Faith groups are increasingly regarded as important civil society participants in British urban governance. Faith engagement is linked to policies of social inclusion and “community cohesion,” particularly in the context of government concerns about radicalization along religious lines. Primary research is drawn upon in developing a critical and explicitly multifaith analysis of faith involvement. A narrative approach is used to contrast the different perspectives of national policy makers, local stakeholders, and faith actors themselves. The narratives serve to illuminate not only this specific case but also the more general character of British urban governance as it takes on a more “decentered” form with greater blurring of boundaries between the public, private, and personal.
Atkinson, R.2000. Narratives of policy: The construction of urban problems and policy in the official discourses of the British government, 1968-1998 . Critical Social Policy20 (2), 211-32.
2.
Baker, C.2007. Religious literacy, faithful capital and language. Paper presented to Economic and Social Research Council Faith and Civil Society Seminar, Anglia Ruskin Univ., Cambridge, UK, January 23.
3.
Bevir, M.2005. New labour: A critique. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
4.
Bevir, M., and R. Rhodes.2003. Interpreting British governance. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Black, A., D. Koopman, and D. Ryden.2004. Of little faith: The politics of George W Bush's faith-based initiatives. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.
7.
Blunkett, D.2004. New challenges for race equality and community cohesion in the 21st century. Speech to the Institute of Public Policy Research, London, July 7.
8.
Burns, N., K. Schlozman, and S. Verba.2001. The private roots of public action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
9.
Canada, B.2003. Faith-based organizations and their relationship with state and local governments: Analysis of recent initiatives. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
10.
Cantle, T.2005. Community cohesion: A new framework for race and diversity . Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan .
11.
---. 2007. If faith is the new "race," is faithism the new racism?Paper presented to Economic and Social Research Council Faith and Civil Society Seminar, Anglia Ruskin Univ., Cambridge, UK, January 23.
12.
Commission on Integration and Cohesion.2007 . Our shared future. London: Communities and Local Government.
13.
Commission on Urban Life and Faith.2006. Faithful cities: A call for celebration, vision and justice. London: Methodist Publishing House and Church House Publishing.
14.
Community Cohesion Panel.2004. The end of parallel lives? The report of the Community Cohesion Panel. London: Home Office.
15.
Crouch, C., and D. Marquand.1995. Reinventing collective action. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
16.
Church Urban Fund.2006. Faithful representation: Faith representatives on Local Public Partnerships. London: Church Urban Fund.
17.
Davies, J.2004. Can't hedgehogs be foxes too? Reply to Clarence Stone . Journal of Urban Affairs26 (1): 27-33.
18.
Dinham, A.2007. Priceless; unmeasureable? Faiths and community development in twenty-first century England. London: Faith Based Regeneration Network.
19.
Dinham, A., and D. Finneron.2002. Building on Faith: Faith buildings in neighbourhood renewal. London: CUF with Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
20.
Dionne, E., and M. Hsu Chen .2001. Sacred places, civic purposes . Washington, DC: Brookings Institution .
21.
Erlandson, D.1993. Doing naturalistic enquiry: A guide to methods. London: Sage.
22.
Fetzer, J., and C. Soper.2005. Muslims and the state in Britain, France, and Germany. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
23.
Formicola, J., M. Segers, and P. Weber.2003. Faith-based initiatives and the Bush administration. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
24.
Furbey, R.2006. Faith engagement: Cuddlesome or troublesome?Paper presented to Faiths and Civil Society Seminar, Anglia Ruskin Univ., Cambridge, UK, May 11.
25.
Furbey, R., A. Dinham, R. Farnell, D. Finneron, and G. Wilkinson.2006. Faith as social capital: Connecting or dividing?Bristol, UK: Policy Press and Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
26.
Giddens, A.1998. The third way. Cambridge, UK: Polity .
27.
Government Accountability Office.2006. Faith-based and community initiative. GAO-06-616. Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office.
28.
Hajer, M.1993. Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice . In The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning , edited by F. Fischer and J. Forester, 43-76. London: Univ. College London Press.
29.
Home Office.2004. Working together: Co-operation between government and faith communities. London: Stationery Office.
30.
---. 2005a. Citizenship survey. London: Home Office.
31.
---. 2005b. Improving opportunity, strengthening society: The government's strategy to increase race equality and community cohesion. London: Home Office.
Jameson, F.1989. The political unconscious: Narrative as a socially symbolic act. London: Routledge.
34.
Leicester City Council (2004) Embracing the present, predicting the future: Social action by the faith communities of Leicester. Leicester, UK: Leicester City Council.
35.
Local Government Association.2002. Faith and community. London: Local Government Association.
36.
London Churches Group.2002. Regenerating London: Faith communities and social action. London: London Churches Group for Social Action.
37.
Lowndes, V., and R. Chapman.2005. Faith, hope and clarity: Developing a model of faith group involvement in civil renewal. London : Home Office.
38.
---. 2006. Faith, hope and clarity: Developing a model of faith group involvement in civil renewal. In Re-energising citizenship: Strategies for civil renewal, edited by T. Brannan, P. John, and G. Stoker, 163-84. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
39.
Lowndes, V., L. Pratchett, and G. Stoker.2006. Local political participation: The impact of rules-in-use. Public Administration84 (3): 539-61.
40.
Lowndes, V., and H. Sullivan.2004. Like a horse and carriage or a fish on a bicycle: How well do local partnerships and public participation go together ? Local Government Studies30 (1): 52-74.
41.
National Council for Voluntary Organisations.2007. Faith and voluntary action. London : National Council for Voluntary Organisations.
42.
Neighbourhood Renewal Unit.2004. References to faith communities in government documents. London: Neighbourhood Renewal Unit.
43.
New Deal for Communities.2000. Faith community workshops in NDC partnerships. London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, New Deal for Communities .
44.
Northwest Regional Development Agency.2005 . Faith in England's Northwest. Warrington, UK: Northwest Regional Development Agency.
45.
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.2005. Report on the 2004 survey of all English LSPs. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
46.
Office of National Statistics.2004. Focus on religion. London: Office of National Statistics.
47.
Morgan, G.1986. Images of organisation. London: Sage.
---. 2007. Rethinking "the public" in troubled times. Public Policy and Administration22 (1): 27-46.
50.
Putnam, R.2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community . New York: Simon & Shuster .
51.
Rhodes, R.1997. Understanding governance. Buckingham , UK: Open Univ. Press.
52.
Sherman, A.L.2002. Empowering compassion: The strategic role of intermediary organizations in building capacity among and enhancing the impact of community transformers. Indianapolis, IN: Hudson Institute.
53.
Stoker, G.1995. Regime theory and urban politics. In Theories of urban politics, edited by D. Judge , G. Stoker, and H. Wolman, 54-71. London: Sage.
54.
---. 2004. Transforming local governance: From Thatcherism to new Labour. London: Palgrave Macmillan .
55.
Stone, C.2004. It's more than the economy after all: Continuing the debate about urban regimes. Journal of Urban Affairs26 (1): 1-19.
56.
Sullivan, H., and C. Skelcher.2002. Working across boundaries. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
57.
Towey, J.2004. Faith and the public square. In One electorate under God? edited by E. Dionne, J. Bethke Elshtain and K. Drogosz, 212-6. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
58.
Verba, S., K. Schlozman, and H. Brady.1995. Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
59.
Vidal, A.2001. Faith-based organizations in community development. Washington, DC: Department of Housing and Urban Development .
60.
Wuthnow, R.2004. Saving America: Faith-based services and the future of civil society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
