem.1978. Cultural democracy in a period of cultural expansion. Social Problems26:179-97.
8.
Finkel, S., E. Muller, and K. Opp.1989. Personal influence, collective rationality, and mass political action. American Political Science Review83:885-904.
9.
Fjeldstad, O.2004. Trust in public finance. TanzaniaChr. Michelsen Institute.
10.
Fox, R.L., and R.A. Schuhmann.2000. Gender and the role of the city manager . Social Science Quarterly81:604-21.
11.
Gilligan, C.1982. In a different voice. Cambridge, MA : Harvard Univ. Press.
12.
Glaser, M., and W. Hildreth.1999. Service delivery satisfaction and willingness to pay taxes. Public Productivity and Management Review23:48-67.
13.
Kellerher, C., and D. Lowery.2002. Tiebout sorting and selective satisfaction with urban public services. Urban Affairs Review37:420-31.
Kelly, J., and D. Swindell.2002. Service quality variation across urban space. Journal of Urban Affairs24:271-88.
16.
Marston, S.A., and M. Saint-Germain .1991. Urban restructuring and the emergence of new political groupings. Geoforum22:223-36.
17.
Norrander, B., and C. Wilcox.2008. The gender gap in ideology. Political Behavior30:503-23.
18.
Paulsen, R., and J. Bartkowski.1997. Gender and perceptions of success among neighborhood association activists. Social Science Quarterly78:196-208.
19.
Sanders, A.1988. Rationality, self-interest, and public attitudes on public spending. Social Science Quarterly69:311-24.
20.
Schlesinger, M., and C. Heldman.2001. Gender gap or gender gaps? New perspectives on support for government action and policies. Journal of Politics63:59-92.
21.
Simonsen, B., and M. Robbins.2000. The influence of fiscal information on preference for city services. The Social Science Journal37:195-214.
22.
---. 2003. Reasonableness, satisfaction, and willingness to pay property taxes. Urban Affairs Review38:831-54.
23.
Smith, N.1996. The new urban frontier. New York: Routledge.
24.
U.S. Bureau of the Census.2000. Census of population. Summary file3. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
25.
---. 2006a. Population estimates. Washington DC : Government Printing Office.
26.
---. 2006b. American Community Survey. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.
27.
Van Ryzin, G., and S. Immerwahr.2007. Importance-performance analysis of citizen satisfaction surveys. Public Administration85:215-26.
28.
Verba, S., K. Schlozman, and H. Brady.1995. Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
29.
Wang, X.2001. Assessing public participation in U.S. cities. Public Performance & Management Review24:322-36.
30.
Welch, S.1985. The "more for less" paradox. The Public Opinion Quarterly49:310-16.
31.
Wilson, L.1983. Preference revelation and public policy: Making sense of citizen survey data. Public Administration Review43:335-43.
