In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, policy makers are once again debating the manner in which we prepare for, respond to, and recover from extreme events in the United States. While much is known about how to make urban regions safer, political and economic calculations often overwhelm these considerations. The mix of competing priorities and incentives of federal, state, and local officials conspire to make urban hazard planning difficult if not impossible. The considerable challenge facing those charged with making cities less vulnerable is to strike an appropriate balance between these political and economic dynamics, and the creation of more disaster-resilient communities.
Barnes, W.2005. Beyond federal urban policy. Urban Affairs Review40(5): 575-589.
2.
Burby, R., ed. 1998. Cooperating with nature: Confronting natural hazards with land-use planning for sustainable communities. Washington, D.C.: Joseph Henry Press.
3.
Cutter, S., and C. Emrich. 2005. Are natural disaster losses in the U.S. increasing? EOS: Transactions, American Geophysical Union86(41): 381-396.
4.
Dixon, L., and R. Stern. 2004. Compensation for losses from the 9/11attacks. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
5.
Eisinger, P.2004. The American city in the age of terror: A preliminary assessment of the effects of September 11. Urban Affairs Review40(1): 115-129.
6.
Frymer, P., D. Strolovitch, and D. Warren. 2005. Katrina’s political roots and divisions: Race, class, and federalism in American politics. Understanding Katrina: Perspectives from the social sciences. Web site created by the Social Science Research Center, University of Maryland, http://www.understandingkatrina.ssrc.org (accessed September 19, 2005).
7.
Garrett, T., and R. Sobel. 2003. The Political Economy of FEMA Disaster Payments. Economic Inquiry41(3): 496-509.
8.
Gerber, B., D. Cohen, B. Cannon, D. Patterson, and K. Stewart. 2005. On the front line: American cities and the challenge of homeland security preparedness. Urban Affairs Review41(2): 182-210.
9.
Godschalk, D., T. Beatley, P. Berke, D. Brower, and E. Kaiser. 1999. Natural hazard mitigation: Recasting disaster policy and planning. Washington, D.C.: Island.
10.
Graham, S.2005. Cities under siege: Katrina and the politics of metropolitan America. Understanding Katrina: Perspectives from the social sciences. Web site created by the Social Science Research Center, University of Maryland, http://www.understandingkatrina.ssrc.org (accessed September 19, 2005).
11.
Hardenbrook, B.2005. The need for a policy framework to develop disaster resilient regions. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management2(3): Article 2.
12.
Holdeman, E.2005. Destroying FEMA. Washington Post, August 30, 2005.
13.
Jordan, M. 2005. Federal disaster recovery programs: Brief summaries. CRS Report for Congress, Congressional Research Service. August 29, 2005.
14.
Kantor, P.2002. Terrorism and governability in New York City: Old problem, new dilemma. Urban Affairs Review38(1): 120-127.
15.
Kestin, S.2005. FEMA battered by waste, fraud. South Florida Sun-Sentinel, September 18, A1.
16.
Lindell, M. K. and C. Prater. 2003. Assessing community impacts of natural disasters. Natural Hazards Review3(2): 176-185.
17.
May, P.1985. Recovering from catastrophes: Federal disaster relief policy and politics. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
18.
Mileti, D.1999. Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Joseph Henry.
19.
New York City Independent Budget Office. 2004. Three years after: Where is the $20 billion in federal WTC aid?Inside the budget. August 11, 2004.
20.
Pielke, R.2005. Historical economic losses from hurricanes: Where does Katrina fit in?Center For Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Colorado, http://www.sciencepolicy.colorado.edu (accessed September 19, 2005).
21.
Platt, R.1999. Disasters and democracy: The politics of extreme natural events. Washington, D.C.: Island.
22.
Reeves, A.2005. Political disaster? Presidential disaster declarations and electoral politics. Department of Government, Harvard University (unpublished manuscript).
23.
Savitch, H.2003. Does 9-11 portend a new paradigm for cities?Urban Affairs Review38(1): 120-127.
24.
Stehr, S.1999. Community recovery and reconstruction following disasters. In The handbook of crisis and emergency management, edited by A. Farazmand, 345-357. New York: Marcel Dekker.
25.
Tierney, K.2005. The red pill. Understanding Katrina: Perspectives from the social sciences. Social Science Research Center, University of Maryland, http://www.understandingkatrina.ssrc.org (accessed September 19, 2005).
26.
U.S. Congress. Senate. Bipartisan Task Force on Funding Disaster Relief. Report of Senate task force on funding disaster relief. 104 Congress. Document No. 104-4.
27.
Vale, L., and T. Campanella, eds. 2005. The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
