As interest in informal methods of regional coordination has grown, it is increasingly important to understand how alternative forms of regional governance emerge. This article addresses this question through analysis of recent attempts at regional transportation coordination in South Florida. Through a detailed case study of the creation of the South Florida Regional Transportation Authority, we demonstrate how informal ties among transportation stakeholders were strengthened over time in ways that eventually made possible the creation of a more formal coordinating mechanism for regional transportation policy. A formal network analysis of transportation stakeholders in South Florida further illustrates the way the strength of ties among those involved in transportation policy in the region facilitated increased regional coordination and positioned business organizations to act as policy entrepreneurs.
Center for Urban and Environmental Solutions at Florida Atlantic University. 2000. Imaging the region: South Florida via indicators and public opinions. Fort Lauderdale: Florida Atlantic University.
6.
Center for Urban and Environmental Solutions at Florida Atlantic University. 2004. Regional shift: South Florida in transition. Fort Lauderdale: Florida Atlantic University.
7.
Chisholm, D.1989. Coordination without hierarchy. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press.
8.
Cigler, B. A.2001. Multiorganizational, multisector, and multicommunity organizations: Setting the research agenda. In Getting results through collaboration: Networks and network structures for public policy and management, edited by M. P. Mandell, 71-85. Westport, CT: Quorom.
9.
Dobson, T.2002. Counting heads while we head for disaster. Sun-Sentinel, June 2, South Florida edition, F4-F4.
10.
Downs, A.1994. New visions for metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
11.
Dreier, P., J. Mollenkopf, and T. Swanstrom.2001. Place matters: Metropolitics for the twenty-first century. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
12.
Feiock, R., ed. 2004. Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition and cooperation. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.
13.
Florida Department of Children and Families (District 11) and SFRPC (South Florida Regional Planning Council). 1999. The geography of welfare reform in South East Florida. Available from http://www.sfrpc.com/ftp/pub/wages.pdf (accessed March 19, 2003).
14.
Foster, K.2001. Regionalism on purpose. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
15.
Gainsborough, J. F.2003. Business organizations as regional actors: The politics of regional cooperation in metropolitan America. Polity35(3): 555-572.
16.
Hamilton, D. K.2002. Regimes and regional governance: The case of Chicago. Journal of Urban Affairs24(4): 413-423.
17.
Heclo, H.1978. Issue networks and the executive establishment. In The new American political system, edited by A. King, 87-124. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
18.
Henton, D., J. Melville, and K. Walesh.1997. Grassroots leaders for a new economy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
Hill, E., H. Wolman, and C. Ford III.1995. Can suburbs survive without their central cities? Examining the suburban dependence hypothesis. Urban Affairs Review31: 147-174.
20.
Internet Coast. 2005. Transportation—Congress approves funds for South Florida transit projects. Available from www.internetcoast.com/index.php?src=news&prid=3392 (dated November 22, 2005, accessed December 22, 2005).
21.
Kanter, R. M.1995. World class: Thriving locally in the global economy. New York: Simon and Schuster.
22.
Kingdon, J.1984. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
23.
Lampe, D., J. Parr, and S. Woodard. 2004. Regional business civic organizations. Denver: Alliance for Regional Stewardship.
24.
Legal Information Center.1993. The Florida political almanac. Centerville, FL: Almanac Research Service.
25.
Oakerson, R. J., and R. B. Parks.1989. Local government constitutions: A different view of metropolitan governance. American Review of Public Administration19(4): 279-294.
26.
Orfield, M.1997. Metropolitics: A regional agenda for community and stability. Washington, DC, and Cambridge, MA: Brookings Institution and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
27.
Parks, R. B., and R. J. Oakerson.2000. Regionalism, localism, and metropolitan governance: Suggestions from the research program on local public economies. State and Local Government Review32(3): 169-179.
28.
Porter, D., and A. Wallis. 2001. Ad hoc regionalism. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
29.
Powell, W. W.1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior12: 295-336.
30.
Prell, R.2003. Community networking and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication8(3): 1-22.
31.
Putnam, R.1993. Making democracy work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
32.
Rusk, D.1995. Cities without suburbs. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
33.
Savitch, H. V., D. Collins, D. Sanders, and J. P. Markham.1992. Ties that bind: Central cities, suburbs, and the new metropolitan region. Economic Development Quarterly7: 341-357.
34.
Savitch, H. V., and R. K. Vogel.2000. Paths to new regionalism. State and Local Government Review32(3): 161-161.
35.
Saxenian, A.1994. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ Press..
36.
Schneider, M., and J. Stolz. 2003. Building consensual institutions: Networks and the national estuary program. American Journal of Political Science47 (1): 143-158.
37.
Schneider, M., P. Teske, and M. Minstrom.1995. Public entrepreneurs: Agents for change in American government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ Press..
38.
Scott, J. P.1994. Social network analysis: A handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Stone, C.1989. Regime politics: Governing Atlanta 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
40.
Strube, J.1998. Fragmentation and mass transit: Struggling to get connected. In Solving urban problems in urban areas characterized by fragmentation and divisiveness, edited by F. W. Becker and M. J. Dluhy, 247-260. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
41.
Texas Transportation Institute. 2005. Urban mobility report. College Station: Texas A&M University.
42.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2003. American community survey: 2003 data profiles, Table 3. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
43.
Wallis, A. D.1994a. Inventing regionalism: The first two waves. National Civic Review83: 159-176.
44.
Wallis, A. D.1994b. Inventing regionalism: A two-phase approach. National Civic Review83: 447-469.
