Municipal governments’ efforts in preparing for possible terrorist events are critical to effective homeland security. Using data gathered from a nationwide sample of municipal officials, the authors identify determinants of homeland security preparedness in U.S. cities, across several attitudinal and behavioral indicators. The authors find that perceptions of terror threat vulnerability and response capacity are tied to factors such as city size and budgetary constraints. Perhaps more important, the authors show that administrative capacity demonstrates consistent explanatory power for both perceived policy commitment and specific preparedness actions. From these analyses, the authors outline several key policy implications for homeland security policy making.
American Association for Public Opinion Research. 2004. Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Lenexa, KS: Author.
2.
Burby, Raymond J., ed. 1998. Cooperating with nature: Confronting natural hazards with land-use planning for sustainable communities. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
3.
Burton, Ian, Robert W. Kates, and Gilbert F. White. 1978. The environment as hazard. London: Oxford University Press.
4.
Carroll, John. 2001. Emergency management on a grand scale: A bureaucrat’s analysis. In Handbook of crisis and emergency management, edited by Ali Farazmand, 463-480. New York: Marcel Dekker.
5.
Cigler, Beverly A.1988. Current policy issues in mitigation. In Managing disaster: Strategies and policy perspectives, edited by Louise K. Comfort, 39-52. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
6.
Cohen, David B., Alethia H. Cook, and David J. Louscher. 2004. The needs of the many: Biological terrorism, disease containment, and civil liberties. In American national security and civil liberties in an era of terrorism, edited by David B. Cohen and John W. Wells, 105-124. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
Comfort, Louise K., ed. 1988. Managing disaster: Strategies and policy perspectives. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
8.
Comfort, Louise K.2002. Rethinking security: Organizational fragility in extreme events. Public Administration Review62:98-107.
9.
Eisinger, Peter. 2004. The American city in the age of terror: A preliminary assessment of the effects of September 11. Urban Affairs Review40 (1): 115-130.
10.
Gerber, Brian J., and Paul Teske. 2000. Regulatory policymaking in the American states: A review of theories and evidence. Political Research Quarterly53 (4): 849-886.
11.
Gilmore Commission. 1999. First annual report to the president and the Congress of the Advisory Panel to Assess Domestic Response Capabilities for Terrorism Involving Weapons of Mass Destruction: Assessing the threat. December 15. Arlington, VA: Rand. http://www.rand.org/nsrd/terrpanel.
12.
Gilmore Commission. 2000. Second annual report to the president and the Congress of the Advisory Panel to Assess Domestic Response Capabilities for Terrorism Involving Weapons of Mass Destruction: Toward a national strategy for combating terrorism. December 15. Arlington, VA: Rand. http://www.rand.org/nsrd/terrpanel.
13.
Gilmore Commission. 2001. Third annual report to the president and the Congress of the Advisory Panel to Assess Domestic Response Capabilities for Terrorism Involving Weapons of Mass Destruction: For Ray Downey. December 15. Arlington, VA: Rand. http://www.rand.org/nsrd/terrpanel.
14.
Gilmore Commission. 2002. Fourth annual report to the president and the Congress of the Advisory Panel to Assess Domestic Response Capabilities for Terrorism Involving Weapons of Mass Destruction: Implementing the National Strategy. December 15. Arlington, VA: Rand. http://www.rand.org/nsrd/terrpanel.
15.
Gould, Jon B.2002. Playing with fire: The civil liberties implications of September 11th. Public Administration Review62:74-79.
16.
Hart, Gary, and Warren B. Rudman. 2002. America still unprepared—America still in danger. Report of an Independent Task Force sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations. New York: Council on Foreign Relations. http://www.cfr.org/pdf/Homeland_Security_TF.pdf.
17.
Kettl, Donald F.2003. The states and homeland security: Building the missing link. New York: The Century Foundation. http://www.tcf.org/Publications/HomelandSecurity/kettl.pdf.
18.
Kettl, Donald F.2004a. System under stress: Homeland security and American politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
19.
Kettl, Donald F.2004b. Unconnected dots. Governing, April, p. 14-14.
20.
Khademian, Anne M.2004. Strengthening state and local terrorism prevention and response. In The Department of Homeland Security’s first year: A report card, edited by Donald F. Kettl, 199-251. New York: The Century Foundation.
21.
Klein, William R.2000. Building consensus. In The practice of local government planning, edited by Charles J. Hoch, Linda C. Dalton, and Rank S. So, 423-438. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
22.
Lindell, Michael K., and Ronald W. Perry. 1992. Behavioral foundations of community emergency planning. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
23.
Logan, Christopher. 2004. Politics and promises. Governing, October (Suppl.): 10-15.
24.
Long, J. Scott, and Jeremy Freese. 2001. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using STATA. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
25.
Lowry, William R.1992. The dimensions of federalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
26.
Manzi, Catherine, Michael J. Powers, and Kristina Zetterlund. 2002. Critical information flows. In The Alfred P. Murrah Building bombing: A case study. Washington, DC: Chemical and Biological Arms Control Institute. http://www.cbaci.org.
27.
May, Peter J.1985. Recovering from catastrophes: Federal disaster relief policy and politics. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
28.
May, Peter J., and Walter Williams. 1986. Disaster policy implementation: Managing programs under shared governance. New York: Plenum.
29.
National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA). 2003. Protecting the homeland: Lessons from prior government reorganizations. Summer. http://www.napawash.org/si/HS-BLUE.pdf.
30.
National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA). 2004. Managing intergovernmental relations for homeland security. February. http://www.napawash.org/si/HS-WHITE.pdf.
31.
National Governors Association (NGA) Center for Best Practices. 2002a. A governor’s guide to emergency management. Vol. 2, Homeland security. Washington, DC: NGA. http://www.nga.org/cda/files/GOVSGUIDEHS2.pdf.
32.
National Governors Association (NGA) Center for Best Practices. 2002b. States’ homeland security priorities. Issue Brief. August 19. Washington, DC: NGA. http://www.nga.org/cda/files/081202HSPRIORITIES.pdf.
33.
Reese, Shawn. 2004. FY2003 and FY2004 state allocations for selected homeland security assistance programs. RL32463. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. http://www.house.gov/maloney/issues/Homeland/StateAllocations.pdf.
34.
Rubin, Claire B., and Daniel G. Barbee1985. Disaster recovery and hazard mitigation: Bridging the intergovernmental gap. Public Administration Review45 (January): 57-63.
35.
Rudman, Warren B., Richard A. Clarke, and Jamie F. Metzel. 2003. Emergency responders: Drastically underfunded, dangerously unprepared. Report of an Independent Task Force on Emergency Responders. New York: Council on Foreign Relations. http://www.cfr.org/pdf/RespondersTF.pdf.
36.
Savitch, H.V.2003. Does 9-11 portend a new paradigm for cities?Urban Affairs Review39 (1): 103-127.
37.
Savitch, H. V., and G. Ardashev. 2001. Does terror have an urban future?Urban Studies38 (13): 2515-33.
38.
Schneider, Saundra K.1992. Governmental response to disasters: The conflict between bureaucratic procedures and emergent norms. Public Administration Review52 (2): 135-145.
39.
Schneider, Saundra K.1995. Flirting with disaster: Public management in crisis situations. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
40.
U.S. Conference of Mayors (USCM) Homeland Security Monitoring Center. 2003. First mayors’ report to the nation: Tracking federal homeland security funds sent to the 50 state governments. September. Washington, DC: City Policy Associates. http://www.usmayors.org.
41.
U.S. Conference of Mayors (USCM) Homeland Security Monitoring Center. 2004a. Second mayors’ report to the nation: Tracking federal homeland security funds sent to the 50 state governments. January. Washington, DC: City Policy Associates. http://www.usmayors.org.
42.
U.S. Conference of Mayors (USCM) Homeland Security Monitoring Center. 2004b. Third mayors’ report to the nation: Tracking federal homeland security funds sent to the 50 state governments. June. Washington, DC: City Policy Associates. http://www.usmayors.org.
43.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security (USDHS). 2004. National Incident Management System. March 1. http://www.dhs.gov/interweb/assetlibrary/NIMS-90-web.pdf.
44.
U.S. General Accounting Office (USGAO). 1998a. Observations on the Nunn-Lugar-Domenici Domestic Preparedness Program. Report no. GAO/T-NSIAD-99-16. Washington, DC: USGAO.
45.
U.S. General Accounting Office (USGAO). 1998b. Opportunities to improve domestic preparedness program focus and efficiency. Report no. GAO/NSIAD-99-3. Washington, DC: USGAO.
46.
U.S. General Accounting Office (USGAO). 2002a. Combating terrorism: Intergovernmental cooperation in the development of a national strategy to enhance state and local preparedness. Report no. GAO-02-550T. Washington, DC: USGAO.
47.
U.S. General Accounting Office (USGAO). 2002b. Homeland security: Intergovernmental coordination and partnership will be critical to success. Report no. GAO-02-899T. Washington, DC: USGAO.
48.
U.S. General Accounting Office (USGAO). 2003. Homeland security: Efforts to improve information sharing need to be strengthened. August. Report no. GAO-03-760. Washington, DC: USGAO.
49.
U.S. General Accounting Office (USGAO). 2005. Homeland security: Management of first responder grand programs and efforts to improve accountability continue to evolve. April. Report no. GAO-05-530T. Washington, DC: USGAO.
50.
Wamsley, Gary L., and Aaron D. Schroeder. 1996. Escalating in a quagmire: The changing dynamics of the emergency management policy subsystems. Public Administration Review56 (3): 235-244.
51.
Waugh, William L., Jr.1988. Current policy and implementation issues in disaster preparedness. In Managing disaster: Strategies and policy perspectives, edited by Louise K. Comfort, 111-125. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
52.
Waugh, William L., Jr.1994. Regionalizing emergency management: Counties as state and local government. Public Administration Review54 (3): 253-258.
53.
Waugh, William L., Jr.2000. Living with hazards, dealing with disasters: An introduction to emergency management. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
54.
Waugh, William L., Jr.2001. Terrorism and emergency management. Emmitsburg, MD: FEMA, Emergency Management Institute. http://training.fema.gov/emiweb/edu/Terrorism.zip.
55.
Waugh, William L., Jr., and Richard T. Sylves. 2002. Organizing the war on terrorism. Public Administration Review62:145-153.
56.
Wise, Charles R.2002. Organizing for homeland security. Public Administration Review62:131-144.
57.
Wise, Charles R., and Rania Nader. 2002. Organizing the federal system for homeland security: Problems, issues, and dilemmas. Public Administration Review62:44-57.
