“Linguistic profiling,” the identification of a person’s race from the sound of their voice and the utilization of that information to discriminate on the basis of race, has been documented in the home rental market. This article examines this phenomenon in the home insurance industry. From an analysis of matched-paired tests conducted by fair-housing organizations, we find that home insurance agents are generally able to detect the race of someone who contacts them by telephone and that this information affects the services provided those who inquire about purchasing a home insurance policy.
Badain, D.1980. Insurance redlining and the future of the urban core. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems16(1): 1-83.
2.
Bertrand, M., and S. Mullainathan. 2004. Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economics Review94(4): 991-1013.
3.
Birnbaum, B.2004. Results are in: Insurance credit scoring causes higher rates for poor and minority consumers. Austin, TX: Center for Economic Justice.
4.
Boggs, R. V. O.1999. The future of civil rights testing: Current trends and new directions. In A national report card on discrimination in America: The role of testing, edited by M. Fix and M. A. Turner, 113-122. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
5.
Cashin, S.2004. The failures of integration: How race and class are undermining the American dream. New York: Public Affairs.
6.
Charles, C. Z.2005. Can we live together? Racial preferences and neighborhood outcomes. In The geography of opportunity: Race and housing choice in metropolitan America, edited by X. S. Briggs. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
7.
Fischer, M. J., and D. S. Massey. 2004. The ecology of racial discrimination. City & Community3(3): 221-241.
8.
Fix, M., and M. A. Turner, eds. 1999. A national report card on discrimination in America: The role of testing. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.
9.
Galster, G., and E. Godfrey. 2005. Bywords and deeds: Racial steering by real estate agents in the U.S. in 2000. Journal of the American Planning Association71(3): 1-19.
10.
Galster, G., D. Wissoker, and W. Zimmermann. 2001. Testing for discrimination in home insurance: Results from New York City and Phoenix. Urban Studies38(1): 141-156.
11.
HOME (Housing Opportunities Made Equal). 1999. Testing Conducted in Richmond, VA.
12.
Insurance Information Institute. 1995. The fact book 1995: Property/casualty insurance facts. New York: Insurance Information Institute.
13.
Insurance Information Institute. 1996. The fact book 1996: Property/casualty insurance facts. New York: Insurance Information Institute.
14.
Insurance Information Institute. 2003. The fact book 2003: Property/casualty insurance facts. New York: Insurance Information Institute.
15.
Katz, B. 2003. The new urban demographics. Presentation at the “Housing in the New Marketplace”Conference, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, March 20.
16.
Lee, B. L.1999. An issue of public importance: The justice department’s enforcement of the fair housing act. Cityscape4(3): 57-78.
17.
Lynch, W. H.1997. NAACP v. American family. In Insurance redlining: Disinvestment, reinvestment, and the evolving role of financial institutions, edited by G. D. Squires, 157-185. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.
18.
Massey, D. S., and N. A. Denton. 1993. American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
19.
Massey, D. S., and G. Lundy. 2001.Use of Black English and racial discrimination in urban housing markets: New methods and findings. Urban Affairs Review36(4): 452-469.
20.
Ross, S. L. and M. A. Turner. 2005. Housing discrimination in metropolitan America: Explaining changes between 1989 and 2000. Social Problems52(2): 152-180.
21.
Ross, S. L., M. A. Turner, E. Godfrey, and R. Smith. 2003. Other things being equal: A paired testing study of discrimination in mortgage lending. Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, Business and Economic Statistics Section (CD-ROM). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
22.
Pager, D.2003. Themarkofa criminal record. American Journal of Sociology108(5): 937-975.
23.
Purnell, T., W. Idsardi, and J. Baugh. 1999. Perceptual and phonetic experiments on American English dialect identification. Journal of Language and Social Psychology18(1): 10-30.
24.
Smith, S. L. and C. Cloud. 1997. Documenting discrimination by homeowners’ insurance companies through testing. In Insurance redlining: Disinvestment, reinvestment, and the evolving role of financial institutions, edited by G. D. Squires, 97-117. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.
25.
Squires, G. D., ed. 1997. Insurance redlining: Disinvestment, reinvestment, and the evolving role of financial institutions. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.
26.
Texas Department of Insurance. 2004. Use of credit information by insurers in Texas. Austin: Texas Department of Insurance.
27.
Turner, M. A., S. L. Ross, G. C. Galster, and J. Yinger. 2002. Executive summary: Discrimination in metropolitan housing markets. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
28.
United States v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company. (C. A. No 95-C-0327, E.D. Wisc. 1995).
29.
Yaspan, R.1970. Property insurance and the American ghetto: A study in social irresponsibility. Southern California Law Review44: 218-274.
