This article compares the logics and institutional consequences of urban government reform in the United States and in England. We focus on the politics of ideas, identifying four common visions of urban reform: efficient public interest management, improved representation, local political leadership, and metropolitan-wide governance. National pressure groups, locality effects, and the status of city charters and council constitutions are key factors mediating the direction and pace of reform. These are embedded in different institutional norms for city government, related to national political and governmental cultures. The strengths and weaknesses of both systems are discussed.
Agranoff, R., and M. McGuire.2003. Collaborative public management. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.
2.
Ball, W., and J. Solomos.1990. Race and local politics. New York: Macmillan.
3.
Berry, J.M.1999. The new liberalism: The rising power of citizen groups . Washington, DC: Brookings Institution .
4.
Blair, T.1998. Leading the way: A new vision for local government. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
5.
Bollens, J.C., and H.J. Schmandt.1972. The metropolis: Its people, politics, and economic life. New York: Harper & Row.
6.
Briffault, Richard1990. Our localism part II-Localism and legal theory. Columbia Law Review90:346-54.
7.
City of Mobile v. Bolden 1980 446 U.S. 55.
8.
City of Richmond v. U.S. 1975 442 U.S. 358.
9.
Copus, C.2004. Party politics and local government. Manchester, UK: Manchester Univ. Press.
10.
---. 2006. Leading the localities: Executive mayors in English local governance. Manchester, UK: Manchester Univ. Press.
11.
Davies, J.S.2003. Partnership versus regimes: Why regime theory cannot explain urban coalitions in the UK. Journal of Urban Affairs25 (3): 253-69.
12.
DiGaetano, A., and J.S. Klemanski.1999. Power and city governance: Comparative perspectives on urban development. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
13.
DiGaetano, A., and P. Lawless.1999. Urban governance and industrial decline: Governing structures and policy agendas in Birmingham and Sheffield, England, and Detroit, Michigan. Urban Affairs Quarterly34 (4): 546-77.
14.
DeSantis, V.S., and T. Renner.2002. City government structures: An attempt at clarification. State and Local Government Review34 (2): 95-104.
15.
Dreier, P., J. Mollenkopf, and T. Swanson.2001. Place matters: Metropolitics for the twenty-first century. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
16.
Fredrickson, H.G., G.A. Johnson, and C. Wood.2004. The changing structure of American cities: A study of the diffusion of innovation. Public Administration Review64 (3): 320-30.
17.
Frederickson, H.G., C. Wood, and B. Logan.2001. How American city governments have changed: The evolution of the model city charter. National Urban Review90 (1): 3-18.
18.
Frug, G.E.1999. City making: Building communities without building walls . Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
19.
Gains, F., P.C. John, and G. Stoker.2005. Path dependency and the reform of English local government. Public Administration83 (1): 25-45.
20.
Gomillion v. Lightfoot 1960 81 U.S 125.
21.
Greer, S.1963. Metropolitics. New York: Wiley.
22.
Gyford, J.1985. The politicisation of local government. In Half a century of municipal decline: 1935-1985, edited by M. Loughlin, M. D. Gelfand , and K. Young, 75-97. London : Allen and Unwin.
23.
Hambleton, R.1996. Reinventing local government: Lessons from the USA. Local Government Studies22 (1): 93-112.
24.
Hambleton, R., and D. Sweeting.2004. US-style leadership for English local government? Public Administration Review64 (4): 474-88.
25.
Hamilton, D.K.1999. Governing metropolitan areas: Response to growth and change . New York: Garland Publishers.
26.
Harding, A.1999. North American urban political economy, urban theory and British research. British Journal of Political Science29 (4): 673-98.
27.
Johnson, K.M.2006. Sovereigns and subjects: A geopolitical history of metropolitan reform in the USA. Environment and Planning A, 38 (1): 149-68.
28.
Jones, G.W., and J. Stewart.1983. The case for local government. London: Allen and Unwin.
29.
Kantor, P., H.V. Savitch, and S. Haddock.1997. The political economy of urban regimes: A comparative perspective. Urban Affairs Review32 (3): 348-77.
30.
Katz, Bruce, and Robert Lang.2003. Redefining urban and suburban America . Washington, DC: Brookings Institution .
31.
Kaufman, H.1956. Emerging conflicts in the doctrines of public administration . American Political Science Review50 (4): 1057-73.
32.
Keating, M.1991. Comparative urban politics: Power and the city in the United States, Canada, Britain and France. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
33.
Kingdon, J.W.1985. Agendas, alternatives and public policies. 2nd ed. New York: Addison Wesley.
34.
Leach, S., H. Davis, C. Game, and C. Skelcher.1991. After abolition: The operation of the post-1986 metropolitan government system in England. Birmingham , UK: Institute of Local Government Studies, University of Birmingham.
35.
Lieberman, R.C.2002. Ideas, institutions and political order: Explaining political change. American Political Science Review96 (4): 697-712.
36.
Lineberry, R.L., and E.P. Fowler.1967. Reformism and public policy in American cities. American Political Science Review61 (3): 701-6.
37.
Logan, J., and H. Motloch.1987. Urban fortunes: The political economy of place: Evidence from Census 2000 Volume 1. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
38.
Lowndes, V.2005. Something old, something new, something borrowed: How institutions change (and stay the same) in local governance. Policy Studies26 (3/4): 291-309.
39.
Mullin, M., G. Peele, and B.E. Cain.2004. City Caesars? Institutional structure and mayoral success in three California cities. Urban Affairs Review40 (1): 19-43.
40.
Newman, J.2001. Modernising governance: New labour, policy and society . London: Sage.
41.
Orren, Karen, and Stephen Skowronek .1996. Institutions and intercurrence: Theory building in the fullness of time. in Nomos XXXVIII Political Order , edited by Ian Shapiro and Russell Hardin.New York: New York Univ. Press.
42.
---. 1999. In search of political development. In The liberal tradition in American politics, by David Ericson.New York: Routledge .
43.
Paine, Thomas.1985. Rights of man. New York: Penguin Classics.
44.
Peterson, P.E.1981. City limits. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Savitch, H.V., and R.K. Vogel.1996. Regional politics: America in a post-city age. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
Scoble, H.1968. Effects of riots on Negro leadership. In Riots and rebellion: Civil violence in the urban community, edited by L. H. Masotti and D. R. Bowen, 329-46. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
50.
Schotzman, K., and J. Tierney.1986. Organized interests and American democracy . New York: Harper & Row.
51.
Sharpe, L.J.1970. Theories and values of local government. Political Studies18 (2): 153-74.
52.
---. 1973. American democracy reconsidered, part 1. British Journal of Political Science3 (1): 1-28.
53.
Skelcher, C.2003. Governing communities: Parish-pump politics or strategic partnerships? Local Government Studies29 (4): 1-16.
54.
---. 2004. The new governance of communities. In British local government into the 21st century, edited by G. Stoker and D. Wilson, 25-42. Basingstoke , UK: Palgrave.
55.
Smith, G., and S. Stephenson.2005. The theory and practice of group representation: Reflections on the politics of race equality in Birmingham. Public Administration83 (2): 323-43.
56.
Sonenshein, R.J.1993. Politics in Black and White: Race and power in Los Angeles . Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
57.
---. 2004. The city at stake: Secession, reform and the battle for Los Angeles. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
58.
Stewart, J.2000. The nature of British local government. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
59.
Stoker, G.2004. Transforming local governance: From Thatcherism to new labour. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan .
60.
Stoker, G., and K. Mossberger.1994. Urban regime theory in comparative perspective . Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy12 (2): 195-212.
61.
Stoker, G., and H. Wolman.1992. Drawing lessons from US experience: An elected mayor for British local government. Public Administration70 (2): 241-67.
62.
Sullivan, H., and C. Skelcher.2002. Working across boundaries: Collaboration in public services. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
63.
Svara, J.1999. The shifting boundaries between elected officials and city managers in large council manager cities. Public Administration Review59 (1): 44-53.
64.
Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas 1974 416 U.S. 213.
65.
Wilson, W.1887. The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly2:481-506.
66.
Wolman, H.1995. Local government institutions and democratic governance . In Theories of urban politics, edited by D. Judge, G. Stoker, and H. Wolman, 135-59. London: Sage.
67.
Wolman, H., and M. Goldsmith.1992. Urban politics and policy: A comparative approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
68.
Wood, A.M.2004. Domesticating urban theory? US concepts, British cities and the limits of cross-national applications. Urban Studies41 (11): 2103-18.
69.
Young, K., and N. Rao.1997. Local government since 1945. Oxford: Blackwell.
