This study reconsiders the political conditions behind the geographically extensive pattern of urbanization in the United States by focusing on a rapidly urbanizing county on the northeast fringe of the Denver metropolitan area. Unusual for Colorado but typical of the industrialized northeast where this pattern first emerged, Weld County has a high concentration of small towns, the primary repository of statutory authority and ideological legitimacy to convert agricultural land to urban use. The urbanization of Weld County in the 1990s was amplified by the expansion of the towns into their surrounding farmland, which flooded the market with newly urbanized land. The study goes on to consider the prospects of this distinctively American political form in the wake of the property tax revolts of the late 1970s and early 1980s and the structural changes in the American economy during the past 30 years.
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR). 1964. The problem of special districts. A-22. Washington, DC.
2.
---. 1994. Significant features of fiscal federalism, Vol. 2. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Anderson, W.1934. The units of government in the U.S. 42. Washington, DC: Public Administration Service.
4.
Associated Cultural Resource Experts (ACRE).2002. Highways to the sky. Littleton, CO : Author.
5.
Bartle, J., C. Ebdon, and D. Krane.2004. Devolution, fiscal federalism, and changing patterns of municipal revenues. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory14:513-33.
6.
Beauregard, R.2006. When America became suburban. Minneapolis : Univ. of Minnesota Press.
7.
Bernanke, B.2008. The economic outlook. Testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives, January 17, 2008.
8.
Brenner, R.2004. New boom or new bubble? New Left Review25:57-100.
Carliner, M.1998. Development of federal homeownership "policy." Housing Policy Debate9 (2): 299-321.
20.
City of Evans. 2007. Annual budget, Department of Finance. April 20. Author.
21.
City of Greeley.2004. West 10th Street corridor neighborhood plan. Greeley, CO: Community Development Department, City of Greeley.
22.
---. 2007. Annual budget. April 20. Greeley, CO: Author.
23.
Clark, T.1999. Can we save the Front Range?Denver Business Journal, July, 2-22.
24.
Clifton, G.2002. Growth management: Recent developments in municipal annexation and master plans. The Colorado Lawyer31 (3): 61-66.
25.
Collins, C., and M. Mika.2002. Cell phones, center pivots and rural repopulation: Planning implications of the new ponderosa. Paper read at Center for Colorado Policy Studies, Colorado Springs, September 27.
Corcoran, S., W. Evans, J. Godwin, S. Murray, and R. Schwab.2003. The changing distribution of education finance: 1972-1997. New York. Russell Sage.
44.
Danielson, M.1976. The politics of exclusion. New York : Columbia Univ. Press.
45.
DeGrove, J.1984. Land growth and politics. Washington, DC: Planners Press.
46.
Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG).1991. Population change in the Denver metropolitan region, 1980-1990 . Denver.
47.
Deutsch, H., J. Breggin, and M. Angelli.1988. Annexation. The Colorado Lawyer (May): 603-9.
48.
Ditmer, J.2000. 24's defeat shows power of advertising. The Denver Post, November 19, 2.
49.
Downs, A.1994. New visions for metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
50.
Edwards, M.2006. State and local revenues beyond the property tax No. WP06ME1 . Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
51.
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).2007 . Table 8: Offenses known to law enforcement. http://www.fbi.gov (accessed March 15).
52.
Federal Reserve.2007. Table B100. Household balance sheet. Washington, DC: U.S. Federal Reserve Board.
53.
Federation of Tax Administrators (FTA).2007 . State sales tax rates. http://www.taxadmin.org (accessed March 20).
54.
Fischel, W.1985. The economics of zoning laws. Baltimore , MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
55.
Fischler, R.1998. The metropolitan dimension of early zoning. Journal of the American Planning Association64 (2): 170-89.
56.
Fox, K.1977. Better city government. Philadelphia : Temple Univ. Press.
57.
Friedmann, J., and R. Bloch.1990. American exceptionalism in regional planning. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research14:576-601.
58.
Furniss, S.W.1973. Proposals for metropolitan reform. The Western Political Quarterly26 (4): 747-65.
59.
Gelfand, M.1975. A nation of cities. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
60.
Gordon, P., and H. Richardson.2001. The sprawl debate. Publius31 (3): 131-49.
61.
Guimond, D., and M. Leccese.2000. Where do we grow from here? The Denver Post, December10, I-01.
62.
Hacker, T.2006. Three huge fixes. Northern Colorado Business Report, September 9-15, 35, 41.
63.
Hartog, H.1983. Public property and private power. Chapel Hill, NC: Univ. of North Carolina Press.
64.
Harvey, D.1982. The limits to capital. Cambridge, MA : Blackwell.
65.
Highlands Ranch. 2008. http://www.highlandsranch.org/ (accessed June 15, 2008).
66.
James, F., and C. Gerboth.2001. A camp divided. In Colorado history, 129-74. Denver: Colorado Historical Society.
67.
Judd, D.1983. From cowtown to sunbelt city. In Restructuring the city: The political economy of urban development, edited by S. Fainstein, N. Fainstein , R. C. Hill, D. Judd, and M. P. Smith.White Plains, NY: Longman .
68.
Juergensmeyer, J., and T. Roberts.2003. Land use planning. St. Paul, MN: Thomson West.
69.
Lenthe, S.2005. New "Main Street" pulls attention away from downtowns . Northern Colorado Business Report, October 28.
70.
Levine, J.2006. Zoned out. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
71.
Lewis, P.1996. Shaping suburbia. Pittsburgh, PA: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.
72.
---. 2001. Retail politics. Economic Development Quarterly15 (1): 21-35.
73.
Lyon, D.2000. From home rule to fiscal rule. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
74.
McCabe, B.2005. The rules are different here. Administration & Society37:404-25.
75.
McKenzie, E.1996. Privatopia. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
76.
McNeil, J.1998. Changes in median household income: 1969 to 1996, 23-196. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
77.
Merritt, G., and M. Whaley.2005. Growth in Weld sets off alarms. The Denver Post, August 21.
78.
Mott, R.1949. Home rule for America's cities 101. Chicago, IL: National Municipal Association.
79.
Mullins, D.2004. Tax and expenditure limitations and the fiscal response of local government. Public Budgeting & Finance24 (4): 111-47.
80.
Mullins, D., and B. Wallin.2004. Tax and expenditure limitations. Public Budgeting & Finance24:2-15.
81.
National Association of Realtors (NAR).2005 . Housing opportunity index. http://www.realtor.org (accessed August 5).
82.
Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (NCWCD).2005. Water conservation and management plan. http://www.ncwcd.org (accessed March 13).
83.
Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO).2006. Housing price index. Washington, DC : U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development . http://www.ofheo.gov (accessed June 15).
84.
Orren, K., and S. Skowroneck.1995. Order and time in institutional study . In Political Science in history, edited by J. Farr, J. Dryzek, and S. Leonard.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
85.
Orsini-Meinhard, K.2004. You call that blight?The Coloradoan, February 1.
86.
Ortiz, C.2007. RTA no go this election year. The Greeley Tribune, August 10.
87.
O'Sullivan, A., T. Sexton, and S. Sheffrin.1995. Property taxes and tax revolts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
88.
Otto, R.2005. Message from the city manager. Round Up: City of Greeley Community Bulletin, Fall-Winter 2005.
89.
Peif, S.2004. I-25/U.S.34 can't wait for state. The Greeley Tribune, February 8.
90.
RealtyTrac.2006. Foreclosure data by state and county. http://www.realtytrac.com/ (accessed May 23).
Schmidt, C.2003. Urban growth and consumption of agricultural land. Presented at the annual meeting of the Association of American Geographers, New Orleans, March 4-7.
93.
Schwartz, J.1997. Prisoners of Proposition 13. Southern California Law Review71:183-217.
94.
Scott, M.1969. American city planning since 1890. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
95.
Shiller, R., and K. Case.2003. Is there a bubble in the housing market? 299-362. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
96.
Smith, R.1964. Public authorities, special districts, and local government . Washington, DC: National Association of Counties Research Foundation.
97.
Stephens, G., and N. Wikstrom.2000. Metropolitan government and governance . New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
98.
Storper, M., and R. Walker.1989. The capitalist imperative. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
99.
Sugrue, T.1992. The origins of the urban crisis. Cambridge MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
100.
Svaldi, A.2006. Weld Co. ranks No. 1 in foreclosures. The Denver Post, September 13.
101.
Thomas, J.V.2006. Dividing lines and bottom lines: The forces shaping local development patterns. Journal of Planning Education and Research25:275-93.
102.
Turner, F.J.1984. The significance of the frontier in American history. Madison, WI: Silver Buckle.
103.
U.S. Census Bureau.1975. Median money income of families and unrelated individuals, 1947-1970 (series G): Historical statistics of the United States, colonial times to 1970. Washington, DC.
104.
---. 2000. Journey-to-work surveys, 1990 and 2000. Washington, DC: Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau .
105.
---. 2006a. Data base on historical finances of municipal governments: Fiscal years 1951-2004. Washington, DC: Government Finance Division, U.S. Census Bureau.
106.
---. 2006b. Homeownership rates (table 14). Washington, DC: Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division, U.S. Census Bureau.
107.
---. 2006c. Inter-census population estimates. Washington, DC: Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau .
108.
---. 2006d. Population estimates: Places and county subdivisions . Washington, DC: Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau.
109.
---. 2006e. Table H-6 Mean and median household income. Washington, DC: Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division, U.S. Census Bureau.
110.
---. 2007. Data base on historical finances of state and local governments: Fiscal years 1957-2004. Washington, DC: Government Finance Division, U.S. Census Bureau.
111.
---. 2008. Historical census of housing tables, home values. Washington, DC: Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division, U.S. Census Bureau.
112.
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).2004 . Colorado state and county data. Washington, DC: Census of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture .
113.
U.S. Department of Energy.2007. Table 7. Energy consumption estimates by source, 1960-2004. http://www.eia.doe.gov/ (accessed June 15).
114.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.2007 . Airdata. http://www.epa.gov (accessed March 15).
115.
U.S. Federal Housing Finance Board.2008. Table IX Terms on conventional home mortgages, averages by state. Washington, DC.
116.
U.S. Federal Reserve Board.2007. Table B100. Household balance sheet. Washington, DC.
117.
Walker, R., and R. Lewis.2001. Beyond the crabgrass frontier. Journal of Historical Geography27 (1): 3-19.
118.
Wassmer, R.2002. Fiscalisation of land use. Urban Studies39 (8): 1307-27.
119.
Weir, M.2000. Planning, environmentalism, and urban poverty. In The American planning tradition, edited by R. Fishman.Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
120.
Weiss, M.1987. The rise of the community builders. Washington DC: Beard.
121.
Weld County.1994. Comprehensive plan, section 22-2-100. Weld County, CO.
122.
---. 2005. Proposed scope for work: Mixed use development plan. Weld County, CO. ---. 2006a. Comprehensive plan, section 22-1-120. Weld County, CO.
123.
---. 2006b. Municipal annexations. Weld County, CO.
124.
---. 2007. Subdivision list, Planning Department . Weld County, CO.
125.
Wirth Chair.2000. Growth problems and opportunities. Institute for Public Policy, Univ. of Colorado at Denver .
